
Donald Trump Walks Back on Key Campaign Pledge: Report
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump appears to have walked back on a key campaign pledge he made last year regarding in vitro fertilization (IVF), according to a Sunday report from The Washington Post.
The newspaper reported that the Trump administration has moved away from plans to improve access to the reproductive healthcare policy due to legal constraints.
Newsweek could not verify the report and has contacted the White House outside of normal business hours to comment on this story.
Why It Matters
IVF is a key reproductive treatment for women finding it difficult to become pregnant. The White House previously said that it can cost up to $25,000 per cycle and that 1 in 7 couples struggle to conceive.
Trump made a pledge on the campaign trail to cover IVF for all women and couples seeking it, telling NBC News last August: "Under the Trump administration, we are going to be paying for that treatment. Or we're going to be mandating that the insurance company pay."
Trump also called himself the "fertilization president" at a Women's History Month event in March, promising "tremendous goodies" for women.
What To Know
Upon returning to the White House for a second term earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order on February 18 expanding access to IVF and making it more affordable for patients. The order, which addressed the importance of starting families, also directed agencies to safeguard access to IVF and directed his domestic policy council to submit policy recommendations about IVF by May 19.
The executive order came amid growing legal concerns over reproductive rights in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. That ruling allowed some states to enact abortion bans that, in some cases, threaten access to IVF by defining life as beginning at conception.
It also came amid concerns about falling birth rates in the U.S. The fertility rate is now projected to average 1.6 births per woman over the next three decades, according to the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) latest forecast released this year. That is below the replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman required to maintain a stable population without immigration.
As of August, there have been no further updates from the White House regarding IVF policies.
The Post, citing two people with knowledge of internal discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations, reported that White House officials said they were still interested in expanding IVF but that there were legal constraints with making it an essential health benefit without congressional approval.
Expanding access to IVF would come at odds with Trump and other conservative's opposition to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, the insurance plan that allows access to health care.
The Post reported that White House officials are backing away from proposals discussed internally to mandate IVF coverage for the roughly 50 million people on the Obamacare exchanges.
The first Trump administration tried to repeal the ACA. Using it to cover IVF by making it an "essential health benefit" would require insurers in the marketplace to cover it and would lead insurance companies to raise premium costs, which could hurt the GOP in next year's midterms, the newspaper reported.
Kaylen Silverberg, an outside adviser to the administration, told the Post that the White House had approached him about fertility methods that use holistic health instead of IVF. Silverberg added that officials had asked him about restorative reproductive medicine, a method of treating infertility by improving overall health via lifestyle changes.
Implementing that would fall "very short" of Trump's initial promises, Silverberg told the newspaper.
President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, on August 3 in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, on August 3 in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson
What People Are Saying
Mark Shanahan, who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom, told Newsweek: "On the campaign trail, Trump said what he needed to say in order to win the 2024 presidential election. Being in office is very different. While he has been able to largely fulfil his campaign promises on foreign policy and issues such as immigration and the size of government through Executive Order, mandating IVF availability requires Congressional support, and with tight majorities in both chambers he's clearly decided it's a hill not worth dying on."
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman told the Post: "President Trump pledged to expand access to fertility treatments for Americans who are struggling to start families. The Administration is committed like none before it to using its authorities to deliver on this pledge."
What Happens Next?
Whether the White House unveils policies regarding IVF remains to be seen.
Meanwhile, the administration has put forth other policies regarding reproduction. In the One Big Beautiful Bill, health care providers who carry out abortions and receive more than $800,000 in federal reimbursements are banned from getting Medicaid funding for a year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US axes mRNA vaccine contracts, casting safety doubts
President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday announced it would terminate 22 federal contracts for mRNA-based vaccines, questioning the safety of a technology credited with helping end the Covid pandemic and saving millions of lives. The announcement, made by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., marks his latest effort to weave vaccine skepticism into the core of US government policy. "We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted," Kennedy said in a statement. The health department's Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) is "terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu," he added. "We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate." The changes affect Moderna's mRNA bird flu vaccine -- a move the company itself disclosed in May -- as well as numerous other programs, including "rejection or cancellation of multiple pre-award solicitations" from pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Sanofi. In total, the affected projects are worth "nearly $500 million," the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said. Certain late-stage projects were excluded from the move "to preserve prior taxpayer investment." "Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them," Secretary Kennedy said. "That's why we're moving beyond the limitations of mRNA and investing in better solutions." Since taking office, Kennedy, who spent two decades sowing misinformation around immunization, has overseen a major overhaul of US health policy -- firing, for example, a panel of vaccine experts that advise the government and replacing them with his own appointees. In its first meeting, the new panel promptly voted to ban a longstanding vaccine preservative targeted by the anti-vaccine movement, despite its strong safety record. He has also ordered a sweeping new study on the long-debunked link between vaccines and autism. Unlike traditional vaccines, which often use weakened or inactivated forms of the target virus or bacteria, mRNA shots deliver genetic instructions into the host's cells, prompting them to produce a harmless decoy of the pathogen and train the immune system to fight the real thing. Though in development for decades, mRNA vaccines were propelled from lab benches to widespread use through President Trump's Operation Warp Speed -- a public-private partnership led by BARDA that poured billions into companies to accelerate development. The technology's pioneers, Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman, were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Medicine for their work contributing "to the unprecedented rate of vaccine development during one of the greatest threats to human health in modern times." ia/jgc


Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Says US Close to Trade Deal With China
President Donald Trump's threatened tariffs, which has left officials in New Delhi feeling unsure of how to respond. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has said he is 'getting very close to a deal' with China to extend the trade truce between the two countries. Bloomberg's Swati Pandey and Romy Varghese break down what we know on The Asia Trade. (Source: Bloomberg)


Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What to know as Israel considers reoccupying Gaza in what would be a major escalation of the war
Advertisement The threat to reoccupy Gaza could be a negotiating tactic aimed at pressuring Hamas after talks mediated by the United States, Egypt and Qatar appeared to have broken down last month. Or it could be aimed at shoring up support from Netanyahu's far-right coalition partners. His governing allies have long called for escalating the war, taking over Gaza, relocating much of its population through what they refer to as voluntary emigration and reestablishing Jewish settlements that were dismantled when Israel withdrew in 2005. Whether they prevail will likely depend on the one person with leverage over Israel — President Trump. Asked Tuesday whether he thought Israel should reoccupy Gaza, he said he wasn't aware of the 'suggestion' but that 'it's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' Ground operations in the most densely populated areas To take full control of Gaza, Israel would need to launch ground operations in the last areas of the territory that haven't been flattened and where most of Gaza's 2 million Palestinians have sought refuge. Advertisement That would mean going into the central city of Deir al-Balah and Muwasi, a so-called humanitarian zone where hundreds of thousands of people live in squalid tent camps along the coast. Such operations would force another wave of mass displacement and further disrupt aid deliveries as the U.N. agencies and humanitarian organizations are already struggling to avert famine. Palestinians struggled to get donated food at a community kitchen in Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip, on Monday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Israel already controls around 75% of the territory, which has been declared a buffer zone or placed under evacuation orders. With Israel also largely sealing Gaza's borders, it's unclear where civilians would go. Related : It would also pose a major risk for the remaining 20 or so living hostages, likely held in tunnels or other secret locations. Hamas is believed to have ordered its guards to kill captives if Israeli forces approach. Hamas-led militants abducted 251 hostages in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that ignited the war and killed around 1,200 people that day, mostly civilians. They are still holding 50 hostages, less than half of them believed to be alive, and recent videos have shown emaciated captives pleading for their lives. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were civilians or combatants. The ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and run by medical professionals, is seen by the United Nations and other experts as the most reliable source on casualties. Israel disputes its toll but has not provided its own. International outrage and further isolation Israel's wartime conduct has shocked much of the international community, and prompted even close Western allies to call for an end to the war and to take steps to recognize Palestinian statehood. Advertisement The International Court of Justice is considering allegations of genocide, and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense minister, alleging war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the use of starvation as a method of war. Related : Israel has rejected the allegations and accused those making them of antisemitic 'blood libel.' It says it has taken every effort to avoid harming civilians and blames Hamas for their deaths because the militants are deeply entrenched in heavily populated areas. Israel has said it will keep fighting until all the hostages are returned, Hamas is defeated or disarmed, and Gaza's population is given the option of 'voluntary emigration,' which the Palestinians and much of the international community view as forcible expulsion. People take part in a protest outside the US Embassy in Tel Aviv demanding the end of the war, the release of hostages held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, on July 26. Mahmoud Illean/Associated Press Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in return for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. It says it is willing to give up power but will not lay down its arms as long as Israel occupies territories the Palestinians want for a future state. Another open-ended occupation Israel captured Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem in the 1967 Middle East war. The United Nations, the Palestinians and others continued to view Gaza as occupied territory after the 2005 withdrawal of Israeli troops and settlers, as Israel maintained control of its airspace, coastline, most of its land border and its population registry. The full reoccupation of Gaza would pose long-term challenges that Israel is well aware of given its long history of occupying Arab lands, including the likelihood of a prolonged insurgency. Israeli support for the war already appears to have declined since Netanyahu ended a ceasefire in March, as soldiers have been killed in hit-and-run attacks. Advertisement As an occupying power, Israel would be expected to maintain order and ensure the basic needs of the population are met. In the West Bank, it has largely outsourced that to the Palestinian Authority, which exercises limited autonomy in population centers. But in Gaza, Netanyahu has ruled out any future role for the PA, accusing it of not being fully committed to peace, and has not produced any plan for Gaza's postwar governance and reconstruction. Long-term repercussions Even if Israel succeeds in suppressing Hamas, the reoccupation of Gaza could pose an even more profound threat to the country. It would leave Israel in full control of the territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, which is home to around 7 million Jews and 7 million Palestinians — most of the latter denied basic rights, including the vote. Even before the war, major human rights groups said the situation amounted to apartheid, something Israel vehemently denies. A tent camp for displaced Palestinians stretches along Gaza City, on Sunday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Unless large numbers of Palestinians are expelled — no longer merely a fantasy of Israel's far-right — Israel would face an all-too-familiar existential dilemma: Create a Palestinian state in the 1967 territories and preserve Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, or rule over millions of Palestinians indefinitely and hope they never rally behind the idea of equal rights in a binational state. Israel would no longer be able to point to Hamas' rule in Gaza, or factional divisions among Palestinians, as reasons to avoid such a reckoning. And when Trump leaves office, it may find it has few friends to back it up. Advertisement