Pam Bondi abruptly fires Justice Department's top ethics chief in four-sentence letter
A letter to 'Jospeh Tirrell' sent on July 11 and seen by The Independent notes his termination is 'effective immediately' but does not state a reason why he was abruptly fired.
Tirrell, who had served as the director of the Justice Department's ethics office since 2023, was responsible for reviewing financial disclosures and other matters related to the attorney general's office and other top law enforcement officials. He led a team of roughly 30 people to ensure government lawyers and other officials adhered to ethical guidelines.
'My public service is not over, and my career as a federal civil servant is not finished,' he wrote on LinkedIn on Monday. 'I took the oath at 18 as a midshipman to 'support and defend the Constitution of the United States.' I have taken that oath at least five more times since then. That oath did not come with the caveat that I need only support the Constitution when it is easy or convenient.'
Tirrell's firing follows Bondi's purge of roughly 20 Justice Department employees involved in former Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigations into the former president. Tirrell had reportedly approved Smith's receipt of $140,000 in pro bono legal fees from the firm Covington & Burling before his resignation. It is unclear whether Tirrell's firing is related.
Shortly after taking office, the president dismissed the government's top ethics watchdog, sparking a legal battle that reached the Supreme Court. That independent Office of Government Ethics would regularly consult with Tirrell's team.
Tirrell's sudden firing also 'shines a bright spotlight back on her own glaring ethical conflicts and how she's handled major DOJ decisions involving her former clients, including the government of Qatar and Pfizer, according to Jon Golinger with democratic advocacy group Public Citizen. 'The question this drastic firing raises is: are there even worse ethics problems Bondi is trying to hide?'
Career prosecutors are also quitting the agency in droves since Trump's election.
More than 100 lawyers at the Justice Department's federal programs bench, which defends the president's policy actions in court, have left their positions in recent months. Roughly 250 attorneys at the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division — accounting for 70 percent of the lawyers there – also quit the agency within the first few months of the Trump administration.
The latest shakeups at the Justice Department also arrive as the administration fumbles for answers about investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, as MAGA loyalists turn on the president, Bondi and other top law enforcement officials over the administration's failure to release more information about the sex offender and his alleged client list.
The Justice Department last week said Epstein, who was facing charges of sex trafficking, did not leave behind such a list, though Bondi in February suggested it was on her desk. She later said she was referring to the overall case.
But the Justice Department ultimately concluded that public disclosure of such materials would be inappropriate and remain under seal by a federal judge, frustrating the president's supporters and conspiracy theorists who have linked the Epstein case to allegations of a wider corruption and sex abuse scandal involving minors and powerful figures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Republican lawmaker reiterates call for probe of Fed's Powell, Fox reports
WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - Republican U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna made good on her threat last week to refer Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to the Justice Department, Fox News reported on Monday, amid U.S. President Donald Trump's ongoing complaints about the Fed chair. A referral does not mean that any criminal charges will be filed against Powell.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Trade war: Is August escalation on - or will Trump chicken out?
Why you can trust Sky News Donald Trump is clearly seething over the term 'TACO' (Trump always chickens out) - a phrase that has characterised financial market trading over the past few months. It suggests that for all the president's bluster and threats during his on-off trade war to date, he rarely follows through. When asked by a reporter about TACO in late May, as his "liberation day" escalation remained on pause, he declared it a " nasty" question and said he wanted negotiations. Mr Trump wants a deal but to effectively bully America's trading partners into agreeing better terms. It's a playbook that has defined his time in the White House and, as things stand, more than 20 nations and territories, including Japan and South Korea, face heightened tariffs of up to 40% on their exports to the US from 1 August. Financial markets don't really believe it. Stock markets, for example, are still hovering near or at record levels in both the US and in Europe. TACO is ingrained in those values. But are markets are in for a shock, especially when it comes to the fight with America's single largest trading partner, the European Union? It was created, Mr Trump has previously claimed, to "screw" the United States. It's fair to say there was great optimism in the EU earlier this month that a deal, similar to that agreed between the US and UK, was looming to avert the worst of a threatened 30% baseline tariff from 1 August. 2:02 But the mood music in Brussels changed at the back end of last week and now EU diplomats are even briefing that a broader range of retaliation measures is being considered beyond additional tariffs on US goods. The seriousness of this fight should not be underestimated. EU figures show trade in goods and services between the bloc and the US account for almost a third of all global trade, at a value in 2024 alone of €1.68trn (£1.45trn). 1:45 EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic has warned that a 30% tariff would "practically prohibit" the bloc's transatlantic trade, according to remarks via diplomats reported by the Reuters news agency. We're told that, even if time runs out, a truce could theoretically be agreed soon after 1 August. Much will depend on the EU's response. Does it go down the route taken by the UK and not retaliate, pending the conclusion of talks? There is growing pressure on Brussels to call Mr Trump's bluff. 1:40 The EU has a package of tariffs on €21bn of US goods ready to go from 6 August. An additional package is yet to be finalised. France is demanding US services are hit too, with even Germany now saying such an escalation should be considered. The so-called "anti-coercion" instrument, as it's known, would also potentially allow the bloc to limit US companies' access to financial service markets in the EU. So what happens after 1 August could be even more explosive. But there is every reason to believe that a tit-for-tat escalation is unlikely, at least for long. The very reason Donald Trump rowed back on his "liberation day" tariffs in April, allowing 90 days for talks, was likely the dire financial market reaction that followed news of the widespread duties. You have a president demanding interest rate cuts (at a time when inflation is on the rise due to the impact of tariffs) in a bid to boost flagging economic growth. Mr Trump says his trade war is all about boosting US manufacturing jobs but, at the end of the day, no powerbase of voters is going to accept a threat to the value of their investments for long. No big US company will stand by and see its sales suffer.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Where's the relief? Ground beef prices hit record-high of $6.12 per pound
The cost of ground beef has hit a record high as Americans face ever-soaring grocery bills. The dinner table staple jumped in price by around 12 percent from the previous year, shooting up from $5.47 in June 2024 to $6.12 in June 2025, according to federal government data released this month. The news is another blow for President Donald Trump's promise to bring grocery prices down. Shrinking herds, drought conditions and the rise of imported beef have all been blamed for the cost hike. Ground beef is not the only favorite foodstuff to see a surge in price in the past year, with the cost of eggs becoming a key talking point in the 2024 presidential election campaign. But the problem may be more complicated to solve, experts warn. 'Beef is way more complicated than eggs,' Wells Fargo's chief agriculture economist Michael Swanson told CNN. 'The cattle industry is still the 'Wild West' of the protein market, whereas the egg market is more 'Corporate America' with its supply and demand management.' Growing competition from other countries has also hit the domestic beef industry, experts say. Imported beef from Latin America and Australia now accounts for roughly 8% of US beef consumption, according to Swanson. Unlike the U.S., Australia had a successful year in the beef market in 2024, producing a record 2.57 million tonnes and exporting record volumes and values of beef around the world, according to the Agriculture and Horticulture Development comparison, the U.S. exported 1.29 million metric tons of beef in 2024, worth almost $10.5 billion, says the AFBF. 'It's a big change that we've seen this year that wasn't on anybody's playbook,' Swanson continued. 'Only a couple of years ago, we were net neutral, where we exported some and imported some. 'We'll continue to see more beef consumption in the United States being supplied by the world market, and they're happy to do it since we're the highest priced beef in the world.' The new data also highlighted that the average price of an uncooked beef steak leapt to $11.49 per pound in June this year – an eight percent rise since last year. All uncooked ground beef products per pound have seen an 11 percent increase. The healthier options, lean and extra lean ground beef, also experienced a jump, with the cost per pound shooting up from $6.89 to $7.67 – a more than 11 percent increase. According to the American Farm Bureau Federation, cattle herd sizes are at their lowest levels in 74 years and ranching is not as profitable as it once was. The cost of animal feed has also substantially impacted costs as droughts throughout large portions of U.S. ranchland have sapped pastures, leaving farmers with little option but to rely on more expensive feed for cattle instead of free-grazing grass, says the AFBF.
