
Will your future job feel like playing a game? OpenAI CEO Sam Altman thinks so
' The statement speaks not only to how work will change, but also to how it may feel.
It is a perspective that challenges the common fear that AI will make human work obsolete. Instead,
Sam Altman
suggests that work could become more engaging, expressive, and rewarding, even if it looks radically different from what we know today.
From repetition to creativity
Altman's insight builds on a larger conversation that leaders like NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang have sparked in recent months.
Their argument is not just that jobs will change because of AI, but that human effort will be redirected toward creativity, experimentation, and meaning. As automation replaces repetitive or analytical tasks, professionals will be expected to take on work that feels less mechanical and more dynamic.
The shift is already underway. In 2025, companies are exploring immersive workspaces using virtual reality, AI-assisted design workflows, and prompt-based content generation.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
DNA Discovery Reveals Truth About Native Americans
Daily Sport X
Undo
These tools are pushing professionals towards higher-level responsibilities that involve managing outputs rather than producing them line-by-line.
Rising expectations for human potential
Altman points out that while AI will enhance people's ability to do more, expectations will also increase. That means jobs may feel more like fast-paced collaboration or high-level decision-making, with human judgment at the center. The experience may feel like a strategy game, where the stakes are real but the process is engaging, layered, and creative.
This shift will demand new capabilities. Young professionals will need to adapt to roles where they manage systems, solve abstract problems, and interpret complex inputs. In this environment, soft skills like communication, empathy, and storytelling will matter as much as technical know-how.
Learning paths are evolving
Colleges and online platforms are already adapting. Institutions like IIT Madras and IIIT Hyderabad have begun integrating courses on AI ethics, systems thinking, and responsible innovation into their curriculum, reflecting a broader shift in Indian higher education towards interdisciplinary and future-focused learning.
Meanwhile, EdTech platforms are also seeing a rise in demand for 'prompt engineering,' and 'AI-assisted writing' courses.
These developments reflect a shift in how students and early-career professionals are preparing. Rather than specialising only in traditional job functions, many are investing in interdisciplinary skills that allow them to work alongside AI, not against it.
Altman's statement also serves as a reminder that work has always evolved.
What seems like play to one generation may carry deep value to another. A few decades ago, job titles such as community manager, UX writer, or social media strategist would have sounded trivial. Today, they are integral parts of many organisations.
This pattern will likely continue. As the workplace becomes more fluid, young professionals must stay curious, flexible, and open to reinvention. Jobs may begin to feel more like games, but that does not make them less important. In fact, it might be a sign that meaning is being redefined for a new era of work.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
5 minutes ago
- Mint
The Big ‘Mc' Feud: Here's why a Gujarat snack maker is suing McDonald's
McPatel Foods Private Limited has filed a civil suit against McDonald's Corporation before an Ahmedabad rural court. The Gujarat-based snack maker alleged that it has been receiving 'groundless threats' from the American fast-food chain due to its use of the mark 'McPatel.' The Indian snack maker filed the suit under Section 142 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, aiming for an injunction to prevent McDonald's from initiating or threatening legal action over its use of the 'Mc' prefix in its corporate and product branding. The case is listed for hearing on July 28, 2025, Bar and Bench reported. The conflict began when McPatel Foods applied to register the mark 'McPatel' under Class 30 (covering bakery goods, snacks, noodles, confectionery, sauces and frozen foods) in March 2024. However, on August 27, 2024, McDonald's filed an objection before the Indian Trade Marks Registry against this application. In its notice of opposition, McDonald's alleged the following: Deceptive similarity: McDonald's claims that the 'McPatel' mark is deceptively similar to its 'Mc' and 'Mac' family of trademarks, including McDonald's, McFries, McChicken and others. Acquired distinctiveness: The 'Mc' prefix, according to McDonald's has gained distinctiveness globally since the 1970s, and since 1996 in India due to its widespread use. Global enforcement: McDonald's argues that its trademarks are registered in more than 100 countries, solely with an aim to protect against third-party use of 'Mc'-formative marks. Dominant element: The fast-food chain also argues that 'Patel' and 'Foods' are quite common, making 'Mc' the dominant and source-identifying element in 'McPatel'. Bad intention: McDonald's also alleged that McPatel adopted the mark in bad faith to benefit from McDonald's goodwill, leading to confusion and deception and of the brand's reputation. In its counter statement filed on October 29, 2024, McPatel Foods denied all allegations, asserting the following: Legitimate adoption: The Indian snack maker claimed that the mark was adopted from its registered corporate name and trading style, with no intent to misrepresent or unfairly benefit from McDonald's reputation. Distinct identity: The company said that it is a legally incorporated Indian MSME specialising in processed food, particularly in frozen French fries and their mark is also visually, phonetically and conceptually different from McDonald's trademarks. No prior conflict: The Trademark Registrar is said to have found no conflicting marks at the examination stage, leading to the application's acceptance and advertisement. Lack of evidence: McPatel also pointed to the absence of actual confusion or consumer deception. Jealousy: McPatel contends that the opposition is driven by 'business jealousy' and is filed in bad faith to harass a domestic company. McPatel stood by its rationale that 'Mc' is a common prefix and McDonald's cannot claim monopoly over it across all combinations or industries. As of now, the trademark registry has not made a final decision on the dispute. The ongoing litigation is expected to cause further delays, as reported by Bar and Bench.


Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
ChatGPT therapy chats are not private, warns OpenAI CEO Sam Altman
More people are using ChatGPT like a therapist, but that doesn't mean it's private. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says those kinds of chats don't have the same legal protections you get with real therapists, doctors, or lawyers. OpenAI says deleted chats from Free, Plus, and Pro users are wiped within 30 days unless they're legally required to keep them for "legal or security reasons."(AP) Altman told podcaster Theo Von, 'So if you go talk to ChatGPT about your most sensitive stuff and then there's like a lawsuit or whatever, we could be required to produce that, and I think that's very screwed up.' He went on, 'Right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's like legal privilege for it — there's doctor-patient confidentiality, there's legal confidentiality,' according to Business Insider report. 'We haven't figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT.' Altman said there should be the 'same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that we do with a therapist' and that it should be 'addressed with some urgency.' Also Read: 'Will AI replace lawyers? Law intern asks to use ChatGPT for witness analysis, gets hard copies instead Youngsters turning to ChatGPT for therapy He said a growing number of people — especially younger users — are turning to ChatGPT for therapy, life advice, or help with relationships. Altman said, 'No one had to think about that even a year ago, and now I think it's this huge issue of like, 'How are we gonna treat the laws around this?'' Unlike end-to-end encrypted apps like WhatsApp or Signal, OpenAI can read your conversations with ChatGPT. Employees sometimes look at chats to improve the AI or to watch for misuse. OpenAI says deleted chats from Free, Plus, and Pro users are wiped within 30 days unless they're legally required to keep them for "legal or security reasons." Back in June, The New York Times and other media outlets asked a court to force OpenAI to save all user chats, even deleted ones, as part of a copyright lawsuit. OpenAI is now appealing that court order.


Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bombay HC issues notice on BCCI's appeal against Rs 538 crore arbitration awards to defunct Kochi Tuskers
The Bombay High Court on Friday issued notice in appeals filed by Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) challenging a single-judge bench order that upheld two arbitration awards worth over Rs 538 crore granted in favour of the now-defunct Indian Premier League franchise Kochi Tuskers Kerala. A division bench of Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Manjusha Deshpande restrained Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) and Kochi Cricket Private Limited (KCPL) from withdrawing the amounts already deposited by the BCCI for eight weeks. The BCCI filed an appeal against the June 18 verdict of the single-judge bench of Justice Riyaz I Chagla that dismissed the BCCI's plea challenging arbitral awards. The franchise took part in only one season of the IPL, in 2011, under a consortium led by RSW and KCPL. The dispute began after the BCCI in September 2011 terminated the Kochi Tuskers Kerala due to alleged breach of the franchise agreement. Aggrieved RSW and KCPL began arbitration proceedings alleging 'wrongful' termination. On June 22, 2015, the arbitral tribunal awarded over Rs 384.83 crore to KCPL and over Rs 153.34 crore to RSW, along with interest and costs. The BCCI challenged the award before Bombay HC, which was upheld on June 18. Justice Chagla had held that arbitrator's conclusion was substantiated by records and there were 'no valid grounds' and 'no patent illegality' raised in BCCI's two pleas to warrant interference with the arbitration awards. Justice Chagla had permitted the KCPL and RSW to withdraw amounts deposited by the BCCI after six weeks. However, the BCCI filed an appeal against the single-judge bench order. The two-judge bench is likely to begin the final hearing on BCCI's appeal from September 17.