Winter is coming for oil – and not in a positive way
Until recently, global oil demand peaked every year with the arrival of the Northern Hemisphere's winter.
As temperatures dropped from October, heating oil and kerosene consumption spiked from the US to Germany to Japan. Hence, as recently as 2014, the fourth quarter still marked the annual high for crude demand and, typically, prices. Since then, the seasonality has flipped: Now, the third quarter sees higher demand and prices.
The shift means the market is now at its tightest from July to September, rather than October to December. While one-time events can still have an effect – the 2008 global financial crisis, for example, or the Covid-19 pandemic that started in early 2020 – looking over a long enough timescale reveals the change clearly. Because it happened incrementally over a quarter of a century, it often does not get the attention it deserves.
The change has three notable features.
First, consumption of winter fuels including heating oil and kerosene is on a structural decline in the industrialised world, replaced by natural gas and electricity.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back in 1990, about 17 per cent of American families heated their homes by burning some kind of refined petroleum product; today, that share has fallen to 9 per cent. The collapse in demand for heating oil in Europe is even more pronounced. At the same time, jet fuel consumption in those regions, which typically peaks during the summer holidays, is growing fast.
Second, oil demand in fast-growing emerging nations follows different seasonal patterns, partly because of their locations closer to the Equator, but also because of the larger role of their year-round industrial oil consumption.
While industrialised nations mostly abandoned oil-fired power stations after the 1970s energy crisis, some emerging market countries, particularly in the Middle East, burn lots of crude for electricity generation and water desalination. At the peak last summer, Saudi Arabia burned more than 800,000 barrels a day to generate electricity for air-conditioning – more than the daily total petroleum demand of Belgium.
So this year, global third-quarter oil demand will be 500,000 barrels a day higher than fourth-quarter consumption. In a dataset going back to 1991, the current year will mark only the fifth time when winter demand will be lower than summer consumption.
Despite rising production from the Opec+ (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies) cartel, oil prices have stabilised in recent weeks at just over US$65 a barrel – about US$10 above the lows seen in early May.
If anything, the physical oil market even feels a bit tight. It helps that China has mopped up much of the oil surplus, putting in May and June barrels into its expanding strategic and commercial stockpiles.
But the squeeze will prove temporary; put another way, the market is defying gravity. Because of shifting seasonality, the Northern Hemisphere's summer is now the tightest period of the year. Winter – and an accompanying decrease in demand – is coming.
For now, the few remaining oil bulls have a few straws of hope to cling to.
Global crude refinery intake is rising swiftly this month, and looks set to peak in August at a record 85.4 million barrels a day – enough to absorb the series of Opec output increases. As a result, global oil stocks are not increasing meaningfully near where it matters most to the market: the pricing points in north-western Europe, home of the Brent benchmark, and the central area of the US, home to the West Texas Intermediate yardstick.
But by October, when all of the cartel's supply hikes will have arrived, along with extra oil from Brazil, Guyana and Canada, refinery throughput will drop to 81.7 million barrels a day, according to the International Energy Agency. The difference – 3.7 million barrels a day – is equal to a couple of mid-sized Opec nations.
Even if China continues stockpiling as much as it has done over the last two months, the surplus would be so large that oil will flow into inventories elsewhere, including near the pricing points on both sides of the Atlantic.
For sure, the market – and I – may be wrong about demand, supply or both. The expected oil surplus during the now seasonally weaker fourth quarter may be smaller than anticipated. Still, on paper, the glut is so big that even if it turns out to be a bit smaller, it would still be enough to put a lot of downward pressure on the market.
As I said, winter is coming for the oil market. BLOOMBERG The writer is co-author of The World for Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth's Resources
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
‘US needs China's fireworks': No alternative for some Chinese goods amid trade uncertainty
LIUYANG/YIWU - Fourth of July celebrations in the United States might have just passed, but Chinese businessman Marx Wu is already prepared for a dampening effect of tariffs on sales of his fireworks to American customers for the festivities in 2026. This is due to the additional 30 per cent tariffs that US President Donald Trump has been imposing on China – since the outbreak of a trade war between the two countries in April – in a bid to bring back manufacturing to the US. 'Customers will be more cautious because their costs have increased significantly,' Mr Wu told The Straits Times. His company, Magnus Fireworks, is based in Liuyang, Hunan province, which is dubbed China's 'fireworks' hometown' for its expertise in manufacturing pyrotechnics. The US government now collects a 35.7 per cent tax from American importers for fireworks from China. The bulk of these sales are meant for the annual US Independence Day celebrations synonymous with fireworks displays. Such orders are typically made a year in advance. But Mr Wu, who sells mainly to the US, remains optimistic about his business' viability in the longer-term, because the strengths of the Chinese industry in Liuyang cannot be easily replicated elsewhere, he said. When unpacking the impacts of Trump's aggressive tariff strategy on Chinese manufacturers, it is a mixed picture on the ground. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Almost half of planned 30,000 flats in Tengah to be completed by end-2025: Chee Hong Tat Asia Death toll climbs as Thai-Cambodia clashes continue despite calls for ceasefire Multimedia Lights dimmed at South-east Asia's scam hub but 'pig butchering' continues Singapore Black belt in taekwondo, Grade 8 in piano: S'pore teen excels despite condition that limits movements Asia Where's Jho Low? Looking for 1MDB fugitive in Shanghai's luxury estate Asia Thousands rally in downtown Kuala Lumpur calling for the resignation of PM Anwar Life SG60 F&B icons: Honouring 14 heritage brands that have never lost their charm Business Can STI continue its defiant climb in second half of 2025? Mr Marx Wu with some of his company's firework products for US Independence Day celebrations at his office in Liuyang, Hunan province. ST PHOTO: LIM MIN ZHANG On the one hand, Mr Trump's move to impose tariffs across the board on Chinese goods in April has led to factory closures and worker lay-offs in certain sectors such as the garment industry, and accelerated moves to diversify away from the US market for other exporters. On the other hand, there are other products which simply have few to no alternatives to 'made in China', because the country's manufacturers are overwhelmingly competitive, say experts. When Mr Trump proclaimed 'Liberation Day' on April 2 with 'reciprocal tariffs' on the US' trading partners, Beijing and Washington engaged in a tit-for-tat tariff war. At one point, American importers had to pay a 145 per cent tax on Chinese goods. But bilateral trade talks since May 12 have de-escalated the situation. US and Chinese officials are set to meet in Stockholm next week (from July 27) to discuss a possible extension of a 90-day truce. The fireworks industry presents a case study showing how, despite trade tensions and strategic competition, the US and China remain economically intertwined. While US businesses now adopt a cautious approach in placing orders, the deals have continued to flow as Chinese manufacturers remain competitive. Liuyang has over decades accumulated the technical know-how, the quality of its raw materials, proper regulatory oversight and strict transportation requirements, Mr Wu said. Factories dot the surrounding mountainous terrain of the city, about an hour's drive from the inland Hunan capital of Changsha. Production has to stop for about a month for safety reasons every summer because of the heat. 'America needs fireworks – this will not change,' said Mr Wu. 'At the very most, they will buy fewer, but they will not stop buying completely. In addition, we have good relations with our customers who trust in our products, and they also believe that this (tariffs issue) is temporary.' Screenshot from a video Mr Wu took of a Fourth of July fireworks celebration in Ohio earlier in July. His company's products were used. PHOTO: MARX WU According to the American Pyrotechnic Association, 90 per cent of professional display fireworks used in the US are imported from China. Reports say that US companies import close to US$400 million worth of consumer fireworks from China each year. More than 200 other imported products depend on China for more than 90 per cent of their supply, including baby carriages, vacuum flasks, umbrellas and artificial plants. Mr Stephen Olson, a visiting senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore who specialises in international trade, said that despite all the conflicts and tension, trade between the US and China has remained remarkably resilient. Although China's exports to the US declined in the first half of the year, China remains among the US' largest trade partners and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future, he said. China's exports to the US declined by 10.7 per cent in the first half of 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, a drop of US$25.7 billion. 'Trump's tariffs have undoubtedly dented China's cost competitiveness but the resilience of China's exports reflect the simple fact that China is the world's preeminent manufacturer and is overwhelmingly competitive in a host of consumer products and industrial inputs. It's simply not possible to cut China entirely out of US consumer markets or supply chains,' Mr Olson said. Mr Steve Houser, president of Missouri-based Red Rhino Fireworks who was on a work trip to China, said he has already placed his orders for 2026, but added that he – like other major importers – is doing so much more cautiously. 'I'm being very particular on what I order. I'm ordering only what I really, really need. I'm not really taking chances on other things because of the tariff rates; the goods are costing me a lot more,' he told ST. He said that the National Fireworks Association in the US was recently in Washington DC to make the case that fireworks should be exempt from the across-the-board tariffs of 30 per cent, as there are no viable alternative suppliers from other countries. Apart from the fireworks business, the US-China trade war has resulted in uncertainty for many exporters, such as those in Yiwu, of Zhejiang province, which is home to the world's largest wholesale market for small commodities. The sprawling Yiwu International Trade City hosts more than 70,000 shops selling products from cosmetics to stationery, backpacks and Christmas decorations. Most shops that stocked Halloween and Christmas decorations at the trade city declined to speak with ST in early July, when it is usually the peak sales season for these products. A few shop owners would only say that business is slower in 2025, while others said they were not authorised to speak with the media. Rows of dozens of shops at Yiwu International Trade City in Zhejiang province selling Christmas decorations were largely empty when ST visited in early July. ST PHOTO: LIM MIN ZHANG Ms Guo Xiabing, an entrepreneur in Zhejiang who runs a factory making Christmas trees in Yiwu, said that typically, US customers are more able to afford higher-priced products, such as those with more fanciful ornaments. She shared about her factory's race to ship orders in the 90-day trade truce between the US and China in a documentary aired in June. 'Customers also do not want to give up on the orders. But that also means that we are left hanging, not knowing when we can resume production and shipping. This type of uncertainty causes a lot of anxiety. Should we let go of the workers? How would we find jobs for them?' she said. Yet others have taken a longer-term view, and have long made efforts to diversify away from the US market. Chief executive of Aokai Sporting Goods in Yiwu, Mr Wu Xiaoming, who has been in the industry for 30 years, counts the South American and African markets as his major customers - at about 50 per cent and 20 per cent respectively - with the US market accounting for only about 5 per cent. Chief executive of Aokai Sporting Goods in Yiwu, Mr Wu Xiaoming, inspecting a football bound for Nicaragua at his factory in Yiwu city, Zhejiang province. ST PHOTO: LIM MIN ZHANG He recalled that there was one American customer who called him to resume an order on May 13, shortly after news of successful US-China trade talks in Geneva was announced, as well as to place a new order for 90,000 footballs. His orders from the US are mainly for supermarkets. 'For the US market, the volume is still there. But it is US consumers who have to bear the cost (of the tariffs). If you force us to lower our costs, it means the quality of the product suffers, so ultimately it's still the consumers who pay the bill,' Mr Wu said. He believes that diversification is necessary for his company's viability, not only because of trade frictions, but also due to other sources of instability. He cited examples such as a Croatian client that halted a shipment because of the Kosovo War in 1998, and how demand from Russia has plummeted because of the Ukraine war. 'There has not been a period where the entire world was completely at peace... In Yiwu, we engage in global trade. If the West doesn't shine, the East will.'
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
China's Premier Li proposes global AI cooperation organisation
[SHANGHAI] Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Saturday (Jul 26) proposed establishing an organisation to foster global cooperation on artificial intelligence (AI), calling on countries to coordinate on the development and security of the fast-evolving technology. Speaking at the opening of the annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference (Waic) in Shanghai, Li called AI a new engine for growth, but adding that governance is fragmented and emphasising the need for more coordination between countries to form a globally recognised framework for AI. The three-day event brings together industry leaders and policymakers at a time of escalating technological competition between China and the United States, the world's two largest economies, with AI emerging as a key battleground. 'Currently, overall global AI governance is still fragmented. Countries have great differences, particularly in terms of areas such as regulatory concepts, institutional rules,' Li said. 'We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible,' he said. Washington has imposed export restrictions on advanced technology to China, including the most high-end AI chips made by companies such as Nvidia and chipmaking equipment, citing concerns that the technology could enhance China's military capabilities. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Despite these restrictions, China has continued making AI breakthroughs that have drawn close scrutiny from US officials. Li did not name the United States in his speech, but he warned that AI could become an 'exclusive game' for a few countries and companies, and said challenges included an insufficient supply of AI chips and restrictions on talent exchange. China wanted to share its development experience and products with other countries, especially those in the Global South, Li said. Waic is an annual government-sponsored event in Shanghai that typically attracts major industry players, government officials, researchers and investors. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who has in past years regularly appeared at the opening ceremony both in-person and via video, did not speak this year. Besides forums, the conference also features exhibitions where companies demonstrate their latest innovations. This year, more than 800 companies are participating, showcasing more than 3,000 high-tech products, 40 large language models, 50 AI-powered devices and 60 intelligent robots, according to organisers. The exhibition features predominantly Chinese companies, including tech giants Huawei and Alibaba and startups such as humanoid robot maker Unitree. Western participants include Tesla, Alphabet and Amazon. REUTERS
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump tariffs leave costly China supply question unanswered
[BEIJING] US President Donald Trump's recent flurry of trade deals have given Asian exporters some clarity on tariffs, but missing are key details on how to avoid punitive rates that target China's supply chains. Trump unveiled tariffs of 20 per cent for Vietnam and 19 per cent for Indonesia and the Philippines, signalling that those are the levels the US will likely settle on for most of South-east Asia, a region that ships US$352 billion worth of goods annually to the US. He's also threatened to rocket rates up to 40 per cent for products deemed to be transshipped, or re-routed, through those countries, a move largely directed at curbing Chinese goods circumventing higher US tariffs. But still unclear to manufacturers is how the US will calculate and apply local-content requirements, key to how it will determine what constitutes transshipped goods. South-east Asian nations are highly reliant on Chinese components and raw materials, and US firms that source from the region would bear the extra tariff damage. That's left companies, investors and economists facing several unanswered questions about Trump's tariffs that appear aimed at squeezing out Chinese content, according to Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore. 'Is that raw materials? All raw materials? Above a certain percentage?' she said. 'How about parts? What about labour or services? What about investment?' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In an agreement with Indonesia last week, the White House said the two countries would negotiate 'rules of origin' to ensure a third country would not benefit. The deal with Vietnam earlier this month outlined a higher 40 per cent tariff rate for transshipped goods. And Thai officials, who have yet to secure a deal, detailed that they likely need to boost local content in exports to the US. Missing details The Trump administration is not providing much clarity on the matter right now. US officials are still working out details with trading partners and looking at value-based local content requirements, to ensure exports are more than just assembled imported parts, according to a source familiar with the matter, who did not want to be identified discussing private talks. A senior Trump administration official also said this week that details on the approach to transhipment are expected to be released before Aug 1, the deadline for when higher US tariffs kick in. Some factories are already adjusting their supply chains to comply with rules that will require more locally-made components in production. Frank Deng, an executive at a Shanghai-based furniture exporter with operations in Vietnam, and which gets about 80 per cent of business from the US, said in an interview that his firm is making adjustments as authorities appear to be more strictly enforcing country-of-origin rules. Vietnam has always had specific local content requirements for manufacturers, Deng added, including that a maximum of 30 per cent of the volume of raw materials originates from China, and the value after production in Vietnam must be 40 per cent higher than the imported raw materials. 'We have been struggling to meet all the standards so that we can still stay in the game,' Deng said. 'But I guess that's the only way to survive now.' For most of South-east Asia, reducing the amount of Chinese-made components in manufacturing will require a complete overhaul of their supply chains. Estimates from Eurasia Group show that Chinese components make up about 60 to 70 per cent of exports from South-east Asia – primarily industrial inputs that go into manufacturing assembly. About 15 per cent of the region's exports now head to the US, up about four percentage points from 2018. Local content The US has become increasingly vigilant about China's ability to bypass US trade tariffs and other restrictions through third countries since Trump's first trade war in 2017. Thailand signalled its frustration over the lack of clarity for how much local content is needed in goods exported to the US to avert transhipment rates, but noted it will likely be much higher than a traditional measure of 40 per cent. 'From what we have heard, the required percentage could be significantly higher, perhaps 60 per cent, 70 per cent, or even 80 per cent,' Deputy Prime Minister Pichai Chunhavajira said on Jul 14. 'Emerging countries or new production bases are clearly at a disadvantage,' he said, as their manufacturing capabilities are still at an early stage and must rely on other countries for raw goods. Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia have all taken steps this year to address Trump's concerns, increasing scrutiny of trade that passes through their ports, including new rule-of-origin policies that centralise processing and imposing harsh penalties on transshippers. Developing nations may still struggle to enforce Trump's rules or comply with the rules if it means going up against China, their largest trading partner and geopolitical partner. 'The reality is it's not enforceable at all,' said Dan Wang, China director at Eurasia Group. 'Chinese companies have all kinds of ways to get around it and those other countries have no incentive to enforce those measures, or capacity to collect the data and determine local content.' BLOOMBERG
