
How Humility Can Restore Trust in Expertise
Our research was sparked by a recurring tension we both noticed early in our academic careers. Our graduate studies made us deeply aware of how little we knew about our respective research areas, even as we developed specialized knowledge in these fields. Scholars call this particular variety of self-awareness ' intellectual humility,' and it's something we suspect many experts encounter as they transition into a new role.
On the other hand, barely anyone seemed to expect us to be intellectually humble in our then new positions. People seemed to engage with us as know-it-all, capital-E experts who could confidently answer any questions that were even remotely related to our specialties. The scariest part was that we could have easily exploited these opportunities to share our opinions on topics well beyond our expertise.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
These experiences got us thinking about the importance of humility among experts. There is value in having confidence in what you know, but being truthful about the limits of your knowledge is also important, even if it's not always encouraged. Research has linked intellectual humility with many desirable behaviors, including considering others' perspectives, being better at conflict resolution and being less dogmatic. Conversely, when experts claim to know more than they actually do, this is not only a betrayal of trust but also potentially disastrous in terms of promoting healthy public discourse.
Given these high stakes, we decided to study how people think about expertise and humility. We discovered that, indeed, many people assume a true expert 'knows all'—even though that's highly unlikely. We propose that encouraging others to value intellectual humility in experts could be critical to correcting that tendency.
We designed a series of studies to understand how people think about experts. Our first was a simple survey. We asked 100 paid participants (recruited through an online research platform) to freely describe their understanding of expertise. In our next study, we analyzed about 200 posts on Twitter (now X) that related to experts during the onset of the COVID pandemic. And in our third study, we asked 700 online participants to tackle a word sorting task in which they identified and grouped different terms (such as 'knowledge' or 'qualifications') into broader perspectives on expertise.
Across these studies, our results suggested that most people assume that exceptional knowledge is a defining feature of expertise. The notion that expertise is defined by solving problems and getting results was also a recurring tendency, as was the belief that specialist training and education are central to expertise.
At first glance, these understandings of expertise seem obvious and benign. There's nothing wrong with using credentials and a demonstrated record of overcoming problems to evaluate someone's position as an expert. Our concern, however, is that relying on these criteria alone may leave some people vulnerable to perceiving expertise in those who only appear to know their stuff—in other words, those who simply project confidence. Much research has shown that the link between confidence and competence is far from straight forward. From this standpoint, defining expertise largely in terms of knowledge and capability may ironically make people more vulnerable to following those who simply project these qualities rather than actual experts.
We argue that humility is a trait worth valuing just as much as competence when thinking about experts. Across our datasets, a small portion of respondents linked expertise with intellectual humility. One participant wrote about how experts are people who come to the 'humble realization that you'll always be a student and there is a lot more to learn.' Or, as one Twitter user put it, 'A tell-tale sign of an expert is that if they don't know something, they will say so.'
Our studies also showed that expecting experts to be all-knowing might contribute to significant problems. For example, people could develop unrealistically high expectations of those in expert roles, leading to disappointment, anger or resentment when they inevitably fail to deliver on those expectations. Some of the tweets we gathered during the pandemic pointed to such frustration, with one person writing, 'Your 'experts' have caused 1000s to die.'
After our initial studies, we wanted to dig deeper into attitudes around humble experts, so we designed and conducted an online experiment with 200 managers. We asked our participants to watch one of three videos. One video highlighted the value of a humble expert. Another depicted the upsides of a highly confident, gets-things-done expert. And the third acted as a control that simply focused on negotiation styles. After they watched the videos, we asked our participants to imagine themselves collaborating with a legal specialist who was open and transparent about the limitations of his expertise. Afterward, our participants rated the specialist on various criteria, measuring the extent to which they saw him as an expert.
We found that showing people a relatively short and simple video that explained the virtues of a humble expert led those participants to rate the specialist in the vignette more highly than those participants who watched the other videos.
In a second, scenario-based experiment, we asked 240 managers with hiring experience to watch their respective videos and then review an application package from a job candidate for a sustainability specialist in a (fictional) organization. Some of the applications portrayed the candidate as highly confident and assured. Others presented someone humble and open about their limitations. Much like the first experiment, our videos could push people to recognize a particular candidate as more (or less) of an expert, depending on the video they viewed.
In future research, we want to see if it's possible to create more substantial changes in how people understand expertise—changes that endure for weeks, months and potentially years. We want to know whether helping people prize intellectual humility in experts might make them better at detecting when someone is venturing beyond the boundaries of their expertise.
In the spirit of humility, we also need to acknowledge our work's limitations. Our research is not a perfect fix for people's vulnerability to experts who claim to know all. But ultimately, it suggests that we can shift people's thinking about experts to create environments that prize and foster intellectual humility. Doing so seems especially valuable, given the potential for intellectual humility in helping experts gain public trust and confidence.
Our research gives us hope for our society and the state of expert engagement. People can and do hold nuanced understandings of expertise, and it's possible to help people move from simplistic understandings of what makes an expert to more thoughtful ones. Part of the solution may lie in valuing intellectual humility in and of itself. Interestingly, researchers have recently found that young children tend to see intellectually humble people as nicer and smarter than those who are arrogant. A shift toward valuing unwarranted confidence over humility may therefore happen later in life.
Although humility is not the first quality most people consider when they think 'expert,' societies can take steps to strengthen this mental link. Doing so can ensure that humble experts, who are aware of and transparent about the limits of their expertise, are there to help humanity tackle our world's most urgent and pressing challenges.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Business News
6 hours ago
- Time Business News
Nano Zeolite Sieves Drive Growth in Energy, Water, and Medical Sectors
Molecular sieve is a crystalline material made from metal aluminosilicates, featuring pores that are all the same size. It has a three-dimensional structure, like a network, made up of silica and alumina tetrahedra all linked together. By heating the material, the natural water it contains gets removed, creating uniform empty spaces. These spaces then act like tiny traps, specifically capturing molecules of a particular size. Increasing demand for processing from of the oil and gas industry and increasing awareness for the treatment of hazardous organic materials in the wastewater are major driving factors. Several emerging opportunities are created with innovation of the nano size zeolite molecular sieves for the medical oxygen concentration. Moreover, advancement in technology for the proper oxygen supply and the development of antimicrobial zeolite molecular sieves drives growth on global scale. Key Growth Drivers and Opportunities Demand in Oil & Gas sector: Molecular sieves are crucial in the oil and gas industry, used for operations such as drying natural gas, refining oil, and making petrochemicals. As the oil and gas industry keeps growing, especially in the Asia-Pacific area, the need for these molecular sieves is also in high demand. Also, strict environmental rules are pushing the use of better purification methods, which in turn is increasing the popularity of molecular sieves. Improvements in sieve design and how efficiently they can be renewed are also making them more useful in both early-stage and later-stage processes. Industrial Application: Molecular sieves are handy in all sorts of industrial jobs, like separating gases, cleaning up air, and acting as catalysts in chemical reactions. They're really good at this because they can soak up and pick out specific things, which makes them perfect for getting rid of moisture, CO₂, and other unwanted stuff from industrial gas flows. Challenges Options such as silica gel, calcium sulfate, and certain membrane methods can offer similar performance but might be more budget-friendly. However, these alternatives often fall short when it comes to the top-tier selectivity, heat resistance, and ability to be easily recharged that molecular sieves provide. That's why molecular sieves are still the go-to pick for demanding jobs where precision and toughness are absolutely essential. Innovation and Expansion Honeywell Backs India with $3M Aid and Oxygen Tech In August 2021, Honeywell International announced that it will provide USD 3 million in assistance to India through the Covid-19 procedure. Personnel from the company constructed critical care units with protective gear, air, and beds. DRDO and the Indian Institute of Petroleum also use the company's molecular sieve adsorbents. This support really showcases Honeywell's dedication to public health and how its technology helps out during emergencies. Their molecular sieves were absolutely crucial for oxygen generation and purification systems throughout the pandemic. BASF Boosts Bio-Based Surfactant Capacity with Dual APG Plants In June 2023, BASF SE has made an announcement that it's planning to boost its production capacity for alkyl polyglucosides (APGs) worldwide. They're going to build two new facilities—one in Bangpakong, Thailand, and another in Cincinnati, Ohio. This move is aimed at keeping up with the growing demand for bio-based surfactants and to offer customers a faster and more flexible service. By growing in two regions at the same time, BASF can cut down on moving products between areas. BASF is hoping its new facilities will give the company a better position in the market for bio-based surfactants. These facilities should also help important industries reach their sustainability goals. APGs, which are widely used in personal care, home cleaning, and industrial cleaning products, are popular as they're gentle and seen as sustainable. Inventive Sparks, Expanding Markets The key players operating the molecular sieve market involves Arkema, Axens, BASF SE, Cabot Corporation, CarboTech AC GmbH, Clariant, Dalian Absortbent Co. Ltd., among others. Major players operating in the target market are focusing on strategic partnerships as well as the launching of the Product Types to gain a competitive edge in the target market. About Author: Prophecy is a specialized market research, analytics, marketing and business strategy, and solutions company that offer strategic and tactical support to clients for making well-informed business decisions and to identify and achieve high value opportunities in the target business area. Also, we help our client to address business challenges and provide best possible solutions to overcome them and transform their business. TIME BUSINESS NEWS


Scientific American
a day ago
- Scientific American
How Humility Can Restore Trust in Expertise
Whom would you trust more: an expert who seems to have all of the answers or one who admits what they don't know? We have spent the past five years studying that question and the many ways people may respond. Our research was sparked by a recurring tension we both noticed early in our academic careers. Our graduate studies made us deeply aware of how little we knew about our respective research areas, even as we developed specialized knowledge in these fields. Scholars call this particular variety of self-awareness ' intellectual humility,' and it's something we suspect many experts encounter as they transition into a new role. On the other hand, barely anyone seemed to expect us to be intellectually humble in our then new positions. People seemed to engage with us as know-it-all, capital-E experts who could confidently answer any questions that were even remotely related to our specialties. The scariest part was that we could have easily exploited these opportunities to share our opinions on topics well beyond our expertise. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. These experiences got us thinking about the importance of humility among experts. There is value in having confidence in what you know, but being truthful about the limits of your knowledge is also important, even if it's not always encouraged. Research has linked intellectual humility with many desirable behaviors, including considering others' perspectives, being better at conflict resolution and being less dogmatic. Conversely, when experts claim to know more than they actually do, this is not only a betrayal of trust but also potentially disastrous in terms of promoting healthy public discourse. Given these high stakes, we decided to study how people think about expertise and humility. We discovered that, indeed, many people assume a true expert 'knows all'—even though that's highly unlikely. We propose that encouraging others to value intellectual humility in experts could be critical to correcting that tendency. We designed a series of studies to understand how people think about experts. Our first was a simple survey. We asked 100 paid participants (recruited through an online research platform) to freely describe their understanding of expertise. In our next study, we analyzed about 200 posts on Twitter (now X) that related to experts during the onset of the COVID pandemic. And in our third study, we asked 700 online participants to tackle a word sorting task in which they identified and grouped different terms (such as 'knowledge' or 'qualifications') into broader perspectives on expertise. Across these studies, our results suggested that most people assume that exceptional knowledge is a defining feature of expertise. The notion that expertise is defined by solving problems and getting results was also a recurring tendency, as was the belief that specialist training and education are central to expertise. At first glance, these understandings of expertise seem obvious and benign. There's nothing wrong with using credentials and a demonstrated record of overcoming problems to evaluate someone's position as an expert. Our concern, however, is that relying on these criteria alone may leave some people vulnerable to perceiving expertise in those who only appear to know their stuff—in other words, those who simply project confidence. Much research has shown that the link between confidence and competence is far from straight forward. From this standpoint, defining expertise largely in terms of knowledge and capability may ironically make people more vulnerable to following those who simply project these qualities rather than actual experts. We argue that humility is a trait worth valuing just as much as competence when thinking about experts. Across our datasets, a small portion of respondents linked expertise with intellectual humility. One participant wrote about how experts are people who come to the 'humble realization that you'll always be a student and there is a lot more to learn.' Or, as one Twitter user put it, 'A tell-tale sign of an expert is that if they don't know something, they will say so.' Our studies also showed that expecting experts to be all-knowing might contribute to significant problems. For example, people could develop unrealistically high expectations of those in expert roles, leading to disappointment, anger or resentment when they inevitably fail to deliver on those expectations. Some of the tweets we gathered during the pandemic pointed to such frustration, with one person writing, 'Your 'experts' have caused 1000s to die.' After our initial studies, we wanted to dig deeper into attitudes around humble experts, so we designed and conducted an online experiment with 200 managers. We asked our participants to watch one of three videos. One video highlighted the value of a humble expert. Another depicted the upsides of a highly confident, gets-things-done expert. And the third acted as a control that simply focused on negotiation styles. After they watched the videos, we asked our participants to imagine themselves collaborating with a legal specialist who was open and transparent about the limitations of his expertise. Afterward, our participants rated the specialist on various criteria, measuring the extent to which they saw him as an expert. We found that showing people a relatively short and simple video that explained the virtues of a humble expert led those participants to rate the specialist in the vignette more highly than those participants who watched the other videos. In a second, scenario-based experiment, we asked 240 managers with hiring experience to watch their respective videos and then review an application package from a job candidate for a sustainability specialist in a (fictional) organization. Some of the applications portrayed the candidate as highly confident and assured. Others presented someone humble and open about their limitations. Much like the first experiment, our videos could push people to recognize a particular candidate as more (or less) of an expert, depending on the video they viewed. In future research, we want to see if it's possible to create more substantial changes in how people understand expertise—changes that endure for weeks, months and potentially years. We want to know whether helping people prize intellectual humility in experts might make them better at detecting when someone is venturing beyond the boundaries of their expertise. In the spirit of humility, we also need to acknowledge our work's limitations. Our research is not a perfect fix for people's vulnerability to experts who claim to know all. But ultimately, it suggests that we can shift people's thinking about experts to create environments that prize and foster intellectual humility. Doing so seems especially valuable, given the potential for intellectual humility in helping experts gain public trust and confidence. Our research gives us hope for our society and the state of expert engagement. People can and do hold nuanced understandings of expertise, and it's possible to help people move from simplistic understandings of what makes an expert to more thoughtful ones. Part of the solution may lie in valuing intellectual humility in and of itself. Interestingly, researchers have recently found that young children tend to see intellectually humble people as nicer and smarter than those who are arrogant. A shift toward valuing unwarranted confidence over humility may therefore happen later in life. Although humility is not the first quality most people consider when they think 'expert,' societies can take steps to strengthen this mental link. Doing so can ensure that humble experts, who are aware of and transparent about the limits of their expertise, are there to help humanity tackle our world's most urgent and pressing challenges.


Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
'Extremely Severe' Obesity on the Rise in US Children—Study
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Extremely severe obesity among American children has increased more than threefold over the past 15 years, with new research published on the JAMA Network, highlighting disturbing trends in prevalence and related health complications. Researchers analyzed national health data from 2008 to 2023, uncovering a surge in the most severe obesity categories for U.S. children aged 2 to 18 years old. Newsweek has reached out to the authors of the study via email Sunday during non-working hours for further comment. Why It Matters The study comes as the nation faces persistent challenges combating childhood obesity, signaling what authors have called a "public health emergency" with wide-ranging medical and economic consequences for future generations. "The findings underscore the urgent need for public health interventions against pediatric obesity in the U.S.," authors Eliane Munte, Xinlian Zhang, Amit Khurana, and Phillipp Hartmann wrote in the study. The sharp upswing in extremely severe obesity among children raises the risk of developing serious medical conditions—including type 2 diabetes, steatotic liver disease, also known as fatty liver disease (MASLD), metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as of April 2024, approximately 1 in 5 children—14.7 million—are already classified as obese, with the burden disproportionately affecting racial minorities and lower-income families. Untreated, these complications can persist into adulthood, multiplying risks for chronic disease and shortened life expectancy. What To Know The study evaluated data from 25,847 children and teens, drawing from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2008 and 2023. Obesity was categorized using percentiles based on age and sex, and researchers identified a 253 percent relative increase in extremely severe obesity. Adolescents aged 16 to 18 and non-Hispanic Black children were especially affected. According to the CDC, the prevalence of obesity in U.S. children and teens aged 2-19 years increased from 19.46 percent in 2008 to 22.52 percent in 2023. Several factors have fueled the rise in pediatric obesity, including decreased physical activity, increased screen time, and greater access to high-calorie, low-nutrient foods. Researchers noted that these issues intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, with children experiencing a nearly doubled rate of annual weight gain between 2019 and 2021 compared to prior years. "The monthly rate of BMI increase nearly times faster after the virus appeared," Dr. Alyson Goodman of the CDC said in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) in 2021, highlighting the influence of pandemic-era disruptions. Economic and social disparities also contribute significantly to who is most affected. The CDC reported higher obesity rates among children in families below 130 percent of the federal poverty level around 25 percent, compared with those in wealthier households at 11.5 percent. Unequal access to healthy foods, safe recreational spaces, and adequate medical care also play roles, the CDC said in 2024. The JAMA study found significantly higher odds of children developing MASLD (a fatty liver disease), diabetes or prediabetes, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and early signs of heart disease. Left unchecked, these conditions can lead to cirrhosis, liver cancer, and major cardiovascular events later in life. In 2024, the CDC estimated the annual medical cost of childhood obesity at $1.3 billion, underscoring the seriousness of the crisis. A beam scale is seen in New York on April 3, 2018. A beam scale is seen in New York on April 3, 2018. AP Photo/Patrick Sison, File What People Are Saying The authors of the study wrote in the conclusion: "The findings of this study with over 25,800 participants provide robust evidence supporting extremely severe obesity specifically as a public health emergency. The association with metabolic and cardiovascular complications necessitates urgent public health action, such as early prevention, targeted education, and the mobilization of resources." What Happens Next? The authors called for "urgent public health interventions" and proposed a multi-layered approach, including preventive education, improved access to nutritious foods, and equitable health care.