logo
India is letting the AI revolution bypass the country. It may have to pay a heavy price

India is letting the AI revolution bypass the country. It may have to pay a heavy price

The Print09-07-2025
I could see that Graffiti was making waves — some of the world's leading graph theorists were publishing results that proved conjectures made by the software. Of course, Graffiti is rather different from today's large language models (LLMs), but it remains a pioneer of sorts.
To my mind, that was one of the early forays of computer science and mathematics into a kind of artificial intelligence. What Siemion had created was software capable of generating new and non-trivial mathematical problems in the field of graph theory, a branch of mathematics. When I next interacted with him in 1992, he had developed Graffiti into a major conjecture–generating tool for both chemistry and graph theory. In fact, The New York Times carried a detailed feature on Siemion's programme.
In 1986, when the world was still largely and blissfully unaware of the meaning of artificial intelligence, I had an interesting one-on-one tutorial on a new software called Graffiti, developed by my friend and colleague at the University of Houston, Siemion Fajtlowicz. I was lecturing in the US, and at Simeon's urging, I sat with him as he demonstrated the mathematical capabilities of Graffiti.
There are three reasons I mention this software. First, Graffiti qualifies as AI in the context of its time (1980s–1990s) and within its domain-specific capabilities. It exhibited several characteristics of AI, such as automated reasoning, problem-solving, and the generation of novel conjectures that mimicked aspects of human mathematical creativity.
Its autonomy in conjecture-making and its impact on mathematical research further support this classification. If memory serves me right, one of the greats of 20th century mathematics, Paul Erdős, once told me that he had worked on some of Graffiti's conjectures.
Another reason I mention Graffiti is that, in all my years of interacting with graph theorists in India — and their numbers abound — not one has shown any knowledge of or interest in using computers for purposes similar to what Graffiti does. I have also not come across a single graph theory course that incorporates ideas similar to Graffiti. This worrisome state of affairs continues to this day. And now, as advances in AI accelerate, India is being left behind in taking advantage of the technology for deep and meaningful knowledge creation.
My final reason for mentioning Graffiti is to underscore that the recent spurt in AI LLMs owes much to early programmes like Graffiti and several other platforms whose seeds were sown in the 1980s and 1990s. Once significant progress was made in data science, neural networks, and related fields, this leap was inevitable.
Even though India had, at one point, achieved a degree of proficiency in coding, we allowed the AI revolution to bypass us. Primarily, this was due to our unimaginative curricula and a lack of intellectual boldness. My fear is that we may pay a heavy price for our neglect over the past four decades.
Also read: AI helps us get over the limits of our cognitive ability. We must embrace it
Exciting and alarming
While the current advances in AI are exciting, they are also somewhat worrying. In mid-May, around 30 top mathematicians, some traveling from the UK, held a secret gathering in Berkeley, California.
Their mission: to challenge a unique 'reasoning' chatbot with a series of difficult mathematical problems they had created. For two days, these experts, including University of Virginia mathematician Ken Ono, who served as the leader and judge, posed professor-level questions to the bot. To their astonishment, the chatbot solved all of them.
'I have colleagues who said these models are approaching mathematical genius,' Ono remarked.
For perspective, my colleagues and I recently experimented with some highly trained chatbots that specialise in mathematical and logical reasoning. On one platform, we posed advanced undergraduate–level questions. The chatbot gave us 'solutions' almost instantly, and asserted their veracity with supreme confidence.
Unfortunately, the solutions were found to be incorrect on close human scrutiny. Contrast this with the chatbot that faced off against expert mathematicians in Berkeley, and it becomes clear this is an entirely different cup of tea. Its ability to operate successfully in the realm of advanced deductive reasoning stems from o4-mini, a reasoning-focused large language model trained by OpenAI.
Let me give a clearer, starker glimpse of just how impressive these capabilities are. At the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine — where I obtained my doctoral degree — the average time to complete a PhD has been about four years. Any student admitted to a doctoral programme at Imperial is already considered quite smart. But if someone earns their degree in under three years, they are considered exceptionally intelligent.
At the Berkeley gathering, the chatbot was presented with a difficult PhD-level problem. According to Ono, it solved the problem in just ten minutes and asserted its dominance with supreme confidence. This makes me wonder about the future of doctoral research, and even mathematical research more broadly.
In fact, Ono is worried that we may be too easily intimidated by such a chatbot into believing it without question.
'There's proof by induction, proof by contradiction, and then proof by intimidation,' he said. 'If you say something with enough authority, people just get scared. I think o4-mini has mastered proof by intimidation; it says everything with so much confidence.'
We mathematicians in particular, and the public at large, should be both excited and alarmed.
Dinesh Singh is the former Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi and adjunct professor of mathematics at the University of Houston, Texas, USA. He tweets @DineshSinghEDU. Views are personal.
(Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta unveils mind-reading wristband that lets you control devices without touching them
Meta unveils mind-reading wristband that lets you control devices without touching them

India Today

time7 hours ago

  • India Today

Meta unveils mind-reading wristband that lets you control devices without touching them

Ever imagined a time when you'd be able to open an app or type a message, not by tapping on the screen or clicking the mouse, but instead by just thinking about it? Sounds like a sci-fi movie? Well, that's exactly what Meta's latest experimental technology is working towards. According to a report by The New York Times via research detailed in Nature (a well-known scientific journal), Meta has developed a wristband that can pick up electrical signals from your muscles and use them to control computers, smartphones, and other devices. The interesting bit — you don't even have to physically move. The wristband can understand your intention to move, and that's enough to trigger a response on screen. Of course, the device is still in development, but Meta says it could be ready for the market in the next few wristband is designed by researchers at Meta's Reality Labs and works using a technique called electromyography (EMG). It reads electrical signals that travel from the brain to the muscles, especially in the forearm. When you think about moving a finger or wrist, your brain sends signals, and this device catches those signals before your muscles even react. 'You don't have to actually move,' said Thomas Reardon, Meta's VP of research, in an interview. 'You just have to intend the move.'The technology relies on AI to make sense of these muscle signals. Meta gathered data from about 10,000 people wearing the wristband prototype. Using machine learning, the team trained the system to recognise patterns linked to specific movements. That means even a new user could strap on the band and start using it without needing to teach it from scratch. 'Out of the box, it can work with a new user it has never seen data for,' said Patrick Kaifosh, one of the scientists leading the project. The main difference between this and brain-implant tech like Neuralink is that Meta's wristband is non-invasive. You don't need surgery — you just wear it like a smartwatch. That makes it safer and easier to use for the general public, as well as for people with mobility issues. Researchers at Carnegie Mellon are already testing it with people who have spinal cord injuries, helping them interact with computers despite limited hand function. 'We can see their intention to type,' said Douglas Weber, professor at Carnegie mentioned at the start, the idea of reading your thoughts might sound a bit sci-fi, but the team behind the wristband is clear — it's not actually reading your mind. 'It feels like the device is reading your mind, but it is not. It is just translating your intention. It sees what you are about to do,' Reardon far, the prototype has shown that users can control a mouse, type words, and even write letters in the air that appear on a screen — all by making small finger gestures or simply intending them. With practice, people can even activate individual muscle fibres without any visible movement at all.- Ends

How Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang won over Trump who wanted to spilt his company
How Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang won over Trump who wanted to spilt his company

Business Standard

time13 hours ago

  • Business Standard

How Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang won over Trump who wanted to spilt his company

US President Donald Trump has revealed that he once contemplated dismantling tech giant Nvidia to spur competition in the artificial intelligence (AI) chip sector. However, he later backed off—a move that highlights Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang's growing influence in the White House. In fact, Huang's personal lobbying and policy engagement has helped drive a major shift in US trade policy and cemented his place as one of the most powerful tech executives in Washington. Why did Trump drop the idea to break Nvidia? Speaking at an AI summit in Washington on Wednesday (local time), Trump admitted, 'I said, 'Look, we'll break this guy up,' before I learned the facts here.' He explained that aides had advised him the move would be far more difficult than anticipated, as Nvidia's dominance in the AI hardware market was underpinned by years of development that rivals would struggle to match in the near term. 'I figured we could go in and sort of break them up a little bit, get them a little competition,' Trump said. 'But I found out it's not easy in that business.' Huang, who sat in the audience during Trump's remarks, was praised several times by the US President along with other tech leaders for their continued investments in the United States. China chip ban spurs Nvidia into action Nvidia holds more than 90 per cent of the market for chips that power AI systems. That dominance has helped it surpass Apple to become the world's most valuable public company, with a market cap topping $4 trillion. But it has also brought the company into the crosshairs of global trade tensions. In April, the Trump administration blocked sales of Nvidia's H20 AI chip to China, a move that sparked concern within the company and triggered an intense lobbying campaign from Huang. According to reports from The New York Times and CNBC, Huang responded with a full-blown lobbying campaign—meeting Trump at Mar-a-Lago, testifying before Congress, and aligning with White House insiders like AI and crypto czar David Sacks. During these meetings, Huang argued that restricting American chip exports would do more harm than good, pushing countries toward Chinese alternatives and weakening US leadership in AI. It seems this narrative began to resonate with Trump's inner circle, especially as Chinese competitor Huawei unveiled its own competing AI chip platform and Chinese demand for AI infrastructure exploded. The campaign culminated last week when Huang met with Trump in the Oval Office. Within days, the administration changed course. The decision was officially linked to broader trade negotiations, officially tying the change to a rare earth magnet deal with China, but insiders, as reported by US media, credit Huang's influence for the change. Jensen Huang's foray into policy During Trump's first term, Apple CEO Tim Cook played a key role in behind-the-scenes diplomacy. But in Trump's second administration, Huang has quietly become the most influential tech executive—surpassing Cook and Tesla's Elon Musk, both of whom have lost standing with the US president. Cook, once seen as Trump's go-to corporate statesman, has faced criticism from the administration over Apple's supply chain strategies and its manufacturing shift to India. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, once considered Trump's right-hand man, has had a public falling out with the president. Is Huang Trump's new best buddy? Huang has publicly praised Trump for acknowledging the need for energy to produce artificial intelligence. In an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier, Huang called Trump a "visionary" for recognising this need. During Wednesday's AI summit, Huang was asked during his session about the US' advantage which other countries don't have. "America's unique advantage that no country could possibly have is President Trump," said Huang.

NYT Connections Hints July 22: Clues and answers to crack the Tuesday puzzle
NYT Connections Hints July 22: Clues and answers to crack the Tuesday puzzle

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

NYT Connections Hints July 22: Clues and answers to crack the Tuesday puzzle

The New York Times Connections puzzle continues to captivate daily solvers with its unique blend of logic and linguistic intrigue. On July 22, 2025, puzzle #772 presented a refreshing mix of categories, some playful, others deeply conceptual, drawing on everything from teen comedies to camouflage patterns. For readers searching for guidance or validation, here's a complete breakdown of NYT Connections hints July 22 and answers for today's game. What Is NYT Connections? In the wake of Wordle's meteoric rise, The New York Times unveiled Connections , a daily word association puzzle that has since become a staple for puzzle enthusiasts. Unlike traditional crosswords, this game requires players to identify thematic links among 16 seemingly unrelated words. Displayed in a 4x4 grid, the challenge is to sort the words into four sets of four, each united by a common thread. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category CXO others Digital Marketing Operations Management Data Science Degree Public Policy Data Science Design Thinking PGDM MCA Finance Management MBA Data Analytics Leadership Technology Project Management Product Management Others Skills you'll gain: Digital Strategy Development Expertise Emerging Technologies & Digital Trends Data-driven Decision Making Leadership in the Digital Age Duration: 40 Weeks Indian School of Business ISB Chief Digital Officer Starts on Jun 30, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Customer-Centricity & Brand Strategy Product Marketing, Distribution, & Analytics Digital Strategies & Innovation Skills Leadership Insights & AI Integration Expertise Duration: 10 Months IIM Kozhikode IIMK Chief Marketing and Growth Officer Starts on Apr 7, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Technology Strategy & Innovation Emerging Technologies & Digital Transformation Leadership in Technology Management Cybersecurity & Risk Management Duration: 24 Weeks Indian School of Business ISB Chief Technology Officer Starts on Jun 28, 2024 Get Details These threads range from literal meanings to idiomatic expressions, cultural references, and linguistic quirks. The puzzle is categorized by difficulty, represented by color: Yellow (Easy), Green (Moderate), Blue (Tricky), and Purple (Challenging or Obscure). Hints to Guide Your Solve – July 22, 2025 For solvers trying to crack today's NYT Connections , subtle thematic nudges are often all one needs. Here are the clues that may help identify the correct associations, as per a report by Beebom: Yellow (SASSINESS) – Think teenage attitude and spicy comebacks à la Mean Girls . Green (MITIGATE) – Words that suggest dampening or reducing force or effect. Blue (PATTERNS) – Visual arrangements, especially those used in design or clothing. Purple (_ _ _ PIE) – All words that, when paired with 'pie,' form well-known desserts. With that scaffold, it becomes easier to eliminate red herrings and inch closer to the solution. Today's NYT Connections Categories Revealed The categories for July 22 delivered a mix of colloquial wit and conceptual depth. Here's how the words broke down into logical clusters, as per the report by Beebom: Live Events Yellow – SASSINESS: ATTITUDE, CHEEK, LIP, MOUTH These terms convey boldness or verbal defiance, often used to describe cheeky remarks or spirited behavior. Green – MITIGATE: CUSHION, DAMPEN, SOFTEN, TEMPER Each word implies reducing intensity or moderating impact — from physical cushioning to emotional temperance. Blue – PATTERNS: CAMO, CHECKERS, HONEYCOMB, STRIPES Recognizable visual designs or motifs, frequently used in fashion, textiles, and nature. Purple – _ _ _ PIE: CHESS, CUTIE, HUMBLE, WHOOPIE While unrelated at first glance, each of these can be combined with 'pie' to form familiar terms: chess pie , cutie pie , humble pie , and whoopie pie . How the Puzzle Played Out Today's NYT Connections puzzle sparked a mixture of delight and head-scratching among daily players. While the Yellow category was instantly recognizable for many — with its nod to sassy dialogue reminiscent of high-school movies — others found themselves circling around misleading associations, particularly in the Purple cluster. Many players were initially stumped by words like CHESS and WHOOPIE , which seemed incongruent until the 'pie' suffix link became evident. Similarly, HONEYCOMB and CAMO appeared unrelated until solvers noticed their connection to visual patterns, aiding identification of the Blue category. The Rise of NYT Connections Since its launch, NYT Connections has continued to carve a unique space in the digital puzzle landscape. Unlike the anagram-focused Wordle , this game challenges thematic thinking, cultural literacy, and semantic precision. Its popularity lies in its ability to surprise — using simple words to construct complex layers of meaning. Game designers behind Connections have reportedly emphasized variety and inclusivity in categories, which range from pop culture to historical references. Each puzzle is designed not just to entertain but to engage minds of all ages and interests. Why Daily Solvers Keep Coming Back Much like its sister game Wordle , NYT Connections benefits from its simplicity and brevity — a brain-teasing burst that fits seamlessly into a morning routine or afternoon break. What distinguishes it, however, is its ability to evoke both intuition and deduction. Today's puzzle exemplified that perfectly. The categories required players to dip into their pop culture knowledge ( Mean Girls ), recall sensory vocabulary ( dampening and softening ), identify visual forms ( checkers and stripes ), and even connect culinary expressions ( humble pie ). The satisfaction lies in the moment the connections click — often after cycles of misdirection. July 22 Connections a Test of Wit and Whimsy The NYT Connections hints July 21 may have been useful for seasoned solvers preparing for today's puzzle. But puzzle #772 proved that even with helpful nudges, the ultimate success relies on observation and lateral thinking. With four cleverly interwoven categories — SASSINESS, MITIGATE, PATTERNS, and _ _ _ PIE — today's game was a masterclass in combining pop culture, semantics, and wordplay. As Connections continues to enthrall wordsmiths globally, one thing remains constant: the joy of the daily chase and the thrill of the "aha" moment. For those ready to take on puzzle #773 tomorrow, expect the unexpected, and keep those categories in mind. FAQs Where can I find NYT Connections? You can access it daily on The New York Times Games website or mobile app. Is NYT Connections good for all ages? Yes. While some puzzles may favor specific age groups due to cultural references, overall it caters to a broad audience, making it ideal for solo play or group fun.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store