Pakistan may soon join an exclusive nuclear missile club and here's why the US is worried
The Foreign Affairs report indicates that Pakistan's ICBM programme intensified following
Operation Sindoor
in May. Whilst Pakistan officially states its nuclear arsenal serves solely as deterrence against India, U.S. authorities suspect the ICBM development aims to counter potential American military actions—whether preventive strikes on nuclear facilities or involvement in
Indo-Pakistani conflicts
.
This represents a notable shift from Pakistan's earlier missile programme, which concentrated on regional concerns.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Prince William & Kate Met Princess Diana's Secret Daughter.
Plays Star
Undo
Whar are ICBMs?
An intercontinental ballistic missile is a sophisticated weapons system that can deliver nuclear payloads across distances exceeding 5,500 kilometres. Contemporary ICBMs typically feature MIRVs (multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles), enabling multiple target strikes from a single launch.
ICBMs are classified as strategic armaments owing to their extensive range and devastating potential. Although technically capable of carrying conventional or biological weapons, these systems are predominantly configured for nuclear warfare.
Live Events
The nations currently maintaining operational ICBM arsenals include the U.S., Russia, China, France, the U.K., India, Israel, and North Korea. Pakistan has been the sole nuclear-armed nation without
ICBM capabilities
until now.
Should these reports prove accurate, Pakistan's ICBM development could necessitate a substantial revision of U.S. policy. Historically, Washington has not maintained alliances with nations capable of striking American territory. Officials suggest this development might require reclassifying Pakistan as a strategic nuclear threat.
Additionally, amid increasing friction between the U.S. and nuclear-armed states including Russia, China, North Korea, and
Iran
, Pakistan's inclusion would further complicate American diplomatic relations. The possibility of strategic coordination amongst these nations presents an especially concerning scenario for global stability.
Pakistan's potential advancement into ICBM capability, whether influenced by Operation Sindoor, regional security concerns, or global power shifts, indicates a significant transformation in its nuclear strategy. This development requires the U.S. to address another critical challenge in an increasingly complex international landscape.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Hulk Hogan embodied the American dream — and its many nightmares
Pro wrestling is an ostentatious, over-the-top spectacle of violence and showmanship, an endless soap opera whose characters dress in tights and perform mind-boggling stunts to entertain their legions of fans. The audience knows about kayfabe but doesn't care, allowing wrestling to straddle reality and fiction unlike any other performing art in the world. In many ways, pro wrestling is the perfect microcosm of Donald Trump's America, a country where the line between what is true and false has been catastrophically blurred, news is increasingly unmistakable from parody, politics is conducted and consumed like entertainment, and conflict underpins public life. Trump's own links to World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) and Vince McMahon, the promotion's erstwhile owner who also played a cartoonishly evil, eponymous character, add further heft to this assessment. Hulk Hogan, pro wrestling's greatest ever superstar who died this week, is MAGA through and through. And he is the quintessential American, an ultimate embodiment of the great American Dream, with all its vast contradictions and ugliness. The son of a construction worker, Hogan was a relative unknown outside wrestling circles when he landed a cameo in Sylver Stallone's Rocky III in 1982. His performance caught the eye of the ambitious McMahon, who saw in Hogan's impressive 6'8' stature and 24-inch pythons (read biceps) the key to taking pro wrestling from grimy backrooms and local TV networks in small-town America to the pinnacle of mainstream pop culture. Indeed, WWE might never have been a billion-dollar company without Hulkamania. In the 1980s, Hogan was as big a celebrity as there has ever been — imagine Taylor Swift today, but on steroids (literally). Hogan's rise to superstardom exemplified the ideals of the American Dream: it was a story of what the average Joe could achieve in America through sheer hard work, uninhibited self-belief, and a healthy dose of patriotism. But behind the success of Hulkamania was a carefully crafted in-ring persona deliberately fashioned around these cherished American ideals. McMahon booked Hogan as the archetypal babyface: He would almost always take a pounding before suddenly turning the bout around, and finishing his opponent with an Atomic Leg Drop. This move, in anticipation of which audiences would go into a frenzy, did so much damage to Hogan's spine that he spent his last years on and off a wheelchair. Hogan, and many other fellow wrestlers, would call this his ultimate 'sacrifice' for wrestling. The moustachioed baldie, who would arrive at the ring to Rick Derringer's 'Real American', always reminded the fans to 'train hard, say your prayers and take your vitamins', although he himself would later admit to using anabolic steroids to hulk up. After a high-profile investigation on steroid use in the WWF in 1993-94, Hogan would quickly lose a noticeable amount of muscle — so much for the vitamins. Hogan's character also championed the classic 'cheer for me because I'm American and my opponent isn't' angle, with Hogan wearing his patriotism on his sleeve (often literally). His feuds with the likes Nikolai Volkoff, an ethnic Czech made to play the 'evil Russian' by McMahon, and the Iron Sheik (later called General Mustafa), a supposed Saddam Hussain sympathiser, were rife with not-so-subtle racist stereotyping. Hogan almost always emerged victorious, and in the process cemented America's supremacy. In recent years, a number of unsavoury details have come out about Hogan's private life and personality. He has often made both racist and homophobic statements: A leaked phone conversation in 2015 saw Hogan telling his son, who at the time was serving a brief prison sentence, 'I just hope we don't come back as a couple, I don't want to say it, blizz-ack gizz-uys, you know what I'm saying?' Hogan was also a prolific philanderer and a through-and-through company man who would snitch on his colleagues to curry favour with management. Charisma and wrestling chops aside, Hogan politicked his way to the top and politicked some more to stay there, famously ratting out Jesse Ventura to McMahon for trying to get wrestlers to unionise in the mid-1980s. Hogan thus leaves a complicated legacy for fans of being the quintessential American hero while also, by many accounts, being a somewhat dubious character. His emergence as one of the most vocal supporters of Donald Trump in recent years — Hogan famously called Trump his 'hero' at last year's Republican National Convention — has only made him more polarising. But while it might be 'woke' to hate Hogan today, he was but a product of the world he inhabited. He did what he did to succeed and survive in a cut-throat industry, said what he said because he knew what the audiences wanted. That America made him the superstar he was speaks more about Americans than Hogan himself.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Kargil Diwas: Decoding Pakistan's ‘Mujahideen' playbook
Kargil Vijay Diwas must be celebrated in earnest across the world using all Indian embassies and consulates to mark bravery over deceit and honour in war as against the ugliness and crime of covert wars that is Pakistan's forte. Image: PTI It is now 26 years since India won a heady victory in Kargil, pushing back Pakistani soldiers in a glacial cold in July 1999. The fight was one of sheer grit, fighting extremely treacherous terrain and an enemy sitting at the heights in sheltered bunkers. Few in the history of war have achieved such a remarkable victory, led from the front by young captains and followed literally to the death by their troops. While the anniversary deserves the homage of the whole country, it was actually just one episode, a marker perhaps, in a long line of such incursions that have plagued this country since the time of Partition. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Regular-Irregular Mix The patterns have been rather repetitive. A series of tribal incursions into Kashmir was followed on October 22, 1947, by a large group of trained tribals and regular Pakistan army personnel in a bid to get control over the state. The whole is detailed in a book by a decorated officer, Major General Akbar Khan, which, however, omits the rape and looting by the greedy invaders and the fierce resistance by the Kashmiris themselves. Khan was the original architect of a Pakistani strategy that continued for almost eight decades, using a mix of both irregulars and troops. A brilliant and ambitious man, he later tried to engineer a coup in the famous Rawalpindi conspiracy case, which arose in part due to the resentment of the ceasefire with India. He was jailed but was later co-opted by Prime Minister Zulfikar Bhutto to quell the furious Baloch. A violent man with a violent history, he set the stage for the 'Kashmir problem' by the eventual demarcation of the state into two parts. Pakistan got its pound of flesh, and instead of being satisfied with its lot, remained lusting for more. Following the same pattern came 'Operation Gibraltar', when the Pakistanis again organised a mixed force of irregulars—not non-state actors but men trained in warfare and headed by Pakistan army regulars—which was ended with the Soviet Union bringing about a meeting between the two sides at Tashkent. That declaration promised good neighbourliness and basically sought to restore the status quo ante. But Foreign Minister Bhutto by then had launched a fiery speech at the United Nations, appealing passionately to stop 'the war of aggression' by India and demanding a 'plebiscite'. That Pakistan had started this war and all the others has been repeatedly declared by the highly respected Air Marshal (retd) Asghar Khan. He also said time and again that India was a 'status quo power', but his was truly a voice in the wilderness. Bhutto, meanwhile, was intent on sabotaging the Tashkent Agreement, and the reasons for that soon became apparent as he became the powerful and hugely popular prime minister on the back of President Ayub Khan's humiliation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Pakistan Army Fights a War, and Loses The 1971 war was a blip in Pakistan's warfighting, though it began with another genocide, this time not in Balochistan but in then East Pakistan, which sent a stream of refugees into India. This time India chose to up the ante in the west, even as it won a resounding victory with the help of the Bangladesh resistance. That led to the Shimla Agreement, which principally called for the Kashmir issue to be resolved in a strictly bilateral fashion and talked of furthering good neighbourliness and created the 'Line of Control' to be respected by both sides. Naturally nothing of the kind happened. The wily Bhutto managed to get around the then Indian prime minister, promising eternal good behaviour if the 93,000 prisoners held by India were returned and the status quo ante restored. Worst, it left even the LoC undemarcated in the north, with a vague reference to a line ending at NJ9842. Why Indira Gandhi did not use this resounding military victory to end the Kashmir issue once and for all remains a mystery, and the fact that India had to launch an 'Operation Meghdoot' to ensure that Siachen remained within its territory is now history. With Pakistan, the long view was clearly missing in Delhi. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD And Then Regulars as Irregulars Once Pakistan acknowledged its nuclear capability to the world in 1987 in an interview given by AQ Khan, father of Pakistan's nuclear Programme, (in 1998, Pakistan announced it conducted nuclear tests and became a nuclear state), its wars shifted towards the use of irregulars entirely, together with a large group of terrorists of different hues. There was the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Jaish-e-Mohammad, whose men received training from the Pakistan army or ex-Pakistan army folks, and a group of others who were cannon fodder, particularly those from Kashmir on both sides. Reports of the Ministry of Home Affairs detail terrorism in Punjab from the 1980s, with Kashmir in flames thereafter. And then came Kargil. Excerpts from a thoroughly researched book by Nasim Zehra outlined how the Pakistanis tried thrice, at least, (not counting the 1965 war) to occupy the heights and that an ISI chief wanted to use ex-Afghanistan mujahideen and launch them into Kargil. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Another thought was to paradrop troops, which was negated by a rather sensible air force. In the event, Pakistani troops—again disguised as irregulars or tribals—simply walked into vacated posts as Indian troops withdrew during winter. Tactically brilliant but strategically short-sighted. India used its air force, signalling its willingness to escalate, and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was forced to ask the US under President Clinton—otherwise friendly to him—to stop the war. Worse, the Pakistani army earned nothing but shame in its refusal to acknowledge the death of its own soldiers from the Northern Light Infantry. With this defeat, it went back to backing terrorism until 9/11, when an irate US president told Pakistan to shut its terror camps in a 'with us or against us' ultimatum. General Pervez Musharraf was smart enough to oblige. Terrorism dropped to near nothing until the Mumbai attacks. Pakistan conducted a detailed investigation, with the international watchdog, the Financial Action Task Force, looking over its shoulder. Terror dropped but never ever stopped entirely. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Irregulars as Bait Fast forward to the present. Field Marshal Asim Munir changed tactics entirely. He used terrorists as bait in a horrific attack, fully expecting the Indian army to react. When it did, he used it to get a series of advantages, including his elevation to 'Field Marshal', sanction from the IMF for a huge step up in the defence budget, showered praise on the US for its 'intervention', and welcomed 'mediation'. Pakistan's position as president of the UN Security Council has been used astutely to shield the Terrorist Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of Lashkar-e-Taibba (LeT), and even recently a resolution at the UN Security Council, which, apart from calling for a pacific settlement of disputes, also noted 'with appreciation' the work of the UN's Mediation Support Unit (MSU) and urged the Secretariat to ensure the availability of 'well-trained, experienced, independent, impartial, and geographically and linguistically diverse mediation experts at all levels'. That's the way the wind is blowing. Expect that Pakistan will again try to pull India into a war that serves its interests in propagating mediation and projecting itself as a 'peaceful' power. Never has there been such hypocrisy at the global level. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Roll Out the Red Carpet All this from a state that has not kept to a single agreement in its violent life, not even the UN Conventions on Terrorism or bilateral agreements with its neighbours, including Iran. Kargil Vijay Diwas must be celebrated in earnest across the world using all our embassies and consulates to mark bravery over deceit and honour in war as against the ugliness and crime of covert wars that is Pakistan's forte. Remember it was Indian troops who gave Pakistani soldiers an honourable burial when Rawalpindi refused to recognise them. It's also time to bring out the role of irregular warfare and the costs it imposes on the global system. Fund universities and think tanks focusing on the myriad criminal, moral, and deceptive aspects of terrorism. And above all, celebrate all our victories: 1965, 1971, Kargil, and Sri Lanka. It's shameful that there is not even a monument to commemorate those who died in that operation. Ironically, Colombo does, but Delhi still shuffles its feet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In Kashmir, observe in force a 'Black Day" in Kashmir on October 22, the day the raiders rolled in, and publicise the sacrifices of those Kashmiris who died fighting them. In sum, roll back the legacy of Akbar Khan and the ugly principles it stood for by reminding the country and the outside world that there are values to war and peace. As wars rage across the world, these have been forgotten. Time to take the lead in bringing back value systems that once united Asia. Let the world begin to heal. The author is Director (R&A) at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. She tweets @kartha_tara. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Deccan Herald
30 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Operation Sindoor strikes sent clear message to Pakistan: Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi
VIDEO | Drass, Kargil: Chief of the Army Staff General Upendra Dwivedi says, "During Operation Sindoor, Indian forces showed the same valour as Kargil and destroyed Pakistan's terrorist infrastructure and achieved decisive victory." #KargilVijayDiwas #KargilVijayDiwas2025 … — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 26, 2025 #WATCH | Dras, Kargil | Addressing the 26th Kargil Vijay Diwas celebrations, Chief of Army Staff Gen Upendra Dwivedi says, "The forces that are conspiring to harm India's sovereignty, integrity and people, will be given a befitting reply in the future too, this is the new normal… — ANI (@ANI) July 26, 2025
