Trump's dealmaker name on the line in high stakes tariff talks
The real estate tycoon, who has staked his reputation on being a consummate dealmaker, embarked on an aggressive strategy of punitive tariffs that his administration predicted could bring "90 deals in 90 days".
The score so far? Two. Three if you count a temporary de-escalation agreement with China.
The 90-day deadline was due on July 9, with dozens of economies including the European Union, India and Japan facing tariff hikes without a deal.
But days before it arrived, Trump issued a delay to Aug 1.
It was his second extension since unveiling the tariffs in April -- reigniting the "TACO Theory" that has gained traction among some Wall Street traders.
The acronym coined by a Financial Times writer stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out", highlighting the president's inclination to roll back policies if markets turn sour.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, part of Trump's multi-leader trade team, has reportedly been a key advocate for the pauses.
But the label has irked Trump and he insisted Tuesday that the deadline had always been in August.
"I didn't make a change. A clarification, maybe," Trump said at a cabinet meeting.
This week, he published more than 20 letters dictating tariff rates to world leaders including in Japan, South Korea and Indonesia.
"We invite you to participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far," Trump wrote.
He also issued letters to the EU, Canada, Mexico and Brazil -- although Brazil was not previously targeted by the steeper "reciprocal" tariffs and Canada and Mexico face a separate tariff regime.
The documents "appear to be Trump's way of combatting the TACO label," said Inu Manak, a fellow for trade policy at the Council on Foreign Relations.
"He wants to show that he's not just kicking the can down the road on the deadline, but that he means business," she told AFP.
"He's likely frustrated that there isn't a parade of deals coming in."
- 'Politically complicated' -
"The shift in his rhetoric from 'there is no cost -- the foreigners pay the tariffs' to 'there is a short term cost, but there will be a long term gain' has put him in a more politically complicated position," said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Trump has repeatedly claimed that foreign countries foot the bill for tariffs, although the reality is more complicated with US companies generally paying them.
"In the public's mind, the tariffs are the pain, and the agreements will be the gain," said Reinsch, a former US commerce official.
He warned that without trade agreements, Americans could conclude Trump's strategy was flawed and deem his tactics a failure.
While the 90-deal goal was probably unrealistic, Reinsch said, "it's clear that three (UK, China, Vietnam) with only one actual text made public (UK) is too small."
- Deflecting attention -
Meanwhile, Trump has announced a 50% levy on copper imports starting Aug 1.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said officials would also conclude investigations into semiconductors and pharmaceuticals -- which could lead to tariffs -- at month-end.
"That timing is not coincidental -- it lines up with the new deadline of Aug 1, adding more pressure and deflecting attention from any lack of deals that get made in that time frame," Manak said.
Analysts believe Trump's supporters will likely not pay much attention to trade talks unless the tariffs fuel inflation.
"Trade policy is not top-of-mind for the average voter," said Emily Benson, head of strategy at Minerva Technology Futures.
She expects the Trump administration's focus on boosting US manufacturing and reinvigorating the defense industrial base means it could be willing to bear some political heat to achieve those objectives.
But it's a delicate balance.
Voters will likely pay more attention if Trump follows through on his August tariff threats, Manak said.
"And we could see a negative market reaction as well, which would not go unnoticed."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
21 minutes ago
- Bangkok Post
Australia will not commit troops in advance to any conflict, minister says
SYDNEY - Australia will not commit troops in advance to any conflict, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said on Sunday, responding to a report that the Pentagon has pressed its ally to clarify what role it would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan. Australia prioritises its sovereignty and "we don't discuss hypotheticals", Conroy said in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. "The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance but by the government of the day," he said. The Financial Times reported on Saturday that Elbridge Colby, the US under-secretary of defence for policy, has been pressing Australian and Japanese officials on what they would do in a Taiwan conflict, although the US does not offer a blank cheque guarantee to defend Taiwan. Colby posted on X that the Department of Defense is implementing President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda of restoring deterrence, which includes "urging allies to step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense". China claims democratically governed Taiwan as its own and has not ruled out the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control. Taiwan President Lai Ching-te rejects China's sovereignty claims, saying only Taiwan's people can decide their future. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, speaking in Shanghai at the start of a six-day visit to China that is likely to focus on security and trade, said Canberra did not want any change to the status quo on Taiwan. Conroy said Australia was concerned about China's military buildup of nuclear and conventional forces, and wants a balanced Indo-Pacific region where no country dominates. He said China was seeking a military base in the Pacific, which was not in Australia's interest. 'Goal is no war' Talisman Sabre, Australia's largest war-fighting exercise with the United States, opened on Sunday on Sydney Harbour and will involve 40,000 troops from 19 countries, including Japan, South Korea, India, Britain, France and Canada. Conroy said China's navy might be watching the exercise to collect information, as it had done in the past. The war games will span thousands of kilometres from Australia's Indian Ocean territory of Christmas Island to the Coral Sea on Australia's east coast, in a rehearsal of joint war fighting, said Vice Admiral Justin Jones, chief of joint operations for the Australian Defence Force. The air, sea, land and space exercises over two weeks will "test our ability to move our forces into the north of Australia and operate from Australia", Jones told reporters. "I will leave it to China to interpret what 19 friends, allies and partners wanting to operate together in the region means to them. But for me... it is nations that are in search of a common aspiration for peace, stability, a free and open Indo-Pacific," he said. US Army Lieutenant General Joel Vowell, deputy commanding general for the Pacific, said Talisman Sabre would improve the readiness of militaries to respond together and was "a deterrent mechanism because our ultimate goal is no war". "If we could do all this alone and we could go fast, but because we want to go far, we have to do it together and that is important because of the instability that is resident in the region," Vowell said. The United States is Australia's major security ally. Although Australia does not permit foreign bases, the US military is expanding its rotational presence and fuel stores on Australian bases, which from 2027 will have US Virginia submarines at port in Western Australia. These would play a key role in supporting US forces in any conflict over Taiwan, analysts say.
Bangkok Post
8 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump calls for MAGA base to end 'Epstein Files' obsession
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump urged his political base on Saturday to stop attacking his administration over files related to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a case that has become an obsession for conspiracy theorists. Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI said in a memo made public last week there was no evidence that the disgraced financier kept a "client list" or was blackmailing powerful figures. They also dismissed the claim that Epstein was murdered in jail, confirming his death by suicide at a New York prison in 2019, and said they would not be releasing any more information on the probe. The move was met with incredulity by some on the US far-right -- many of whom have backed Trump for years -- and strident criticism of Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel. "What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!" Trump said Saturday in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform. "We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein," he added, referring to his "Make America Great Again" movement. Many among the MAGA faithful have long contended that so-called "Deep State" actors were hiding information on Epstein's elite associates. "Next the DOJ will say 'Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed,'" furious pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Alex Jones tweeted after last week's move. "This is over the top sickening." Far-right influencer Laura Loomer called for Trump to fire Bondi over the issue, labeling her "an embarrassment." But on Saturday, Trump came to the defense of his attorney general, suggesting that the so-called "Epstein Files" were a hoax perpetrated by the Democratic Party for political gain, without specifying what benefits they hoped to attain. On Saturday, Trump struck an exasperated tone in his admonishment of his supporters. "For years, it's Epstein, over and over again," he said. "Let' waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." The US president called for Patel and Bondi to instead focus on what he terms "The Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020," which Trump lost to Joe Biden. The Republican has repeatedly perpetuated unfounded conspiracy theories about his loss being due to fraud. He called for the FBI to be allowed to focus on that investigation "instead of spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old, Radical Left inspired Documents on Jeffrey Epstein. LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE'S GREAT!" Trump, who appears in at least one decades-old video alongside Epstein at a party, has denied allegations that he was named in the files or had any direct connection to the financier. "The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been," said FBI Director Patel on Saturday, hours before Trump's social media post. Not everyone, however, seemed to be on the same page.
Bangkok Post
8 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump's dealmaker name on the line in high stakes tariff talks
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump set out early in his second term to fulfill a decades-long desire of reshaping US trade with the world, but the main outcomes so far have been discord and uncertainty. The real estate tycoon, who has staked his reputation on being a consummate dealmaker, embarked on an aggressive strategy of punitive tariffs that his administration predicted could bring "90 deals in 90 days". The score so far? Two. Three if you count a temporary de-escalation agreement with China. The 90-day deadline was due on July 9, with dozens of economies including the European Union, India and Japan facing tariff hikes without a deal. But days before it arrived, Trump issued a delay to Aug 1. It was his second extension since unveiling the tariffs in April -- reigniting the "TACO Theory" that has gained traction among some Wall Street traders. The acronym coined by a Financial Times writer stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out", highlighting the president's inclination to roll back policies if markets turn sour. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, part of Trump's multi-leader trade team, has reportedly been a key advocate for the pauses. But the label has irked Trump and he insisted Tuesday that the deadline had always been in August. "I didn't make a change. A clarification, maybe," Trump said at a cabinet meeting. This week, he published more than 20 letters dictating tariff rates to world leaders including in Japan, South Korea and Indonesia. "We invite you to participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far," Trump wrote. He also issued letters to the EU, Canada, Mexico and Brazil -- although Brazil was not previously targeted by the steeper "reciprocal" tariffs and Canada and Mexico face a separate tariff regime. The documents "appear to be Trump's way of combatting the TACO label," said Inu Manak, a fellow for trade policy at the Council on Foreign Relations. "He wants to show that he's not just kicking the can down the road on the deadline, but that he means business," she told AFP. "He's likely frustrated that there isn't a parade of deals coming in." - 'Politically complicated' - "The shift in his rhetoric from 'there is no cost -- the foreigners pay the tariffs' to 'there is a short term cost, but there will be a long term gain' has put him in a more politically complicated position," said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Trump has repeatedly claimed that foreign countries foot the bill for tariffs, although the reality is more complicated with US companies generally paying them. "In the public's mind, the tariffs are the pain, and the agreements will be the gain," said Reinsch, a former US commerce official. He warned that without trade agreements, Americans could conclude Trump's strategy was flawed and deem his tactics a failure. While the 90-deal goal was probably unrealistic, Reinsch said, "it's clear that three (UK, China, Vietnam) with only one actual text made public (UK) is too small." - Deflecting attention - Meanwhile, Trump has announced a 50% levy on copper imports starting Aug 1. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said officials would also conclude investigations into semiconductors and pharmaceuticals -- which could lead to tariffs -- at month-end. "That timing is not coincidental -- it lines up with the new deadline of Aug 1, adding more pressure and deflecting attention from any lack of deals that get made in that time frame," Manak said. Analysts believe Trump's supporters will likely not pay much attention to trade talks unless the tariffs fuel inflation. "Trade policy is not top-of-mind for the average voter," said Emily Benson, head of strategy at Minerva Technology Futures. She expects the Trump administration's focus on boosting US manufacturing and reinvigorating the defense industrial base means it could be willing to bear some political heat to achieve those objectives. But it's a delicate balance. Voters will likely pay more attention if Trump follows through on his August tariff threats, Manak said. "And we could see a negative market reaction as well, which would not go unnoticed."
