Winter is coming for oil – and not in a positive way
Until recently, global oil demand peaked every year with the arrival of the Northern Hemisphere's winter.
As temperatures dropped from October, heating oil and kerosene consumption spiked from the US to Germany to Japan. Hence, as recently as 2014, the fourth quarter still marked the annual high for crude demand and, typically, prices. Since then, the seasonality has flipped: Now, the third quarter sees higher demand and prices.
The shift means the market is now at its tightest from July to September, rather than October to December. While one-time events can still have an effect – the 2008 global financial crisis, for example, or the Covid-19 pandemic that started in early 2020 – looking over a long enough timescale reveals the change clearly. Because it happened incrementally over a quarter of a century, it often does not get the attention it deserves.
The change has three notable features.
First, consumption of winter fuels including heating oil and kerosene is on a structural decline in the industrialised world, replaced by natural gas and electricity.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back in 1990, about 17 per cent of American families heated their homes by burning some kind of refined petroleum product; today, that share has fallen to 9 per cent. The collapse in demand for heating oil in Europe is even more pronounced. At the same time, jet fuel consumption in those regions, which typically peaks during the summer holidays, is growing fast.
Second, oil demand in fast-growing emerging nations follows different seasonal patterns, partly because of their locations closer to the Equator, but also because of the larger role of their year-round industrial oil consumption.
While industrialised nations mostly abandoned oil-fired power stations after the 1970s energy crisis, some emerging market countries, particularly in the Middle East, burn lots of crude for electricity generation and water desalination. At the peak last summer, Saudi Arabia burned more than 800,000 barrels a day to generate electricity for air-conditioning – more than the daily total petroleum demand of Belgium.
So this year, global third-quarter oil demand will be 500,000 barrels a day higher than fourth-quarter consumption. In a dataset going back to 1991, the current year will mark only the fifth time when winter demand will be lower than summer consumption.
Despite rising production from the Opec+ (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies) cartel, oil prices have stabilised in recent weeks at just over US$65 a barrel – about US$10 above the lows seen in early May.
If anything, the physical oil market even feels a bit tight. It helps that China has mopped up much of the oil surplus, putting in May and June barrels into its expanding strategic and commercial stockpiles.
But the squeeze will prove temporary; put another way, the market is defying gravity. Because of shifting seasonality, the Northern Hemisphere's summer is now the tightest period of the year. Winter – and an accompanying decrease in demand – is coming.
For now, the few remaining oil bulls have a few straws of hope to cling to.
Global crude refinery intake is rising swiftly this month, and looks set to peak in August at a record 85.4 million barrels a day – enough to absorb the series of Opec output increases. As a result, global oil stocks are not increasing meaningfully near where it matters most to the market: the pricing points in north-western Europe, home of the Brent benchmark, and the central area of the US, home to the West Texas Intermediate yardstick.
But by October, when all of the cartel's supply hikes will have arrived, along with extra oil from Brazil, Guyana and Canada, refinery throughput will drop to 81.7 million barrels a day, according to the International Energy Agency. The difference – 3.7 million barrels a day – is equal to a couple of mid-sized Opec nations.
Even if China continues stockpiling as much as it has done over the last two months, the surplus would be so large that oil will flow into inventories elsewhere, including near the pricing points on both sides of the Atlantic.
For sure, the market – and I – may be wrong about demand, supply or both. The expected oil surplus during the now seasonally weaker fourth quarter may be smaller than anticipated. Still, on paper, the glut is so big that even if it turns out to be a bit smaller, it would still be enough to put a lot of downward pressure on the market.
As I said, winter is coming for the oil market. BLOOMBERG The writer is co-author of The World for Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth's Resources
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
IMF warns tariffs aren't the answer to global imbalances
[WASHINGTON] Global current account balances widened sharply in 2024, reversing a narrowing under way since the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, the International Monetary Fund said on Tuesday (Jul 22), warning that tariffs were not the answer. In its annual External Sector Report, which assesses imbalances in the 30 largest economies, the IMF noted that external surpluses or deficits were not necessarily a problem, but could cause risks if they became excessive. It said prolonged domestic imbalances, continued fiscal policy uncertainty, and escalating trade tensions could deteriorate global risk sentiment and elevate financial stress, hurting both debtor and creditor nations. The report took aim at US President Donald Trump's imposition of higher import tariffs against nearly every trading partner, which his administration says is aimed at increasing revenues and righting longstanding trade deficits. 'A further escalation of the trade war would have significant macroeconomic effects,' it said, noting that higher tariffs would reduce global demand in the short term and add to inflationary pressures through rising import prices. Rising geopolitical tensions could also trigger shifts in the international monetary system (IMS), which in turn could undermine financial stability, it said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up This year's report, based on 2024 data, showed the widening of global current account balances was due largely to increased excess balances in the world's three largest economies – the United States, China and the euro area. The deficit in the United States widened by US$228 billion to US$1.13 trillion or 1 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP), while China's surplus increased by US$161 billion to US$424 billion and the euro surpluses expanded by US$198 billion to US$461 billion. In an accompanying blog, IMF chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas said excessive surpluses or deficits stemmed from domestic distortions, such as overly loose fiscal policy in deficit countries and insufficient safety nets that caused excessive precautionary savings in surplus countries. Changes aimed these domestic drivers – not tariffs – were needed, he said. That meant China should focus on boosting consumption, Europe should spend more on infrastructure and the US needed to reduce large public deficits and rein in fiscal spending, he said. The report was based on data collected before approval of a massive tax cut and spending bill, which the Congressional Budget Office on Monday said would add US$3.4 trillion to the US deficit over 10 years, causing further pressure. 'Public deficits in the United States remain excessively large and the recent broad depreciation of the Chinese yuan – together with the US dollar – runs the risk of widening current account surpluses in China,' he wrote. Rising tariffs had little impact on global imbalances, Gourinchas said since they tended to reduce both investment and savings in the tariffing country, leaving current account balances little changed. Uncertainty about tariffs could also undermine consumer and business confidence, increase financial market volatility and lead to persistent appreciations of the US dollar, the IMF report said. However, it noted the dollar had depreciated 8 per cent since January, its largest half-year decline since 1973. It acknowledged the continued dominance of the US dollar, but said growing geoeconomic fragmentation could pose risks in the future, and recent weaker demand for US Treasuries could reflect concerns about the US fiscal trajectory. Increased use of China's yuan in international trade and finance, a 'softening in the United States' role as world banker and insurer' and the emergence of alternative payment systems and private digital assets could eventually lead to changes in the use of international currencies. 'While the risks of serious dislocation in the IMS remain moderate, rapid and sizable increases in global imbalances can generate significant negative cross-border spillovers,' Gourinchas wrote in the blog. 'A major risk for the global economy is that countries will instead respond to rising imbalances by further raising trade barriers, leading to increased geoeconomic fragmentation. And while the impact on global imbalances will remain limited, the harm to the global economy will be long-lasting.' REUTERS
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Bessent says he will meet Chinese officials, discuss tariff deadline extension
[WASHINGTON] US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday (Jul 22) that he will meet his Chinese counterpart next week and discuss what is likely to be an extension of an Aug 12 deadline for higher tariffs. Bessent told Fox Business Network's Mornings With Maria programme that trade with China was in 'a very good place' and the meetings in Stockholm would take place next Monday and Tuesday. 'I think we've actually moved to a new level with China, where it's very constructive and... we're going to be able to get a lot of things done now that trade has kind of settled in at a good level,' Bessent said. While a previous tariff truce was focused on restarting the flow of Chinese rare earth metals and US semiconductor software and materials, Bessent said that in Stockholm, Trump administration officials would discuss other issues, including reducing China's over-reliance on manufacturing and exports. 'Hopefully we can see the Chinese pull back on some of this glut of manufacturing that they're doing and concentrate on building a consumer economy,' Bessent said. He said he also wants to issue warnings to China about continuing to buy sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil and China's efforts to aid Russia's war against Ukraine. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Bessent said that there was bipartisan support in the US Senate for legislation aimed at imposing tariffs of 100 per cent on goods from countries that continue to buy Russian oil, namely China and India. 'I'm going to be in touch with my European counterparts. The Europeans that have talked a big game about sanctioning Russia, and it'll be very important for the Europeans to also be willing to put on these high level of secondary tariffs for sanctioned Russian oil.' He said that the US was poised to announce 'a rash of trade deals' with other countries, and Japan could be among these despite an election setback for Japan's ruling party and difficult negotiations. 'I wouldn't be surprised if we aren't able to iron out something with Japan pretty quickly,' Bessent said. Nonetheless, he said that for most countries, tariffs would 'boomerang' back towards April two levels from the current 10 per cent, but negotiations on trade deals could continue. REUTERS
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Is Wall Street still too bearish on the impact of tariffs?
'LIBERATION Day' feels like a long time ago. Since US President Donald Trump shocked markets with sky-high new tariff rates and a hasty U-turn, the S&P 500 Index has rebounded to all-time highs, and there's a pervasive sentiment that Wall Street is recklessly ignoring economic risks that haven't really gone away. Earnings season may, however, provide further fuel for the rally. Earnings estimates for the more trade-sensitive companies still haven't rebounded from the very serious hit they took after Apr 2. Maybe (just maybe) we'll start to see that happen as companies announce their quarterly results. Though tariffs are no joke for profit margins, many large companies are finding ways to mitigate the impact, and there's no clear sign that the levies will precipitate the economic downturn that many initially feared. Consider consumer discretionary stocks. Excluding special cases and Tesla, sellside analysts are projecting a 6.2 per cent contraction in S&P 500 discretionary earnings this calendar year. The outlook collapsed after Liberation Day and has remained gloomy. The speed and scope of the downward earnings revisions for the sector since early April were the worst in 20 years outside of 2020 (the start of the Covid-19 pandemic) and 2008 (the onset of the financial crisis). Even if 2025 isn't all sunshine and roses for these companies, Wall Street may still be a bit too negative. We can observe a similar collapse of earnings expectations across the entire S&P 500 if we carve out the so-called Magnificent 7 group of mega-capitalisation growth stocks. Analysts now project modest declines this year for consumer staples, and the rebound in industrial earnings is expected to be weaker than what was estimated early in 2025. Among the non-Magnificent-7 cohort, it's noteworthy that analysts soured not only on profit margins but also on revenues. The latter has room to recover even in an environment of enduring tariffs, as long as we assume that the US economy will skirt a downturn. If analysts are so down on so many stocks, how has the index performed as well as it has? Basically, it's the same old story of Magnificent 7 exceptionalism, with a special emphasis on a few standouts among them. America's superstar mega-cap stocks are putting the market on their shoulders, driven by extraordinary underlying growth and optimism about artificial intelligence (AI). The trade war briefly hit earnings expectations for the likes of Nvidia and Amazon, but they swiftly bounced back. More than just a retailer, Amazon has a massive cloud business that's relatively trade-proof, and Nvidia has benefited from positive reversals in policy since the trade war first broke loose (more on that later). BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Microsoft, Meta Platforms and Alphabet never lost their mojo in the eyes of analysts, a reflection of business models that weren't highly exposed to the changes that Trump introduced. Of the entire group, only Apple and Tesla have seen an enduring drop in earnings expectations after early April. For Tesla, trade is just one in a confluence of factors that includes Elon Musk's dramatic fallout with Trump and the pending loss of electric vehicle tax credits. Investors are also learning that some of these stocks qualify for special treatment from the Trump administration. This week, the government reversed course on restricting shipments of key AI processors to China, unlocking billions in potential revenue for Nvidia and rival Advanced Micro Devices. Whether this Magnificent 5 leadership is a blessing or a hazard is still mostly in the eye of the beholder. Certainly, the lofty expectations implicit in these companies' valuations come with risks of their own, but they're generally separate from the question of whether markets are appropriately pricing tariff policy. In the meantime, investors are benefiting handsomely. Moreover, equity investors have other developments to cheer for. The Republican tax and spending package, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enshrines tax benefits on domestic and international income that Morgan Stanley said could benefit companies across a range of industries, including tech and communication services. On the trade front, Bloomberg reported that President Trump had softened his tone with China to set the table for a summit with counterpart Xi Jinping. Could the tariff story take another turn for the worse? Absolutely. Trump is still unveiling new threats, and ongoing trade investigations could push the effective rate closer to 20 per cent before the tariff drama is over. Most major trading partners have responded cautiously so far, but an all-out trade war with the likes of the European Union could change the calculus rather quickly. Despite the perception that Trump has backtracked, the average tariff rate still stands at about 13 per cent today, comparable to the 1940s, and it's possible that significant economic damage is already in train with a lag. Yet, unlike small businesses, large-cap stocks have extraordinary negotiating power with their suppliers, and the dispirited forecasts in key sectors suggest that there could, optimistically speaking, be room for analysts to start revising earnings higher rather than lower this earnings season. If that happens, we may yet see some modest upside in the US market. BLOOMBERG
