'Brave' police hailed after shooting machete-armed man
The 29-year-old died at the Mount Druitt Westfield in Sydney's west on Saturday afternoon with the officers involved in the incident hailed for their actions.
On Sunday, Assistant Police Commissioner Gavin Wood said six women aged in their mid 20s had crossed paths in the car park at 3.15pm and a brawl had erupted.
The women were not known to each other and it was "sheer fluke that they have met", he said.
The husband of one of the women retrieved a large machete from his car and was walking towards the women when police intervened.
"Police asked the male to drop the machete," Mr Wood said.
The man refused, and continued to walk towards the women.
"The police officers got in the middle between the deceased person who was carrying a large machete and some of those females subject to the melee," he said.
"At that stage, the police officer fired his service revolver".
Mr Wood had checked CCTV footage and the officers' body-worn video and was "content with the actions of the police".
The shooting would be subject to scrutiny but he said "their actions were commendable … they were brave".
"We will put our arms around those police as we do, and they deserve that," he said.
"They are good people, they are good police officers. They didn't come to work yesterday knowing they had to shoot somebody."
Mr Wood said he had spoken to both officers and they were upset, and the enormity of what happened had started to set in.
The shooting was declared a critical incident. The investigation will be overseen by the police law enforcement commission and professional standards and led by the homicide squad.
The man, a father of two young children, did not have an extensive criminal history and no gang affiliations.
Mr Wood said the machete he was carrying was at least 50 cm long.
"If anyone had seen it, you'd be alarmed simply by the vision of it," he said.
The man's wife was arrested but later released, subject to further police inquiries.
The actions of the six woman involved in the incident will also form part of the police investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'I was chilling in Erdington - then carjack gang with machetes smashed car window and beat me up'
A Birmingham driver was ambushed by an machete-wielding gang of carjackers as he sat eating in his prized motor with a friend. The balaclava-clad thugs smashed a window of his Volkswagen Golf before dragging him from the car to beat him up and demand: "What you got on you?" Despite telling them everything was inside the vehicle, the 22-year-old was struck in the ribs, kicked on the floor and punched in the face in a horrific assault near Perry Common Road, Erdington. READ MORE: Birmingham killer who stabbed neighbour to death dies in hospice with 'family by his side' The attackers fled with his £23,000 pride-and-joy, which he had worked hard for and saved for years since passing his test. Police responded to a 999 call, but the driver claimed officers had not been in touch since his ordeal early on Tuesday, July 15. "I can't sleep at night. I keep having flashbacks," he told BirminghamLive. "I've always kept myself away from this stuff, so when it does happen, it affects me because I'm not a violent person. I just work, come home, see my mates, that's it. "I just want them [the police] to crackdown on it, not just for me but for anyone else who goes through it." After the attack, the victim took himself to hospital with injuries including a bruised rib, swollen lip, stiff neck and grazed knees from the floor scuffle. "I was just chilling with my mate getting food. We were parked up, it was just a little car park - you could even see the main road from there," he recalled. "All of a sudden about five people came from the park behind us. "The first time I saw them they were by my driver's side window, they smashed it straight away, pulled me out of the car and started beating me up. "They had machetes on them. They hit that into my ribs and started kicking me on the floor, punching me in the face. I don't know why, everything - my keys, my phone, wallet - was in the car. "They never said much just 'what have you got on you, what have you got on you?' I said 'everything's in the car' and they were still beating me up. That's all they said to me." No-one was seriously hurt but the victim feared his new car was destined for a scrapyard to be sold off as parts. He said: "I called 101 because it was all over social media, someone said they saw it being taken into a scrapyard. Police said they couldn't do anything because they would need a warrant to go into the scrapyard. An officer said he would just 'pop it on the file.' "I'm assuming they'll take all the parts of the car and just sell them separately. "Police said they would take a statement the next day but I haven't heard back from them. It's like they don't seem bothered. "Everyone's like 'have you told the police?, I'm like 'yeah but I don't think they're going to do anything.'" West Midlands Police said officers had been carrying out a 'thorough' investigation. No arrests had been made and officers were trying to "identify the people responsible." "Officers have been exploring CCTV opportunities around the area, and have used a range of investigative tactics to try and find the car, which has been marked as stolen," a force spokesman said. "We've also made efforts to contact the person who reported the robbery as we try to identify the people responsible. "Anyone with information should contact us on 101 quoting crime reference number 20/309868/25."
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie rangers caught unlawfully using 'cruel' devices on native animals
Australian authorities have admitted to unlawfully using a controversial device to capture dingoes so they could be killed, despite the possession and practice being 'in breach' of their own animal welfare rules. The ACT Government confirmed the mistake with Yahoo News, revealing it permitted soft-jaw traps to be used for years, even after it passed an amendment in 2019 that prohibited them. When stepped on, the trap's jaws snap tightly around the animal's foot, keeping it in a fixed position until a routine check is made, sometimes causing it pain for hours. Unlike steel-jawed traps, they have padding to lessen damage to the animal's limb, and they are commonly used for dingo control in other states. The practice of trapping dingoes on public land was never hidden. But it's understood that until recently, the territory authorities didn't realise the method was now banned. Most animal welfare groups oppose the traps, with Humane World for Animals (formerly Humane Society International) claims they are 'inherently cruel, cause intense stress, injury, and prolonged suffering'. While Deakin University ecologist Professor Euan Ritchie said governments have 'far better ways' to manage dingoes humanely. Alix Livingstone from wildlife protection organisation Defend the Wild described them as "outdated". Why are dingoes trapped? Dingoes are regarded as a separate species from domestic dogs, and they have notable behavioural differences, including howling like wolves. DNA testing across Australia suggests there is very little hybridisation between dogs and dingoes. Despite being culturally important to Indigenous people and playing an important ecological role as an apex predator, state and territory governments around Australia routinely trap, shoot and poison dingoes on public land that borders farmland, due to concerns they kill sheep. Two notable places they are protected are K'gari in Queensland and a small, critically endangered population in Victoria's northwest. How was the illegal trapping discovered? In July, a confidential source alerted Yahoo about conflicting descriptions of soft-jaw traps in ACT government documents. Their possession and use were explicitly prohibited as prescribed items alongside shock collars and cockfighting spurs under the Animal Weflare Act and the associated Animal Welfare Regulation. Yet another government document, the ACT Pest Animal Management Strategy, described them as an 'effective technique' to control wild dogs, which is a common term used to describe dingoes. On July 23 this year, Yahoo posed six questions to Parks and Conservation Services (PCS), which manages dingo control, about its use of soft-jaw traps. It did not respond directly and instead emailed a short statement from the government. 'The ACT Government is currently reviewing the legislation and the appropriateness of the regulatory settings regarding the management of overabundant wildlife in the ACT,' it said. For over a week, further requests for comment did not receive a response. Government amends laws and resumes dingo trapping Concerns about the use of soft-jaw traps were raised at an uncomfortable time for the ACT government. It is in the process of updating the Nature Conservation Act to change the status of dingoes from a pest species to a controlled native animal, giving it a similar status to eastern grey kangaroos. And this has upset some farmers who fear it could make it harder to control dingoes, and the matter was raised during budget estimates on Friday. After PCS was told it was illegally using traps, it suspended their use for weeks. But it quietly began working on amending legislation. On July 31, a new regulatory change was published by the government, creating an exemption for the use of soft-jaw traps by permit holders and conservation officers. Then on August 1, as the law came into effect, it resumed dialogue with Yahoo, responding to new questions by issuing a lengthy statement. 'The use of soft-jaw traps by [PCS], primarily for controlling pest animals or overabundant native wildlife under the Biosecurity Act 2023, was recently found to be in breach of the Animal Welfare Act 1992 and its associated Regulation,' it said in part. 'Although PCS had used these traps for many years as part of their pest management activities, an amendment in 2019 added soft-jaw traps to the list of prohibited items under the Animal Welfare Regulation 2001, rendering their continued use unlawful.' It then explained its decision to resume their use, claiming they are "essential for effective dingo control". "To resolve the issue, the ACT Government has amended the Animal Welfare Regulation to include exemptions to the possession and use of soft-jaw traps," it said. Government urged to consider 'humane' control methods The government said soft-jaw traps are used in accordance with national animal welfare standards, including the National Code of Practice for the humane control of dingoes and that daily inspections and prompt euthanasia ensure "humane treatment". But the decision to amend legislation rather than adhere to established animal welfare protections has frustrated a number of leading experts and ecologists. Humane World for Animals Dr Renae Charalambous described the change as 'deeply troubling'. 'Rather than bringing their wildlife management practices into line with the law and community expectations, the government has amended the legislation to suit its own operational needs,' she said. "The use of these traps to manage native species like dingoes is particularly disturbing. Dingoes are a native apex predator, not a 'pest', and lethal control methods like trapping and killing fail to provide long-term solutions to conflicts with livestock." In many cases, traps can kill or harm non-target native wildlife, including birds, wombats, and goannas. Due to the risks they pose to animal welfare, Professor Euan Ritchie warned trapping can also harm and, in some cases, said 'strong considerations' needed to be made about where and when they were used. 'Leg-hold traps can cause a range of impacts on dingoes, ranging from relatively minor and short-lived pain and discomfort, through to more severe pain and distress, swelling, dehydration, bruising, lacerations, dislocations, and fractures,' he told Yahoo. Continuing, he said there are 'better ways' to manage dingoes that are more humane than trapping, shooting and poisoning, and that more investment was needed in alternative methods. 'Strategic fencing, but not large barrier fencing, has a role. So too does the appropriate use of guardian dogs and donkeys, which have been demonstrated to be effective in Australia, and around the world,' he said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cincinnati official under fire for celebrating brutal attack: ‘They begged for that beat down!
After sickening viral videos captured a brawl in the heart of downtown Cincinnati on Friday night, an Ohio city councilmember disturbingly claimed the victims were asking to be assaulted during the ruthless mob attack. 'They asked for that beatdown,' Cincinnati Councilwoman Victoria Parks replied to video of the July 27 brawl on Facebook, claiming she had the 'whole story.' The 67-year-old Democrat angered Cincinnati's police union boss, who blasted Parks for the comments and called for her resignation. It remains unclear what sparked the brawl— but witnesses told WXIX that one of the groups made racial comments before the blows started, though it is also unclear who the initial aggressors were.
