Selling misinformation
I was riding my bike, crossing an underpass, when I saw a man struggling to walk with a polio-affected leg. He gestured for a ride, and I stopped to help. As he settled on the seat behind me, I casually asked, "What happened to your leg?" He sighed and replied, "It is because of polio. When I was a child, my parents refused to get me vaccinated. They believed the polio vaccine was haram (forbidden) in Islam, and they had other excuses too — saying it was part of some conspiracy or that it would make me infertile." His words stayed in my mind. A life-changing disability, not by fate but by false information.
This is the world we live in today. Influencers, not journalists, are shaping public discourse, and where truth competes with virality, engagement and profit-driven disinformation. The rise of digital content creators has fundamentally changed the way Pakistanis consume information, but not always for the better. Social media was supposed to democratise access to information, but instead, it has weaponised misinformation and disinformation, often at the cost of public health, democracy and social harmony.
Unlike trained journalists who work under editorial scrutiny, influencers operate with zero accountability. They claim expertise on everything from politics to vaccines and yet, a majority of them do not verify their content before posting. A recent UNESCO report on digital content creators found that 42% of influencers determine credibility based on engagement rather than verification. The study also revealed that 59% of them have little or no knowledge of regulations on digital communication. In short, they are influencing millions without any understanding of the responsibility that comes with it.
Pakistan has already witnessed the deadly consequences of information disorder. The tragic lynching of Mashal Khan in 2017, fueled by false blasphemy accusations on social media, was a scary reminder of how a single unchecked narrative can destroy a life. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fake news about vaccine side effects undermined national immunisation efforts, delaying progress in combating the virus.
Political misinformation, especially during elections, has fueled distrust and unrest. Influencers tied to interest groups amplify such narratives to boost engagement, weakening public trust in democratic institutions. A question arises. Why do they do it? The answer is simple: misinformation is profitable. Social media rewards controversy and outrage. The more sensational content, the more engagement it attracts.
And engagement equals money, whether through brand endorsements, YouTube monetization or political sponsorships. The UNESCO study found that 52% of influencers create sponsored content, but nearly half fail to disclose their funding sources. This raises a critical ethical dilemma: are they shaping public opinion independently, or are they merely puppets for those who pay them?
Countering this growing crisis requires more than just calling out fake news. The UNESCO Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms emphasise the need for transparency, accountability and digital literacy. Pakistan must enforce stricter policies on algorithmic accountability, ensuring that platforms disclose how they amplify misinformation. Fact-checking institutions must be strengthened, and media literacy programmes integrated into education curricula.
Most importantly, Right to Information (RTI) laws must be fully enforced, ensuring proactive disclosure of certified information to minimise reliance on unreliable sources.
But while regulating misinformation is essential, Pakistan's latest approach to countering fake news is deeply flawed and dangerously authoritarian. Instead of addressing digital literacy and algorithmic responsibility, the government has introduced draconian amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), criminalising "false and fake information" with penalties of up to three years in prison.
At first glance, a law targeting disinformation may seem necessary. After all, misinformation is a serious problem. But who decides what is "fake" news? The state now claims the power to determine the truth; and in a country where press freedom is already under threat, this law is a clear attempt to silence dissent rather than counter disinformation. The PECA amendment expands the definition of a complainant, allowing government institutions and corporations to file cases against journalists and citizens alike. This means any critical reporting on the government or judiciary could be deemed "false" and punished. It further establishes a social media Regulatory Authority with unchecked powers, making the government both the judge and the jury in matters of digital content.
Such broad definitions are ripe for abuse. Under this law, a journalist reporting on corruption or human rights violations could be jailed if the government deems the information "misleading". A citizen tweeting about inflation, censorship or political repression could face criminal charges if their post considered as "causes unrest". This is not about countering fake news; it is about controlling the narrative.
History has repeatedly shown that censorship does not tackle misinformation. The answer to fake news is not imprisonment but education, transparency and effective fact-checking mechanisms. Instead of silencing journalists and citizens, Pakistan must hold social media platforms accountable for their role in amplifying disinformation. Instead of silencing voices, we need to invest in media literacy programmes to empower people to distinguish fact from fiction.
The digital battlefield is real, and Pakistan stands at a crossroads. Do we fight fake news through education and regulation of tech platforms, or do we surrender to state-controlled truth? The future of our democracy, governance and freedom of expression depends on this choice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Selling misinformation
Listen to article I was riding my bike, crossing an underpass, when I saw a man struggling to walk with a polio-affected leg. He gestured for a ride, and I stopped to help. As he settled on the seat behind me, I casually asked, "What happened to your leg?" He sighed and replied, "It is because of polio. When I was a child, my parents refused to get me vaccinated. They believed the polio vaccine was haram (forbidden) in Islam, and they had other excuses too — saying it was part of some conspiracy or that it would make me infertile." His words stayed in my mind. A life-changing disability, not by fate but by false information. This is the world we live in today. Influencers, not journalists, are shaping public discourse, and where truth competes with virality, engagement and profit-driven disinformation. The rise of digital content creators has fundamentally changed the way Pakistanis consume information, but not always for the better. Social media was supposed to democratise access to information, but instead, it has weaponised misinformation and disinformation, often at the cost of public health, democracy and social harmony. Unlike trained journalists who work under editorial scrutiny, influencers operate with zero accountability. They claim expertise on everything from politics to vaccines and yet, a majority of them do not verify their content before posting. A recent UNESCO report on digital content creators found that 42% of influencers determine credibility based on engagement rather than verification. The study also revealed that 59% of them have little or no knowledge of regulations on digital communication. In short, they are influencing millions without any understanding of the responsibility that comes with it. Pakistan has already witnessed the deadly consequences of information disorder. The tragic lynching of Mashal Khan in 2017, fueled by false blasphemy accusations on social media, was a scary reminder of how a single unchecked narrative can destroy a life. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fake news about vaccine side effects undermined national immunisation efforts, delaying progress in combating the virus. Political misinformation, especially during elections, has fueled distrust and unrest. Influencers tied to interest groups amplify such narratives to boost engagement, weakening public trust in democratic institutions. A question arises. Why do they do it? The answer is simple: misinformation is profitable. Social media rewards controversy and outrage. The more sensational content, the more engagement it attracts. And engagement equals money, whether through brand endorsements, YouTube monetization or political sponsorships. The UNESCO study found that 52% of influencers create sponsored content, but nearly half fail to disclose their funding sources. This raises a critical ethical dilemma: are they shaping public opinion independently, or are they merely puppets for those who pay them? Countering this growing crisis requires more than just calling out fake news. The UNESCO Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms emphasise the need for transparency, accountability and digital literacy. Pakistan must enforce stricter policies on algorithmic accountability, ensuring that platforms disclose how they amplify misinformation. Fact-checking institutions must be strengthened, and media literacy programmes integrated into education curricula. Most importantly, Right to Information (RTI) laws must be fully enforced, ensuring proactive disclosure of certified information to minimise reliance on unreliable sources. But while regulating misinformation is essential, Pakistan's latest approach to countering fake news is deeply flawed and dangerously authoritarian. Instead of addressing digital literacy and algorithmic responsibility, the government has introduced draconian amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), criminalising "false and fake information" with penalties of up to three years in prison. At first glance, a law targeting disinformation may seem necessary. After all, misinformation is a serious problem. But who decides what is "fake" news? The state now claims the power to determine the truth; and in a country where press freedom is already under threat, this law is a clear attempt to silence dissent rather than counter disinformation. The PECA amendment expands the definition of a complainant, allowing government institutions and corporations to file cases against journalists and citizens alike. This means any critical reporting on the government or judiciary could be deemed "false" and punished. It further establishes a social media Regulatory Authority with unchecked powers, making the government both the judge and the jury in matters of digital content. Such broad definitions are ripe for abuse. Under this law, a journalist reporting on corruption or human rights violations could be jailed if the government deems the information "misleading". A citizen tweeting about inflation, censorship or political repression could face criminal charges if their post considered as "causes unrest". This is not about countering fake news; it is about controlling the narrative. History has repeatedly shown that censorship does not tackle misinformation. The answer to fake news is not imprisonment but education, transparency and effective fact-checking mechanisms. Instead of silencing journalists and citizens, Pakistan must hold social media platforms accountable for their role in amplifying disinformation. Instead of silencing voices, we need to invest in media literacy programmes to empower people to distinguish fact from fiction. The digital battlefield is real, and Pakistan stands at a crossroads. Do we fight fake news through education and regulation of tech platforms, or do we surrender to state-controlled truth? The future of our democracy, governance and freedom of expression depends on this choice.
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Drug-resistant TB threatens public health
Tuberculosis (TB) continues to cast a long and deadly shadow across the globe, with Pakistan standing among the countries most affected by the disease. TB claimed over 1.25 million lives worldwide in 2023, with 8.2m new cases reported despite the fact that it is both preventable and curable. For Pakistan, the numbers are especially sobering. Over 686,000 Pakistanis, including 81,000 children, developed TB last year. An estimated 47,000 lives were lost to the disease, many of them due to late diagnosis and lack of access to treatment. Experts say that overcrowding, poverty, and weak healthcare infrastructure are some of the conditions where TB thrives. What makes it particularly dangerous is its ability to spread silently. The infected individuals remain asymptomatic for months, unknowingly passing on the disease. While first-line treatment can cure most TB cases, the rising number of drug-resistant TB cases presents a serious public health threat. In 2023, 15,000 people in Pakistan developed Rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB)a particularly hard-to-treat form of the disease. Rifampicin, a cornerstone of TB treatment, becomes ineffective in such cases, forcing patients to rely on more complex and toxic second-line therapies. Historically, RR-TB treatment lasted up to two years and involved painful injections, often with disappointing outcomes. Fortunately, recent advances have introduced shorter, all-oral regimens such as BPaLM, offering hope for better results and fewer side effects.
Express Tribune
7 days ago
- Express Tribune
UN says development goals progress 'insufficient' 10 years on
Ten years after the United Nations adopted its Sustainable Development Goals, it said Monday that more people now have access to the internet, but major issues like hunger have worsened. UN member states committed in 2015 to pursuing 17 goals that range from ending extreme poverty and hunger to pursuing gender equality and clean energy by 2030. In a report published Monday, the United Nations said that 35 percent of the objectives were advancing, while around half had stagnated and the rest were heading backwards. This scorecard, it said, showed that the progress was "insufficient." Among the most successful was improving access to electricity, with 92 percent of the world connected by 2023. Internet usage has also risen from 40 percent to 68 percent worldwide in the last decade. Some 110 million more children and young people have entered school since 2015, the report said, while maternal mortality has fallen from 228 deaths per 100,000 births in 2015 to 197 in 2023. But some goals have receded despite this progress. In 2023, 757 million people (9.1 percent of the world's population) were suffering from hunger, compared with 713 million (7.5 percent) in 2019, the report said. Meanwhile, more than 800 million people -- around one in 10 people worldwide -- are still living in extreme poverty. "Eradicating extreme poverty by 2030 appears highly unlikely due to slow recovery from Covid-19 impacts, economic instability, climate shocks, and sluggish growth in sub-Saharan Africa," the report said.
