JD Vance doesn't want lovelorn Americans to use ‘destructive' dating apps
The veep is so concerned about dating apps that he brought the issue up with Pope Leo XIV when they spoke over the weekend in Rome, raising the issue in a conversation about AI.
'If you look at basic dating behavior among young people — and I think a lot of this is that the dating apps are probably more destructive than we fully appreciate,' Vance said in a New York Times interview published Wednesday, noting that he spoke to the Holy Father about his concerns.
Advertisement
3 Vice President JD Vance talks to reporters on board of the Air Force Two at Leonardo da Vinci International Airport, in Rome, on May 19, 2025, after attending the inauguration of Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
'I think part of it is technology has just for some reason made it harder for young men and young women to communicate with each other in the same way,' Vance added of the dangers of online dating.
'Our young men and women just aren't dating, and if they're not dating, they're not getting married, they're not starting families.'
Advertisement
The Catholic VP has long discussed ways to increase the birthrate in the US and encourage families, as couples choose to have families later and later — or not have kids at all.
More and more people are meeting their partners online instead of striking up conversations in person.
The threat of AI, Vance said, is even more concerning with young people engaging with 'chatbots' online and becoming isolated from society, unable to make genuine connections.
'There's a level of isolation, I think, mediated through technology, that technology can be a bit of a salve. It can be a bit of a Band-Aid. Maybe it makes you feel less lonely, even when you are lonely. But this is where I think AI could be profoundly dark and negative,' Vance told the outlet.
Advertisement
3 Studies show that over half of young people use dating apps to find partners.
dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images
3 Vance has expressed concern about the future generation of Americans not marrying and having kids.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
'I don't think it'll mean three million truck drivers are out of a job. I certainly hope it doesn't mean that. But what I do really worry about is does it mean that there are millions of American teenagers talking to chatbots who don't have their best interests at heart?
'Or even if they do have their best interests at heart, they start to develop a relationship, they start to expect a chatbot that's trying to give a dopamine rush, and, you know, compared to a chatbot, a normal human interaction is not going to be as satisfying, because human beings have wants and needs.'
Advertisement
The newly elected Pope has said he's worried about the Catholic response to the development of AI and how that will change society — similar to what his previous namesake, Pope Leo XIII, went through with the Industrial Revolution.
Vance said AI could bring about other issues as well, like the lack of cybersecurity, where your bank accounts could be hacked, and how China will use the technology.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Critics slam Kamala Harris for gloomy July 4 post — with photo that crops out Biden
Critics piled on former Vice President Kamala Harris for issuing a gloomy statement on the Fourth of July — while sharing a picture of last year's festivities that cropped out her onetime running-mate Joe Biden. 'This Fourth of July, I am taking a moment to reflect. Things are hard right now. They are probably going to get worse before they get better,' Harris posted Friday on X. 'But I love our country — and when you love something, you fight for it. Together, we will continue to fight for the ideals of our nation.' 5 'Kamala cropping Joe out is very symbolic,' noted Link Lauren, a former senior adviser to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s presidential campaign. Kamala Harris, /X X users were quick to point out that the image Harris promoted — which showed her and first gentleman Doug Emhoff enjoying an Independence Day fireworks display in July 2024 — was conveniently framed to exclude Biden and first lady Jill. 'Kamala cropping Joe out is very symbolic,' noted Link Lauren, a former senior adviser to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s presidential campaign, publishing another shot from the White House balcony that shows the first couple just feet away. '[W]hose elbow is that at the right[?]' jeered another X user. 5 Critics piled on former Vice President Kamala Harris for issuing a gloomy statement on the Fourth of July — while sharing a picture of last year's festivities that also cropped out her onetime running-mate Joe Biden. Getty Images Others took issue with the ominous tone of her holiday statement. 'Feeling grateful we didn't end up with a President who posts 'things are gonna get worse' on the 4th of July,' added Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kiersten Pels. 'Among other reasons, this is why you're not President,' a second netizen chimed in, while a third encouraged her to 'just enjoy the day.' 5 'America is unburdened by what has been,' a fourth needled, paraphrasing a favorite catchphrase of the VP. AP 'America is unburdened by what has been,' a fourth needled, paraphrasing a favorite catchphrase of the VP. 'Kamala sets a new record for the worst 4th of July message ever,' claimed 710 WOR radio host Mark Simone. Still, others pointed to her use of the word 'fight' as telling of her future political ambitions. '[S]he's definitely running in 2028,' one X user mused. 'Don't stop fighting, Kamala,' mocked Article III Project founder and Trump ally Mike Davis. 'And please run again in 2028.' The California Democrat has made few public appearances since her resounding loss to Donald Trump in the 2024 election, with all seven swing states going to the Republican after Biden bowed out of the race months prior. In April, Harris delivered an odd keynote address that attacked the Trump administration's economic and immigration policies — without directly invoking the 47th president's name — during a 20th anniversary gala in San Francisco for Emerge, a Democratic group helping women run for office. 5 The California Democrat has made few public appearances since her resounding loss to Donald Trump in the 2024 election, with all seven swing states going to the Republican after Biden bowed out of the race months prior. Getty Images Recent public polling also shows that her favorability and chances at clinching the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination are declining. An Emerson College poll last month found just 13% would back Harris in the primary, whereas 16% would favor former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who dropped out of the Democratic contest with just 15 delegates before Super Tuesday in 2020. When the same pollster surveyed Dems in November, at least 37% still stood by Harris. 5 Harris insiders told Politico the former vice president and California Democratic senator will make a decision about her political future by the end of this summer. AFP via Getty Images Other surveys have ranked her much higher, with a Morning Consult poll in March showing 36% support from Democratic and Democratic-leaning independent voters in the 2028 primary. The following month, the same percentage of respondents seen as 'policy influencers' said they weren't that excited about her pursuing a gubernatorial bid in California next year either, according to a survey by Politico and UC Berkeley's Citrin Center. Harris insiders told Politico the former vice president and California Democratic senator will make a decision about her political future by the end of this summer.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's what's in Trump's "big, beautiful bill" passed by Congress
Washington — The House passed a massive spending and tax bill that includes signature policies of President Trump's second-term agenda Thursday, sending the so-called "big, beautiful bill" to the president's desk ahead of a July 4 deadline. Mr. Trump signed the bill into law on Friday afternoon. The House approved the bill in a 218 to 214 vote Thursday, after the Senate narrowly approved the bill Tuesday in a 51-50 vote that required Vice President JD Vance to break a tie. At the center the "big, beautiful bill" is an extension of Mr. Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was slated to sunset at the end of the year. The legislation would make most of the tax cuts permanent, while increasing spending for border security, defense and energy production. The bill is partially paid for by significant cuts to health care and nutrition programs, like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would add $3.4 trillion to federal deficits over the next 10 years and leave millions without health insurance. Republicans and the White House dispute those forecasts. Senate Republicans used a process known as budget reconciliation to pass the bill, which limits the types of policies that can be included in a simple majority vote. A handful of provisions that initially appeared in the bill were ultimately removed, including one that would have ordered the sale of public lands and another that would have paused state regulations on artificial intelligence. The House passed its own initial version of the legislation last month, with some key differences to the final Senate-crafted version. The lower chamber approved the Senate's changes Thursday, sending the measure to the president's desk. Here's what is in the 887-page bill: Medicaid restrictions The legislation includes restrictions on Medicaid, which provides government-sponsored health care for low-income and disabled Americans. The bill imposes work requirements for some able-bodied adults and more frequent eligibility checks. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would result in 11.8 million Americans losing health coverage under Medicaid over the next decade. The Senate parliamentarian determined that a measure cutting federal funds to states that use Medicaid infrastructure to provide health care coverage to undocumented immigrants, along with banning Medicaid from covering gender transition services, wasn't in compliance with Senate reconciliation rules. The parliamentarian also weighed in on what's known as the provider tax, which states use to help fund their portion of Medicaid costs, in a blow to the Senate GOP's initial plan. Senate Republicans proposed steeper cuts to Medicaid funding, in part by incrementally lowering provider taxes from 6% to 3.5% by 2032. The timeline is delayed by one year from the Senate GOP's initial proposal, after the issue became one of the bill's sticking points in recent weeks. It's a departure from the initial House-passed bill, which sought to lower federal costs by freezing states' provider taxes at current rates and prohibiting them from establishing new provider taxes. The bill also includes a rural hospital stabilization fund after some GOP senators expressed concern over how rural hospitals could be impacted by the Medicaid restrictions, allocating $50 billion for rural hospitals over the same period that the provider taxes would be lowered. Homeland security and immigration The legislation includes more than $46.5 billion for border wall construction and related expenses, $45 billion to expand detention capacity for immigrants in custody and about $30 billion in funding for hiring, training and other resources for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It also includes a minimum $100 fee for those seeking asylum, down from the $1,000 fee outlined in the initial House bill. The Senate parliamentarian ruled out the $1,000 fee for anyone applying for asylum. Increasing the state and local tax deduction, or SALT The package also includes an increase to the cap on the state and local tax deduction, raising it from $10,000 to $40,000. After five years, it would return to $10,000, a departure from the initial House-passed bill. The issue was a major sticking point in the House, where blue-state Republicans threatened to withhold their support without the increase to the deduction. But with no Republicans hailing from blue states in the Senate, the upper chamber has been contending with its own dynamics. Before the rule, taxpayers could deduct all their state and local taxes from their federal taxes, which some policymakers have said mainly benefits wealthy homeowners in states with high taxes, such as New York and California. But advocates for increasing the caps argue that the $10,000 cap is increasingly impacting middle-class homeowners who live in regions where property taxes are rising. Green energy policies The final bill passed by the Senate would largely terminate numerous tax incentives from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act for clean energy, electric vehicles and energy efficiency programs that benefited consumers. It would end tax credits for new and used electric vehicles, installation of home EV charging equipment and insulation or energy efficient heating and cooling systems. The bill also ends the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which gives funding to nonprofit organizations providing financing for projects that reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions in communities. Existing contracts and grants under the program are not affected. Restrictions on food stamps The bill still shifts the costs of SNAP, or food stamps, to some states. The program is currently fully funded by the federal government. The federal government would continue to fully fund the benefits for states that have an error payment rate below 6%, beginning in 2028. States with error rates above 6% would be on the hook for 5% to 15% of the costs. States are also given some flexibility in calculating their share. The package also aligns with the initial House version on age requirements for able-bodied adults to qualify for SNAP benefits. Currently, in order to qualify, able-bodied adults between 18 and 54 must meet work requirements. Both the Senate and House bills would update the age requirement to 18 and 64, with some exemptions for parents. Alaska and Hawaii could receive waivers for the work requirements if it's determined that they're making a "good faith effort" to comply. Addressing the debt limit The legislation would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, going beyond the $4 trillion outlined in the initial House-passed bill. Congress faces a deadline to address the debt limit later this summer. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has urged Congress to address the debt limit by mid-July, saying that the U.S. could be unable to pay its bills as early as August, when Congress is on recess. By addressing the debt ceiling as part of the larger package, Republicans in Congress aimed to bypass negotiating with Democrats on the issue. Unlike most other legislation in the Senate, the budget reconciliation process that governs the package requires a simple majority, rather than the 60-vote threshold to move forward with a bill. Child tax credit The current $2,000 child tax credit is set to return to the pre-2017 level of $1,000 in 2026. The tax credit would permanently increase to $2,200 under the bill, $300 less than the initial House-passed hike. Limits on overtime and tips deductions The bill would allow individuals to deduct a certain amount of tip wages and overtime from their taxes. The provisions would expire in 2028. The "no tax on tips" provision in the spending bill would create a new deduction for tipped workers, eliminating what they owe in federal income tax. Tipped workers would still have to pay state and local income tax and payroll taxes. The Senate version varies from the initial House-passed provisions on a few key points, including how much a worker could claim in deductions. The Senate proposal limits that deduction to $25,000, while the early House version was uncapped. Under the initial House measure, meanwhile, only people with annual income of $160,000 or less would have qualified for the tipping tax break, while the Senate version phases out benefits for individuals whose income exceeds $150,000 or couples whose income exceeds $300,000. Changes to standard deduction The bill seeks to permanently expand the basic standard deduction, which was nearly doubled in 2017. The increases will expire at the end of the year. What a new DOJ memo could mean for naturalized U.S. citizens July 4 holiday week expected to set record for travelers Group meets to handwrite the U.S. Constitution
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs 'big beautiful bill' into law in White House ceremony
President Trump signed his signature tax cut and spending bill into law on Friday, after Congress met his self-imposed deadline to pass it by July 4. The signing followed a series of intense and emotional debates over the past week on Capitol Hill. The bill moved through the Senate on a 50-50 tally that required Vice President JD Vance to break the tie before the 870-page bill passed the House a few days later in a vote of 218-214. The process proved exceptionally contentious largely over healthcare provisions that are set to extract hundreds of billions in government savings but could cause millions to lose coverage. Medicaid and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase were just two of the most controversial pieces of a complex bill that is set to reshape whole swathes of the US economy, especially around taxes, energy, and healthcare. It's a bill also set to be felt keenly in American pocketbooks with provisions like no taxes on tips, cuts to student loans and the Pell Grant program, changes to 529 plans for education expenses, an increase in state tax deductions, and a range of other provisions that both business and consumer groups will be digesting for months. Clean energy companies are already paying perhaps the keenest attention, with government support for EVs and solar projects set to be eliminated in the years ahead due to changes in the bill. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk emerged during final negotiations as the top business-world critic attacking the bill's price and how it treats clean energy. He said in recent days that the $3.3 trillion increase in debt expected from the bill makes a "mockery" of his work at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Economists have likewise noted the final price tag, which could top $4 trillion. Also critiqued was an accounting gimmick Republicans employed to hide much of that red ink that Maya MacGuineas of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget called "a massive cover-up" in a withering statement that added that the bill was "the single most expensive, dishonest, and reckless budget reconciliation bill ever." Silicon Valley also has questions after a last-minute change stripped a closely-watched artificial intelligence provision. But a range of GOP priorities that were included — from increased funding for border enforcement to money for America's 250th anniversary celebration next year — pushed the bill over the line with many in corporate America also in favor and focused on the tax piece. Business Roundtable Chair Chuck Robbins, the CEO of Cisco (CSCO), offered following the final vote that the bill would allow "American businesses to better plan, invest and build for the future." Trump for his part worked relentless to flip votes and get the bill passed calling it at one point the "greatest bill ever passed." Here is a closer look at three ways the current version the bill would impact the business world. A centerpiece of the bill — and far and away the source of the most expensive provisions — surrounded taxes. The bill's main impetus has long been to permanently extend tax cuts for individuals contained in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law on a temporary basis during his first term. The bill would represent a continuation of the status quo for taxpayers. As one example, the bill is set to mean America's highest earners will carry on with a top rate of 37%. The bill also provides new tax credits for individuals by fulfilling signature Trump campaign promises — albeit slightly less fulsomely than in the House version — via the elimination of taxes on tips, overtime, and car loan interest. It also offers an expanded standard deduction for seniors after Trump promised to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits. Employees will be able to deduct up to $25,000 annually for tips and overtime. Business owners, meanwhile, are keenly focused on a series of tax deductions that will reinstate credits for corporations for things like property depreciation, capital investments, new factory construction, interest expenses, and research and development costs. Many of these provisions were present in the House version, but only temporarily. Permanency was a key Senate priority and is now included in the bill, even as it increased the price tag by hundreds of billions of dollars. Senate Finance Committee chair Mike Crapo shepherded the tax changes and celebrated passage with a statement that said corporate provisions give "businesses the certainty they need to make the long-term investments that power economic growth." The bill also makes permanent the pass-through deduction at a rate of 20%. That deduction — formally known as the 199A deduction — is focused on often smaller businesses organized as S corporations or partnerships. The Senate version also includes an array of other tax changes, including a $40,000 annual deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) for the coming years, an expanded child tax credit, enhanced credits for "opportunity zones," and so-called MAGA accounts. The effect on the energy sector could also be profound, especially after a last-minute series of changes turned the bill even further against the clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels. The bill has long been expected to phase out Biden-era clean energy tax credits, but the final bill will shut them down faster than many had expected. The proposal to eliminate EV credits would even take effect on Sept. 30 of this year. A late addition to the bill also raised worries that a new tax on wind and solar projects completed after 2027 was in the offing. But a flurry of objections led to a moderation, with the final draft quietly removing that excise tax. "The bill's targeted tweaks to solar and wind tax credits, especially the phaseout language, are a relative market positive given the onerous nature of the previously proposed excise tax," is how Ed Mills of Raymond James summed up the net effects there. At the same time, new last-minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral for a government manufacturing credit. "We're doing coal," Trump said in a recent interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell." It was a mix that led Musk and others to predict that the larger effect of the bill would be to cut off clean energy, hurt the overall energy grid, and perhaps lead to higher utility bills. At one point, Musk called the bill "utterly insane" and vowed that members of Congress who voted yes "will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The bill is also set to implement major changes to the healthcare system. Healthcare negotiations continued until nearly the literal last minute, and the overall package is set to trim the government's Medicaid spending by around $900 billion in the years ahead. Corners of the sector, like rural hospitals, are set to be most directly impacted. Republican Sen. Collins of Maine flipped against the bill late in the process and explained her no vote afterwards as driven "primarily from the harmful impact [the bill] will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural health care providers like our hospitals and nursing homes." And the bottom line for patients — according to an accounting from the Congressional Budget Office that came in over the weekend — is that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the healthcare provisions. Some that lose coverage would be illegal immigrants, as Republicans often point out, but millions of US citizens are expected to lose coverage if the bill is enacted because of additional requirements to qualify for coverage. This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
