Power at any cost: Sánchez's separatist tightrope
While EU diplomatic sources say the vote is unlikely to take place, Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares will again raise the issue at the General Affairs Council, under pressure from hardline Catalan party Junts.
The initiative is the latest in a string of high-stakes concessions Sánchez has made to secure support from regional pro-independence forces.
Sánchez's Socialist-led coalition, which scraped together a majority in 2023, depends on both left-wing ERC and right-wing Junts. Though often at odds, the two separatist parties are united in leveraging their support for concessions, prompting opposition accusations that Sánchez is trading national unity for political survival. A constant headache In exchange for supporting Sánchez's re-election, Junts secured a promise to push for Catalan's recognition as an official EU language. That demand was part of a broader deal that also included the controversial Amnesty Law, which pardons hundreds involved in Catalonia's failed independence push between 2012 and 2023.
The law passed narrowly in parliament with a razor-thin 177-172 majority despite deep public opposition. Sánchez defended it as a 'step towards reconciliation,' but Brussels has raised rule-of-law concerns, and the Court of Justice of the EU is investigating its legality.
Junts, led by self-exiled former Catalan leader Carles Puigdemont, remains an unpredictable partner. Its seven votes in parliament are essential to Sánchez's thin majority, which an opposition right-wing P artido Popular (PP) MP said described as "continuous blackmail from separatist parties". Growing internal rift Tensions have also emerged within the governing bloc.
This week, Junts rejected a proposed 'unique' financing model for Catalonia that was backed by ERC and Sánchez's PSOE. Junts called it insufficient and instead demanded full fiscal sovereignty similar to the Basque-style model.
The backlash has also reached inside PSOE. Emiliano García-Page, Castilla-La Mancha's regional president, warned the party 'cannot remain in power at any cost,' calling the tax deal a 'dramatic attack on equality among Spaniards.'
Opposition parties, meanwhile, labelled the deal a 'political payoff' to separatists. Push for greater autonomy Junts and Sánchez's PSOE have floated a proposal to grant Catalonia powers over migration, including limited deportation authority, drawing fierce criticism from the opposition.
Far-right Vox said the plan could be the 'last step before a de facto independence,' while ERC welcomed it as part of an ongoing plan to 'reduce the state's presence' in Catalonia.
Though full border control is not on the table, the Sanchez government did agree to give Catalonia partial authority over ports and airports starting in September. Scandals and shifting support To complicate matters further for Sánchez, Junts and ERC have threatened to withdraw support following a bombshell police report. The investigation uncovered a network of kickbacks, rigged tenders and influence peddling involving former cabinet members, senior Socialist officials, the prime minister's inner circle and, potentially, even Sánchez himself.
In a recent debate in Congress, Sánchez accused Junts of 'permanent blackmail.' Yet when asked about the state of the coalition, a PSOE spokesperson told Euractiv that 'monthly meetings' with the separatists continue, even though these remain "discreet".
As the prime minister faces growing pressure both from within his coalition and from political opponents, the question remains how long he can maintain the delicate balance.
'The clock is ticking,' a Junts spokesperson warned Sánchez last week.
(cs, de)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Meta to stop running political ads on Facebook and Instagram
Social media giant Meta announced today that it will stop running political, electoral or social issue advertising in the EU from October, instead of complying with the bloc's transparency rules for political advertising. EU-wide rules on the transparency of political advertising come into effect from October, with the aim of curbing information manipulation and foreign interference during elections, according to a Council announcement on the agreement last year. The regulation obliges online publishers of political advertisements to disclose whether an ad is paid for by a political actor to make it easier for citizens to recognise political marketing. It also requires disclosure of whether the ad was targeted using personal data. Meta is sidestepping all these requirements, per its announcement today, as the company says it will no longer allow political, electoral or social issue ads in the EU. It defines these types of ads in its terms and conditions for different territories. Meta said the change would also apply in other "European territories", including the UK. The company is blaming its decision to end political ads on the EU's Regulation – claiming it's too restrictive and burdensome for advertisers. "Unfortunately, the TTPA [the political ads transparency regulation] introduces significant additional obligations to our processes and systems that create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU," Meta wrote. It said the move won't change any of its other policies for people in the EU as regards debating politics. Nor will it stop politicians from posting content on its social networks. However political actors would not be able to pay Meta to amplify such content. Responding to Meta's announcement, liberal lawmaker Sandro Gozi, the rapporteur for the EU's regulation on political advertising, said it "confirms a deep allergy to transparency, data protection and democratic accountability." "They [Meta] pretend to fight disinformation, but in reality they are making money from it," he added. Last year, Google also announced that it would stop serving political ads in the EU before the regulation came into effect. It blamed the law for having an overly broad definition of "political advertisement" for it to be able to comply, hence choosing to stop running such ads across the bloc. But one question both companies' actions raises is how effective their own – typically automated – ad review systems are at detecting political, electoral or social issue ads and stopping them from being distributed. Any political ads that do slip through would automatically breach the EU's transparency rules given their ad systems do not provide these disclosures. In Meta's case, this is not the first time it's blamed EU laws for forcing it to change its ad behaviour: the tech giant is currently facing Digital Markets Act enforcement over its pay-or-consent advertising model. (nl)
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
Deadline looms in Kosovo's parliamentary stalemate
A months-long stand-off over Kosovo's next parliamentary speaker is dragging the tiny Balkan nation toward an unparalleled crisis, experts warn, ahead of a deadline this weekend. After more than 50 attempts, Kosovo's MPs now have just two days to meet a court mandate to pick their new speaker, a key step toward Albin Kurti's possible return to office."This is an unparallelled situation, an undefined vacuum and chaos," law professor Mazllum Baraliu told Kurti's Vetevendosje party topped the February elections, it did not win the seats needed to install its chosen speaker, Albulena Haxhiu – a pick that opponents view as too political for the role. Even if the Vetevendosje overcome this impasse, the party will still need to negotiate its way to a majority to govern. Last month, after dozens of failed votes, the Constitutional Court set a 30-day deadline, which expires at midnight on Saturday. Baraliu said instead of cooperating to protect the state, 120 MPs instead had "trampled" it. "That is absurd," he said. 'Circus of democracy' Without a speaker, the parliament can't be formed, and no new minister, including the prime minister, can be sworn in – forcing Kurti into a caretaker role for more than five months. "The Assembly has turned into a circus of democracy," Eugen Cakolli, from independent monitor the Kosovo Democratic Institute, said. "Without a doubt, it is one of the most serious, longest and most consequential crises in the recent political history of Kosovo," Cakolli said. In Kosovo, the inaugural session of parliament must be reconvened every 48 hours until a speaker is elected. Ordinarily, there is no legal time limit for how long this can continue. "The citizens will pay the highest price from this political experiment that risks plunging the country into an institutional dead end," economist Safet Gerxhaliu said. Facing ongoing sanctions and a "frozen" accession process into the European Union, the situation was alarming for the continent's newest country, he added. "Kosovo has been forgotten by the EU," said Gerxhaliu. The lack of a functioning government also meant Kosovo risked losing EU funding of more than €883 million, said Njomza Arifi, a researcher at the Pristina-based think tank Group for Legal and Political Studies. Donkeys and deadlines Outside Pristina's parliament, there have been few signs of public outcry over the stalemate, but one man has become a symbol of protest. "I have no other homeland – MPs, don't make it collateral for stubbornness," lawyer Arianit Koci told media after hacking at his hair with an electric trimmer in his latest stunt. Earlier, he had brought four donkeys to the entrance of the assembly, a not-so-subtle jibe at "who is leading Kosovo". His presence has meant most MPs pick up their pace when entering the assembly. Inside, however, there has been little change. Early this week the Kosovo's President Vjosa Osmani called on the court to clarify what would happen if the order lapsed. "This is an attempt to prevent irreparable consequences for the constitutional order of the country," she said. But as the deadline approached, even the nation's would-be leader was unsure of the outcome. "I don't know what will happen," Kurti said in a brief response to reporters' questions on Monday.
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany and France to EU: Stay out of arms export policy
The defence ministers from Germany and France both declared that the European Union has absolutely no role to play in weapons export decisions, issuing a clear rebuke to European Commission ambitions to ease trade within the EU weapons market. Weapons export decisions are 'exclusively' the preserve of national governments, and the EU and the European Commission 'have no role to play in this regard ', German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Thursday evening at a joint press conference with his French counterpart, Sébastien Lecornu. The remarks demonstrate strong and united opposition from the EU's two most important members to the Commission's push to l oosen export controls within the EU in order to fast-track arms production. The EU executive has proposed allowing countries to skip obtaining approval before reselling key sensitive components used in weapons manufacturing. Many countries control how weapons and other sensitive products can be used, and retain the right to veto the further resale of defence equipment to third countries. France has for months opposed the idea of loosening those rules within the EU, as Euractiv first reported earlier this spring . Paris has argued that the move goes beyond existing agreements on transfers of defence-related products within the EU – and would effectively strip France of the right to control and keep track of where critical components end up. But despite those protests from Paris, the Commission has kept pitching the idea of loosening export rules, most recently last month in its package to ease regulation on the defence sector, known as the "defence omnibus". The Commission also announced plans to revise the existing intra-EU transfer directive, which governs trade in defence-related products within the bloc, sometime in the coming months. Pistorius's remarks, however, clearly bolster France's opposition to those changes. "There is no question of the European Commission interfering in the competences of the member states, especially when it comes to arms exports," Lecornu said. (bts, aw)
