Dead congressman's social media account accused of ‘necroposting' endorsement of successor
The X account of late Virginia Congressman Gerry Connolly was used to share an endorsement of his former chief of staff as his chosen successor, with many finding the move unappealing.
Connolly died on May 21 after he was diagnosed with esophageal cancer. He previously announced that he wouldn't be running for re-election at the age of 75, having been in the House of Representatives since 2009.
In December of last year, Connolly defeated New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a race to serve as the ranking Democrat on the influential House Oversight Committee, to the annoyance of some younger and more progressive Democrats who had been pushing for a generational shift in the party.
His death made the situation worse. Connolly was the third House Democrat to die in office this year, following the deaths of Texas Rep. Sylvester Turner, 70, and Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva, 77. Connolly became the eighth congressional Democrat to die in office since 2022. The vacant Democratic seats have created more room for Republicans to maneuver in the House.
Two weeks before his death, Connolly endorsed his former chief of staff, James Walkinshaw, to succeed him.
'For over two decades, [Walkinshaw] stood by my side — as my chief of staff, my partner in progress, and my closest ally in the fight for Northern Virginia,' Connolly wrote on May 7. 'Today, I'm proud to endorse him to succeed me in Congress. James is ready to lead on day one.'
Connolly died two weeks later.
After his death, his X account was updated to state that 'Congressman Connolly passed away 5/21/2025. All posts made with the consent of the Connolly family.'
The first post after his death came one month later on June 24. It has since been deleted.
'Early voting starts TODAY in VA-11! Before passing, Gerry endorsed @JamesWalkinshaw to carry the torch. Let's honor that legacy and vote for bold leadership that'll fight for us every day,' the post stated, linking to Walkinshaw's campaign site.
The post quickly garnered criticism. Democratic operative Kamran Fareedi previously criticized the Connolly campaign for sending out emails after his death, calling it 'beyond unethical.'
However, he said the June 24 post on X 'goes beyond emailing on the late-Rep. Connolly's behalf after he passed away.'
Dustin Keith, a supporter of Irene Shin, one of Walkinshaw's challengers, wrote on X that the post was 'exactly why Walkinshaw should lose.'
'It's entirely inappropriate and disgusting to exploit access to the late Congressman's socials for your own political gain,' Keith added.
Others criticized the account's ' necroposting ' as ' ghoulish,' ' grotesque,' ' unethical,' ' disgusting,' and ' creepy.'
'Tweeting from the account of someone who just passed doesn't sit right with me,' MSNBC contributor Rotimi Adeoye wrote. 'And personally, I really dislike when Congressional staff immediately jump in to run for their boss's seat: feels opportunistic and leaves a bad taste.'
Walkinshow is running in the June 28th primary for Connelly's seat against nine other Democrats. He has also been endorsed by top Virginia Democrats such as Rep. Don Beyer, former Rep. Jennifer Wexton, Rep. Eugene Vindman, and a large number of state lawmakers.
The Independent
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Amber heat health alert extended further across England
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
As Trump targets birthright citizenship, the terrain is once again ‘women's bodies and sexuality'
One day after Donald Trump's inauguration, five pregnant immigrant women – led by an asylum seeker from Venezuela – sued over the president's executive order limiting automatic birthright citizenship, out of fear that their unborn children would be left stateless. The case went before the supreme court, which sided with the Trump administration Friday by restricting the ability of federal judges to block the order. The legal drama recalls a scene a century and a half earlier, when a different cohort of immigrant women went to the country's highest court to challenge a restrictive California law. In 1874, San Francisco officials detained 22 Chinese women at the port after declaring them 'lewd and debauched' – a condition that allowed for denial of entry. The supreme court sided with the women and struck down the law, delivering the first victory to a Chinese litigant in the US. But its ruling also established the federal government's exclusive authority over immigration, paving the way for the passage of the Page Act of 1875, the first piece of federal legislation restricting immigration. Trump's hardline immigration-enforcement strategy, which has focused on birthright citizenship and sparked a family-separation crisis, bears resemblance to the restrictive laws against Chinese women in the late 19th century, which historians say led to lasting demographic changes in Chinese American communities. Political campaigns of both eras, experts say, sought to stem the growth of immigrant populations by targeting women's bodies. 'What the Page Act, the Chinese Exclusion Act and birthright citizenship all have in common is the battle over who we deem admissible, as having a right to be here,' said Catherine Lee, an associate professor of sociology at Rutgers University whose research focuses on family reunification in American immigration. 'And the terrain on which we're having these discussions is women's bodies and women's sexuality.' The Page Act denied entry of 'lewd' and 'immoral' women, ostensibly to curb prostitution. While sex workers of many nationalities immigrated to the US, experts say local authorities almost exclusively enforced the law against women of Chinese descent. More than curbing immigration, Lee said, the legislation set a standard for determining who was eligible for citizenship and for birthing future generations of Americans. The law placed the burden of proof on Chinese women themselves, research shows. Before boarding a ship to the US, the women had to produce evidence of 'respectable' character by submitting a declaration of morality and undergoing extensive interrogations, character assessments and family background checks. At the same time, doctors and health professionals smeared Chinese women as carriers of venereal diseases, Lee said. J Marion Sims, a prominent gynecologist who led the American Medical Association at the time, falsely declared that the arrival of Chinese women had caused a 'Chinese syphilis' epidemic. Bill Hing, a law and migration studies professor at the University of San Francisco and author of Making and Remaking Asian America, said the Page Act was 'an evil way at controlling the population' to ensure that the Chinese American community wouldn't grow. The law did drastically alter the demographics of the Chinese population. In 1870, Chinese men in the US outnumbered Chinese women by a ratio of 13 to 1. By 1880, just a half decade after the law's passage, that gap had nearly doubled, to 21 to 1. One legacy of the Page Act, Hing said, was the formation of 'bachelor societies'. The de facto immigration ban against Chinese women made it virtually impossible for Chinese men to form families in the US, as anti-miscegenation laws forbade them from marrying women outside their race. Today, Hing said, attempts to repeal birthright citizenship is another way of suppressing the development of immigrant populations. 'It falls right into the same intent of eliminating the ability of communities of color to expand,' he said. Trump's January executive order, which would deny citizenship to US-born babies whose parents aren't citizens or green-card holders, employs a gendered line of argument similar to that of the Page Act, Lee said. (The government has lost every case so far about the executive order, as it directly contradicts the 14th amendment.) In a 6-3 vote Friday, the supreme court ruled that lower courts could not impose nationwide bans against Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship. The ruling, which immigrant rights advocates say opens the door for a partial enforcement of the order, doesn't address the constitutionality of the order itself. 'Birthright citizenship assumes that women are having sex,' Lee said, 'and whether she's having sex with a lawful permanent resident or a citizen determines the status of her child.' Congressional Republicans continue to employ gendered and racialized rhetoric in their attacks on birthright citizenship and so-called 'birth tourism', the practice of pregnant women traveling to the US specifically to give birth and secure citizenship for their children. Political and media attention on the latter issue has been disproportionately focused on Chinese nationals. Last month, the Republican senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee introduced a bill that bans foreign nationals from 'buying' American citizenship. She called 'birth tourism' a 'multimillion-dollar industry' exploited by pregnant women from 'adversaries like communist China and Russia'. Although the extent of 'birth tourism' is unknown, studies have shown that it comprises just a small portion of US-born Chinese infants. Many are born to US citizens or permanent residents, who form more than a majority of the foreign-born Chinese population. (A decade ago, Chinese 'birth tourists' accounted for just 1% of all Chinese tourists visiting the US.) Virginia Loh-Hagan, co-executive director of the Asian American Education Project, said a long-lasting ramification of the Page Act is the 'exploitation, fetishization and dehumanization' of Asian women that has led to deadly hate crimes, such as the spree of shootings at three Asian-owned Atlanta spas in 2021. 'If immigrants in this country were denied the opportunity to build families and communities,' Loh-Hagan said, 'then they have less community strength, less voice and power in politics and governance of this country.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Sleeper cells and threat warnings: how the US-Iran conflict is spinning up fear
As the war between Iran and Israel intensified, teasing the eventual involvement of the US military, American security agencies began to warn of a looming threat of Tehran-backed 'sleeper cells' known to be active stateside that could be called in for retaliatory attacks. But as the B-2 bombers struck nuclear sites across Iran and the Iranian military responded with a missile barrage on US bases in the region, a ceasefire took shape. In the end, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) – Iran's elite military and intelligence branch, wielding a global web of terrorist groups and agents acting on its behalf – didn't appear to sponsor or carry out any covert operations inside the US, nor has it since. The Department of Homeland Security, however, issued a heightened threat bulletin, because the 'ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment'. The FBI followed suit with its own warnings of sleeper cells. The same sort of reasoning has been used before: during and after the invasion of Iraq, president George W Bush continued to link the fallen Iraqi regime with 'sleeper cells' and sponsoring terrorism against American targets. In the past, the IRGC and its proxies have certainly shown they are more than willing to carry out terrorism plots against the US – as was the case of a Brooklyn-based Iranian activist who was the target of a foiled assassination attempt in 2023 – but separating Maga talking points with reality prompts the question: how real are these sleeper cells? The US border 'czar', Tom Homan, has been accused of cherrypicking national security threats to fit his mandate. He suggested that the US border is so porous, Iranian operators have already taken advantage of it. 'When I was a Fox News contributor,' Homan recently told Fox News, calling out Iranian agents as a threat, 'I said my biggest concern is the open border causing the biggest national security vulnerability this country has ever seen.' To Trump administration figures like Homan and JD Vance, who have both warned of an almost imminent strike on Americans, Iranians have become useful bogeymen and a cudgel for emphasizing a foreign danger they can use for domestic crackdowns. Experts say the IRGC threat is both credible and overstated. 'While often discussed in sensational language, Iran almost certainly maintains small clandestine cells inside the US and other countries,' said Broderick McDonald, associate fellow at King's College London's XCEPT research programme, who studies conflict in the Middle East. 'Both Iran and proxies like [Hezbollah] have repeatedly used small clandestine cells for decades to carry out assassinations, target dissidents and collaborate with criminal networks.' Hezbollah, which has largely degraded in power since the Israeli invasion of Lebanon last year, has acted hand in glove with the IRGC for years, including offering up its agents to the work of Tehran. McDonald continued: 'These so-called sleeper cells are a valuable asset for any country to collect surveillance, conduct targeted assassinations and carry out strategic strikes on military infrastructure during a crisis.' Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, geopolitical watchers have warned that the conflict heralded a new era of sabotage and covert operations between nation-states. Iran, already old-hat at these kinds of clandestine activities and willing to pay the Russian mafia to do its bidding – was expected to up its foreign op tempo, even before the Israel conflict. At the same time, operations such as Ukraine's drone attack on Russian airfields, codenamed 'Spider's Web', and Israel's similar mission in Tehran before its bombing of the city earlier in June, have showcased the growing appetite among spy agencies to carry out acts of violence on the soil of their enemies. But McDonald explained that any attacks on the US homeland – especially with another Trump presidency more than willing to escalate and carry out unprecedented killings – is a 'contingency asset for regimes like Iran'. In other words, initiating a terrorist attack on the US would require a moment of true existential desperation, which is not where Iran currently finds itself. 'Iran's telegraphing of its retaliatory strikes on US bases in Qatar and Iraq suggests it was looking to downshift rather than inflame tensions with the US,' McDonald said. 'While some media outlets and online personalities have played on sensational language to describe these so-called sleeper cells and the likelihood they will be mobilised, small clandestine cells do pose serious threats to national security that we are only partially prepared for.' For example, recent 'war on terror'-styled reporting from Fox News, an outlet with public affiliations to the White House, blamed the Biden administration for letting more than 700 Iranians into the country, noting it was 'unclear' how many of those people were on the terrorism watchlist. Sources confirmed to the Guardian that the FBI is indeed concerned with stateside Iranian infiltration. One threat in particular, the use of suicide first-person-view (FPV) drones on US citizens or major targets, would be almost impossible to defend against and has been popularized by its ease of use in Ukraine. 'I am still surprised we haven't seen more FPV-type attacks, but that's certainly a strong possibility,' said Colin Clarke, the director of research at the Soufan Center, pointing out past Iranian sponsored attacks in Argentina, Bulgaria and Saudi Arabia – evidence alone of its willingness to strike at its enemies using asymmetric means. Iran is also well known to have sponsored much of the insurgency against US forces in Iraq, going so far as to manufacture the roadside bombs that became a scourge on American soldiers there. But, according to Clarke, while Iran is a formidable and active foe to western countries, its current weakness might also mean it is much less likely to invite the wrath of the US and the Pentagon's firepower. 'I think the threat of sleeper cells in the United States is real, but now that there's a ceasefire in place, Iran is unlikely to want its fingerprints on any traceable attack planning,' he said in an email. 'But in the immediate aftermath of the war kicking off two weeks ago, and even before the US got involved, there were palpable fears of a potential terrorist attack on US soil conducted by Iran's proxy network.' Clarke noted that the latest US-Israeli strikes on Tehran is likely to 'to stoke further anger' in a climate of political extremism, which has brought about recent killings. 'Since the October 7 attacks and the ongoing war in Gaza, western countries have experienced a surge in both antisemitism and Islamophobic attacks, hate crimes and other violent events,' he said.
