Governor/INDOT announce over $200 million in road construction grants
These grants are to be used in local road and bridge construction projects. The money will be split across 245 cities, towns, and counties throughout Indiana. These different communities filled out applications for these grants back in January. Funding for these grants comes from the state's matching grant fund for this type of work. Community Crossings has given out more than $2 billion since 2016 when it was created.
'Improving and maintaining roads and bridges at all levels is crucial for enhancing quality of life and public safety for Hoosiers,' said Gov. Braun. 'Communities across the state need investment in their local infrastructure and we are pleased to partner with them to make necessary improvements.'
These are the local areas to receive grant money:
Brazil
$616,401.23
Clay County
$1,500,000.00
Daviess County
$1,120,970.25
Knox County
$1,500,000.00
Martin County
$1,106,930.25
Merom
$24,842.42
Newberry
$102,000.00
Oaktown
$82,200.57
Parke County
$1,500,000.00
Putnam County
$1,457,989.50
Shelburn
$252,729.74
Staunton
$71,387.25
Sullivan County
$1,500,000.00
Vermillion County
$1,500,000.00
Vigo County
$749,799.61
Long-term funding has already been approved for these grants to continue their work as part of House Enrolled Act 1002, passed in 2017. To learn more about the Community Crossings matching grant program, you can click on the link here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
3 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana tolls on I-65? I don't like it, but our crumbling roads need the cash.
When I head to Chicago or Nashville, I know I'll be receiving a tolling invoice in the mail soon after. It's a minor inconvenience because I don't use those routes very often. But the prospect of Indiana tolling interstates within state lines is an entirely different discussion. I take Interstate 65 to and from work almost every day and I would no doubt rack up a ridiculous bill — at the same time that I'm paying high gas taxes every time I fill up. My immediate reaction is: no way. But I'm trying to see all sides of the debate. The fact is Hoosiers love to complain about our roads, but no one wants to pay to improve them. And our roads aren't that bad depending on who you ask. The Indiana Department of Transportation compared Indiana to neighboring states on 12 criteria, including road and bridge conditions, fatality rates, travel reliability and more: 'INDOT ranked in the top 3rd in 5 areas and in the middle 3rd in the others,' the 2024 report said. The federal Bureau of Transportation Statistics also rates 97% of Indiana's roads as 'good' or 'fair.' But a Reason Foundation analysis found Indiana ranked 32nd in highway performance nationally. And the money raised from Indiana's fuel-related taxes simply isn't keeping up with demand. That's partially because people are purchasing less gasoline. Newer cars are more efficient, and some cars don't need it at all. Inflation has also spiked the cost of repairing or replacing roads and bridges. So, Indiana — and every other state — has a diminishing revenue stream but more roads than ever to maintain. And when I say Indiana, I don't just mean state-owned roads. Most of the roads in the state are cared for by counties, cities and towns — about 89%. Their needs are immense. One analysis said local governments would require an additional $2.4 billion annually to eliminate poorly rated local roads and bridges across the state over the next 10 years. The annual price tag for simply maintaining roads at the current condition is $1 billion. So, would any of the additional revenue raised from tolls go to local infrastructure? More from Niki Kelly: Indiana's crackdown on small college programs will drive students away Lawmakers recently tried to think outside the box and offer other options. One was a surcharge on deliveries, such as Amazon and DoorDash. That language was removed pretty quickly. The state is also trying to force local units into implementing wheel taxes to take some ownership of the problem and raise fees and taxes at the local level. But those are honestly just nibbling around the edges of the problem. Tolling is where the money is at. And it's a lot of money. One 2017 feasibility study produced for INDOT estimated that a statewide interstate highway tolling program would have an 85% chance of generating upwards of $39 billion between 2021 and 2050. It further reported a 50% chance that revenue could exceed $53 billion over that timeframe. The estimates didn't include the costs to install and maintain tolling gantries, process payments, provide customer service, enforce collections and more. Former Gov. Eric Holcomb chose not to go down that route, but Gov. Mike Braun appears to be more interested. And lawmakers recently removed some final impediments to imposing tolling on state highways. 'It's going to have to be considered because, otherwise, I don't think we can maintain our main arteries,' Braun said earlier this year. Tolling interstates isn't as clear-cut as it seems. It's generally against federal law to collect tolls on existing federal highways. But Congress has allowed several exceptions. For instance, a state can toll an existing bridge after it is reconstructed and toll new lanes added to an interstate. Briggs: Mike Braun grandstands on Indianapolis crime while murders drop 24% The option that is most expansive is the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program, which allows tolling on existing interstate facilities to fund needed reconstruction or rehabilitation on corridors that could not otherwise be adequately maintained or functionally improved. It has only three slots — awarded to Missouri, North Carolina and Virginia years ago. But those states never implemented the program, which has essentially been inactive. INDOT said it has not filed a waiver request on tolling — yet. I honestly don't see how tolling in some way can be avoided. Leaders want to capture the trucks and travelers passing through Indiana without stopping for gas. But it'll be tough to avoid hurting Hoosiers already paying their fair share.
Indianapolis Star
3 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump administration grants two Indiana plants ‘relief' from toxic pollution regulations
Last week the Trump administration eased pollution regulations for dozens of industrial sites across the country that spew toxic emissions — two of which operate inside Indiana. Across a series of four proclamations, the White House gave the roughly 90 facilities — chemical manufacturers, sterilization facilities, power plants — an additional two years to meet hazardous air pollution rules set by the EPA under the Biden administration. The new proclamations will allow certain facilities to keep operating under the EPA's old regulations until roughly 2028 and 2029, although individual deadlines vary. In Indiana, a chemical manufacturing plant in Mount Vernon, SABIC Innovative Plastics, and a medical equipment sterilization facility in Ellettsville, operated by Cook Medical, both received extensions. Some Hoosiers are concerned the move deprioritizes human health. The government claims "that meeting compliance is too burdensome/expensive to the business but not meeting the compliance levels can be very burdensome to the health of nearby communities," Gabriel Filippelli, a biochemist and urban health researcher at Indiana University, wrote to IndyStar in an email. "These standards have been developed for solid, scientific reasons, and this feels like rolling back protections for people to enhance profits for companies." The Clean Air Act allows pollution compliance extensions if the technology needed to meet standards isn't available and if the exemptions are in the national security interest of the United States. The White House is arguing both points. 'SABIC appreciates the Trump administration's decision to grant regulatory relief,' Jennifer Schumann, a spokeswoman for the Mount Vernon plant, wrote in a statement to IndyStar. There isn't an 'off the shelf solution' for compliance with the 2024 EPA regulations, she added — rather, the technology needs to be engineered and constructed. The American Chemistry Council, which represents manufacturers like SABIC, maintained the cost of meeting pollution regulations could exceed $50 billion, per a partially filled records request that the IndyStar obtained from the EPA. Advocates for environmental and public health say the exemptions are examples of the administration putting profit over human and environmental health. An EPA assessment for the plants in Mount Vernon and Ellettsville places both facilities on the high end of riskiness to human health, after considering the amount of chemicals released onsite, the degree of toxicity and the size of the exposed population. 'There were regulations put in place by experts based on what is good for human health,' said Heather Navarro, the director of the Midwest Climate Collaborative, a climate change response network which includes Indiana University and the City of Indianapolis. 'Now we're saying that what's more important is profit. And I think that's hugely problematic, and that should concern every American.' It isn't yet clear if or how the administration will address the potential public health impacts of two-year exemptions. And while it's hard to gauge exactly how two additional years of non-compliance will impact communities downwind of pollutants, the exemption "equals two years of potentially profound impacts on community health," according to Filippelli. One proclamation targeted exemptions at 39 medical equipment manufacturing facilities, which often use the gas ethylene oxide to sterilize their products. Ethylene oxide is highly effective, but it's also a carcinogen that can leak out of vents during the sterilization and aeration process, according to the EPA. In a 2024 report, the EPA wrote many medical sterilization facilities in the United States are located near residences, schools and communities with environmental justice concerns. They determined the use of ethylene oxide at several of the plants pose 'high lifetime cancer risks to surrounding communities.' 'It's a really useful compound in manufacturing everything from sterilizations to manufacturing things like antifreeze and polyester,' said Shannon Anderson, the directory of advocacy at Earth Charter Indiana. 'But it's also incredibly dangerous to human health. It's a carcinogen. It's responsible for all kinds of respiratory inflammation and chronic inflammation and it can damage your nervous system. And in certain quantities, it can be fatal.' The Cook Medical plant treats tens of thousands of pounds of ethylene oxide every year, but the facility's emissions and discharges of the toxic chemical have dropped drastically since 2019, according to EPA data. In 2023, the EPA reported 11 pounds of ethylene oxide at Cook Medical in Ellettsville were disposed of or released. Cook Medical declined to comment on why they applied for an exemption. A separate proclamation directed two-year exemptions at chemical manufacturers and refineries, like the SABIC plastic plant in Mount Vernon. The SABIC plant develops thermoplastics, and in 2023, it released several million pounds of chemicals on and offsite, according to the EPA. Schumann, SABIC's spokeswoman, told IndyStar in a statement the emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants impose 'substantial and costly additional burdens on chemical manufacturers already operating under stringent regulations,' and the company will continue to uphold the 'highest standards' in their environmental stewardship. But environmental advocates aren't convinced the burdens of monitoring and regulating air pollution can just dissipate with a presidential proclamation.
Indianapolis Star
3 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
When Hoosiers move from Indiana, where do they go? Here's what U-Haul says
When Hoosiers decide to pack their belongings into a U-Haul truck and put Indiana in the rearview mirror, where do they go? According to a recent report by U-Haul, many stick close to the Midwest, traveling an average of 230 miles if they're headed to major U.S. cities outside of Indianapolis. Here's what we know. From January to July 2025, U-Haul tracked customers renting its one-way trucks, trailers and U-Box containers as part of its annual midyear growth report. The resulting "U-Haul 2025 Midyear Migration Trends" reveals what cities and states its customers arrived from when traveling to 35 U.S. metro areas, each with populations greater than 2 million people. Chicago, as it turns out, gets a lot of ex-Hoosiers and vice versa, while Ohio has three major cities that are attractive places to live. A quick glance at the report also reveals where, if you live in Indiana, your new neighbors might have come from. Note: U-Haul does not provide the exact number of customers entering and exiting U.S. States, which its lists are based upon, "for competitive and proprietary reasons," a spokesperson with the company told IndyStar. The U-Haul Growth Index for 2024, however, compiled upwards of 2.5 million customer transactions, according to the company. The cities below are listed alphabetically as they appeared in the report. According to the findings, the top metro areas Hoosiers move to include these cities, which are sorted alphabetically: Here's a quick breakdown of each city and where Indiana ranks. Distance from Indianapolis to Chicago: 183 miles. The Windy City is a popular state for ex-Hoosiers, according to the report. Indiana ranked first for arriving U-Haul customers. After that, it's Michigan, Wisconsin and these other U.S. states: Story continues after photo gallery. Indianapolis also is the second leading metro area for arriving U-Haul customers to Chicago outside of Illinois, according to the company. The rankings are as follows: Distance from Indianapolis to Cincinnati: 112 miles. Is Cincinnati chili really all that good? Possibly. Indiana ranks second among the top states for arriving U-Haul customers to Cincinnati outside of Ohio. The list includes: The top metro areas for arriving U-Haul customers to Cincinnati outside of Ohio are: Distance from Indianapolis to Cleveland: 316 miles. We know last year's Indianapolis Colts season could've gone better, but trading them for the Cleveland Browns? Really? It must not be for the football. Indiana ranked sixth for U-Haul customers arriving to Cleveland outside of Ohio, according to the report, which includes these other states: More about the Colts: Why the Colts need Anthony Richardson to be the starting quarterback. Distance from Indianapolis to Columbus: 174 miles. Columbus is regarded for its vibrant arts, culture and food scene, and ex-Hoosiers apparently want a piece of that. Indiana came in second among the top states for arriving U-Haul customers to Columbus outside of Ohio, according to the report. And while Florida might have come in first, Indianapolis was cited as the top metro area of U-Haul's customers headed to Columbus. Here's the breakdown: The top metro areas for arriving U-Haul customers to Columbus from outside of Ohio are: Distance from Indianapolis to Detroit: 287 miles. Trading one Midwest powerhouse for another, Indiana ranked fourth of arriving U-Haul customers to Detroit from outside of Michigan. The top states include the following: Distance from Indianapolis to Nashville: 288 miles. Nashville might be known as "Music City" but Hoosiers appear to be at the back of the choir singing its praises. Indiana ranked 10th among the top states for arriving U-Haul customers to Nashville from outside of Tennessee, according to the report. The top states were Florida, Georgia, Texas and these others: Distance from Indianapolis to St. Louis: 247 miles. St. Louis is famous for its iconic Gateway Arch, which welcomed Hoosiers moving to Missouri this year. Indiana ranked sixth among the top states for arriving U-Haul customers to St. Louis, according to the report. The top states include Illinois, Texas, and these others: Indianapolis by the decade: Archive photos show a century of life in Indy. Maybe the grass is greener on both sides of the lawn? While U-Haul's 2025 midyear migration report might have listed Illinois and Ohio as top places Hoosiers moved to when leaving Indiana, the Circle City received plenty of one-way U-Haul customers from both the Prairie and Buckeye states. According to the report, the top U.S. states for arriving U-Haul customers to Indianapolis include the following: So far in 2025, Indianapolis is receiving more U-Haul customers from Chicago than Cincinnati or Louisville, according the report. Within Indiana, U-Haul reports its customers living in Fort Wayne are moving to Indianapolis in greater numbers than elsewhere inside the Hoosier State. The top five Indiana cities of U-Haul customers moving to Indianapolis include:
