Tom Cruise and Ana de Armas spark dating rumours after being spotted yachting in Spain
Tom Cruise and Ana de Armas spotted once again, are they dating?
It is not the first time the Hollywood A-listers have been spotted together. Their "just friends" narrative began back in February after a low-key dinner in London, supposedly with agents in tow and work talk on the menu. But after multiple sightings, including slipping out of David Beckham's star-studded 50th birthday bash in May, fans are not buying the strictly-business storyline so easily.
Tom Cruise and Ana de Armas collaborating for a film?
Ana de Armas has repeatedly insisted the Cruise connection is all about cinema, not chemistry. In interviews across the board, from Good Morning America to Variety, she has spilled about working closely with Cruise on 'multiple' projects alongside directors Doug Liman and Christopher McQuarrie, both long-time Cruise collaborators.
Ana de Armas and Tom Cruise in a newly shared photo. 📷 pic.twitter.com/EJhgU9zzbd
De Armas recently told WWD that they are 'working on something' with the same action-packed brains behind Cruise's biggest blockbusters. That is no small hint, and it has definitely sparked curiosity about a potential mega movie collab.
Cruise is a Ballerina stan?
Adding fuel to the speculative fire, Cruise apparently got an early look at de Armas' spin-off flick Ballerina from the John Wick universe and loved it. She gushed that having his support was 'really special,' especially since Cruise is known for championing theatrical releases across the board. According to her, he is not just a fan, he is rooting for everyone to win in cinema.
Ya he visto a feministas súper enojadas porque Tom Cruise tiene 63 años y está saliendo con Ana de Armas que tiene 37.El descaro es que la están infantilizando.Ni siquiera dicen nada porque Tom pertenece a una secta muy represiva y controladora, sino que les enoja su edad. https://t.co/ycmx3IjGEJ
So what is next for the Cruise-de Armas saga? Projects, premieres, or plot twists, one thing is clear: these two are not disappearing from headlines anytime soon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Anthony Mackie reveals how he almost didn't star in The Hurt Locker
Actor Anthony Mackie has revealed he almost missed out on his breakthrough role in The Hurt Locker due to his commitment to another project: one he now regrets taking on. Speaking on a recent episode of Variety's Know Their Lines, Mackie described the experience of working on the unreleased film as 'one of the most disheartening' of his career. Anthony Mackie reveals he almost lost on on The Hurt Locker.(Screengrab/The Falcon and the Winter Soldier) Speaking during the episode, Mackie said that he shot Hurt Locker in 2007. But he was filming another movie in North Carolina at the time, which was being 'directed by quite possibly the worst director to ever direct,' and added that because the movie's schedule was pushed further, the Captain America: Brave New World actor had to pull out of Hurt Locker. Also read: Tom Holland debuts new Spider-Man suit in Brand New Day; Fans say 'prayed for…' After Mackie was forced to drop out, the team behind The Hurt Locker offered the role of Sergeant JT Sanborn to another actor. However, the actor refused the remuneration. This twist turned into Mackie's golden opportunity since the filmmakers chose to wait for his availability. What was the other project? Mackie did not name the project directly during the interview, but it is widely believed to be Bolden, a troubled biopic on jazz musician Buddy Bolden, according to another Fandomwire report. Directed by Daniel Pritzker, the film began production in 2006 but was not released until 2019 due to creative and logistical issues. In contrast, Mackie was all praises for Hurt Locker maker Kathryn Bigelow. He said the moment he landed in Jordan's Amman, he and Bigelow hit the ground running. Also read: Sakamoto Days Season 1 Part 2 Episode 15: Release date, time, where to watch and more The Hurt Locker, which starred Jeremy Renner alongside Mackie, became a hit and won six Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director. Mackie's performance as a member of a bomb disposal unit in Iraq marked a turning point in his career. Mackie, speaking about the film, told Variety that The Hurt Locker was probably one of the most important acting experiences he has had. Anthony Mackie and Jeremy Renner's paths likely to cross again Renner and Mackie then went on to star in Marvel's Avengers franchise. While Mackie is confirmed to appear in the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday, Renner's return is still uncertain. However, fans could see the two reunite in Avengers: Secret Wars, which will be released on December 17, 2027. FAQs Q: What movie almost cost Anthony Mackie his role in The Hurt Locker? A: The film is believed to be Bolden (2019), a biopic about jazz musician Buddy Bolden. Q: Who was offered the role after Anthony Mackie pulled out? A: The name of the actor was not revealed, but he reportedly declined the role due to low pay. Q: How did The Hurt Locker impact Anthony Mackie's career? A: It was a breakout role that led to wider recognition and future roles in blockbuster franchises like the MCU. Q: Who directed The Hurt Locker? A: It was directed by Kathryn Bigelow, who became the first woman to win the Academy Award for Best Director. Q: Where can I watch The Hurt Locker and Bolden? A: Both films are available to rent on Apple TV+ (USA).
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Tom Holland debuts new Spider-Man suit in Brand New Day; Fans say ‘prayed for…'
Tom Holland's all-new Spider-Man suit from the highly anticipated Spider-Man: Brand New Day has been unveiled. After teasing the fans on National Spider-Man Day (August 1), he stepped out of the shadows in a dramatic video on Saturday morning, which unveiled a brighter, comic-accurate costume. Tom Holland debuts new suit for Spider-Man: Brand New Day(X/@SpiderManMovie) 'We ready?' Holland asked in the clip before revealing the redesigned outfit, which features bolder red and blue tones and a larger spider insignia, which is in line with the classic comic book version rather than his previous suits in Homecoming, Far From Home, and No Way Home. Fans react to new Spider-Man suit Fans went berserk after the all-new suit was unveiled in a video on X (formerly Twitter). Many of them said they were pumped for Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Some said they 'prayed for days like this' and added the latest instalment could be the best Spider-Man movie ever. An X user wrote, 'The new Spider suit looks great and I am more than hyped for this movie!' The user added that with every new promo, they were getting more excited to watch the film and said, 'I will be seated at the theater July 31 2026!' Another user wrote, 'It is the same suit as at the end of No Way Home, I prayed for days like this!! A Brand New Day, a Brand New Era!' A third user commented they don't care if the new suit has glazing or not, but one look at the costume, the plot rumors for the film have them believing that Spider-Man: Brand New Day could be 'one of the best Spider-Man movies ever'. Also read: Spider-Man Brand New Day first look: Tom Holland returns in a sharp new suit. Watch 'The web pattern, the colors, the shiny blue, the my days,' a fan wrote while another gushed, 'No disrespect, but this 15-second clip made me happier than Superman and F4 combined! Call me biased, but it is what it is. Nothing can top Spider-Man.' One more fan wrote, 'His new suit is so good, the fact that the blue segments are slightly darker than before is perfect.' Brand New Day marks Holland's fourth solo outing as the web-slinger in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and first since 2021's Spider-Man: No Way Home, which brought together three generations: Holland, Tobey Maguire, and Andrew Garfield, in a multiverse adventure, reported Variety. In No Way Home, Peter Parker's identity is publicly exposed by Mysterio (Jake Gyllenhaal), prompting him to seek help from Doctor Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch). A spell gone wrong leads to a multiverse collision, the death of Aunt May (Marisa Tomei), and a heartbreaking decision to erase everyone's memory of Peter Parker. The Variety report added that in Brand New Day picks up pieces of the fallout and reportedly draws inspiration from the controversial comic book arc of the same name, where Peter makes a deal with the demon Mephisto to resurrect Aunt May and reset his life, at the cost of erasing his relationship with MJ. New faces and familiar heroes join the cast of Spider-Man The upcoming film is directed by Destin Cretton, best known for Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings. The film introduces Sadie Sink and Liza Colon-Zayas in undisclosed roles while welcoming back Mark Ruffalo's Hulk and Jon Bernthal's Punisher to the MCU, the Variety report added. With these changes in storyline and cast, a change in tone might be certified for the franchise, possibly granting the birth of a new era of Marvel storytelling while acknowledging Spidey's sitting legacy. The film will be released on July 31, 2026. FAQs Q1: When will Spider-Man: Brand New Day release? A: The movie is set to release on July 31, 2026. Q2: What's different about Spider-Man's new suit? A: The suit features brighter colours and a larger spider logo, closely resembling the original comic-book design. Q3: What happened in the last movie, No Way Home? A: Peter's identity was revealed, leading to a spell that erased everyone's memory of him, including MJ and Ned. Q4: Who's directing the new film? A: Destin Daniel Cretton, known for Shang-Chi, is directing. Q5: Will MJ (Zendaya) return? A: Her return has not yet been confirmed. Q6: Who are the new characters? A: Sadie Sink and Liza Colón-Zayas are new additions. The film also features Punisher and Hulk.
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Who, Exactly, Is the ‘Netflix of AI' For?
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- In the ongoing, fiercely competitive race to see who can come up with the most unwanted, unwelcome AI technology, we may have a new frontrunner. According to Variety, Inc. has made an undisclosed investment in Fable, a Bay Area start-up, and specifically in its newly launched Showrunner service, which Fable is touting as the 'Netflix of AI.' The company describes its software, which went public Wednesday and is currently available via its Discord, as '[an] AI platform that puts a studio at your fingertips, where anyone can create, watch, and personalize series and stories.' More specifically, it allows users to use keywords to create scenes or episodes of animated cartoon shows, either of the user's own creation or (more likely, and easily) from existing templates of television programs. What seems to be missing from Fable and Amazon's efforts is consideration for the most essential question in any consumer product strategy: Who, exactly, is this for? The potential copyright issues alone are exhausting. Fable's CEO and co-founder Edward Saatchi told Variety that he is 'in talks' with Walt Disney Co. and other studios about licensing partnerships, but there's plenty of potential here for studios and IP holders to slap the company with a Midjourney Inc. type lawsuit. When Saatchi tested (and showed off) the software two years ago with nine short South Park episodes, he didn't bother securing rights or permission from the show's creators. Reportedly, he reached out to assure them that it wasn't for commercial use. While the animations got over 80 million views, South Park's cultural cachet was likely the driving force. With the software's star power still a big if, the question of who Showrunner's intended audience is looms even larger. On one hand, sure, animation (and, for that matter, live-action filmmaking) is costly, laborious and difficult. I'm certain there are plenty of would-be Walt Disneys who'd like to make their own little cartoons. But — and this is the tricky part — who wants to watch them? It's tiring enough to scroll through the constant stream of clumsy generative-AI 'art,' with its unsettling visuals and recurring anatomical errors— so the idea of actually watching a full scene, let alone an entire episode, of AI-generated animation feels especially unappealing. What Showrunner is offering seems like the streaming equivalent of self-publishing in the book world: empowering for the authors, but rarely read by anyone else. The company's website proudly promises 'No agents' and 'no studio gatekeepers,' but here's a potentially controversial opinion: Sometimes gatekeepers are good. They serve to filter out untalented artists and elevate gifted ones. The burning desire to tell a story does not necessarily translate to the skill of telling one, and if you don't believe me, go spend a day at a third-tier film festival sometime. Beyond the specifics of this software, however, lurks a larger disconnect between the people who create entertainment and the people who create technology intended to supplant entertainment. Saatchi insists, 'Our relationship to entertainment will be totally different in the next five years,' and claims that 'Hollywood streaming services are about to become two-way entertainment: audiences watching a season of a show [and] loving it will now be able to make new episodes with a few words and become characters with a photo.' As someone who engages with film and television all the time, the concept is genuinely puzzling and not particularly appealing. The idea of 'two-way entertainment'— where loving a show or movie leads to inserting oneself into it or reshaping its narrative through personalized storylines — runs counter to why we engage with art. Part of the joy in watching something is experiencing a creator's vision. The expectation that audiences should actively participate in shaping entertainment feels more like a shift toward self-involvement than storytelling. It's hard to imagine watching a favorite show and thinking, 'The only thing that would make this better is if I were in charge of it.' The creators and consumers of fanfiction may disagree, but these matters are best left to the professionals. Perhaps that, ultimately, is what this all boils down to. The generative AI that we're constantly being bombarded with, in the fields of prose writing, visual art and now streaming television, comes at the expense of human artists, sidelining the very creativity and craft that give meaning to the work itself. People in all walks of life — especially in business and tech — love to describe themselves as 'storytellers' (even when they're only 'telling stories' in the most generous sense of the phrase), while simultaneously taking every opportunity to kneecap actual storytellers. Each so-called advancement rests on the premise that anyone can create high-quality art. But the reality is, not everyone can. Sure, I can daydream my own episodes of The Sopranos or Breaking Bad, to use two of my favorite series as examples. But that's exactly where those fantasies belong: in my head. What makes those shows exceptional is the mastery of David Chase and Vince Gilligan, who understand how to build complex characters, construct meaningful conflict, and deliver rising action and satisfying conclusions. Of course, it would be far more convenient — and far more profitable — for streaming platforms if anyone could replicate that expertise. And that may be the most troubling part of this deal: not just that software exists that devalues artists, erases creative labor and potentially infringes on copyrights, but that Amazon is so eager to invest in From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Jason Bailey is a film critic and historian whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Vulture, the Playlist, Slate and Rolling Stone. He is the author, most recently, of 'Gandolfini: Jim, Tony, and the Life of a Legend.' More stories like this are available on
