logo
Greenpeace must pay $660m to oil company over pipeline protests, jury says

Greenpeace must pay $660m to oil company over pipeline protests, jury says

Al Jazeera20-03-2025
A jury in the United States has ordered Greenpeace to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in damages in a defamation lawsuit brought by oil pipeline operator Energy Transfer, raising serious free speech concerns.
The environmental advocacy group has said it will appeal Wednesday's verdict, which came almost a decade after activists joined a protest led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe against the Dakota Access Pipeline, in one of the largest anti-fossil fuel protests in US history.
The jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660m in damages across three Greenpeace entities, citing charges including trespass, nuisance, conspiracy and deprivation of property access.
Energy Transfer, a Texas-based company worth $64bn, celebrated the verdict and has denied attempting to stifle speech.
'We would like to thank the judge and the jury for the incredible amount of time and effort they dedicated to this trial,' the company said in a statement.
'While we are pleased that Greenpeace will be held accountable for their actions, this win is really for the people of Mandan and throughout North Dakota who had to live through the daily harassment and disruptions caused by the protesters who were funded and trained by Greenpeace.'
The nine-person jury in Mandan, North Dakota, deliberated for two days, in the trial which began in late February, before finding in favour of Energy Transfer on most counts.
However, a group of lawyers who monitored the case, calling themselves the Trial Monitoring Committee, said many of the jurors had ties to the fossil fuel industry.
'Most jurors in the case have ties to the oil and gas industry and some openly admitted they could not be impartial, although the judge seated them anyway,' the committee said in a statement, following jury selection.
Greenpeace plans to appeal the verdict. Greenpeace International is also countersuing Energy Transfer in the Netherlands, accusing the company of using nuisance lawsuits to suppress dissent. A hearing in that case is set for July 2.
'The fight against Big Oil is not over today,' said Greenpeace International General Counsel Kristin Casper.
'We know that the law and the truth are on our side.'
The 'water protectors' of Standing Rock
Energy Transfer's case against Greenpeace dates back to protests in North Dakota almost 10 years ago.
In April 2016, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe set up a protest camp along the proposed Dakota Access Pipeline route to stop construction, calling themselves 'water protectors'.
The camp continued for more than a year, drawing support at first from other Indigenous people around the country and later from other activists, including environmental organisations like Greenpeace, and even hundreds of US Army veterans.
Even as wintry conditions set in and hundreds of police patrolled the protests with waves of violent arrests which also targeted journalists, the Sioux and their supporters remained in place.
According to Energy Transfer's lead lawyer Trey Cox's closing arguments, Greenpeace's role involved 'exploiting' the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to advance its anti-fossil fuel agenda, according to the North Dakota Monitor.
But Greenpeace maintains that it played only a small and peaceful role in the movement, which, it says, was led by Native Americans.
As one Lakota organiser, Nick Tilsen, testified during the trial, the idea that Greenpeace organised the protests is 'paternalistic', according to the Lakota Times.
Despite the protests, the pipeline, designed to transport fracked crude oil to refineries and on to global markets, became operational in 2017.
Energy Transfer, however, continued its legal pursuit of Greenpeace, initially seeking $300m in damages through a federal lawsuit, which was dismissed.
It then shifted its legal strategy to North Dakota's state courts, one of the minority of US states without protections against so-called 'Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation' (SLAPP).
'Drill, baby drill'
Wednesday's verdict is another win for the fossil fuel industry, as President Donald Trump promises to open up the US to fossil fuel expansion, with his campaign slogan of 'drill, baby drill', including by eliminating air and water protections.
Throughout the years-long legal fight, Energy Transfer's billionaire CEO Kelcy Warren, a major Trump donor, was often candid about his motivations.
His 'primary objective' in suing Greenpeace, he said in interviews, was not just financial compensation but to 'send a message'.
Warren went so far as to say that activists 'should be removed from the gene pool'.
Critics call the case a textbook SLAPP, designed to silence dissent and drain financial resources.
It comes as the Trump administration is also seeking to instate a wider crackdown on freedom of expression across the country.
In a post on Bluesky responding to Wednesday's verdict, author and journalist Naomi Klein noted that 'attacks on protest and freedoms' affecting different movements including 'climate, Palestine, labor, migrant, trans and reproductive rights' should be seen as related.
'Fossil fuel companies should be forced to pay the public trillions in damages for the costs of planetary arson,' Klein added.
Meanwhile, climate change is already contributing to increasingly severe and frequent disasters in the US and around the world, including recent fires in California, and an unprecedented inland hurricane in North Carolina.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed a new lawsuit last October against the US Army Corps of Engineers, which has jurisdiction over a section of the pipeline upstream from the Standing Rock Reservation, arguing that the pipeline is operating illegally and must be shut down, according to the North Dakota Monitor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China trade talks could include TikTok: Lutnick
China trade talks could include TikTok: Lutnick

Qatar Tribune

time9 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

China trade talks could include TikTok: Lutnick

Agencies TikTok may come up in trade talks with China next week, but if Beijing does not approve a divestment deal for Chinese owner ByteDance, the app will soon go dark in the United States, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday. US President Donald Trump's administration will allow TikTok to remain in the US 'if it's in American control, and … China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece', Lutnick said, speaking on CNBC. 'Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm. That's something Donald Trump is willing to do. If that deal gets approved then by the Chinese, then that deal will happen,' he said. 'If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' Asked whether an agreement over TikTok is part of current trade negotiations, Lutnick said 'yes and no'. 'It's not really part of the trade talks, but you can't really go meet somebody and not bring up the topics that are relevant,' he said. 'So … it's not officially part of it, but unofficially? Of course.' ByteDance is under pressure to divest the short-video app by September 17 or face a ban in the US. Last year, then-US President Joe Biden signed a sale-or-ban law, requiring that a 'foreign adversary' no longer control the app, defined as a 20 per cent stake, over national security concerns. Despite an original January deadline, Trump has repeatedly delayed enforcement of the law. The original deadline as set in law was January 19, with allowance for a one-time 90-day extension if progress towards a sale was evident. Trump had extended that deadline his first day in office via executive order, days after a call with Chinese President Xi Jinping during which TikTok was discussed. He has since extended it twice more. If the sale is approved, the app is expected to use an algorithm and data system separate from its global platform, Reuters reported this month. That would resolve years of debate over whether ByteDance would share what is considered TikTok's secret sauce – the recommendation algorithm – and mark a potential end to years of angst over the app's security concerns in Washington. A deal had reportedly been in the works earlier this year to spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. But the plan was put on hold after Beijing indicated it would not approve it after Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese imports, according to Bloomberg. Under current Chinese export controls, some technologies used by TikTok, including the recommendation algorithm, require Beijing's approval for export. The restriction was implemented by Beijing in 2020, killing a deal that had been under negotiation involving ByteDance, Oracle and Walmart during the first Trump administration. In the years since, Beijing had given little indication it would support a sale, urging the US to provide an 'open, fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment' for Chinese businesses. The law mandating the divestment, passed last year as part of a foreign aid package, reflects concern in Washington that TikTok's ownership makes it beholden to the Chinese government and that Beijing could use the app to spy on Americans or conduct influence operations. Free speech advocates have argued that a ban would unlawfully restrict Americans from obtaining access to foreign media in violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Other critics, including some US lawmakers, have pointed to the lack of evidence of content manipulation by Beijing. The US Supreme Court upheld the forced divestment law in January. Over 60 per cent of American teens and about a third of US adults use TikTok, according to a Pew Research Centre study from last year.

Saudi Arabia signs deal worth $6 bn with Syria
Saudi Arabia signs deal worth $6 bn with Syria

Qatar Tribune

time9 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Saudi Arabia signs deal worth $6 bn with Syria

dpa Damascus Saudi Arabia on Thursday signed economic deals worth over $6 billion with war-shattered Syria, the latest sign of support from the oil-wealthy Gulf monarchy for Syria's new rulers. The deals were signed at a major Saudi-Syrian business forum that opened on Thursday in Damascus. Saudi Arabia has thrown its political and economic weight behind Syria since an Islamist-led rebel alliance deposed the country's long-time ruler Bashar al-Assad in December. Iran was a major ally of al-Assad. In May, Saudi Arabia's de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, hosted a meeting in Riyadh between US President Donald Trump and incumbent Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, marking the first encounter between the leaders of the two countries in 25 years. During his trip to Saudi Arabia, Trump announced the lifting of US sanctions on Syria. The European Union has also taken a similar step. The pacts signed on Thursday cover a wide range of fields including energy, infrastructure, industry, fiscal services, information technology and agriculture, according to Saudi Investment Minister Khalid Al-Falih. 'We will work to encourage international investors to explore investment opportunities in Syria,' Al-Falih said on Thursday. The Saudi official arrived in Damascus on Wednesday, leading a large business delegation. He also attended the launch of Syria's first white cement plant near Damascus. In April, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, another Gulf energy-rich emirate, said they would settle Syria's outstanding arrears with the World Bank Group, amounting to some $15 million. Qatar has pledged investments of over $7 billion for the construction of gas-fired power plants to improve Syria's poor electricity supply Earlier this month, investment-hungry Syria signed an $800 million deal with the Dubai-based DP World to develop and manage the port of Tartus, a key Syrian Mediterranean facility. Since al-Assad's overthrow, Syria's new leadership has sought to garner world recognition and economic support to rebuild the country devastated by more than a decade of war.

American Airlines restores economic forecast amid economic uncertainty
American Airlines restores economic forecast amid economic uncertainty

Al Jazeera

time15 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

American Airlines restores economic forecast amid economic uncertainty

American Airlines has restored its full-year outlook as broader economic uncertainty continues to weigh on domestic consumer demand across the travel industry. The Fort Worth, Texas-based carrier on Thursday offered a wide range for its full-year forecast on the heels of its earnings report, saying the broader economic uncertainty is hobbling consumer spending. The airline had suspended financial guidance in April. The airline says it expects an adjusted loss per share of 20 cents a share to a profit of 80 cents a share in 2025. The midpoint of the forecast is 30 cents per share, compared with analysts' average estimate of 61 cents a share, according to LSEG data. American, which generates more than two-thirds of its passenger revenue from the US domestic market, said that if domestic travel demand continues to strengthen, it expects to hit the top end of its outlook. But if the economy weakens, it only expects to be at the bottom end of the forecast. 'The domestic network has been under stress because of the uncertainty in the economy and the reluctance of domestic passengers to get in the game,' CEO Robert Isom told analysts on an earnings call. American said tepid domestic travel demand affected its bookings in July. Isom, however, said the performance is expected to improve sequentially in August and September. 'We expect that July will be the low point,' he said. The company expects its domestic unit revenue, or revenue generated from each seat, to remain lower year-over-year in the third quarter. Its non-fuel operating costs are estimated to be up as much as 4.5 percent in the September quarter. American expects an adjusted loss per share in the range of 10 cents to 60 cents in the third quarter, compared with analysts' estimates of a loss of 7 cents, according to data compiled by LSEG. The company's outlook contrasts with upbeat forecasts of rival Delta and United Airlines. Alaska Air Group has also reported improvements in passenger traffic and pricing power. Most US airlines withdrew their financial forecasts in April as President Donald Trump's trade war created the biggest uncertainty for the industry since the COVID-19 pandemic. While some have reinstated their expectations, there is lingering uncertainty as to how the economy will fare in an ever-evolving tariff landscape. Demand in the domestic travel market has remained subdued, with budget travellers approaching their plans with caution, hurting carriers that primarily service the US domestic market and price-sensitive customers. Even summer, typically the peak money-making season for airlines, is falling short this year, with unsold standard economy seats forcing carriers to cut fares. It dented the second-quarter earnings of Southwest Airlines, the largest US domestic airline. At American, the domestic market was the weakest in the second quarter, with its unit revenue declining 6.4 percent from a year ago. The company's unit revenue in international markets was up, led by a 5 percent annual jump in the transatlantic market. On Wall Street, the stock is taking a hit and was down 7.2 percent from the market open as of 11:30am in New York (15:30 GMT).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store