Victim of alleged Dublin mugger got tetanus shot after accomplice 'dug' her fingernails into his arms
Robert Maguire, 35, was charged with robbery on Sycamore Street on 31 May last and refused bail by Judge Máire Conneely at Dublin District Court today.
Garda Shane McConkey stated that at around 3.15am, the injured party was on his way home after socialising in the city centre. He turned onto Sycamore Street, in Dublin 2, when Maguire and a woman allegedly pursued him.
The accused, who resided at a hostel on Merchant's Quay, Dublin 8, reportedly punched him in the back of the head, causing him to become disoriented.
The pair then wrestled him into a doorway before another male became involved, and they threw him to the ground.
The complainant dropped his iPhone 15.
The second male robber picked it up as the female accomplice allegedly 'dug her nails into his forearm and attempted to pull his watch off of his wrist'.
The garda who objected to bail stated that this caused the man extreme pain.
'He attempted to fight back but was overwhelmed when the third male returned and helped pin him to the ground.'
It was alleged that the three suspects then rooted through his pockets.
Advertisement
The man shouted for help, and the trio fled when several members of the public approached.
The court heard there was an unsuccessful bid to use his bank card, which had been in his phone case, in a shop at O'Connell Street.
It was claimed the man suffered bruising to both his elbows, scrapes to his right forearm, and deep nail marks on his wrist and left bicep.
He went to a doctor the following day and needed a tetanus shot due to the deep nail marks on his arms becoming infected.
Judge Conneely was informed that the man had to take antibiotics for several days. He also missed work due to his injuries and psychological effects.
CCTV footage was obtained.
A decision awaits on whether the accused will be tried in the District Court or the Circuit Court, which has wider sentencing powers.
Defence counsel Sam Friel argued that his client, who has yet to plead, was entitled to the presumption of innocence and could face a lengthy period of pre-trial detention.
Garda McConkey agreed that the identification evidence did not come from the complainant but was based on the belief of gardaí that the accused was the person in the CCTV footage.
However, he asserted that a jacket had been seized from the accused's hostel room, which matched the video evidence.
Legal aid was granted.
Earlier this month, a 34-year-old woman who allegedly dug her fingernails into the man's arms was refused bail after she too was charged with robbery.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
11 hours ago
- Sunday World
OAP spent 73 days in hospital after being hit by jack-knifed horse trailer
James Farrell, 62, appeared in court to face a charge of careless driving causing serious bodily harm along a section of the main N55. A collision involving what Judge Owens described as two "long based jeep type vehicles", one of which was driven by James Farrell left an old age pensioner with broken ribs, a punctured lung fractured pelvis vertebrae in his back alongside a multitude of other injuries, a court has heard. James Farrell (62) had been intending to plead guilty to a charge of careless driving causing serious bodily harm before Judge Bernadette Owens deemed the case to be too serious to be heard in the District Court. An old age pensioner was forced to spend almost three months in hospital and left with multiple broken bones when he was 'propelled into a ditch' by a vehicle that collided with a towed horse trailer along a busy national carriageway in the midlands. The elderly man, aged in his 80s, was left with several broken ribs, a punctured lung and fractured pelvis together with breaks to his left leg and shoulder, a dislocated right shoulder and fractured vertebrae in his back as a result of a collision which occurred at Cranalagh More, Edgeworthstown, Longford on August 18, 2024. Sixty-two-year-old James Farrell, with an address at Cranley Beg, Edgeworthstown, Co Longford appeared at a sitting of Longford District Court to face a charge of careless driving causing serious bodily harm along a section of the main N55. James Farrell (62) had been intending to plead guilty to a charge of careless driving causing serious bodily harm before Judge Bernadette Owens deemed the case to be too serious to be heard in the District Court. The court was told how the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) had directed the case to be disposed of in the District Court on a guilty plea only. Judge Bernadette Owens, in deciding jurisdiction, was informed the incident took place shortly after 8am when the pensioner exited the front passenger seat of a jeep he had been travelling in order to go to the toilet. The accused, the court heard, had been travelling in a "long based jeep type' vehicle when it collided with the horse trailer. Such was the force of the collision, the trailer jack-knifed and struck the elderly man who was thrown into a ditch as a result. James Farrell outside Longford Courthouse. Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 27th Farrell's defence solicitor Tom Madden indicated that while a guilty plea would be forthcoming, there were a certain degree of 'extenuating circumstances' at play. They chiefly revolved around the fact the collision took place at a particularly hazardous location and occurred at a time when his client's vision had been impaired by the glare of a rising morning sun. Having heard the State's evidence and submission made on behalf of Farrell, Judge Owens said the court had to weigh up a number of factors before deciding whether its sentencing powers were sufficient enough to dispose of the case. A collision involving what Judge Owens described as two "long based jeep type vehicles", one of which was driven by James Farrell left an old age pensioner with broken ribs, a punctured lung fractured pelvis vertebrae in his back alongside a multitude of other injuries, a court has heard. She said Farrell's intention to plead guilty was one such element, as was Mr Madden's contention in reference to the challenges posed by a low lying sun, the location of the collision on a 'narrowish' stretch of road and by the fact its locus was governed by the presence of a continuous white line. More crucially, however, she said were the 'very significant injuries' that emanated from the incident and which ultimately coincided in the elderly man's hospitalisation for a total of 73 days. On that basis, Judge Owens said the court had no option but to refuse jurisdiction. That prompted Sgt Enda Daly to take to his feet and reveal the DPP, on foot of the court's ruling, would now be consenting for Farrell to be returned for trial to the Circuit Criminal Court for trial or for sentencing on a signed guilty plea. Mr Madden confirmed sufficient disclosure of all State evidence in the case had been made in order to discuss those practicalities with his client. Farrell was consequently remanded on bail to appear back at a sitting of Longford District Court on September 23.
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Man allegedly put tracker in child's car seat to ‘monitor' his ex-partner in ‘insidious' safety order breach
The man, who is aged in his 30s and from Dublin, appeared before Judge Patricia McNamara at Tallaght District Court. Garda Gavin Cribbin objected to bail under the O'Callaghan principles, citing eight alleged breaches of a safety order during June and July 2025. The court heard the most serious breach involved a small tracking device allegedly hidden in the seat where the couple's child usually sits. The device was discovered on June 29, after the injured party's relative - a passenger in her car - received an alert on their phone warning that a tracker was nearby. The complainant used two separate apps to confirm the presence of the device and eventually located it tucked into the child's car seat. The court heard the accused had allegedly borrowed the seat to facilitate a custody exchange - and it was alleged he later admitted to a relative that he had planted the tracker. Detective Sergeant Ruth Finnegan told the court it was "an AirTag-type of device". Judge McNamara described the tracker incident as 'particularly insidious' and said it formed part of a worrying pattern of behaviour that posed a real risk of interference with the complainant. The accused is facing eight alleged breaches of the safety order, four of which relate to email contact. The court heard the man was only permitted to contact the injured party regarding child access but allegedly sent around 50 emails a day over three consecutive days - some of which were described as abusive and made no reference to child access. One message allegedly contained repeated verbal abuse, and the complainant eventually blocked his email address. The injured party gave evidence in court, saying she had been in a relationship with the man for almost a decade and that they share children. ADVERTISEMENT She was granted a two-year safety order in April 2025, after applying earlier in the year. 'He won't stop contacting me or intimidating me,' she said. 'I feel like he's going to snap one day.' The woman described how daily life had become fearful and tense, saying she felt sick when she realised she was being tracked. 'I don't know what it will take for him to leave me alone,' she told the court. She also described a custody handover on July 12, where the man allegedly shouted abuse in front of the children, followed her on foot, and initially refused to hand the children over. Garda Cribbin said that while no explicit threat had been made, the tracking incident was of particular concern and reflected what he called an 'evolution of behaviour' that was becoming more serious and invasive. Defence solicitor John O'Leary said his client maintains the presumption of innocence and pointed out there was no history of violence. Refusing bail, Judge McNamara said she was satisfied there was a real risk of interference with the injured party and refused bail under the O'Callaghan principles. She said: 'There is a presumption of innocence, but I am satisfied from what I've heard that there is a possibility of interference with the applicant in the safety order.' She described the tracker allegation as 'particularly insidious,' adding: 'It's not even the emails, even though they're quite abusive - it's the allegation that he borrowed a car seat and put a tracker in there to monitor her movements.' Judge McNamara noted that the injured party had expressed fear and that the behaviour appeared to be escalating. The man was remanded in custody to appear via video link at Cloverhill District Court at a later date. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme.
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Man who illegally entered 88-year-old's home leaving him in fear has jail term doubled after failed appeal
The appeal court heard that Gerry Cash (33) with an address at Tombrack, Ferns, Co Wexford left the vulnerable pensioner, who has short term memory loss, in a distressed state after entering his Co Kildare house. Cash was convicted in the District Court of trespassing on a building in a manner that causes or is likely to cause fear in another person contrary to section 13 (1) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994. He was sentenced to nine months in custody with the final six months suspended and later lodged an appeal against his conviction. However his defence counsel, Asma Saleh BL, yesterday informed the court that the case would proceed by appealing the severity of sentence only and the prosecuting garda's evidence was not contested. Garda Padraig Murphy told the District Court Appeals Court that gardai got a report on February 22, 2023 from the daughter of the injured party. He said that a neighbour alerted her that they saw a white van outside her father's house and that a man knocked on the window and the door of the house. Garda Murphy said that the man was heard shouting 'I've got you that' before entering the house. He said that the neighbour saw the man in the sitting room and he later left the property in his van. Gda Murphy said that the victim was left 'very shaken and pale' after the incident. Garda Murphy said that the man was in the care of his daughters, who left him alone for one hour a day. He said this had never happened to the man before and he had no memory of the incident due to his memory loss difficulties. Garda Murphy said that CCTV was obtained and shared with gardai allowing Cash to be identified, arrested and detained. He said that in the interview, Cash admitted to being at the scene and leaving a calling card. He was charged with trespassing and was convicted in the District Court. Ms Saleh said that Cash is 'extremely remorseful' for his actions and that he is aware it was bad behaviour. ADVERTISEMENT She said that her client's doctor reports that he suffers from anxiety, depression and low mood swings. She also said that his wife is currently pregnant after a long time in IVF treatment. The daughter of the injured party gave a victim impact statement, telling the court that she is her father's full time carer and that he used to have one hour on his own. She said when she came into her father's house that day he didn't know what had happened and was very pale. She said that he shook as she showered him and he was very upset. She said: 'that man took every bit of independence from my father'. She said that her father worked all of his life and he 'didn't deserve for that to happen to him'. Judge Dara Hayes said that the court had the power to increase the appellant's jail sentence as well as decreasing it on appeal. He said that the original sentence of nine months in custody with the final six months suspended was 'lenient under the circumstances'. He said that it was clear from the injured party's reaction that he was put in a position of some distress. The judge said that whatever independence the man had was taken away and that the injured party was entitled to be unmolested in his own home. Judge Hayes decided to keep the sentence of the District Court of nine months in custody but only suspended the final three months. This represents an increase from an effective three months in custody in the original sentencing, to six months in custody after appeal. He said that he would suspend the final three months for the period of 12 months on the condition that Cash keeps the peace and does not contact the injured party or his family again. Funded by the Courts Reporting Scheme.
