Richard Marles won't ‘speculate' on Oscar Jenkins swap
Richard Marles has refused to speculate on the prospects of a prisoner swap for Oscar Jenkins after a Russian court sentenced the Melbourne man to 13 years in a penal colony.
Russian authorities in Ukraine's occupied Luhansk region declared Mr Jenkins a mercenary, complicating any prisoner swap talks as mercenaries are not protected by conventions on the treatment of prisoners of war.
Condemning the court decision as a 'sham trial', the Deputy Prime Minister on Monday said Mr Jenkins 'should be treated as a prisoner of war'.
The Albanese government is pushing for Oscar Jenkins to be released from Russian captivity. Picture: NewsWire Handout
Mr Jenkins was fighting with the Ukrainian military when Russian forces captured him. Picture: Screengrab
'This was a sham trial which handed down this sentence,' Mr Marles, who is also defence minister, told Sky News.
'Oscar Jenkins should be treated as a prisoner of war and all the rights that go with that under international humanitarian law should be provided by Russia to Oscar Jenkins.
'That's what we expect of the Russian government, and we are very concerned for Oscar Jenkins.'
Mr Jenkins was fighting with Ukraine's International Legion — a formal part of the Armed Forces of Ukraine — when he was captured late last year near Makiivka, a tiny village on the Zherebets River in Luhansk.
Mr Marles was asked whether he thought Mr Jenkins was 'brave' for joining Ukraine's fight against invading Russian forces.
But he reiterated the government did not encourage people to go to Ukraine due to its designation as a war zone – noting they had made their position 'clear'.
'Oscar Jenkins, though, is an Australian citizen, and we will continue to advocate on his behalf,' Mr Marles said.
'And as I said, we regard him as a prisoner of war in these circumstances, and we expect all the rights that are afforded to prisoners of water be applied by Russia to him.'
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has called on Russia to treat Mr Jenkins as a prisoner of war. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
Later, Ukraine's envoy in Canberra said securing Mr Jenkins' release was a 'top priority' for the Ukrainian government.
Vasyl Myroshnychenko said it was 'good' the Australian fighter had been sentenced because 'now he could be swapped'.
But the Ukrainian ambassador added 'how the Russians interpret him' could complicate matters.
'And of course, we're working on that, making sure that we can get him released as soon as possible,' Mr Myroshnychenko told Sky News.
'We don't know how long it's going to take but I'm in touch with (the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) all the time.'
Ukraine and Russia regularly swap prisoners through exchanges largely organised by the Red Cross.
Officials from both countries agreed to swap some 1000 prisoners during peace talks last week.
Mr Myroshnychenko said he did not know if Mr Jenkins would be included in that exchange.
Anthony Albanese also raised Mr Jenkins and 'other cases' when he met Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV's inauguration on Sunday.
The Prime Minister thanks the Ukrainian President for his help on the matter.
Originally published as Richard Marles won't 'speculate' on possible prison swap for Oscar Jenkins after 'sham' trial, jailing
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Tulsi Gabbard details bombshell claims of Obama-era cabal's 'treasonous conspiracy' against Donald Trump
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard detailed "striking" findings from declassified documents released Friday, claiming to showcase "overwhelming evidence" that an Obama-era cabal laid the groundwork for what would be the years-long Trump-Russia collusion probe after the 2016 election. "The implications of this are frankly nothing short of historic," Gabbard said on this week's "Sunday Morning Futures." "Over 100 documents that we released on Friday really detail and provide evidence of how this treasonous conspiracy was directed by President Obama just weeks before he was due to leave office after President Trump had already gotten elected. This is not a Democrat or Republican issue. This is an issue that is so serious it should concern every single American because it has to do with the integrity of our democratic republic," she continued. Documents shared by Gabbard's office claimed that before the 2016 election, there was no evidence showing Russia tried to directly alter vote counts. However, members of the intelligence community later suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Trump win. Gabbard argues the narrative shift was politically motivated rather than based on new findings. "Creating this piece of manufactured intelligence that claims that Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected contradicted every other assessment that had been made previously in the months leading up to the election that said exactly the opposite, that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to try to 'hack the United States election,'" Gabbard told host Maria Bartiromo. "So the effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people, undermining our democratic republic and enacting what would be essentially a years-long coup against President Trump, who was duly elected by the American people." Evidence released by Gabbard's office implicated then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, among others, in addition to the former president. Gabbard confirmed her intent to send all the uncovered documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI for a criminal referral. When asked if she expects to see prosecutions, she vowed to do "all that [she] can" to ensure accountability. "We have whistleblowers, actually, coming forward now after we released these documents because there are people who were around, who were working within the intelligence community at this time who were so disgusted by what happened," she shared. "We're starting to see some of them come out of the woodwork here because they… want to see justice delivered… there must be indictments. Those responsible, no matter how powerful they are and were at that time, no matter who was involved in creating this treasonous conspiracy against the American people, they all must be held accountable." Some Democrats, including Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, who is the top member of his party on the House Intelligence Committee, have criticized Gabbard's claims as "baseless." Fox News Digital previously reached out to Obama, representatives for the former president, Clapper, Comey, Brennan, Rice, Lynch and McCabe for comment and did not receive a response. Originally published as Tulsi Gabbard details bombshell claims of Obama-era cabal's 'treasonous conspiracy' against Donald Trump
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Not everyone believes Ukraine's new prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko will hold much power
It was April 30, and Yulia Svyrydenko had arrived in Washington DC for perhaps the most important meeting of her political career so far — to sign the highly anticipated Ukraine-US critical minerals deal. Just two months earlier, her country's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, had come to the White House to do it, but was abruptly shown the door after that infamous verbal clash with US President Donald Trump and Vice-President JD Vance. The US-Ukraine relationship had hit such a low point that many wondered if the Trump administration would walk away from supporting Kyiv's war effort entirely. But, after weeks of fraught behind-the-scenes negotiations, careful relationship rebuilding, and a hurried face-to-face meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy at the Vatican ahead of Pope Francis's funeral, things were back on track. Four days after the Vatican meeting, it was up to Ms Svyrydenko, who was then Ukraine's deputy prime minister and economy minister, to lead a delegation to Washington to get the minerals deal done. Within hours, she had inked the agreement, posed for photographs with the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and was reporting back to Kyiv that the US would help fund Ukraine's reconstruction in exchange for a stake in its vast mineral wealth. The relationship between the US and Ukraine has been improving ever since. For her role in bringing the minerals deal back from the brink, as well as her economic credentials and loyalty to Mr Zelenskyy, Ms Svyrydenko has this week been appointed Ukraine's first new prime minister in five years. A majority in the 450-seat parliament — 262 members — voted for her as part of Mr Zelenskyy's biggest government reshuffle since Russia's invasion began in February 2022. Ms Svyrydenko, who has risen through the ranks since joining the government in 2019, said it was a "great honour" to lead the government of Ukraine and she pledged to get straight to work. "War leaves no room for delay. We must act swiftly and decisively," the 39-year-old posted on social media after the vote. Sevgil Musayeva, the chief editor of leading independent newspaper Ukrainska Pravda, told the ABC that Ms Svyrydenko has been "one of the main faces of the Zelenskyy team" and rumours began swirling last year that she would be in line for the job of PM. Ms Musayeva said that, as well as the minerals deal, Ms Svyrydenko had also signed important economic and redevelopment agreements for her country at the Ukrainian Recovery Conference in Rome this month, reportedly worth €11 billion ($20 billion). However, Ms Musayeva added that she believes the real power in Kyiv will remain with Mr Zelenskyy and the head of the presidential office, Andriy Yermak. "I don't believe that she will actually have any kind of independence … she has no freedom to make important decisions," Ms Musayeva said. Some opposition politicians have also voiced scepticism about the new government's ability to remain independent of Mr Zelenskyy's administration. In Ukraine, the president serves as the head of state and is responsible for foreign policy, while the constitution gives the prime minister the power when it comes to domestic policy. Under previous presidents in pre-war times, prime ministers were not only independent of the president but were often at odds with them. However, because Mr Zelenskyy's political party, 'Servant of the People', holds a majority in parliament, and while he remains broadly popular, he is more influential. "From the start of the war, he became a symbol of Ukrainian resistance, and it actually gives him a lot of power and responsibility. He controls the parliament, absolutely," Ms Musayeva said. Elections in Ukraine are prohibited while the country is under martial law, a principle widely accepted by the people, given the difficulty of staging a vote while millions are displaced and cities are under bombardment and occupation. But this also means it is difficult for new leaders to emerge. Ms Svyrydenko's elevation to prime minister this week came as part of a major cabinet reshuffle. Former prime minister Denys Shmyhal, Ukraine's longest-serving head of government, moves to the role of defence minister, while other senior cabinet ministers are swapping roles too. Opposition member of parliament Oleksii Goncharenko told the ABC it was all just for show. "Maybe the idea was to show some change, but I don't know to whom," Mr Goncharenko said. "If to Ukrainian people, Ukrainian people are not stupid, and they see that it's the same people. If to foreign partners, they also will see the same people just in a little bit of a different status. So, there is no real change. "Also, the new government did not present any new programs or policies." Ms Musayeva likened the reshuffle to "a rearrangement of old furniture". "But there are some reasons why it takes place right now because there is a lot of negative feedback for the work of the government and for its anti-corruption issues and reforms," she said. "So, it's necessary to do something just to try to change this kind of a negative narrative that is spreading about this government and Zelenskyy's leadership." Mr Goncharenko said the new prime minister needed to prioritise mobilising troops, building the defence industry, and fighting corruption. "The Ukrainian government is effective abroad in diplomacy and that is very good and very important, but it is not effective inside [Ukraine]," Mr Goncharenko said. "There are many questions inside the country, economic, social, rule of law, the fight against corruption, and many, many other things. We have big problems."
SBS Australia
11 hours ago
- SBS Australia
In a $29 billion race for influence, Australia trails China as our allies turn away
China is leading the development race in Southeast Asia as traditional donors like the United States and United Kingdom step away from the region, according to a new Lowy Institute report. The third edition of the Southeast Asia Aid Map shows China increased its regional development spend in 2023 for the first time in three years. "The lack of Western and European money going into Southeast Asia is a real problem," says Grace Stanhope, a research associate at the Lowy Institute. "We're projecting a 20 per cent drop in bilateral foreign aid to the region by 2026." Writing shortly after the 2025 federal election, the Lowy Institute's Grace Stanhope said the re-elected Albanese government would "have to move fast" if it wanted to increase Australia's influence in Southeast Asia. Source: Supplied China favours infrastructure, loans After reducing its annual Southeast Asian development spend by 68 per cent over five years, China boosted its financing in 2023. The regional superpower is still favouring market-rate loans for infrastructure projects, with rail ventures in Indonesia and Malaysia accounting for most of the annual increase. China is on track to overtake traditional partners in infrastructure spending, quadrupling its commitments from 2022 to 2023 through the revival of the Kyaukphyu Deep Sea Port Project in Myanmar. Development spending committed by both China and Australia's traditional partner nations to Southeast Asia has decreased since 2015. Source: SBS News It's the loans to the region's poorest countries — like Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia — that have some concerned. "These countries have far less options in terms of other development providers, and also far higher development needs," says Stanhope. "Increasingly, these countries have little room to manoeuvre in their negotiations." Stanhope warns reduced competition could reduce domestic scrutiny on China's funding. "I think we can expect to see less pressure for reform in terms of China's development finance offering if there are no viable alternatives." Most countries in the Indo-Pacific region have avoided high debt burdens taken on by other developing countries. Globally, a third of developing nations spend more on interest repayments than health each year. "We don't want countries in the Indo Pacific to be heavily indebted," says Melissa Conley Tyler, executive director at the Asia Pacific Development Diplomacy and Defence Dialogue. "That's a huge problem if countries can't provide the services that they need to their citizens because they're paying back debt." Further cuts expected The full impact of aid cuts is yet to be seen in the region. The Lowy Institute says that will result in the "centre of gravity" shifting in Southeast Asian development financing. Source: SBS News Australia's response Australia increased its aid to Southeast Asia in 2023, with Labor committed to raising its international assistance budget annually in line with inflation. Speaking after the ASEAN Leaders Summit earlier this month, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia had "sought to pivot our aid to the [Indo-Pacific] region" in response to recent cuts. "Some 75 cents in every dollar that Australia provides in development assistance is directed to our broader region;" said Wong. "We will continue to prioritise that." Source: SBS News Conley-Tyler says it's critical for Australia to maintain that focus. "If you have a pandemic or animal diseases, if you have climate migration, all of those things are going to matter greatly to Australia," she says. "We would, of course, prefer to live in a region that is secure and stable and prosperous. And so the money we put into things like our development assistance is helping on our national interest in that."
