logo
Texas Pushes LGBTQ+ School Club Ban as Pride Month Kicks Off

Texas Pushes LGBTQ+ School Club Ban as Pride Month Kicks Off

Newsweek01-06-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Texas lawmakers have advanced legislation that bans public K-12 schools from sponsoring student clubs based on sexual orientation or gender identity, drawing sharp criticism from Democratic legislators and LGBTQ+ advocates.
Senate Bill 12, sponsored by Senator Brandon Creighton, passed its final hurdle in the Texas House on Saturday and is now poised for the governor's signature.
Newsweek has contacted Senator Brandon Creighton via email for comment.
Why It Matters
The bill's passage marks a significant escalation in Texas' ongoing campaign against what conservatives describe as ideological indoctrination in education, however critics argue the ban endangers children and strips them of their dignity.
The legislation would specifically bar schools from authorizing or sponsoring LGBTQ+ student clubs and is part of a broader legislative push that has also targeted diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in K-12 settings.
File photo: a pride flag is seen ahead of pride month.
File photo: a pride flag is seen ahead of pride month.
Aaron Schwartz/Sipa via AP
What To Know
Alongside banning LGBTQ+ school clubs, Senate Bill 12, often dubbed the "Parental Bill of Rights," gives parents expanded authority over what clubs their children can join.
The bill emphasizes that parents have a fundamental right to direct their child's education and upbringing, including decisions on moral, religious, medical, and psychological matters.
It prohibits public schools from "infringing" on those rights unless required to serve a compelling state interest.
The bill bans instruction, programming, or activities related to sexual orientation or gender identity in all grades, pre-K through 12. Schools are barred from allowing third-party groups to deliver such content as well.
SB 12 also explicitly bans any diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) responsibilities for school employees unless mandated by state or federal law.
It defines DEI broadly to include hiring practices, training programs, or any special treatment based on race, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
What People Are Saying
State Senator Brandon Creighton said in a statement: "Passing the Texas Education Freedom Act sends a message to all of Texas. It tells the
next generation of Texas leaders: your path should fit your purpose—your ambition is greater than any system. It tells our educators that innovation and excellence will be encouraged—not limited by ZIP code. And it tells every parent in Texas: you are trusted, you are respected, and you are in charge."
"The future of Texas begins in the classroom. Too often, we get lost in the debates about systems and budgets and programs. Not today—today, we are focused on the child at the center of it all. The one who needs a hand up, a better fit, or simply a chance."
Democratic State Representative Gene Wu said during the debate, according to The Texas Tribune: "The real monsters are not kids trying to figure out who they are. The monsters are not the teachers who love them and encourage them and support them. They are not the books that provide them with some amount of comfort and information. The real monsters are here."
Democratic State Representative Rafael Anchía, said, according to The Texas Tribune: "It wasn't a sex club. They'd get together and they'd watch movies. They'd color. They'd go to musicals. It was about a kid who felt weird who found her people and everything about it was good. I don't know why grown-ups in this body are so triggered with my daughter getting together with her classmates in a school-sponsored activity."
Democratic State Representative Jolanda Jones, said, according to The Texas Tribune: "We've passed bill after bill about access to care, about youth suicide, about prevention and treatment. But this bill makes kids sicker, sadder, more alone. This bill doesn't protect children. It endangers them. It doesn't give parents more rights. It strips children of their dignity."
What Happens Next
Passed by both chambers, the bill awaits the signature of Governor Greg Abbott. If enacted, the rules would take effect from September 1, 2025, and Texas would join a growing number of Republican-led states that have passed similar restrictions on school activities and curriculum related to LGBTQ+ identities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schumer to force reading of 1,000-page GOP mega bill, delaying it by half a day
Schumer to force reading of 1,000-page GOP mega bill, delaying it by half a day

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Schumer to force reading of 1,000-page GOP mega bill, delaying it by half a day

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) told Democratic senators Saturday that he will force the clerks to read the 1,000-page Republican megabill on the Senate floor once Republicans vote to proceed to the legislation, a procedural act of defiance that will take an estimated 12 hours and delay final passage of President Trump's agenda by half a day — at least. Schumer told his caucus to prepare to force a full reading of the bill, according to a Democratic source familiar with the internal discussion over floor strategy. The question is whether Senate GOP leaders will force the clerks to read the bill late into Saturday night and early Sunday morning to complete the time-and energy-consuming task or whether staff will get some time to sleep before the Senate is expected to launch into a multi-hour series of votes known as a vote-a-rama. Senate Republicans were anticipating that Schumer might force a reading of the bill as an act of protest. Schumer's action comes as Senate Republicans are hustling to pass President Trump's massive tax and spending bill by the president's assigned July 4 deadline. GOP leaders were initially planning for an initial procedural vote Saturday afternoon, followed by up to 20 hours of debate and then an unlimited series of amendment votes known as a vote-a-rama. With Schumer's push, the expected timeframe for the 'vote-a-rama' has been pushed back. It remains unclear if Republicans have the votes to advance the Senate's version of the spending bill. Senate Republicans can only afford to lose three votes, and three lawmakers — GOP Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.), Ron Johnson (Wis.) and Thom Tillis (N.C.) — say they will vote 'no.' Updated at 6 p.m. EDT. Sarah Polus and Regina Zilbermints contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Iranian Woman Who Has Lived in US for Four Decades Detained by ICE
Iranian Woman Who Has Lived in US for Four Decades Detained by ICE

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Iranian Woman Who Has Lived in US for Four Decades Detained by ICE

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Mandana Kashanian, a 64-year-old Iranian woman who came to the United States at 17 years old just ahead of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, was arrested by U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Sunday and is being in detention in Louisiana. Newsweek has confirmed her detention in the ICE detainee database. Newsweek has reached out to ICE for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters Kashanian's detention comes amid an immigration crackdown by the Trump administration and inflamed U.S. relations with Iran. The U.S. struck three of Iran's nuclear sites, Isfahan, Fordow, and Natanz, lastSaturday. Iran later struck a U.S. base in Qatar. Also last weekend, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) arrested 11 Iranian citizens who were in the U.S. illegally. Since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran and the U.S. have severed main diplomatic ties and maintained a tense relationship, with occasional high-profile nuclear talks. Ahead of and during the Iranian Revolution, hundreds of thousands of Iranians fled to the United States. Many had supported Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi or belonged to ethnic and religious minorities and faced persecution under the new government. At the time, U.S. President Jimmy Carter maintained close ties with the Shah who was backed by Washington. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has pledged to launch the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. In addition to people residing in the country illegally, immigrants with valid documentation, including green cards and visas, have been detained and face legal jeopardy. What To Know Kashanian came to the U.S. on a student visa on July 24, 1978 and "gained authorization to remain in the U.S. until May 31, 1983 by changing her status to that of a spouse of a nonimmigrant student" according to documents from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reviewed by Newsweek. She eventually applied for asylum, but her claim was denied, according to the 2001 court documents. Her family told MSNBC that she applied for asylum and was denied multiple times. Kashanian has appealed several court decisions relating to her status as well as filing a motion to reopen appeals. She married early on and then divorced. She then married Russ Milne, a U.S. citizen, in 1990 and the couple share a 32-year-old daughter together, who is also a U.S. citizen. Part of the complication of Kashanian's status is due to her first marriage, which the court reported as "improper" and fraudulent, and subsequently interfered with her green card application once married to Milne. Her father had worked as an engineer for the Shah in Tehran, according to and she claimed she would "experience extreme hardship if deported," per court documents. The local outlet said she was granted a stay of removal on the basis that she comply with immigration requirements, which her family says she has always met. Her husband told MSNBC on Friday that she has no criminal history. She has lived in the states for almost 50 years, setting down roots in New Orleans. She shares Persian recipes on a YouTube channel, was involved in her daughter's parent-teacher association, volunteered after Hurricane Katrina, and helps out family and neighbors, her husband told MSNBC. On June 22, she was arrested by officers in unmarked vehicles, her neighbor Sarah Gerig, told noting that the arrest was less than a minute. Kashanian is currently held in South Louisiana ICE processing center, according to the ICE database. The GEO Group runs the 1,000-person capacity facility located in Basile, Louisiana. The South Louisiana ICE Processing Center is seen in this aerial photo in Basile, Louisiana, on April 8. The South Louisiana ICE Processing Center is seen in this aerial photo in Basile, Louisiana, on April 8. AP Photo/Gerald Herbert What People Are Saying Russ Milne, Kashanian's husband, told "She's always worked, she's had a driver's license, she has a social security card, she's paid taxes/ She's about to qualify for Medicare. She's been a contribution to the community for her whole life." Joe Giarrusso, a member of the New Orleans City Council, said in an X, formerly Twitter, post sharing the article about Kashanian on June 25: "I usually don't comment on federal issues but this is a local issue, too. Someone living here with the federal government's full knowledge and approval for nearly 50 years is hardly Public Enemy Number 1. This should not happen." Kaitlynn Milne, Kashanian's daughter, told MSNBC on Friday: "She's tried going through the correct system and ... it's been hard for always caring. She's our support system, so it's obviously been really rough this week. She's the person that was always at my school. Always taking care of things around my school. She was, you know, always a huge volunteer, always helping everybody around." Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security said in a June 24 press release about the arrest of 11 Iranian nationals: "Under Secretary [Kristi] Noem, DHS has been full throttle on identifying and arresting known or suspected terrorists and violent extremists that illegally entered this country, came in through Biden's fraudulent parole programs or otherwise. "We have been saying we are getting the worst of the worst out—and we are. We don't wait until a military operation to execute; we proactively deliver on President Trump's mandate to secure the homeland." What Happens Next It is not clear when Kashanian will have an immigration hearing.

New Jersey AG ‘confident' in battle against Trump birthright citizenship order
New Jersey AG ‘confident' in battle against Trump birthright citizenship order

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

New Jersey AG ‘confident' in battle against Trump birthright citizenship order

New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin, one of the plaintiffs in a 22-state lawsuit against President Trump's executive order curbing birthright citizenship, said Saturday he was 'confident' the order could still be blocked nationwide following a Friday Supreme Court ruling that broadly restricted the ability of the court system to halt the president's policies. 'There's a whole range of administrative challenges that would make this completely unworkable, which is why I'm confident we'll get the nationwide relief we've sought when we go back to the lower courts,' Platkin said in an MSNBC appearance. The nation's highest court ruled Friday that Trump's executive order could be partially enforced because lower-court judges had exceeded their authority in issuing nationwide injunctions that blocked the policy. The ruling did not address the underlying constitutionality of Trump's order, but still drastically limited a judicial tool that has been used for decades, including to block federal policies from multiple presidential administrations. New Jersey is one of 22 Democratic-led states, along with a group of expectant mothers and immigration organizations, that sued to block the executive order almost immediately after it was issued in January. The injunctions issued by three federal judges in Washington, Maryland and Massachusetts in the ensuing months granted relief not just to those plaintiffs, but everyone in the country. That move, the Supreme Court majority said Friday, was unconstitutional. Instead, injunctions should be narrowly tailored to provide 'complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.' The lower courts will now get the first attempt at tailoring injunctions to comply with the ruling. On MSNBC, Platkin contended that 'complete relief' to the states harmed by the executive order would still involve blocking the executive order across the country. 'It would be impossible to administer a system of citizenship based on which state you live in,' he said. The suits of the non-state plaintiffs, meanwhile, were quickly refashioned into class-action lawsuits, a legal route that Justice Amy Coney Barrett noted could provide broader relief against the birthright citizenship order in her majority opinion. The executive order remains blocked for at least 30 days while the courts and parties sort out the next steps.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store