logo
Monty Python's Terry Gilliam: Trump ‘destroyed satire'

Monty Python's Terry Gilliam: Trump ‘destroyed satire'

The Hill15 hours ago
Monty Python's Terry Gilliam said President Trump 'destroyed satire' in a recent interview with The Hollywood Reporter.
'He's f—– up the latest film I was working on,' the British filmmaker and comedian said in the interview, released Tuesday, when talking about Trump. 'Because it was a satire about the last several years when things were going as they were. He's turned it upside down. So he's killed my movie.'
'That's 'The Carnival at the End of Days,' right?' The Hollywood Reporter asked Gilliam.
'Yes. I had a sub-title that said: 'Great fun for all of those who enjoy taking offense.' That was how I approached it. I think Trump has destroyed satire. I mean, how can you be satirical about what's going on in the way he's doing the world?' Gilliam responded.
'With 'Carnival,' the other day I was thinking I was going to put a little preamble on it saying that what you're about to see takes place during the period historians refer to as the Trump lost years from 2020 to 2024,' he added.
In 2020, English actor and comedian Eric Idle, another member of Monty Python, threatened to sue the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) for the use of a Monty Python song in a political attack ad.
Idle posted online that the NRCC had 'stolen' Monty Python's 'Lumberjack Song' in an ad taking aim at a Democratic representative.
'While we sue these low life thieving reprobates lets VOTE for Cindy to piss them off,' Idle said in his post. 'Are all Republicans now lawless? Whatever happened to America?'
The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Admin Sues California Over Soaring Egg Prices
Trump Admin Sues California Over Soaring Egg Prices

Newsweek

time17 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Admin Sues California Over Soaring Egg Prices

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration has sued California over its animal cruelty laws, saying the state's regulation of chicken farms has led to high egg prices across the country. Lowering the cost of eggs, which spiked in recent years as an avian flu outbreak ravaged American flocks, was one of President Donald Trump's key campaign promises in the lead-up to the 2024 election. But almost six months into his second mandate, his administration has struggled to keep the cost of the staple down. The administration now says California's regulations create "unnecessary red tape" in the production of eggs and are responsible for stubbornly high prices. The lawsuit is the latest flash point in the ongoing battle between the U.S. president and the Democratic-led state, which has clashed with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration policies and transgender rights. "Trump's back to his favorite hobby: blaming California for literally everything," the office of California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X, formerly Twitter, about the lawsuit. "Next up: @CAGovernor Gavin Newsom caused the fall of Rome and sent the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs!" What Is the Lawsuit About? The lawsuit, which the Trump administration filed in Los Angeles federal court, blamed the Golden State's animal cruelty laws—widely regarded as among the strictest and most progressive in the nation—for creating the conditions that led to the current spike in egg prices across the country. The laws, the Trump administration argued, have prevented "farmers across the country from using a number of agricultural production methods which were in widespread use—and which helped keep eggs affordable." Under Proposition 2, an initiative approved by California voters in 2008 and implemented in 2015, the state forbids farmers from packing chickens together so close that a hen cannot "lie down, stand up, fully extend its limbs, and turn around freely." Essentially, the state bans the use of chicken battery farms, a method of intensive egg production where hens are stacked in rows and rows of tiny cages, which restrict their natural movements and can cause the animals high levels of stress and frustration. A composite image of a supermarket shopper walking past an egg display in Monterey Park, California, on February 10 and an inset of President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House... A composite image of a supermarket shopper walking past an egg display in Monterey Park, California, on February 10 and an inset of President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 9. More FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images;Proposition 12, an initiative backed by California voters in 2018 and implemented in January 2022, outlawed the use of cages for egg-laying hens, sows and calves raised for veal, giving specific requirements of how much space farmers must give to their animals. Crucially, it also banned the in-state sale of products from caged animals raised out of state. The Trump administration's lawsuit argued that the federal Egg Products Inspection Act of 1970 should preempt any California state laws related to eggs. This law, the lawsuit says, gives the Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services the authority to regulate eggs to protect consumers' health and welfare, and it requires "national uniformity" in egg safety standards. "It is the prerogative of the federal government alone to regulate the quality, inspection, and packaging of eggs," the Justice Department wrote in its civil complaint. "Americans across the country have suffered the consequences of liberal policies causing massive inflation for everyday items like eggs," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. "Under President Trump's leadership, we will use the full extent of federal law to ensure that American families are free from oppressive regulatory burdens and restore American prosperity." It is not the first time that California's animal cruelty laws have been challenged in court. In 2014, six states—Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kentucky and Iowa—sued California over its egg regulations. The states lost both in a federal district court and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Other states—including Colorado, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon and Washington—have laws requiring eggs sold in the state to be from cage-free hens. In February, Nevada temporarily relaxed its cage-free requirements because of the shortages, but the rules were restored in June. How High Are Egg Prices? According to the latest consumer price index, egg prices nationwide averaged $4.55 per dozen in May—up from $2.69 a year earlier, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The main reason behind higher egg prices is that supply has shrunk as a direct consequence of the avian flu that broke out in the country in February 2022 and has since wreaked havoc among American flocks. Under federal policy, to prevent the spread of the virus, entire flocks must be culled if even a single infected bird is found on a farm. Cage-free hens proved to be particularly vulnerable to the virus. In 2024, according to NerdWallet, cage-free hens represented almost 60 percent of all bird flu cases for the year, even as they accounted for about a third of egg-laying hens in the U.S. In January, the White House blamed the Biden administration for killing more than 100 million birds, most of which were egg-laying hens. The Trump administration's lawsuit against California does not mention the avian flu that has laid waste across the U.S. egg industry and led to the culling of millions of birds across the country over the past few years.

White House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple
White House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

White House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple

White House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple originally appeared on TheStreet. President Trump began a wild tariff ride when he started his second term. On April 2, Trump announced "reciprocal tariffs" on all countries not subject to other sanctions, and additional tariffs for 57 major trading partners were planned for April 9, but were later paused. Trump also imposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, but later exempted products that were compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. 💵💰 Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter💰💵 The United States and China reached an agreement in Geneva in May to temporarily slash tariffs in an effort to de-escalate the trade conflict between the two countries. The joint statement revealed the US will temporarily decrease its average tariffs on Chinese products from 145% to 20% and China will reduce its duties on American products from 125% to 10%. The pause on additional "reciprocal tariffs" was supposed to expire on July 9. However, on July 7, Trump extended the pause to August 1 while at the same time sending "tariff letters" to some countries, warning they would be subject to a new tariff rate if they didn't reach an agreement with the US by the new deadline. It appears that the on-again, off-again tariff situation has been best described by an asset management firm, Franklin Templeton: "Continued uncertainty appears to be the only certainty." Technology is one of the industries heavily impacted by trade wars. Among the many tech giants, one is gaining special attention tariff-wise: Apple. In February, the tech giant announced it plans to invest $500 billion in the United States, which was praised by Trump. In April, the government announced that certain electronics like smartphones and laptops would, at least temporarily, be excluded from the tariffs placed on China. However, officials have indicated that additional, sector-specific tariffs on electronics are to tariffs, Apple () made a major move: It shifted more of its iPhone production to India, reducing its reliance on China. In March, it shipped nearly $2 billion worth of iPhones to the US, a record amount for its two India-based suppliers. Shifting production to India provoked Trump, who wanted new tariffs to boost US production instead of moving production from China to other countries. "I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else," Trump wrote on Truth Social in May. "If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S." Later that same day, Trump explained that tariffs would not only impact Apple but also other tech companies such as Korea's Samsung. More Tech Stocks:More recently, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro commented on Apple's overseas production. During an interview on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street," Navarro went straight after Apple's CEO, saying: "Going back to the first Trump term, Tim Cook has continually asked for more time in order to move his factories out of China. I mean it's the longest-running soap opera in Silicon Valley." According to Navaro, Cook isn't moving manufacturing out of China quickly enough, writes CNBC."With all these new advanced manufacturing techniques and the way things are moving with AI and things like that, it's inconceivable to me that Tim Cook could not produce his iPhones elsewhere around the world and in this country," Navarro said. How complicated would it be to move iPhone production to the US, and what would be the consequences? Wedbush Securities Senior Analyst Dan Ives previously warned that moving Apple's manufacturing to the US could make an iPhone priced at around $3,500, probably making many people reluctant to even consider buying. The time it would take to relocate production is estimated to be five to 10 years. "We believe the concept of Apple producing iPhones in the U.S. is a fairy tale that is not feasible," Ives said, according to Barron' House advisor sends hard-nosed message to Apple first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 9, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 9, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store