Digital manga platforms pull sexually explicit ads from sites
The Japan E-Bookstore Association (JEBA) that consists of major operators of digital manga distribution platforms ceased running sexually explicit advertisements on websites that can be seen by children at the end of April.
According to the JEBA, it stopped distributing ads depicting sexual acts and nudity. Among the 11 digital manga platforms it oversees are Comic CMOA and Mechacomic.
The private and self-regulatory Japan Advertising Review Organization (JARO) had received numerous complaints that websites easily accessible to children ran such ads.
These sites are not age-restricted and anyone can visit them, children included.
Public opinion had also tilted toward classifying advertisements by purpose, function and choosing sites that matched their content to prevent them from popping up on children's sites. Furthermore, the issue was discussed in a Diet session.
These factors pushed JEBA, founded in 2018, to establish unified standards to regulate explicit ads at the end of April.
'We consider this an industry-wide issue and will collaborate to ensure advertisements are appropriate,' a JEBA official said.
The public is increasingly calling for greater regulation of explicit online ads.
One woman in her 30s submitted a petition on the issue to the safety division of the Children and Families Agency on June 4 after it amassed more than 100,000 signatures on Change.org. The mother of three first launched the petition drive in September 2024.
'We are not asking the government for legal regulations. We want the government to recognize that sexually explicit advertisements on nonsexual sites are a problem," the woman said at a news conference in Tokyo held the same day. "And we want pertinent ministries to collaborate to conduct surveys on the actual situation, to study efforts made by other countries and to develop solutions, including addressing technical issues.'
The woman, whose oldest child is 10, was shocked to see explicit ads after her children asked her to look up video game guides.
'In addition to the perspective of wanting to raise children properly, adults also experience mental distress caused by accidental exposure to sexually explicit ads,' she said. 'I am concerned that the existing social structure affirming the idea of women as sexual objects could create unconscious gender biases and lead to further sexual discrimination against women.'
Though her concern remains, she praised how the issue has been received, which includes increased media coverage after she started the petition.
'I am grateful that it has been recognized as a social problem and that self-regulation by industry groups and companies is gradually progressing,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
05-06-2025
- Asahi Shimbun
Digital manga platforms pull sexually explicit ads from sites
A woman who has collected more than 100,000 signatures to seek restrictions on online sexual advertisements on the online petition site holds a news conference in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward on June 4. (Midori Iki) The Japan E-Bookstore Association (JEBA) that consists of major operators of digital manga distribution platforms ceased running sexually explicit advertisements on websites that can be seen by children at the end of April. According to the JEBA, it stopped distributing ads depicting sexual acts and nudity. Among the 11 digital manga platforms it oversees are Comic CMOA and Mechacomic. The private and self-regulatory Japan Advertising Review Organization (JARO) had received numerous complaints that websites easily accessible to children ran such ads. These sites are not age-restricted and anyone can visit them, children included. Public opinion had also tilted toward classifying advertisements by purpose, function and choosing sites that matched their content to prevent them from popping up on children's sites. Furthermore, the issue was discussed in a Diet session. These factors pushed JEBA, founded in 2018, to establish unified standards to regulate explicit ads at the end of April. 'We consider this an industry-wide issue and will collaborate to ensure advertisements are appropriate,' a JEBA official said. The public is increasingly calling for greater regulation of explicit online ads. One woman in her 30s submitted a petition on the issue to the safety division of the Children and Families Agency on June 4 after it amassed more than 100,000 signatures on The mother of three first launched the petition drive in September 2024. 'We are not asking the government for legal regulations. We want the government to recognize that sexually explicit advertisements on nonsexual sites are a problem," the woman said at a news conference in Tokyo held the same day. "And we want pertinent ministries to collaborate to conduct surveys on the actual situation, to study efforts made by other countries and to develop solutions, including addressing technical issues.' The woman, whose oldest child is 10, was shocked to see explicit ads after her children asked her to look up video game guides. 'In addition to the perspective of wanting to raise children properly, adults also experience mental distress caused by accidental exposure to sexually explicit ads,' she said. 'I am concerned that the existing social structure affirming the idea of women as sexual objects could create unconscious gender biases and lead to further sexual discrimination against women.' Though her concern remains, she praised how the issue has been received, which includes increased media coverage after she started the petition. 'I am grateful that it has been recognized as a social problem and that self-regulation by industry groups and companies is gradually progressing,' she said.
Yomiuri Shimbun
05-06-2025
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Penalties in Whistleblowing System: The Weight of Protecting Accusers Must Be Seriously Taken to Heart
The revision of the Whistleblower Protection Law can be described as an attempt to ensure protection for those who accuse others of wrongdoing or illegal acts within their organizations. Local governments and corporations should take the newly established penalties seriously. A bill to revise the law, meant to offer whistleblowers more robust protection, has been passed. It received unanimous support in the House of Representatives and the backing of a significant majority in the House of Councillors. The current law prohibits local governments, private companies and other entities from conducting disadvantageous treatment to those who report illegal acts in their organizations to internal sections to deal with whistleblowing, media organizations or others. However, there are no penalties at present. The revised law stipulates a fine of up to ¥30 million for corporations that dismiss or take disciplinary action against a whistleblower for leveling an accusation. Individuals who are involved in decisions to punish whistleblowers are to be jailed for up to six months or fined up to ¥300,000. In addition, the revised law states explicitly that whistleblowers may not be sought out. Under the current law, this is noted in the guidelines. In the past, whistleblowers have revealed that information on food labels was being falsified and that vehicle recalls were not issued when they should have been. There are many examples of whistleblowers uncovering irregularities in organizations. However, if those who speak out about offenses are mistreated, there will be no one left to blow the whistle. Establishing penalties to prevent undue pressure on whistleblowers is a significant step. The importance of the whistleblowing system has been underlined again by the turmoil that has plagued the Hyogo prefectural government since last year. Gov. Motohiko Saito has repeatedly acted in a way that appears to have trampled on the spirit of the law. Saito directed a search for a former senior official in the prefectural government who accused him of workplace bullying, among other things, and identified the accuser. The prefectural government then took disciplinary action against the former official. He later died in what is believed to have been a suicide. This year, a third-party committee set up by the prefectural government concluded that the search for the accuser and the disciplinary action were violations of the Whistleblower Protection Law. However, Saito still denies any illegality. He has said that the conclusions of the committee and others are 'just one view' and that his 'perception differs' from them. Although third parties pointed out his offense, Saito simply became defiant, and he has evinced no shred of sincerity as he continues to evade the issue. The penalties in the revised law do not apply retroactively, but the Diet's passage of the revised bill by an overwhelming margin demonstrates just how unjust was the disciplinary action against the former official. A new allegation has surfaced that personal information about the former official was leaked externally at Saito's direction. As long as Saito refuses to admit to his wrongdoing and remains in his post, the turmoil in the prefectural government will not abate. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 5, 2025)
The Mainichi
27-05-2025
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Can Japan protect privacy under law ordering digital data provision?
TOKYO -- Japan has enacted revisions to the Code of Criminal Procedure and other legislation aimed at digitizing criminal justice procedures, yet concerns remain that citizens' privacy may be unjustly infringed upon in the name of criminal investigations. With the enactment of the revisions, search and seizure warrants can now be requested and issued online, enhancing the efficiency of investigations. A new system also allows investigative authorities to order the provision of electronic data with a court warrant. Online "seizure" is now possible, and failure to comply with such orders may result in penalties. It is anticipated that providers and cloud service operators will be asked to provide information including communication histories and server access records. There could also conceivably be cases in which acquaintances of investigation targets are required to submit their exchanges via communication apps. During the Diet deliberations, a key issue raised was the risk of collecting more personal information than necessary, as businesses or other parties fearing criminal liability may provide information not directly related to a crime. There are no rules requiring authorities to notify targets of investigations when information provision orders are issued to businesses or other parties. Regulations have also been established, with penalties, to keep the provision of information confidential. Both measures are intended to prevent the destruction of evidence. However, there is a risk of people's privacy being infringed on without their knowledge. Even if improper data collection is later revealed, investigative authorities are not obligated to delete the information. There are additional potential restrictions on the rights of investigation targets. If information stored on smartphones or computers is protected with a password, investigative authorities cannot force a person to reveal it. But under the new system, they can order the person to unlock the password and provide the information, with penalties for noncompliance. It has been pointed out that this may conflict with the constitutional guarantee that people shall not be compelled to testify against themselves. Courts play a crucial role in preventing the arbitrary collection of information. Strict scrutiny is required to ensure that such orders are limited to the scope necessary for investigations. In the European Union, where the protection of personal information is stringent, an independent supervisory body has been established to ensure unnecessary data is deleted by criminal justice authorities. Japan should consider adopting a similar approach.
