&w=3840&q=100)
Are you really cool? A global survey finds 6 traits to fit the definition
A new global survey has identified six core traits commonly associated with 'cool' individuals: extroversion, hedonism, power, adventurousness, openness, and autonomy.
The study, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, involved nearly 6,000 participants from 12 countries. Despite differences in geography, age, income, education, and gender, responses were remarkably consistent.
'What blew my mind was the fact that it was pretty much the same result everywhere,' said Dr Caleb Warren, one of the study's authors and a professor at the Eller College of Management at the University of Arizona.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Cool, but not always kind
Participants were asked to think of specific people they considered cool, not cool, good, and not good. They then assessed these individuals based on 15 personality traits. While there was some overlap between cool and good individuals, 'good' people were more often described as conforming, traditional, secure, warm, agreeable, conscientious, calm, and universalistic.
Interestingly, kindness, commonly associated with goodness, was not a defining feature of those seen as cool.
Western roots of cool
All participants recognized the word 'cool' in English, without translation. Researchers suggest this reflects the global influence of American media and cultural exports.
'Globally, American success has led to the diffusion of music styles and an immense amount of cultural content, including, apparently, the concept of cool,' said Dr Joseph Henrich, an anthropologist at Harvard University who was not involved in the study.
Limits and bias
One limitation noted by the researchers is that participants who didn't recognize the English word 'cool' were excluded. This means the findings cannot fully assess how the concept is understood or valued in non-Western cultures. The average age of participants also skewed young, typically around 30 or under.
Other studies suggest cultural factors influence what is seen as desirable.
'Factors like aggression make us have higher status in some Western cultures and simultaneously give us less status in the East,' said Mitch Prinstein, chief of psychology at the American Psychological Association.
Adolescence and identity
Coolness may be especially influential during adolescence. Prior research has found it affects preferences in entertainment, social interactions, and even consumer behaviour. But what society deems cool may not always align with personal values.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Dr Warren and his colleagues made this distinction by comparing perceptions of cool versus good. Across cultures, traits tied to kindness or helpfulness were more frequently associated with being good rather than cool.
Is it worth it?
Dr Warren offers a word of caution. 'I have serious doubts,' he said, when asked if coolness is a trait worth chasing.
Some research suggests that adolescents who engage in risk-taking to appear cool may face challenges later in life, including issues with substance use and relationships. 'They are doing more extreme things to try to act cool,' one of the researchers told The New York Times.
Dr Prinstein added that while popularity may bring attention and visibility, long-term success often depends on being genuinely liked.
'Even the most uncool kid will probably fare well if they have at least one close friend,' he said.
Coolness, it seems, is more complicated than it appears, and not always beneficial in the long run.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
2 hours ago
- News18
World UFO Day 2025: 5 UFO Sightings That Shocked India And The World
World UFO Day seeks to encourage the idea that extraterrestrial life might be a reality rather than a figment of imagination. While it is more widely celebrated on July 2, some people also celebrate World UFO Day on June 24. The reason behind the lack of consensus on a single day for the observance is that the occasion commemorates two separate incidents that took place just a few days apart in 1947. June 24 marks the anniversary of the day on which an American aviator named Kenneth Arnold claimed to see a group of unusual flying objects. Meanwhile, July 2 commemorates the famous Roswell incident. World UFO Day 2025: 5 UFO Sightings In India And Across The World Mount Rainier, Washington, US: On June 24, 1947, pilot Kenneth Arnold reported witnessing nine unusual objects flying in a synchronised manner. Roswell, New Mexico, US: Just days after Arnold's claim, the crash and subsequent recovery of a flying object in New Mexico's Roswell sparked major and long-lasting conspiracy theories centred around the possible existence of aliens. Though the wreckage in question was later identified by the US military as the debris of an experimental weather balloon, the explanation only worked towards reinforcing conspiracy theories. Decades later, however, the balloon was eventually revealed to be a tool in a project meant to detect Soviet nuclear bomb tests. Canary Islands, Spain: In June 1976, widespread claims of a UFO sighting came from both civilians and military personnel in the area. They claimed to have witnessed a humongous sphere that hovered at a really short altitude for several minutes and eventually vanished into thin air. Two humanoid-like figures were also supposedly witnessed inside the large, translucent ball. Bihar, India: An account of a suspected UFO sighting from 1957 suggests that hundreds of villagers of a particular area in a now-defunct district called Manbhum gathered to witness a UFO that came down to an altitude of 500 ft above ground level. Tehran, Iran: The eerie incident that took place in the sky over Tehran on September 16, 1976, is considered one of the most well-documented UFO sightings. According to reports, three fighter warplanes were scrambled after a bright object was reported by multiple civilians and also detected by a radar. The pilots of two of the fighter jets involved in the defensive sorties claimed that some of the onboard systems in their aircraft faced technical issues as they approached the unusual object. About the Author First Published: July 02, 2025, 07:10 IST


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Black coffee can lower the risk of death, but there's a catch
Coffee lovers, rejoice! A recent study reveals that your daily coffee might be more beneficial than you think, potentially lowering the risk of all-cause mortality. Researchers at Tufts University discovered that black coffee, or coffee with minimal additives, is linked to a reduced risk of death. Coffee lovers, we have good news for you. Your daily indulgence might actually be doing more than just waking you up - it might be saving you, quite literally. Drinking coffee can lower the risk of all-cause mortality; however, a recent study suggests that making it a certain way could kill its benefits. A new study by researchers from the Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University found that drinking black coffee or coffee reduced the risk of death from all causes. However, those benefits may be lost when the beverage is consumed with certain additives. The study is published in The Journal of Nutrition . Coffee, but no additives Coffee may bring some benefits; however, you may want to hold the cream and sugar. The researchers found that the association between coffee consumption and mortality risk changes with the amount of sweeteners and saturated fat added to the beverage. They found that drinking 1-2 cups of caffeinated coffee per day was linked to a lower risk of death from all causes, including cardiovascular disease. Black coffee with low levels of added sugar and saturated fat is linked to a 14% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to no coffee consumption. The researchers noticed that these benefits were, however, slashed when the coffee was added with high amounts of added sugar and saturated fat. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Glicemia acima de 100? Insira essa fruta na sua dieta Saúde Nacional Undo ' Coffee is among the most-consumed beverages in the world, and with nearly half of American adults reporting drinking at least one cup per day, it's important for us to know what it might mean for health. The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits,' Fang Fang Zhang, senior author and the Neely Family Professor at the Friedman School, said, in a statement. The study The researchers analyzed data from nine consecutive cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 1999 and 2018. The study included a nationally representative sample of 46,000 adults aged 20 years and older who completed valid first-day 24-hour dietary recalls. This data was then linked to the National Death Index Mortality Data. Ronnie Coleman Hospitalised: Fans Alarmed Over Sudden Medical Emergency The researchers categorized the coffee consumption by type (caffeinated or decaffeinated), sugar, and saturated fat content. They also included mortality outcomes such as all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. The amount of low added sugar (from granulated sugar, honey, and syrup) was defined as under 5% of the Daily Value, which is 2.5 grams per 8-ounce cup or approximately half a teaspoon of sugar. The low saturated fat (from milk, cream, and half-and-half) was defined as 5% of the Daily Value, or 1 gram per 8-ounce cup or the equivalent of 5 tablespoons of 2% milk, 1 tablespoon of light cream, or 1 tablespoon of half-and-half. The findings The findings were striking. The researchers found that drinking at least one cup per day was linked with a 16% lower risk of all-cause mortality. When the coffee consumption was increased to 2-3 cups per day, the link rose to 17%. No benefits were found beyond three cups. 'Few studies have examined how coffee additives could impact the link between coffee consumption and mortality risk, and our study is among the first to quantify how much sweetener and saturated fat are being added. Our results align with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans which recommend limiting added sugar and saturated fat' first author Bingjie Zhou, a Ph.D. graduate from the nutrition epidemiology and data science program at the Friedman School added. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!


The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Major reports about how climate change affects U.S. removed from websites
Legally mandated U.S. national climate assessments seem to have disappeared from the federal websites built to display them, making it harder for State and local governments and the public to learn what to expect in their backyards from a warming world. Scientists said the peer-reviewed authoritative reports save money and lives. Websites for the national assessments and the U.S. Global Change Research Programme were down Monday and Tuesday with no links, notes or referrals elsewhere. The White House, which was responsible for the assessments, said the information will be housed within NASA to comply with the law, but gave no further details. Searches for the assessments on NASA websites did not turn them up. NASA did not respond to requests for information. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which coordinated the information in the assessments, did not respond to repeated inquiries. "It's critical for decision makers across the country to know what the science in the National Climate Assessment is. That is the most reliable and well-reviewed source of information about climate that exists for the United States," said University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs, who coordinated the 2014 version of the report. 'It's a sad day for the United States if it is true that the National Climate Assessment is no longer available," Jacobs said. "This is evidence of serious tampering with the facts and with people's access to information, and it actually may increase the risk of people being harmed by climate-related impacts.' Harvard climate scientist John Holdren, who was President Obama's science advisor and whose office directed the assessments, said after the 2014 edition he visited governors, mayors and other local officials who told him how useful the 841-page report was. It helped them decide whether to raise roads, build seawalls and even move hospital generators from basements to roofs, he said. 'This is a government resource paid for by the taxpayer to provide the information that really is the primary source of information for any city, state or federal agency who's trying to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate,' said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who has been a volunteer author for several editions of the report. Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in NOAA's library. NASA's open science data repository includes dead links to the assessment site. The most recent report, issued in 2023, included an interactive atlas that zoomed down to the county level. It found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority and Native American communities often disproportionately at risk. The 1990 Global Change Research Act requires a national climate assessment every four years and directs the president to establish an interagency United States Global Change Research Programme. In the spring, the Trump administration told the volunteer authors of the next climate assessment that their services weren't needed and ended the contract with the private firm that helps coordinate the website and report. Additionally, NOAA's main website was recently forwarded to a different NOAA website. Social media and blogs at NOAA and NASA about climate impacts for the general public were cut or eliminated. 'It's part of a horrifying big picture,' Holdren said. 'It's just an appalling whole demolition of science infrastructure.' The national assessments are more useful than international climate reports put out by the United Nations every seven or so years because they are more localised and more detailed, Hayhoe and Jacobs said. The national reports are not only peer reviewed by other scientists, but examined for accuracy by the National Academy of Sciences, federal agencies, the staff and the public. Hiding the reports would be censoring science, Jacobs said. And it's dangerous for the country, Hayhoe said, comparing it to steering a car on a curving road by only looking through the rear view mirror: "And now, more than ever, we need to be looking ahead to do everything it takes to make it around that curve safely. It's like our windshield's being painted over.'