logo
Pa. Congressman Dwight Evans won't seek reelection in 2026, announces plans to retire

Pa. Congressman Dwight Evans won't seek reelection in 2026, announces plans to retire

Yahoo5 days ago
U.S. Rep. Dwight Evans (D-3rd District)
U.S. Rep. Dwight Evans (D-3rd District) announced on Monday that he will not run for reelection in 2026.
'After some discussions this weekend and thoughtful reflection, I have decided that the time is right to announce that I will not be seeking re-election in 2026,' he said. 'Serving the people of Philadelphia has been the honor of my life. I am deeply proud of what I have been able to accomplish over my 45 years in elected office — from revitalizing neighborhoods block by block to fighting for justice, economic opportunity, investments in infrastructure and education.'
'I cannot express the gratitude that I have for the trust that voters put in me as their voice in both state and federal office,' he added. 'It has been a privilege of a lifetime to serve as their advocate in government.'
In May 2024, Evans suffered a stroke and did not vote for several months during his recovery. He was reelected to another term last year. In his statement, Evans said that he is in 'good health and fully capable of continuing to serve.' He intends to serve the remainder of his current term that ends on Jan. 3, 2027.
Evans career in elected office spans several decades. He served in Pennsylvania's General Assembly for multiple decades before he defeated indicted incumbent Congressman Chaka Fattah in the Democratic Party primary in 2016 to win a seat in the U.S. House.
He has cruised to reelection four times and represents a safe Democratic district, according to national ratings outlets.
Evans is a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, where he serves on the Subcommittees on Health, and Worker and Family Support.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reported in December that multiple Democrats would be interested in running for the seat, if Evans decided to not seek reelection in 2026. A few confirmed interest in the seat following Evans announcement. Earlier this year, Evans' first quarter fundraising total, was the lowest in the state's congressional delegation.
State Sen. Sharif Street, who also serves as the chairman of the state's Democratic Party, said 'We'll be filing paperwork tomorrow that will answer that question.'
State Rep. Chris Rabb (D-Philadelphia) previously set up an exploratory committee for the seat in October 2023, but decided against challenging Evans.
'I had no intention of running against the congressman, but now that he has announced that he's not running for re-election. I'm seriously considering it,' Rabb told the Capital-Star on Monday.
State Rep. Morgan Cephas, who serves as the chair of the Philadelphia caucus in the state House, told POLITICO on Monday that 'me and my team are strongly considering a bid.'
Dave Oxman, a physician, and Robin Toldens, who the Inquirer reports is a former city government employee and real estate agent, are both Democrats who have already filed to run for Pennsylvania's 3rd Congressional District
Peter Hall and Ian Karbal contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tax breaks and spending cuts: Here are the winners and losers in Trump's big bill
Tax breaks and spending cuts: Here are the winners and losers in Trump's big bill

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tax breaks and spending cuts: Here are the winners and losers in Trump's big bill

There are major changes coming for Americans' finances, after the House of Representatives passed a landmark tax and spending bill at the center of President Donald Trump's domestic agenda. House Republicans passed the legislation Thursday in a 218-214 vote along party lines. The Senate passed it in a 51-50 vote two days earlier. Trump's signature, which came Friday, was the last thing needed to usher in the changes that many people will start seeing early next year. Now that the megabill has passed, expect a ton of short-term debt to be sold to finance the government's deficit 'I'm single': At 70, I have $500,000 in stocks and $220,000 in savings. How do I invest my $130,000 windfall? 'Today is my 61st birthday': I have my ex-spouse's Social Security benefits. Should I retire at 65 and travel? 'I do all the yard work, cooking and cleaning': I live with my daughter and her lazy boyfriend. She wants me to buy her house. Do I say yes? My wife and I are in our late 60s. Do I sell stocks to pay our $30,000 credit-card debt — or do it gradually over 3 years? The bill is permanently etching lower income-tax rates into the tax code and averting a widespread 2026 tax hike, when the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term were supposed to expire. But the bill is about more than tax cuts, and its myriad provisions mean that some Americans will benefit from the legislation while others will lose out. For a law Trump calls the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' the beauty may be in the eye of the beholder. For example, millions of Americans are poised to receive tax cuts — but richer Americans are more likely to see bigger tax savings. There are new tax breaks geared at low- and moderate-income households, but also spending cuts that could make it harder for some to receive public assistance or hold onto health insurance. Homeowners win, so long as they live in areas where they can put a more generous write-off to good use. Car buyers win too, depending on the vehicle they are getting. 'The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers for the American people,' Republican Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a predawn floor speech. 'This is the largest tax cut for working families, farmers and small businesses in U.S. history.' But House Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries railed against 'this one big, ugly bill,' recounting the stories of people across the country who talked about the necessity of their Medicaid health insurance — and their fears of losing the coverage. The bill is 'the largest cut to health care in American history,' he said in his marathon remarks. In promoting the bill, the White House and Republican leaders emphasized the wins for everyday Americans. The widely-used standard deduction is becoming more generous, along with the child tax credit. There are new deductions for tips, overtime and other expenses that will add to the ways many Americans can cut their taxable income. The full force of taxes and predicted economic growth would boost annual take-home pay up to roughly $10,000 for a family with two kids, according to the White House. But there's also the value of provisions like a permanently higher estate tax, generous business expensing and partnership accounting rules that all help richer taxpayers. Outside models agree the majority of taxpayers are getting tax cuts when the tax provisions are tallied up. Yet those estimates show that the higher up the income ladder, the better those cuts look. That's both in dollar value and as a share of after-tax income. Estimates from the Tax Foundation, the Tax Policy Center and the Penn Wharton Budget Model show the pattern, each comparing the bill to what would happen if the 2017 tax law expired. In the Tax Policy Center numbers, a household making between roughly $67,000 and almost $120,000 a year would be getting a $1,780 tax cut next year, a 2.3% addition to their after-tax income. The top 20% of households, in a band that starts with households making nearly $220,000 and soars to multimillionaires, get an average $12,500 tax cut. That's a 3.4% increase in their after-tax income. The Penn Wharton Budget Model takes into account the effects of stricter rules for Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — two programs geared at low-income households — in determining how the bill would affect Americans' incomes. In 2027, a household making less than $18,000 would lose $165 and a household making less than $51,000 would gain $30. By 2030, when temporary deductions go away, households in these income bands would be projected to lose more than $1,000. For the top band of households, 2027 increases in after-tax income range from nearly $6,700 to over $300,000, Penn Wharton researchers said. The nation's 4 million tipped workers are getting a deduction worth up to $25,000 in a win for hairdressers, bartenders and waiters, among others. Workers who rely on tips could save an average of $1,700 per year, according to the White House Council of Economic Advisers. The tax break runs from 2025 from 2028, meaning people could start taking the deduction on the 2025 taxes they file next tax season. The question is how many tipped workers will use the tax break, according to the Yale Budget Lab. More than a third of the nation's workers relying on tips had incomes so low, they didn't have to file an income-tax return in 2022, while only 4% of workers earning less than $25 an hour received tips. The break on overtime could save workers between $1,400 and $1,750 per year, the White House Council of Economic Advisers said last month. It runs from 2025 to 2028. Workers who earn regular overtime pay, like nurses, firefighters and construction workers, also stand to benefit from the bill's tax provisions. It's a sliver of the workforce, with 8% of hourly workers and 4% of salaried workers conceivably qualifying for the deduction, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Car buyers will gain a deduction up to $10,000 on their auto loans, applying to the interest paid on loans for new vehicles assembled in the U.S. The average buyer paid $1,332 on auto-loan interest charges in 2024, according to AAA. The tax break is available for loans through 2028, but it's limited to new cars. It's expensive buying a new car, with the average final price at $48,799 in May, according to Cox Automotive. So the question is how many people take up the offer of a tax break? A new-vehicle buyer's income averaged $115,000 in 2023, Cox Automotive data said. Other research suggests a six-figure salary is necessary to afford a new car. Homeowners are getting more firepower to write off their state income taxes and local property taxes. After much wrangling, the state and local tax (SALT) deduction is going to at least $40,000. It will drift higher with inflation through 2029 before tumbling back to $10,000 in 2030. The quadrupled deduction is a win for people living in areas with high state income taxes and big property-tax bills. Critics say that's a giveaway putting other homeowners at a disadvantage if they live in states with lower tax bills. People ages 65 and up are getting a $6,000 deduction, in a nod to Trump's campaign pledge to end taxes on Social Security benefits. The tax break coming to seniors technically isn't excluding their benefit money from taxes, due to the budget rules lawmakers had to follow. But the White House says the deduction zaps out the tax differently. The deduction will exceed taxable Social Security benefits for 88% of recipients. The deduction will reach 51.4 million beneficiaries, according to the Council of Economic Advisers. It's a major break for older Americans living on fixed incomes. Coupled with a standard deduction that's already enhanced for seniors, deductions would total $23,750 for single filers and $46,700 for married couples. It's a short-term win with a tax break that runs from 2025 to 2028. But the bill creates indirect problems for retirees, according to critics. Less tax revenue coming into Social Security and Medicare trust funds will speed up insolvency, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Starting in 2034, Social Security trust funds will hit a shortfall and pay 81% of the promised benefit, according to the latest official projections. Social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are getting tighter eligibility rules and more verification requirements. More SNAP administrative costs are getting pushed onto states and new limits are coming for the ways states generate the fund to pay their side of Medicaid. A tax-credit boost is going away for people getting their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act exchange. Almost 12 million more people will be without health insurance by 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's tally of the bill. An earlier CBO estimate put the number at 16 million. Democrat criticism is a scare tactic, Republican leaders say. No one who really needs public assistance will lose it, they say, and work requirements are worth adding to promote work and prevent benefit misuse, they say. Still, the Medicaid changes and their possible fallout have been enough to concern some GOP members. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against the bill due to parts of the Medicaid changes. A reporter asked Trump on Tuesday about the CBO's estimate of nearly 12 million people losing health insurance. The amount of people falling off Medicaid would be smaller and that amount would be targeting Medicaid's waste, fraud and abuse, he said. Medicaid is also the country's biggest payer for long-term care including nursing homes, according to the AARP. Tighter funding may have implications on nursing home access and staffing levels, according to KFF. But the White House says Medicaid without waste, fraud and abuse can better serve the populations it's supposed to help, including low-income seniors. The bill's other main flash point was its price. The bill raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, coming at a time when national debt exceeds $36 trillion. Deficit critics on Capitol Hill slammed the bill. So did Elon Musk. Consumers who need financing may lose out with the national debt worries. Lenders use Treasury yields to help determine interest rates for mortgages, car loans and more. For example, the rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage tends to follow the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y. A bond's price and its yield move in opposite directions. If the Treasury Department issues more debt to finance government operations and buyers aren't willing to buy as much, that would lower the price of government debt and raise its yields — which would raise consumer borrowing costs. The bond market has been watching the bill's twists and turns, said Lawrence Gillum, LPL Financial's chief fixed-income strategist. Though investors are expecting higher deficits, Gillum said their reaction will depend on how big those deficits go. The one thing Gillum can say with some certainty 'is that interest rates are not going to go down because of this bill.' An excise tax on private university endowments is becoming steeper. The excise tax tops out at 8% for universities with a per-student endowment value of $2 million or more, but constitutes a significant increase from the current, flat rate of 1.4%. That's likely a hit to schools, including those in the Ivy League — like Harvard University. Schools will have less money for research and financial-aid packages, said Steven Bloom, assistant vice president of government relations with the American Council on Education. 'Students will lose out in that,' he said. The bill is also set to overhaul the way students repay their federal student loans. Among other things, it's scrapping many repayment plans and going with two ways borrowers can repay their debts. The bill does have some help for borrowers repaying their loans. Workers don't have to count it for tax purposes when their employers paid up to $5,250 on these bills. The bill makes the tax break permanent. The legislation is tough news for Americans who want to buy electric vehicles. The bill eliminates a $7,500 tax credit for the purchase or lease of new EVs, as well as a $4,000 credit for used EVs. Those are just some of the clean-energy tax breaks fading fast under the legislation. 'Renewable energy is the big loser, set to lose hundreds of billions in Biden-era subsidies, while most companies that spent 2025 playing defense on taxes walked away mostly unscathed,' John Gimigliano of KPMG. Now, would-be EV buyers have to step on it if they want the tax code to help defray their costs. The credits on new and used EVs are good through Sept. 30. What personal-finance issues would you like to see covered in MarketWatch? We would like to hear from readers about their financial decisions and money-related questions. You can fill out or write to us at . A reporter may be in touch to learn more. MarketWatch will not attribute your answers to you by name without your permission. My wife and I have $7,000 a month in pensions and Social Security, plus $140,000 cash. Can we afford to retire? 'Finance makes me break out in hives': I inherited $240K from my parents. Do I pay off my $258K mortgage and give up my job? The Dow and Russell 2000 are joining the stock market's party. Is it a game changer for the bulls? My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum — or $355 a month for life? I'm a stay-at-home mom. Do I take a part-time job to spend more time with my kids — or get a job for six figures? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Grok uses climate change stats to explain Karoline Leavitt's post about Texas floods
Grok uses climate change stats to explain Karoline Leavitt's post about Texas floods

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Grok uses climate change stats to explain Karoline Leavitt's post about Texas floods

Grok, Elon Musk's artificial intelligence bot on X, summarized a post from the White House Press Secretary about the devastating Texas floods, providing information on how global warming increases the likelihood of extreme weather. On Saturday, Karoline Leavitt re-posted a Truth Social message from President Donald Trump acknowledging the intense flooding that has killed at least 32 people and informing the public that the administration is working with local Texas officials to assist. When asked to summarize the post, Grok said Trump was referencing the tragic July 4 flooding event in Texas but then provided some background information on how climate change is making flooding worse. 'Climate models from the IPCC and NOAA suggest that ignoring climate change could intensify such flooding events in Texas, as warmer air holds more moisture, with peer-reviewed studies (e.g., Trenberth et al., 2018) indicating a 7% increase in atmospheric water vapor per 1°C warming, potentially exacerbating future disasters,' Grok summarized. Since January, the Trump administration has drastically rolled back climate regulations, cut research funding, and essentially eliminated climate programs. Trump has called climate change a 'hoax' and downplayed concerns about severe weather becoming more common and deadly despite science showing otherwise. The administration has made cuts to the National Weather Service, the government agency responsible for monitoring weather events, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the agency tasked with coordinating disaster response and administering recovery efforts. Both NWS and FEMA play major roles in warning people of inclement weather, coordinating a response, and delivering relief to those in need. Yet, Trump has characterized FEMA as an unnecessary federal resource intervening in state-level issues. 'A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor,' Trump said last month. The administration also made cuts to the NWS, which led to the departure of nearly 600 employees – hundreds of whom are critical in monitoring weather and issuing warnings to residents. While the agency is hiring new staff to 'stabilize' itself, former NWS directors warned that cutting staff could understaff offices so much so that 'there will be a needless loss of life.' Further cuts to programs that monitor climate and weather patterns, such as the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which produces congressionally mandated reports on how climate change is affecting life, could hinder preparations for extreme weather. Texas officials said, over the weekend, they were unprepared for the amount of rain that flooded nearby rivers and created lethal flash flooding overnight.

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) Could Benefit From Shifting Power Sources, Says Jim Cramer
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) Could Benefit From Shifting Power Sources, Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) Could Benefit From Shifting Power Sources, Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is a former General Electric business that has prospered on the stock market in today's AI wave. This is because of the firm's exposure to nuclear energy as it manufactures turbines and other equipment. GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) is one of Cramer's top nuclear power stocks. The CNBC host is typically dismissive of nuclear energy stocks as he believes that the returns from nuclear power projects typically take years to materialize. In his recent remarks, Cramer discussed by GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV)'s shares recently soared: 'And then GE Vernova. Which you know yesterday there was an article in the Times about how windmills are going to get hurt in the Republican bill. GE Vernova was up nine again. A lot of it has to do parts where they're made and they're fabled for making American stuff. I would think that if you banned Chinese parts or you make them pay, that people would be willing to, that they might shift from one kind of power to another. But wind power is very very cheap.' Later, Cramer discussed how GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEV) can benefit from President Trump's trade discussions: 'Second, as Vernova CEO, Scott Strazik told us when he came on the show in late April, his company could see some real benefits from trade tensions. Just like Boeing's planes, GE Vernova's turbines are big-ticket items. They cost tens of millions of dollars each. People say they're about $50 million on average. The Trump administration wants a lot of countries to reduce their trade surpluses with the United States, and buying a bunch of natural gas turbines is an easy way to make that happen. I've liked GE Vernova since before it was spun out of GE, and I see no reason to turn bearish now. Sure, the stock's expensive, trading at roughly 72 times this year's earnings estimates, which is why a couple of analysts have downgraded it, from Buy to Hold in recent weeks. But the scale of the opportunities is enormous, and the story seems almost tailor-made for this moment. Look, over time, I bet GE Vernova can continue to grind higher. Count me as a buyer for the trust.' While we acknowledge the potential of GEV as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store