RAF board dissolved amid scandal and leadership failures
In a statement, the Department of Transport confirmed that the decision followed escalating governance failures, ranging from reckless decision-making to boardroom infighting, and the inability to fill critical executive positions – all of which have severely undermined the RAF's ability to function effectively. Wasteful legal battles : The RAF spent millions on protracted court disputes, particularly around accounting standards.
: The RAF spent millions on protracted court disputes, particularly around accounting standards. Leadership instability : The board's handling of suspended CEO Collins Letsoalo drew legal challenges and worsened internal divisions.
: The board's handling of suspended CEO drew legal challenges and worsened internal divisions. Ballooning debt : Default judgments and unpaid claims have deepened the RAF's financial crisis.
: Default judgments and unpaid claims have deepened the RAF's financial crisis. Power struggles : Crucial decisions were passed by narrow votes rather than board consensus.
: Crucial decisions were passed by narrow votes rather than board consensus. Unfilled vacancies: Strategic roles like Chief Claims Officer and Head of Legal remained empty for months.
'This has resulted in a loss of confidence in the board's ability to run the entity effectively,' said Minister Creecy.
To avoid a leadership vacuum, the Department of Transport has asked the National Treasury to appoint an interim Accounting Authority.
A new board will be established through a transparent recruitment process, while an expert panel will conduct a full review of the RAF's operations.
The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) may also expand its existing corruption investigation to include recent controversies under the outgoing board.
Creecy reiterated her commitment to pushing forward the Road Accident Benefit Scheme Bill, aimed at simplifying the claims process under a no-fault system, which could revolutionize how victims receive compensation.
As trust in the RAF hits rock bottom, many see this as a much-needed reset.
However, analysts warn that the real test will be whether new leadership can deliver accountability, efficiency, and transparency to an institution crucial to the lives of road crash victims.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
The price of going viral – when political activism becomes very expensive
In an age where a single WhatsApp message can mobilise protesters and a Facebook post can shape public opinion about workplace disputes, the traditional boundaries between political activism and trade union representation are blurring in ways that would have been unimaginable a generation ago. The recent labour court judgment in Boomerang Fruits (Pty) Ltd v Umkhonto weSizwe and Others offers a stark reminder that these boundaries exist for good reasons and that crossing them can have serious legal consequences – particularly when amplified through digital platforms that can transform minor workplace grievances into viral political campaigns. From payroll error to digital political theatre The case began with a seemingly mundane payroll error. Agricultural workers at a fruit farm in Elgin in the Western Cape were underpaid overtime wages ranging from R120 to R176 per person – hardly the stuff of revolutionary politics. Yet within days, this minor administrative mistake had escalated into a full-blown industrial dispute involving police escorts, highway blockades, criminal charges and a sophisticated digital media campaign that branded the employer across multiple online platforms as racist and colonial. The transformation was breathtakingly swift. What might once have taken weeks of careful union organisation now unfolded in real time across social media networks. The Umkhonto weSizwe party (MK) didn't simply insert itself into the dispute – it digitally amplified it, using Facebook posts, press releases and WhatsApp groups to craft a narrative that reached far beyond the farm gates of the Western Cape. The digital disruption of industrial relations The involvement of the MK party demonstrates how political parties have learned to exploit the digital revolution in ways that fundamentally challenge traditional industrial relations. When employees contacted the party for assistance, the MK party didn't simply offer advice or direct workers to appropriate legal channels. Instead, it created a parallel digital infrastructure that bypassed established negotiation mechanisms entirely. The party's WhatsApp communications coordinated meetings with management, its Facebook posts generated public sympathy for workers, and its press releases shaped media coverage – all while maintaining the pretence of merely providing 'advisory' support. This digital orchestration allowed the MK party to function as a shadow trade union while avoiding the legal responsibilities that formal representation would entail. Judge Robert Lagrange's judgment methodically dissected this digital strategy, concluding that the MK party had 'consistently assumed the role of the representative of the strikers' while simultaneously 'launching a media attack on Boomerang, portraying it in villainous terms'. The court recognised that in the digital age, representation isn't just about formal negotiations – it's about controlling the narrative that shapes public perception and influences the balance of power. The legal principle at stake is both simple and profound, but its application has become infinitely more complex in the digital era. South Africa's industrial relations system was designed for an analogue world where disputes unfolded in board rooms and on factory floors, not on social media platforms where every statement can be screenshot, shared and weaponised. The social media amplification effect The court's analysis of the MK party's digital campaign reveals how social media has fundamentally altered the dynamics of labour disputes. Traditional negotiation assumes a degree of privacy that allows parties to make concessions without losing face publicly. Digital platforms destroy this privacy, creating performative pressures that make compromise virtually impossible. The MK party's Facebook posts describing the company as a 'colonial nest' and 'active site of colonial exploitation' weren't just political rhetoric – they were strategic digital content designed to generate shares, comments and viral engagement. The party understood that in the attention economy, inflammatory language performs better than nuanced analysis. The result was a digital firestorm that bore little resemblance to the original overtime payment dispute. WhatsApp democracy and workplace organising Perhaps most significantly, the case highlights how WhatsApp has become a significant organising tool for both legitimate trade union activity and political interference. The MK party's use of WhatsApp groups to coordinate with workers, arrange meetings and distribute talking points created an informal, but highly effective communication network that traditional employers and unions struggle to understand or counter. This 'WhatsApp democracy' operates outside formal industrial relations structures, creating new possibilities for worker organisation, but also new vulnerabilities to political manipulation. The platform's end-to-end encryption makes it nearly impossible for employers to understand how disputes are being coordinated, while its group messaging functionality allows political parties to influence large numbers of workers simultaneously. The judgment also reveals how digital platforms have created expectations of real-time transparency that clash with the traditionally private nature of labour negotiations. The MK party's social media strategy assumed that followers expected constant updates, behind-the-scenes content and immediate responses to developments. This digital transparency imperative makes the patient, confidential work of genuine dispute resolution nearly impossible. When every negotiation session can be livestreamed, every concession can be immediately scrutinised by online audiences, and every statement can be taken out of context and shared widely, the incentives shift dramatically towards performative confrontation rather than problem-solving. Political parties, with their natural understanding of digital engagement, are far better positioned to exploit these dynamics than traditional trade unions or employers. Digital accountability and legal consequences Judge Lagrange's decision to confirm the interdict against the MK party represents one of the first serious judicial attempts to grapple with how digital platforms are reshaping labour relations. The court recognised that social media posts and WhatsApp messages aren't just commentary – they constitute active participation in labour disputes with real legal consequences. The costs order against the MK party is particularly significant in the digital context. By requiring the party to pay the employer's legal costs, the court has established that viral social media campaigns carry financial risks. This digital accountability principle could fundamentally alter how political parties approach online labour activism. The broader implications extend far beyond this single case. Digital platforms don't just amplify existing power dynamics – they create entirely new ones. Political parties that master social media engagement can mobilise workers more effectively than traditional trade unions, but they lack the institutional knowledge and legal obligations that make genuine representation possible. The result is what might be called 'algorithm activism' – political engagement optimised for digital metrics rather than real-world outcomes. The MK party's campaign generated thousands of shares and comments, but it ultimately prolonged the dispute and harmed the workers it claimed to represent. The digital medium had become the message, drowning out the substance of legitimate workplace grievances. Towards digital industrial relations As South Africa grapples with persistent inequality and workplace exploitation, the intersection of digital technology and labour relations will only become more complex. The Boomerang Fruits case provides a crucial precedent for how courts might approach political parties that use social media to blur the lines between advocacy and representation. The challenge ahead is developing industrial relations frameworks that can harness the democratising potential of digital platforms while preventing their exploitation by political opportunists. This will require new forms of digital literacy among trade unionists, employers and judges, as well as clearer legal guidelines about what constitutes impermissible political interference in the social media age. The labour court's firm stance in this case demonstrates that legal principles can adapt to technological change, but only if we remain vigilant about protecting the institutional boundaries that make effective labour relations possible.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Gayton's family diamond mine plummets: 'No longer profitable'
Gayton McKenzie's diamond mine business – now managed by his son Calvin Le John – has reportedly taken a turn for the worse as prices have plummeted and the demand is at an all-time low. The Minister of Sport, Art, and Culture's son made the revelation in his first interview last week. In it, he discussed his acquisition of PSL club Siwelele FC, previously SuperSport United, for R50 million. The transaction was funded by selling shares to the mines. Since being sworn in as minister, Gayton has transferred all his businesses into his firstborn's name. According to Calvin Le John, Gayton McKenzie made most of his fortune from his slate and diamond mine business. Speaking to Robert Marawa, the Minister's firstborn revealed that Siwelele FC was bought after shares in the diamond mine were sold to a consortium for R90 million. However, Le John claimed that the business was no longer profitable. He said, 'Lab diamonds are now a big factor in the industry. I'm trying to divest as quickly as I can because I see a storm coming. Gayton McKenzie's son Calvin Le John reveals how he sold shares to the family's diamond mines. Images via 947/ X: @gaytonmck 'Diamond prices are at it lowest in years. It's circumstances that we're dealing with . There are a lot of diamond miners that have left the country. Diamond miners are literally living hand to mouth'. After his prison release over an armed robbery sentence, Gayton McKenzie worked as a consultant at various gold and diamond mines. With the help of a mentor, he founded his own mine – Central Rand Gold Mine – with pal and political party right-hand man, Kenny Kunene. He later owned gold, diamond, and slate mines in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Before handing over the reins to his son, Gayton McKenzie had multiple businesses in the entertainment, transport, publishing, mining, and property sectors. According to Parliament's 2025 Register of Members' Interests, Gayton was the director of several businesses, which he claims he has since deregistered from. They include the Taboo Tradio group of nightclubs and entertainment, ZAR Productions in the film and television industry, record label Nu Money Records, and an investment holdings company called Hustler's Empire. He also had his fingers in the pie of logistics, solar trading, microbreweries, ICT, and health and wellness enterprises. He said in a recent Facebook Live: 'We are a fairly wealthy family. My son [Calvin Le John] took over the ownership of all the family businesses before I was appointed as a minister. As ministers, we are not allowed to be involved in any private business. '… All our family businesses have been given to him. He grew up in money'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Commitment to 'clean governance' sees national Transport department achieve audit milestone
Transport Minister Barbara Creecy has welcomed the clean audit the national Transport Department received from the Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA). Image: GCIS The Department of Transport has received a clean audit from the Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA) for the 2024/25 financial year, the first in the department's 31-year history. Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy and Deputy Minister Mkhuleko Hlengwa welcomed the outcome and said it marked a significant shift towards sound governance. 'This is a step in the right direction towards a fully accountable and clean administration,' they said in a joint statement issued on Sunday. According to the AGSA's report, the department submitted its Annual Financial Statements (AFS) on time and without any material misstatements. Furthermore, the Auditor-General did not find any significant deficiencies in the department's financial management processes and noted that there were no findings on the completeness of the performance indicators used for planning and reporting. Creecy and Hlengwa attributed the result to 'the department's commitment to clean governance and accountability,' adding that the department's leadership had taken internal assurance processes seriously. They emphasised that management had ensured that 'assurance providers are appropriately resourced and capacitated,' and had responded positively to audit recommendations by addressing concerns 'timeously, through effective audit action plans.' The department also credited its proactive engagement with the Auditor-General's office, noting that preparing for the audit process in advance had ensured 'smooth seamless execution.' The ministers said the clean audit outcome was a result of 'a combined effort and assurance practice from all functions within the department, from Management efforts to Risk Management, Internal Audit, and oversight Committees – especially the Audit Committee.' They also acknowledged the Transport Portfolio Committee in Parliament, which they said had played a key oversight role. 'The role of the Transport Portfolio Committee ensured that the Department is accountable to Parliament,' the statement read. The AGSA's clean audit opinion is based on an assessment of financial statements, internal controls, and performance information, and is seen as a benchmark of good governance in the public sector. The Department of Transport's clean audit follows years of public concern over irregular expenditure and audit disclaimers in various state entities, with Creecy and Hlengwa positioning the result as evidence of institutional reform within the department. THE MERCURY
