
FSU students have plan to prevent campus shootings — after all, they lived through one
Phoenix Ikner, 20, an FSU undergraduate student from Tallahassee, is being charged with the murder of Coach Robert Morales— a local legend who coached high school football and had ties to Miami — and Tiru Chabba, a South Carolinian food service executive visiting FSU for work.
A lack of gun control didn't directly cause this tragedy. Ikner used firearms that legally belonged to his parents; his stepmother is a Leon County Sheriff's deputy. While there is no single solution to prevent gun violence, a group of FSU students has developed a three-part proposal to mitigate the risk of school shootings on college campuses.
We propose three legislative acts: the ACCESS Act, the ARMOR Act and the AGENT Act.
▪ The ACCESS Act addresses a long-standing issue for college students — access to mental health resources. College students are an especially vulnerable group when it comes to mental health.
This act would create the Office of Mental Health Services to provide oversight and coordinate mental health resources across Florida's public university system. It would fund the hiring of more licensed mental health practitioners and train existing staff on specialized care. A portion of services would be provided by licensed professionals, with support from graduate students earning clinical hours. Of course, counseling alone cannot prevent all forms of gun violence.
▪ The ARMOR Act is designed to ensure that every classroom door on Florida's 110 public college campuses can be locked from the inside during an emergency. This simple yet crucial infrastructure upgrade could save lives by buying time during active shooter events.
▪ The AGENT Act is a more controversial but, we believe, necessary measure. It gives students the right to protect themselves from armed threats, like the one we faced in April. In 1990, President George H.W. Bush signed the Gun-Free School Zones Act to curb campus violence. However, in practice, this designation has turned campuses into soft targets — spaces where law-abiding citizens cannot respond to threats.
The AGENT Act in accordance with federal statute, would permit campus carry of guns in Florida under tightly controlled conditions. It would not simply follow Florida's constitutional carry law. Instead, the AGENT Act would require a concealed carry weapons (CCW) permit, which involves a live-fire proficiency test. To carry on campus, students and staff would have to pass this test annually and undergo regular mental health check-ins through the new Office of Mental Health Services or an equivalent body on private campuses.
Our bill is modeled on elements from Georgia and West Virginia's campus carry laws and includes important limitations. For instance, weapons would not be allowed in on-campus daycares to eliminate risks to infants and children.
Similarly, areas with 'adequate security measures'— meaning locations with electronic screening and armed staff— would be exempt from carry permissions, as those spaces already have built-in protections.
By combining mental health investment, safety-focused infrastructure upgrades and regulated campus carry, we believe Florida can make meaningful progress in protecting students.
We, the students behind this proposal, urge the Florida Legislature to act. We also call on the public to demand meaningful change from their elected officials.
We are looking for legislative sponsors and are meeting with Florida representatives and senators.
Together, we can turn a tragic moment into a lasting transformation that protects the future of our state — and its students.
Reid Seybold is pursuing a bachelor's degree in political science at FSU. Noah Brown is pursuing a master's degree in applied American politics. They can be reached at: TheAAASolution@gmail.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
4 days ago
- The Hill
Mace leading South Carolina Republican gubernatorial primary polling
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who has teased a run for governor in South Carolina, is leading a hypothetical 2026 GOP gubernatorial field in new polling. The survey from the nonpartisan research organization South Carolina Policy Council found Mace with 16 percent support from Republican-identifying voters — 1 point ahead of Attorney General Alan Wilson (R), who launched his campaign last month. Lt. Gov. Pam Evette (R) earned 8 percent, Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) snagged 6 percent and state Sen. Josh Kimbrell was at 3 percent. At the same time, a little more than half of respondents — 52 percent — were still undecided. 'I will be making a decision over the next couple of days about my future,' Mace told Fox News over the weekend. 'I believe I may be forced to run for governor because I can't watch my beautiful red state of South Carolina go woke. It's gone woke over the last couple of years.' On Monday, she posted a graphic promising a 'special announcement' and 'big things ahead.' Mace would enter a crowded GOP primary to succeed term-limited Gov. Henry McMaster (R) in the Palmetto State, but framed the election as a potential face-off against Wilson. 'This is a two-man race, if I get in, between me and Alan Wilson, the South Carolina attorney general, who likes to put pedophiles on trial and give them one day in jail,' the congresswoman said. Mace flipped South Carolina's 1st Congressional District to GOP control in 2020, and won reelection by double digits last year. A staunch supporter of President Trump, Mace backed him in the 2024 GOP presidential primary over her fellow South Carolinian, former Gov. Nikki Haley (R), who has notably endorsed Norman in the gubernatorial race. On the Democratic side, 83 percent in the new South Carolina Policy Council poll were undecided, with potential contenders scoring just 5 percent or less. Democratic state Rep. Jermaine Johnson launched an exploratory committee for the 2026 race last month. Cook Political Report rates the open race as solid Republican, and whoever wins the Republican primary next year is seen as the heavy favorite to win the November election. The poll of 1,200 registered voters statewide, conducted by Targoz Market Research from July 21-25, has a margin of error of 2.77 percentage points. Norman had not yet launched when the poll was in the field.


CBS News
24-07-2025
- CBS News
Police respond to an alleged armed man inside a Koreatown laundromat
Los Angeles Police Department officers are responding to a call of a man with an alleged gun inside a Koreatown laundromat. Police said they were called at 5:40 a.m. to the Koreatown laundry business on W. 3rd Street and S. Catalina Avenue. The caller reported a man with a gun. Around 7:10 a.m., aerial footage showed police officers, with guns drawn, outside the strip mall business. The situation is ongoing.

22-07-2025
Miami can't postpone its elections to next year, judge rules
Miami elections could proceed this year as originally planned, after a judge ruled that city officials could not push elections back to 2026 without voter approval. The ruling comes after the Miami city council voted 3-2, and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez signed off, to cancel November's elections and hold them in 2026 instead. They argued the alignment with statewide elections would lower costs and increase turnout. The decision was met with pushback for being done via ordinance rather than a vote from the public. Suarez and council members faced accusations, including from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, of deciding to extend their own time in office, some beyond legal term limits. Mayoral candidate Emilio Gonzalez filed a lawsuit on June 30, challenging the decision, calling it "unconstitutional" and a "blatant power grab." Miami-Dade County Circuit Judge Valerie R. Manno Schurr ruled in favor of Gonzalez on Monday, saying the city did not have the authority to shift elections without voter approval. "The Court declares that the City of Miami cannot change the dates of municipal elections or the terms of offices for the City's elected officials without amending the City of Miami Municipal Charter … which requires approval by the electorate," Schurr wrote in her opinion. DeSantis lauded Monday's decision. He previously called the attempt to postpone the elections "wrong" and said he hoped to see "a swift legal response." "City of Miami politicians voted to defy term limits, cancel this year's scheduled election, and extend their own terms in office — all without voter approval. Today, a judge has put the kibosh on the scheme," DeSantis wrote on X. "Great to see the law and common sense prevail." Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, who had issued a legal opinion on June 11 supporting Gonzalez's argument, also weighed in on social media. "Thrilled that the Court agreed with our legal opinion on the City of Miami's unconstitutional attempt at moving back an election without voter approval," Uthmeier wrote. Another amicus brief supporting Gonzalez's came come from former Miami mayor and current Commissioner Joseph Carollo. Carollo was one of the two commissioners who voted against shifting the elections. The court's ruling offers declaratory relief but not injunctive relief, meaning Miami is legally in the wrong but has not been explicitly ordered not to postpone its elections. However, Florida State University Law Professor Michael Morley said "if push comes to shove, the court can just enter injunctive relief" at any time. The city is appealing Schurr's decision. "While we respectfully disagree with the trial court's decision, we are confident in the strength of our case and remain optimistic about the outcome on appeal," City Attorney George Wysong wrote in the appeal notice. Morley said he thought the appeal was "extremely unlikely" to succeed. Speaking prior to the ruling, University of Miami Law Professor Charlton Copeland said due to the nature of the dispute, the suit would be able to move through the courts "fairly quickly." "These are clean legal arguments about what law governs… these aren't procedurally complicated issues," Copeland said. Aubrey Jewett, a professor at the University of Central Florida, said the choice to hold elections on even or odd years involves a "trade off." Odd-year elections might have lower turnout, but "a greater emphasis on local issues that people are actually looking at and voting on." In even years, local concerns might be drowned out by state or federal issues despite a higher turnout, Jewett told ABC News. Even as elections could go forward this year as planned, Jewett said harm has been done to Miami's political culture already because the postponement decision was pushed without voter input. "The local politics has long had a reputation for being sort of an insider's game, and that a relatively few number of people have a lot of influence," Jewett said. "I think that for a lot of Miami residents, it will breed even more cynicism and distrust."