logo
Not everyone believes Ukraine's new prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko will hold much power

Not everyone believes Ukraine's new prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko will hold much power

It was April 30, and Yulia Svyrydenko had arrived in Washington DC for perhaps the most important meeting of her political career so far — to sign the highly anticipated Ukraine-US critical minerals deal.
Just two months earlier, her country's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, had come to the White House to do it, but was abruptly shown the door after that infamous verbal clash with US President Donald Trump and Vice-President JD Vance.
The US-Ukraine relationship had hit such a low point that many wondered if the Trump administration would walk away from supporting Kyiv's war effort entirely.
But, after weeks of fraught behind-the-scenes negotiations, careful relationship rebuilding, and a hurried face-to-face meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy at the Vatican ahead of Pope Francis's funeral, things were back on track.
Four days after the Vatican meeting, it was up to Ms Svyrydenko, who was then Ukraine's deputy prime minister and economy minister, to lead a delegation to Washington to get the minerals deal done.
Within hours, she had inked the agreement, posed for photographs with the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and was reporting back to Kyiv that the US would help fund Ukraine's reconstruction in exchange for a stake in its vast mineral wealth.
The relationship between the US and Ukraine has been improving ever since.
For her role in bringing the minerals deal back from the brink, as well as her economic credentials and loyalty to Mr Zelenskyy, Ms Svyrydenko has this week been appointed Ukraine's first new prime minister in five years.
A majority in the 450-seat parliament — 262 members — voted for her as part of Mr Zelenskyy's biggest government reshuffle since Russia's invasion began in February 2022.
Ms Svyrydenko, who has risen through the ranks since joining the government in 2019, said it was a "great honour" to lead the government of Ukraine and she pledged to get straight to work.
"War leaves no room for delay. We must act swiftly and decisively," the 39-year-old posted on social media after the vote.
Sevgil Musayeva, the chief editor of leading independent newspaper Ukrainska Pravda, told the ABC that Ms Svyrydenko has been "one of the main faces of the Zelenskyy team" and rumours began swirling last year that she would be in line for the job of PM.
Ms Musayeva said that, as well as the minerals deal, Ms Svyrydenko had also signed important economic and redevelopment agreements for her country at the Ukrainian Recovery Conference in Rome this month, reportedly worth €11 billion ($20 billion).
However, Ms Musayeva added that she believes the real power in Kyiv will remain with Mr Zelenskyy and the head of the presidential office, Andriy Yermak.
"I don't believe that she will actually have any kind of independence … she has no freedom to make important decisions," Ms Musayeva said.
Some opposition politicians have also voiced scepticism about the new government's ability to remain independent of Mr Zelenskyy's administration.
In Ukraine, the president serves as the head of state and is responsible for foreign policy, while the constitution gives the prime minister the power when it comes to domestic policy.
Under previous presidents in pre-war times, prime ministers were not only independent of the president but were often at odds with them.
However, because Mr Zelenskyy's political party, 'Servant of the People', holds a majority in parliament, and while he remains broadly popular, he is more influential.
"From the start of the war, he became a symbol of Ukrainian resistance, and it actually gives him a lot of power and responsibility. He controls the parliament, absolutely," Ms Musayeva said.
Elections in Ukraine are prohibited while the country is under martial law, a principle widely accepted by the people, given the difficulty of staging a vote while millions are displaced and cities are under bombardment and occupation.
But this also means it is difficult for new leaders to emerge.
Ms Svyrydenko's elevation to prime minister this week came as part of a major cabinet reshuffle.
Former prime minister Denys Shmyhal, Ukraine's longest-serving head of government, moves to the role of defence minister, while other senior cabinet ministers are swapping roles too.
Opposition member of parliament Oleksii Goncharenko told the ABC it was all just for show.
"Maybe the idea was to show some change, but I don't know to whom," Mr Goncharenko said.
"If to Ukrainian people, Ukrainian people are not stupid, and they see that it's the same people. If to foreign partners, they also will see the same people just in a little bit of a different status. So, there is no real change.
"Also, the new government did not present any new programs or policies."
Ms Musayeva likened the reshuffle to "a rearrangement of old furniture".
"But there are some reasons why it takes place right now because there is a lot of negative feedback for the work of the government and for its anti-corruption issues and reforms," she said.
"So, it's necessary to do something just to try to change this kind of a negative narrative that is spreading about this government and Zelenskyy's leadership."
Mr Goncharenko said the new prime minister needed to prioritise mobilising troops, building the defence industry, and fighting corruption.
"The Ukrainian government is effective abroad in diplomacy and that is very good and very important, but it is not effective inside [Ukraine]," Mr Goncharenko said.
"There are many questions inside the country, economic, social, rule of law, the fight against corruption, and many, many other things. We have big problems."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ASX rollercoaster: After a major market melt-up, a reckoning looms
ASX rollercoaster: After a major market melt-up, a reckoning looms

West Australian

time44 minutes ago

  • West Australian

ASX rollercoaster: After a major market melt-up, a reckoning looms

The Australian share market has been on something of a tear over the past few months, up 11 per cent since the depths of Donald Trump's Kamikaze tariff attack, cresting at an all-time high Friday. It's an impressive run given the economy is barely limping along, interest rates are only ever so slightly on the way down and the global economy is on tenterhooks. Such lofty heights amid persistent uncertainty suggest this bull run has more to do with FOMO than fundamentals and vis ulnerable to any hint of bad news. How else to explain a drop of as much as 2.9 per cent for our largest bank, CBA, 3.4 per cent nearly and 2.75 for ANZ and NAB? The sell-off has been sheeted home to the Japanese election, where the ruling Liberal Democratic Party lost its majority in the upper house of parliament. It's the first time there hasn't been a governing majority since 1955. Market watchers suggest it could derail Japan's economic trajectory, given its high debt levels. That issue seems a long way from Australian banks, which derive the majority of their revenues from domestic lending. Aussie banks were up 30 per cent for the financial year ended, driven by the 46 per cent gain for Commbank. Australia's largest bank has been seen as something of a safe haven in times of uncertainty, popular with domestic and international investors alike for its strong balance sheet and stable earnings. But the company is not shooting the lights out in terms of growth, meaning investors are pushing up company valuations without worrying if it is being met by associated profits. 'CBA is the extreme version of that. On Friday, it was at record levels, and this is despite several years of falling earnings and significant uncertainty around what may happen internationally with tariffs,' said AMP chief economist Shane Oliver. It might be that the FOMO trade is going elsewhere. While banks were sold, miners were gold, with Rio Tinto up 1.5 per cent, Fortescue 1.35 per cent and South 32 up 4.33 per cent. There may also be a bet building on China. Stronger oil and metals prices in recent weeks have stirred speculation Beijing could unleash new stimulus. The iron ore price hit a four-month high thanks to a Chinese plan to build a hydroelectric dam in Tibet. But the base metal has been on the upward slope for four weeks, not due to further stimulus talks however, but a forced consolidation of the sector. In a market that is on the hunt for good news, investors seem to be ready to bid on any opportunities. 'Maybe the market's stepping that out,' Dr Oliver said, though he cautioned that recent Chinese GDP data didn't support that optimism. 'There was nothing in there suggesting China's going to jump in with a big stimulus. I'm less optimistic than the market on that one.' A higher iron ore price will certainly be welcome for miners, but a lot of the market is still relying on a bump from the Reserve Bank cutting interest rates. While that will be positive for corporates, the market seems very confident. Across the ASX200 the price earnings ratio - a metric that shows how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of a company's profit - is 23 times and well above the long term average of around 17. It is also heading higher, raising questions about whether investors are shovelling money into stocks beyond the bargain hunting in the wake of Trump's Liberation Day tariff announcement. 'Share markets aren't cheap anymore,' Dr Oliver said. 'Maybe they were back in April… but they're not cheap anymore. Valuation measures certainly suggest the market is somewhat expensive.' A similar story is playing out in the US, where the markets have hit new records. That is significantly driven by the dominant tech firms but also in the hope that two key events occur: The US Federal Reserve cuts interest rates, and Trump backs down on tariffs. US markets edged higher on suggestions by one Fed member that rates should be cut, even though Fed chair Powell has indicated no change until the tariff impact can be calculated. The other big hope is the TACO trade. Investors are banking on Trump Always Chickening Out, presuming he will cave in the face of economic fallout. It's a risky strategy, given the still very punitive tariff levies spelled out in recent letters. But the key indicator of market risk, the VIX measure of market volatility, is not much higher than before Trump came to office at 16.41. In April, when tariffs were announced, it spiked above 52. 'That's another indication of the extreme optimism around the TACO trade,' Dr Oliver said. That sets up the current earnings season as a key test of investor confidence. Companies will need to show profit growth that justifies their expanded multiples or risk sharp repricing. While investment firms are banking on those earnings staying benign, early signs suggest company insiders are already wary. According to data from just 10 per cent of corporate officers are buying their own company's stock. That is well below the 10-year average in the high 20s and far off the peaks above 40 per cent recorded in recent years. It leaves investors with quite the dilemma. Sit the current enthusiasm out and miss out on the steady melt up or bank on a combination of factors all working in unison: a tariff climbdown, a Fed rate cut, a Chinese stimulus, and no other destabilising factors. It's heady stuff, and at these levels, markets can easily run out of oxygen.

Victorian members to push Labor over AUKUS deal
Victorian members to push Labor over AUKUS deal

AU Financial Review

timean hour ago

  • AU Financial Review

Victorian members to push Labor over AUKUS deal

Rank-and-file Labor members are preparing to launch a blistering attack on United States president Donald Trump and demand the Albanese government withdraw from the AUKUS pact when the party gathers for its Victorian state conference early next month. It will be the first major Labor conference since the re-election of Anthony Albanese in May and will add to pressure on the government over AUKUS, as it waits on the outcome of a US review.

Russia strikes Ukraine after Kyiv offers fresh talks
Russia strikes Ukraine after Kyiv offers fresh talks

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Russia strikes Ukraine after Kyiv offers fresh talks

67BW7KF Russia fired a volley of drones and missiles at Ukraine early on Monday, hitting apartment blocks and a nursery in Kyiv, days after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky proposed holding a fresh round of peace talks. Moscow has not responded to Zelensky's call for new negotiations this week or an ultimatum by US President Donald Trump to make progress on a peace deal or face massive sanctions. Two people were killed across the country, Zelensky said. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot arrived in the capital, Kyiv, while rescuers were still sifting through the rubble. Zelensky condemned the strikes as an "assault on humanity" and said at least 15 other people had been wounded in the attacks, including a 12-year-old boy. Efforts to reach a diplomatic solution to the three-year war have stalled in recent weeks. The two sides last met for direct negotiations more than a month ago in Istanbul. They did not make any progress towards a ceasefire, instead agreeing to a series of prisoner exchanges. Six districts of Kyiv came under attack on Monday, sparking fires at a supermarket, multiple residential buildings and a nursery, authorities said. An AFP reporter saw damage to multiple buildings, as well as debris and shattered glass on streets. Russia launched 450 drones and missiles in total, according to Ukraine's air force. The strikes also caused damage in the western region of Ivano-Frankivsk and the eastern regions of Kharkiv and Sumy, according to Zelensky. Meanwhile, travel chaos that began during the weekend continued in Russia, as Kyiv targeted Moscow with drones; The attacks forced Vnukovo airport -- a transport hub for the Russian government -- to briefly suspend flights. - Top French diplomat in Kyiv - An entryway to the Lukyanivka metro station in Kyiv was also damaged by the overnight strikes. French foreign minister Barrot condemned the attacks during a visit to the station. "The shelters themselves are no longer entirely safe, as the metro station behind me, which is being used as a shelter for the people of Kyiv, has been targeted," he said. "This comes even as President Zelensky's statement on Saturday morning, that showed Ukraine's willingness to enter into new negotiations with Russia," he added. The European Union agreed on Friday an 18th package of sanctions on Moscow that targeted Russian banks and lowered a price cap on oil exports. Barrot said the sanctions were aimed at increasing the cost of war for Russia to pressure President Vladimir Putin into negotiations. The Kremlin said this month it was ready to continue talks with Ukraine after Trump gave Russia 50 days to strike a peace deal or face sanctions. At talks last month, Russia outlined a list of demands, including calls for Ukraine to cede more territory and to reject all forms of Western military support. Kyiv dismissed them as unacceptable and at the time questioned the point of further negotiations if Moscow was not willing to make concessions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store