logo
Netanyahu's Nobel nomination for Trump really is beyond satire

Netanyahu's Nobel nomination for Trump really is beyond satire

The National09-07-2025
Netanyahu – a mass murderer, perpetrator of genocide, the angel of death – has nominated his amoral, narcissistic American pimp for an award that, with some exceptions, is noted for its virtuous and deserving recipients. In 2010, Liu Xiaobo won the Nobel Peace Prize for 'his long and non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China'. Fifteen years later, the proposer is a man who not only ignores fundamental human rights but continues to butcher thousands upon thousands of people for personal political survival and to execute fundamental Zionist dogma.
READ MORE: David Lammy calls Israel Gaza concentration camp plan 'sticking point'
Meanwhile, the nominee has recently ordered an attack on another country on spurious grounds whilst openly supporting ethnic cleansing in Palestine to enable his real-estate ambitions there to come to fruition. It is akin to Gary Glitter nominating Jimmy Savile for his services to children's welfare.
Yet the press and world leaders will not react with well-deserved scorn and derision to this proposed symbolic triumph of evil over good, of iniquitousness over equity. Starmer, Swinney and others who profess to lead will cower or remain silent in the face of overwhelming evidence of the ethical sewer that the USA has become and the ongoing depravity of the state of Israel.
Owen Kelly
Stirling
I HEAR that Trump is being promoted for the Nobel Peace Prize by his 'good buddy' Bibi Netanyahu, and if that wasn't a sick enough joke, Netanyahu's Defence Minister Katz is proposing Israel's largest concentration camp – bigger than Auschwitz Birkenau in Poland.
Inmates are to be searched on the way in and kept in, with no exit planned.
READ MORE: Israeli plan to force Palestinians into camps 'crime against humanity'
This is to be built on the ruins of Rafah in the south of Gaza. The new Riviera with a Hotel California, where you can check out but never leave.
I await the take of Kevin Bridges or Frankie Boyle on this. Other comedians are available.
Alistair Ballantyne
Angus
ON July 7, President Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a White House dinner. Also in attendance was the US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, who has stated that 'there is no such thing as a Palestinian'.
At this dinner, Netanyahu reaffirmed his support for Trump's 'brilliant vision', which would cynically allow Palestinians the 'free choice' to move to other countries. No mention was made of Israel reducing Gaza to rubble and destroying all means of sustaining human life.
READ MORE: Ex-Irish taoiseach says he's 'never been so glad' Ireland out of Nato
As US political scientist John Mearsheimer has warned: 'If you don't want a two-state solution, then what are you going to do? … Israel has turned into an apartheid state … And the Israelis understand that over the long term this is probably not viable … They want to get out of that situation, and the best way to do that, from their point of view, is to ethnically cleanse the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.'
President Donald Trump and his administration seem more than willing to help Israel achieve this goal.
Terry Hansen
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
ON the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 London bombings – a day etched in grief by the murder of innocents – the UK's political and media class reached new depths of moral collapse. In a functioning democracy, the so-called 'free press' would be aflame with outrage at this treasonous conduct. Instead, they serve as silent accomplices as the government rewards terrorism, re-establishing ties with Syria's new regime led by members of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), an Al-Qaeda spinoff.
This grotesque betrayal is compounded by the banning of Palestine Action, a peaceful protest group resisting genocide, while Westminster arms Israel's slaughter in Gaza and embraces jihadists who massacred minorities in Syria.
READ MORE: Kneecap slate John Swinney at Glasgow gig ahead of TRNSMT
Foreign Secretary David Lammy's claim that engaging HTS ensures 'stability' is a sick joke. The group has already unleashed violence against Alawites, Druze, and Christians. Meanwhile, Palestine Action faces bans for spraying paint on warplanes, while the UK legitimises a regime that beheads dissenters. This isn't diplomacy – it's complicity in terror.
This moral rot underscores why Scotland must break free. An independent Scotland could reject Nato's imperialism, Zionist apartheid, and Wahhabi-funded extremism – choosing human rights over Westminster's blood-stained hypocrisy.
The UK Government has proven, yet again, that its words are poison and its actions vile. The only solution is dismantling this rotten state.
Alan Hinnrichs
Dundee
SO, Hansard is not a true record of what is said in Parliament after all, despite what we're led to believe (MP's 'we are Palestine Action' comment edited out of Hansard, thenational.scot, Jul 8). What else has been edited. Why and by whom? And who has been sacked for this?
Anyway, I am Palestine Action. I support them wholeheartedly in the fight against our murderous British government aiding and abetting the murder of civilians in Gaza. This British government are criminals using the police and courts to facilitate murder against Palestinians. How long before they use their dark forces against us?
Please try to jail me so I can show just how stupid this Labour government is. I'd welcome you trying to jail me and every other citizen who knows this British government are scum.
Come on. Do it. Make an example of me.
Jim Taylor
via thenational.scot
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff to visit Russia
Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff to visit Russia

Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Times

Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff to visit Russia

The American special envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Russia this week before a US deadline for the Kremlin to call off its invasion of Ukraine, President Trump has said, admitting that any fresh sanctions against Moscow might not be effective. Trump also said that American 'nuclear submarines' whose deployment he ordered after a social media spat with Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president, were now 'in the region'. He gave no other details, such as whether he meant the submarines were nuclear-powered or carrying nuclear missiles. Trump said that Witkoff would go to Russia on Wednesday or Thursday to try to 'get a deal where people stop getting killed'. Witkoff has been widely criticised over his warm relations with President Putin, whom he has described as 'gracious' and a 'super-smart guy'.

Trump's voters stand to lose the most from his kamikaze trade policies
Trump's voters stand to lose the most from his kamikaze trade policies

Telegraph

time7 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump's voters stand to lose the most from his kamikaze trade policies

Teflon Don strikes again. After concluding his new trade agreement with the European Union last week, many US trading partners will now face sky-high tariffs on their exports. The president's strongarm tactics and dealmaking have led many on the Right to praise Trump's approach. Even The New York Times has claimed that Trump is 'winning his trade war'. The economic reality is that Trump isn't winning anything. He is simply reshaping US trade policy to create a lot of losers: the American people chief among them. According to modelling by the Yale University-based Budget Lab, American consumers face paying for an average tariff rate of 18.2 per cent, the highest since 1934. They project that this will raise prices by 1.8 per cent in the short term, which translates to an average loss of $2,400 per household in 2025. Accounting for expected changes in consumer behaviour in response to the tariffs (by which time consumers have already lost out by paying for goods they otherwise would not have purchased), the effective tariff rate comes to 17.3 per cent; that is still the highest since 1935. More concerning for Trump and his party, however, is the regressive distributional effects of the tariffs. The proportional impact on disposable incomes for the lowest earning American households is set to be three times as bad as it is for the top decile. Trump's electoral success has been built on voters who feel that the economy has left them behind. His message has single-handedly reshaped the American electoral map and made his party significantly more dependent on poor, working-class, and non-university educated voters than it once was. Unlike 2020, Trump won a majority of voters earning less than $50,000 per year in 2024: this was an unthinkable outcome for a Republican presidential candidate as recently as a decade ago. While his 2016 election victory was powered by poorer white voters, he has since attracted significantly more poor and working-class Hispanic votes and even moved the needle on overwhelmingly Democratic African-Americans. Make no mistake, it is these American voters who will be the major losers from these tariffs, not Europeans, Canadians, or Mexicans. It would also be wrong to expect Trump's base to enjoy the benefits of the President's protectionism. Yes, American manufacturing output is projected to expand by 2 per cent because of the tariffs, but that is because raw manufacturing output would rise by substituting high value, specialised production with lower value production. This makes the sector less efficient and productive. Some small groups of people may get jobs that otherwise wouldn't have existed, but that will be at the direct expense of far more people who will suffer from subsequent lower productivity. In any case, the positive impact of increased manufacturing production on overall economic output would be more than cancelled out by expected productivity losses in key sectors like construction, mining, and agriculture. These industries have been a fruitful source of Republican fundraising and employ plenty of Trump's core voters. But could it be that this doesn't matter? Trump is giving Americans less globalisation at the expense of their incomes: isn't that what people voted for? Perhaps, but the voters who swing US elections do so with their wallets – the opinions they state to pollsters matter much less. The reason Trump lost in 2020 and the reason why he reclaimed office in 2024 is the same: it's the economy, stupid. Trump may not have to face voters again, but his party and the long line of would-be successors should be worried.

Texas GOP's new map moves Jasmine Crockett's home out of her district
Texas GOP's new map moves Jasmine Crockett's home out of her district

Daily Mail​

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Texas GOP's new map moves Jasmine Crockett's home out of her district

Firebrand Democrat Jasmine Crockett (pictured) faces being booted from Congress after Republicans proposed a heavily gerrymandered redistricting map that would mean she no longer lives in her district. Crockett has made headlines numerous times in recent months as a key critic of the Trump administration, and the redistricting issue is the latest one she has spoken out on. She has slammed the Texas redistricting maps as a sham that silences minority voices and keeps power in the hands of the few, diluting the voting power of Latino and Black communities. The redistricting push in Texas was spurred by a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice sent to state officials in July, which argued that four of the state's congressional districts were racially gerrymandered. Democrats won all four of these seats in the 2024 elections. President Donald Trump then urged Texas Republicans to rethink their Congressional maps to give Republicans a leg up in next year's midterm elections. Texas Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican author of the bill pushing the new maps, described the new proposed carveouts in the following way: 'It is important to note that four of the five new districts are majority minority, Hispanic. … Each of these newly drawn districts now trends Republican,' Hunter said. 'Political performance doesn't guarantee electoral success; that's up to the candidates. But it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts.' Crockett called Trump 'Temu Hitler' in a recent interview with SiriusXM host Zerlina Maxwell, due to the president's involvement in the redistricting process. 'So what we have seen is, again, this rogue Department of Justice going out to do the bidding of this Temu Hitler,' Crockett told Maxwell in July. Crockett also added that in her view, Trump believes that the only way to 'ensure that [he] will have no checks on [him] is if [he] can ensure that those voices of color do not have representation.' The Texas congressional maps were already redrawn after the 2020 Census, and they are typically edited every ten years. After the Friday hearings on the proposed new maps, the Republicans on the Texas House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting voted to advance House Bill 4 on a party-line vote. Democrats plan to stall a vote on the legislation by the full chamber by not showing up. A full chamber vote could happen as soon as Tuesday. 100 members of the Texas House are needed to conduct business, and Republicans hold 88 seats in the body. 62 seats are held by Democrats. Lawmakers could be fined $500 a day if they refuse to come to work, per a rule adopted in 2021 after Texas Democrats pulled a similar move to postpone another voting bill. Regardless of the creation of the new maps, Crockett's time in the U.S. House of Representatives may be coming to an end soon. In a July interview with liberal comedian and media personality Hasan Minhaj, Crockett noted that she already has her 'expiration date in mind for the House,' adding that she already has 'been eyeing people to replace' her. Polling released by the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) last month showed Democrat Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett leading a hypothetical Democratic primary with 35 percent of likely voters, followed by former Rep. Colin Allred at 20 percent. Failed Democrat candidate for both U.S. President and U.S. Senate Beto O'Rourke, and Rep. Joaquin Castro tied in that poll at 13 percent. Only 18 percent of respondents to the poll remained undecided about who should challenge Republican Sen. John Cornyn, who is seeking a fifth term.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store