Democrats decry extra US scrutiny of solar, wind projects on public lands
The lawmakers said the directive creates a bottleneck that will block progress on wind and solar energy, which accounted for the vast majority of new U.S. power generation added to the grid last year.
"Rather than ensuring an efficient permitting process for all energy resources, it appears this directive actively disfavors renewable projects in favor of more expensive, and
more polluting, technologies" such as fossil fuels, said the letter to Burgum from Senators Martin Heinrich, Ron Wyden and two others.
They urged Burgum to rescind the directive and restore a transparent and timely permitting framework for renewable energy.
The Interior Department did not comment on the letter. But a spokesperson said the "enhanced oversight will ensure all evaluations are thorough and deliberative."
President Donald Trump has called wind and solar unreliable and expensive, and has pushed policies to boost U.S. production of oil, gas and coal.
Heinrich, ranking Democrat on the Senate energy committee, represents New Mexico, which has bountiful oil, gas, wind and solar resources.
Interior has said the reviews would apply to rights-of-way, leases, construction and other permitting activities.
Trump has ordered several measures aimed at restricting wind and solar. His spending law accelerated by several years the phase-out of tax credits for the renewable power sources.
Solar and wind companies have said Interior's directive was at odds with Trump's broader goal to slash burdensome regulations and boost energy for new data centers and artificial intelligence, which are hiking U.S. power demand for the first time in two decades.
Former President Joe Biden's Interior Department had been reviewing more than 65 utility-scale onshore clean energy projects, with nearly 200 more in the queue, the senators said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Celtics co-owner set to buy WNBA's Connecticut Sun for record $325m
A group led by Celtics minority owner Steve Pagliuca has reached a deal to buy the Connecticut Sun for a record $325m and move the team to Boston, according to a person familiar with the sale. The franchise wouldn't play in Boston until the 2027 season. Pagliuca also would contribute $100m for a new practice facility in Boston for the team, the person said. The person spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity on Saturday because the deal hasn't been publicly announced. The sale is pending approval of the league and its Board of Governors. 'Relocation decisions are made by the WNBA Board of Governors and not by individual teams,' the league said in a statement. The Sun have played one regular season game at TD Garden eac of the last two years, including one against Caitlin Clark and the Indiana Fever in July. The league has announced five expansion teams that will begin play over the next five seasons with Portland (2026), Toronto (2026), Cleveland (2028), Detroit (2029) and Philadelphia (2030) joining the WNBA. Each paid a then-record $250m expansion fee. Nine other cities bid for expansion teams, including Houston, which the league singled out as getting a team in the future when it announced Cleveland, Detroit and Philadelphia in June. Boston did not. 'No groups from Boston applied for a team at that time and those other cities remain under consideration based on the extensive work they did as part of the expansion process and currently have priority over Boston. Celtics' prospective ownership team has also reached out to the league office and asked that Boston receive strong consideration for a WNBA franchise at the appropriate time.' The Boston Globe first reported the sale. The Sun are owned by the Mohegan Tribe, which runs the casino where the team has played since 2003. The Tribe bought the franchise for $10m and relocated it from Orlando that year. The Connecticut franchise was the first in the league to be run by a non-NBA owner and also became the first to turn a profit. The team announced in May that it was searching for a potential buyer for the franchise and had hired investment bank Allen & Company to conduct the probe. The WNBA has experienced rapid growth the last few seasons and ownership groups have been investing more into their teams, including player experiences. That has come in the way of practice facilities. The Sun are one of the few teams in the league that haven't announced any plans for a new training facility. Connecticut practices either at the arena in the casino or a local community center. Despite the lack of facilities, the Sun have been one of the most successful teams in the league, making the postseason in 16 seasons, including a run of six straight semifinal appearances. But the team was hit hard this offseason with the entire starting five from last season leaving either via free agency or trade. Connecticut are currently in last place in the WNBA at 5-21. The team sent out a letter to season ticket holders last week saying they'd still be playing at the casino next year. The last team to be sold in the WNBA was in 2021 when real estate investor Larry Gottesdiener led a group that bought the Atlanta Dream for under $10m. A year earlier, Mark Davis paid roughly $2m for the Las Vegas Aces.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
FLOURISHING AFTER 50: I've found love again - but now my kids are worried they'll lose their inheritance
Dear Vanessa, I never thought I'd be writing to you, but here I am at 56, divorced for 10 years, and finally with a man who makes me feel alive again. We met on a hiking trip, and it's been wonderful – until we started talking about moving in together. He wants us to sell our homes and buy something new. I have more equity, so naturally, I'd be putting in more. My kids are worried I'll lose their inheritance if things don't work out. He thinks I'm overthinking it and that love means trusting each other. After everything I've been through, I just want to protect myself and my future. But I don't want money fears to ruin what could be the best chapter of my life. How do couples in their 50s blend finances without breaking their relationship? Wishing for guidance, Linda. Linda, congratulations on finding love again. Many people in their 50s believe that part of their life is over, so it's wonderful you've found happiness. You're also wise to pause and think before making big financial moves. Love is about trust, but later-in-life relationships often come with complex money matters that need clear agreements. When you've spent decades building your assets and raising children, combining finances isn't as simple as when you were younger. A co-habitation or prenuptial agreement can outline exactly what would happen if you separated. Far from being unromantic, it creates confidence that both of you will be treated fairly, allowing you to enjoy the relationship without financial anxiety hanging over you. If you decide to buy a home together, you don't need to split ownership 50/50. Many couples use arrangements where each person owns a percentage of the property that matches what they've contributed. This also allows you to leave your share to your children rather than it automatically passing to your partner if something happens to you. It's one of the most effective ways to protect family inheritance while still buying together. At 56, your pension and retirement savings are key to your long-term security. Putting too much of your equity into a shared home may leave you with less flexibility later to invest, increase your pension contributions, or cover healthcare needs. While your main home usually isn't counted in means-tested benefits, locking up most of your wealth in property can limit your options if life changes. Keeping some money separate can help you maintain independence and peace of mind well into your 70s and beyond. Money can be an uncomfortable topic, especially after divorce, but having open and calm conversations now is crucial. A financial adviser who understands blended families can model different scenarios for you – whether you keep separate homes, buy together equally, or use different ownership shares – so you can see exactly what's at stake. If you don't have an adviser, you can use my free service to find one who's right for you here. With professional advice and the right agreements in place, you can protect your children's inheritance, safeguard your retirement, and still build a secure and happy future with your new partner. Wishing you happiness and peace of mind,
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Former Trump and Epstein lawyer threatened with arrest over feud with pierogi vendor
Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump 's former attorney Alan Dershowitz was threatened with arrest after getting into a spat with a pierogi vendor on Martha's Vineyard. Dershowitz was at the West Tisbury Farmers Market on Wednesday when he claims Good Pierogi declined to sell to him because of his 'politics'. Video of the aftermath showed a police officer threatening to arrest the lawyer for trespassing unless he left the area. 'They couldn't say no blacks, they couldn't say no Jews, and they can't say... no Trump supporters, I'm not a Trump supporter, but they can't say no Trump supporters,' he said to the officer. 'I've been going here for 53 this farmer's market. I have never been refused service,' he added. The two went back and forth for several minutes arguing about the law until the officer said Dershowitz was 'causing a disturbance'. 'I had four people come up to me and say that the gentleman with the blue shirt is causing a disturbance,' the officer said. 'I have multiple reports—' 'But they're wrong,' Dershowitz interrupted. 'I'm not causing a disturbance.' Dershowitz then said he wanted to stay at least 20 feet away from the pierogi stand and encourage people not to patronize them. 'If you do that on the premises you will be asked to leave because you're disrupting the business,' the officer said. Dershowitz tried to insist that he knew the law better than the officer, but the interaction wound down once the officer said he would arrest Dershowitz for trespassing if he stayed at the farmer's market. After some more arguing, Dershowitz agreed to leave. Krem Miskevich is the owner and operator Good Pierogi. Miskevich, who was born in Warsaw, Poland, also runs a catering business on Martha's Vineyard. Dershowitz told Daily Mail that Miskevich was the one who declined to sell him the six pierogi he asked for. 'And he said "no,"' Dershowitz claimed. 'I said "oh, you've run out of pierogi? Too bad." [The vendor allegedly said] "no no no, we have plenty of pierogi. I just won't sell them to you".' Dershowitz said he asked why and Miskevich allegedly replied, 'I won't sell them to you because I don't approve of your politics. I don't approve of who you've represented. I don't approve of who you support.' In a post on X, Dershowitz declared that he would be 'suing' and called the Good Pierogi a 'bigoted vendor'. Daily Mail approached Good Pierogi and Miskevich for comment. 'The clear implication was that he opposed me because I defended Donald Trump on the floor of the Senate,' Dershowitz said. Dershowitz was one of the lawyers who defended Trump in his first impeachment trial in 2020. He was also part of the 'Dream Team' that convinced a jury to acquit O.J. Simpson in his 1995 murder trial. His most controversial past client though was unquestionably Epstein, whom he represented in 2008 when the financier was first formally accused of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls. With the representation of Dershowitz and others, Epstein secured what many have called a lenient plea deal from the Miami US Attorney's Office that led to him only serving 13 months jail. Dershowitz didn't mention Epstein as a reason the pierogi vendor could have turned on him, however, he did claim that the vendor looked at him funny during an earlier visit when he was wearing a T-shirt that said, 'Proud American Zionist'. 'It became evident to me that he opposed my being a Zionist, my support for Israel,' he said. Dershowitz said he informed an official with the farmer's market that he would take 'legal action' against it 'to make sure that they only have booths by people who will sell to everybody, that they don't allow people to have booths on this quasi-public property that discriminate on the basis of race or religion or gender or politics'. He told Daily Mail that he isn't going to have to sue the farmer's market because management told him 'they're probably going to change their bylaws'. 'I don't have to sue. I've won,' he added. Ethan Buchanan-Valenti, the manager of the farmer's market, previously told the Vineyard Gazette that he is in the process of reviewing the bylaws, 'to make sure everyone at the market is always being respected and their rights protected'. A spokesman for the West Tisbury Police Department confirmed to Daily Mail that Dershowitz showed up to Saturday's farmer's market. 'He came by earlier today,' the spokesman said. 'There was no incident he caused. He was not disorderly.' The spokesman added that the Good Pierogi stand was not at the market today, as it usually only makes an appearance on Wednesdays. This is not the first highly public spat that Dershowitz has had with someone on Martha's Vineyard. Back in 2021, he and Larry David — whom he was friends with for 25 years — got into a screaming match at a general store, according to Dershowitz. The comedian was reportedly furious that Dershowitz patted Trump's former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on the back, which was first reported by PageSix.
