
Greenpeace must pay $660m to oil company over pipeline protests, jury says
The environmental advocacy group has said it will appeal Wednesday's verdict, which came almost a decade after activists joined a protest led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe against the Dakota Access Pipeline, in one of the largest anti-fossil fuel protests in US history.
The jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660m in damages across three Greenpeace entities, citing charges including trespass, nuisance, conspiracy and deprivation of property access.
Energy Transfer, a Texas-based company worth $64bn, celebrated the verdict and has denied attempting to stifle speech.
'We would like to thank the judge and the jury for the incredible amount of time and effort they dedicated to this trial,' the company said in a statement.
'While we are pleased that Greenpeace will be held accountable for their actions, this win is really for the people of Mandan and throughout North Dakota who had to live through the daily harassment and disruptions caused by the protesters who were funded and trained by Greenpeace.'
The nine-person jury in Mandan, North Dakota, deliberated for two days, in the trial which began in late February, before finding in favour of Energy Transfer on most counts.
However, a group of lawyers who monitored the case, calling themselves the Trial Monitoring Committee, said many of the jurors had ties to the fossil fuel industry.
'Most jurors in the case have ties to the oil and gas industry and some openly admitted they could not be impartial, although the judge seated them anyway,' the committee said in a statement, following jury selection.
Greenpeace plans to appeal the verdict. Greenpeace International is also countersuing Energy Transfer in the Netherlands, accusing the company of using nuisance lawsuits to suppress dissent. A hearing in that case is set for July 2.
'The fight against Big Oil is not over today,' said Greenpeace International General Counsel Kristin Casper.
'We know that the law and the truth are on our side.'
The 'water protectors' of Standing Rock
Energy Transfer's case against Greenpeace dates back to protests in North Dakota almost 10 years ago.
In April 2016, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe set up a protest camp along the proposed Dakota Access Pipeline route to stop construction, calling themselves 'water protectors'.
The camp continued for more than a year, drawing support at first from other Indigenous people around the country and later from other activists, including environmental organisations like Greenpeace, and even hundreds of US Army veterans.
Even as wintry conditions set in and hundreds of police patrolled the protests with waves of violent arrests which also targeted journalists, the Sioux and their supporters remained in place.
According to Energy Transfer's lead lawyer Trey Cox's closing arguments, Greenpeace's role involved 'exploiting' the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to advance its anti-fossil fuel agenda, according to the North Dakota Monitor.
But Greenpeace maintains that it played only a small and peaceful role in the movement, which, it says, was led by Native Americans.
As one Lakota organiser, Nick Tilsen, testified during the trial, the idea that Greenpeace organised the protests is 'paternalistic', according to the Lakota Times.
Despite the protests, the pipeline, designed to transport fracked crude oil to refineries and on to global markets, became operational in 2017.
Energy Transfer, however, continued its legal pursuit of Greenpeace, initially seeking $300m in damages through a federal lawsuit, which was dismissed.
It then shifted its legal strategy to North Dakota's state courts, one of the minority of US states without protections against so-called 'Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation' (SLAPP).
'Drill, baby drill'
Wednesday's verdict is another win for the fossil fuel industry, as President Donald Trump promises to open up the US to fossil fuel expansion, with his campaign slogan of 'drill, baby drill', including by eliminating air and water protections.
Throughout the years-long legal fight, Energy Transfer's billionaire CEO Kelcy Warren, a major Trump donor, was often candid about his motivations.
His 'primary objective' in suing Greenpeace, he said in interviews, was not just financial compensation but to 'send a message'.
Warren went so far as to say that activists 'should be removed from the gene pool'.
Critics call the case a textbook SLAPP, designed to silence dissent and drain financial resources.
It comes as the Trump administration is also seeking to instate a wider crackdown on freedom of expression across the country.
In a post on Bluesky responding to Wednesday's verdict, author and journalist Naomi Klein noted that 'attacks on protest and freedoms' affecting different movements including 'climate, Palestine, labor, migrant, trans and reproductive rights' should be seen as related.
'Fossil fuel companies should be forced to pay the public trillions in damages for the costs of planetary arson,' Klein added.
Meanwhile, climate change is already contributing to increasingly severe and frequent disasters in the US and around the world, including recent fires in California, and an unprecedented inland hurricane in North Carolina.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed a new lawsuit last October against the US Army Corps of Engineers, which has jurisdiction over a section of the pipeline upstream from the Standing Rock Reservation, arguing that the pipeline is operating illegally and must be shut down, according to the North Dakota Monitor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
4 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Beijing urged to deepen ASEAN ties amid US tariff threat
Agencies Beijing should encourage its firms to deepen integration with Southeast Asian economies instead of using the region as a transshipment route to the US, according to a senior regional economist – as Washington threatens the export-reliant region with high tariffs. Transshipments drew attention earlier this month after the US announced tariffs on imports from Vietnam and 23 other trading partners. US President Donald Trump warned that imports diverted through Vietnam would face a 40 per cent tariff – double the 20 per cent levy on goods made in the Southeast Asian nation. 'Of course, [Southeast Asian authorities] would check the country of origin for products,' said He Dong, chief economist at the Singapore-based Asean+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO), on Tuesday, adding that some already have agreements with the US to do so. Chinese officials should also 'encourage their firms to become more deeply ingrained or integrated with local economies' in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), He said. While the Chinese government seeks to protect its exports, businesses should have the autonomy to make long-term decisions about their role in local economies, which would also protect them from unpredictable tariff rates, he added. Imports from China face an average tariff rate of 42 per cent, according to Morgan Stanley estimates, while other Asian countries face rates of 25 to 40 per cent starting August 1. Since the US launched a trade war against China in 2018, Beijing has stepped up trade and investment with Asean countries. s The goods trade between China and the bloc reached US$982.34 billion last year, up 7.8 per cent from 2023, customs data showed – consolidating the bloc as China's top trade partner. Vietnam, in particular, has drawn attention due to an influx of Chinese investment in its factories since Trump's first termthough it remains unclear exactly how Trump's transshipment clause will work in practice. Before Trump took office in January, officials in Malaysia and Thailand said they would not permit transshipments to the US. On Tuesday, the White House announced it had agreed a trade deal with Indonesia that would see the US reduce its proposed tariff rate to 19 per cent in return for Indonesia eliminating tariff barriers on a 'full range' of US industrial and food products. A similar deal has also been struck with the Philippines.


Qatar Tribune
4 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Interpol deletes wanted notice for anti-whaler Paul Watson
DPA Paris Well-known anti-whaling activist Paul Watson is no longer wanted by the international police organization Interpol, after the 'red notice' against him was deleted. The notice issued at Japan's request has been deleted, according to a spokesman for the France-based organisation on Wednesday. An internal control commission made the decision in light of Denmark's decision not to extradite Watson to Japan. A red notice allows a country to request that a person be located and provisionally arrested. It is not the same as an international arrest warrant. Interpol coordinates cross-border cooperations, but each country decides for itself how to handle a case. According to Watson's lawyer, William Julié, the commission considered the manhunt for the conservationist to be disproportionate, partly because the case was so old and no serious crime had been alleged. Following an incident with a whaling ship in the Antarctic in 2010, the Japanese authorities had Watson searched and accused him of damaging the ship and preventing the whalers from doing their work. Watson denied any wrongdoing. In July last year, the Canadian-American citizen was detained in Greenland. However, Denmark eventually released him and decided not to extradite him to Japan.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Over 1,400 killed in March violence in Syria coast
dpa Damascus A Syrian fact-finding committee on Tuesday confirmed that 1,426 people - mostly civilians, including many Alawites - were killed during a wave of violence in the country's coastal provinces between March 6 and 9. According to committee spokesman Yasser al-Farhan, the clashes began when remnants of armed groups linked to toppled dictator Bashar al-Assad launched coordinated attacks on government forces in Latakia, Tartous and Hama, killing 238 army and security personnel. Among the dead were 90 women, most of them unarmed civilians, the committee said as it presented its findings at a press conference in Damascus. The attackers were described as organized, unlawful groups loyal to the ousted Assad regime, now operating independently and resisting transitional authorities. The new government launched a military operation to quash the violence. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a British-based war monitor, estimated at the time that over 1,600 people, mainly from the Alawite minority, to which Assad belonged, had been killed in the unrest. According to the committee, 550 individuals have been identified as responsible for the attacks and subsequent sectarian violence, though their names remain confidential, with only 31 suspects arrested so far.