logo
Labor romped home in Tassie. The PM's salmon move worked

Labor romped home in Tassie. The PM's salmon move worked

Tasmanian voters have endorsed Labor's shift to protect salmon jobs from environmental challenges, as the government claimed two fresh Tasmanian seats, retained two others and locked the opposition out of lower house seats entirely.
But the politics of salmon farming continue to carve a course through the south of the state, with anti-salmon candidate Peter George coming second on preferences to Labor's Fisheries Minister Julie Collins.
Salmon farming pens that proliferate along Tasmania's south-east and west coasts are owned by eight companies including foreign-owned giants Huon Aquaculture, Petuna and Tassal.
The $1.8 billion industry made national and international headlines when a 'mass mortality' event over summer caused by a bacterial outbreak killed more than a million fish, and led to chunks of salmon carcasses and oil globules washing up on beaches near the pens.
After salmon workers were filmed shovelling still-writhing fish from diseased pens, and sealing the lids closed, the RSPCA revoked its certification for Huon Aquaculture salmon. No Tasmanian salmon is now certified as meeting the authority's animal welfare standards.
As negative headlines grew, so too did industry concern for the more than 5000 workers it says rely on the industry (estimates vary between 1700 and 5100), and for the wider impacts losing the $1.3 billion industry could cause in the state.
In March, the day before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the federal election, Labor and the Opposition joined forces in the Senate to pass amendments to federal environment laws.
Those changes put a line under Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek's formal reconsideration of the 2012 expansion of salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour – in the electorate of Braddon – at the request of environmental groups.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major call on Mark Latham portrait after public allegations levelled at him by ex-partner Nathalie Matthews
Major call on Mark Latham portrait after public allegations levelled at him by ex-partner Nathalie Matthews

7NEWS

time28 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

Major call on Mark Latham portrait after public allegations levelled at him by ex-partner Nathalie Matthews

Embattled politician Mark Latham's portrait will remain on the wall of past Labor leaders at Parliament House but a plaque will be adding saying he was 'banned for life' from the party. Latham made headlines last week when his former partner, Nathalie Matthews, alleged a 'sustained pattern' of abuse by him including claims he once defecated on her before sex. Latham has denied any wrongdoing. He has not been charged with any crime. Amid the controversy, several people including Sydney MP Tanya Plibersek, have called for his portrait to be removed from Parliament House. Latham was banned from the ALP nearly a decade ago, after he joined the Liberal Democratic Party in May 2017. He went on to join Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party. Now, a note will hang below the portrait saying: 'In 2017 Mark Latham was expelled from the Australian Labor Party and banned for life. His actions do not accord with Labor values and failed to meet the standards we expect and demand.' On Tuesday, The Daily Telegraph's James Willis and Western Sydney Women CEO Amanda Rose joined Monique Wright on Sunrise, speaking about the decision. 'I think we have to be careful about removing history. There's been some poor examples of that in Australia, where statues have been removed unfairly,' Willis said. 'In this case, Mark Latham was the leader of the Labor Party ... so, to remove him altogether would have been silly. 'I think the censorship is a bit of a shot at him. 'But ultimately, the bigger question here is that given what has been revealed about Mark Latham in the last week, and not just the allegations by his ex-partner, but the explicit texts in Parliament, and the other behaviour that's been reported, in any other workplace, whether it was in media, whether he was the CEO of a company, he would have been suspended or gone by now. 'Instead, he's still Parliament and we can't do anything about him for years to come.' Rose advocated a level of fairness, saying if Latham's portrait was to be removed then everyone's history would need to be re-examined. 'I think the reality is if you're going to remove his portrait for things he's done now, or doing now, then you are going to have to go through every single portrait on that wall and say 'What have they done that we don't agree with?' And then (potentially) remove it,' Rose said. 'I'm sure there's plenty on there that have been great and plenty that have done some dodgy things as well. 'James is right. You don't want to remove history. 'His role ... was back then, and I think just removing someone's entire past because of something that they're going through right now, if you apply that ... you would have to apply that to everyone. Both sides of politics..' Rose agreed with a plaque. 'That's information (because he was expelled),' Rose said. 'I think just now, everyone is kind of focusing on getting rid of everything with him ... If we did that in a lot of circumstance, a lot of people would have to get removed.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese outraged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese weighed in for the first time since the allegations emerged, saying he never wanted Latham to be the party's leader. 'Mark Latham has views which I find repulsive across a range of areas,' Albanese told ABC's 7.30. 'He's someone who I regret being ever being elected leader of the Labor Party.' Albanese said his feelings were not in 'retrospect' and he had been doing the numbers for Kim Beazley during the 2003 leadership challenge which Latham narrowly won. 'History has proven that judgment to be correct. Mark Latham since ... has gone further and further and further away from any values that represent mainstream Australia,' he said.

‘Won't hesitate': Vow as parliament returns
‘Won't hesitate': Vow as parliament returns

Perth Now

time28 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

‘Won't hesitate': Vow as parliament returns

With a pre-parliament mass done and dusted, Sussan Ley has vowed to hold Anthony Albanese and his government to account as MPs and senators flood Parliament House for the first sitting fortnight since the federal election. The Opposition leader was among the parliamentarians that attended a morning mass at Canberra's Wesley Uniting Church, sitting on the front pew with the Prime Minister. Speaking to reporters after the service, Ms Ley said the liturgy offered 'sober reflection' but wasted no time in getting down to brass tacks. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have attended a mass ahead of parliament reopening. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Ley and Mr Albanese shared a pew. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'I and my team will always put the interests of the Australian people front and centre as we get very busy in the building just over here in just a few short hours,' she said. 'We will be constructive where we can be.' She pointed to childcare safety laws as an example of where she was keen to work with Labor. 'We're happy to be constructive with the government, but I and my team will be critical where we need to be, and we won't hesitate to hold the government to account, and that includes for the promises that it has made.' More to come.

Labor's YouTube ban would face backlash from parents as overwhelming majority say it helps kids learn
Labor's YouTube ban would face backlash from parents as overwhelming majority say it helps kids learn

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Labor's YouTube ban would face backlash from parents as overwhelming majority say it helps kids learn

Parents overwhelmingly consider YouTube to be a valuable learning resource, with new research revealing just how unpopular Labor' social media ban for children would be. It comes after a growing group of lawmakers expressed frustration that the government backflipped on its previous exemption for YouTube in the under-16 social media ban laws. Labor has considered breaking its promise and dragging YouTube into the ban after being lobbied by Chinese-owned platform TikTok. eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has also pressured Labor to break its pledge and ban the video sharing platform. YouTube has since released new research by Oxford Economics which found 72 per cent of parents think the video sharing platform 'helps their children learn'. Head of YouTube Australia Ed Miles said families took advantage of sophisticated parental controls and safety features to make the platform appropriate for learning. 'This new research from Oxford Economics demonstrates that Australian parents not only trust YouTube as a valuable learning resource, but also feel confident in guiding their children to use YouTube responsibly,' he said. 'This reflects parents' active involvement and their comfort in navigating YouTube alongside their children, using our safety features and parental controls.' The research also found: 72 per cent of parents who use YouTube agree that YouTube (or YouTube Kids) helps their children learn. 79 per cent of parents who use YouTube agree that YouTube (or YouTube Kids) provides quality content for their children's learning and/or entertainment. 74 per cent of parents who use YouTube feel confident in their ability to guide their child on how to use YouTube (or YouTube Kids) responsibly. The figures come after revealed Ms Inman Grant misled Labor by suggesting YouTube was an algorithmically dangerous platform, falsely suggesting her comments were based on evidence. "I don't make determinations or write recommendations to the minister based on whether I keep the public onside. I follow the evidence," she said, at the National Press Club in June. "My main concern with these platforms is that harms are happening, but I talked about the pervasive design features. "YouTube has mastered those. Opaque algorithms driving users down rabbit holes they're powerless to fight against." Both Labor and eSafety refused to share this research until lodged a Freedom of Information request. Once obtained the research it was clear the findings had been misrepresented. In fact, it found that YouTube was one of the safest platforms for key risk concerns such as grooming, sexual harassment and bullying. Children are more likely to be bullied via text messages than on YouTube. The percentage of teenagers who reported being groomed on YouTube was three per cent, the same percentage as teenagers who reported grooming via text messages. On Snapchat the figure was seven times higher at 23 per cent. On Instagram it was five times higher at 17 per cent. There was no recommendation from Ms Inman Grant to ban text messages for teenagers. Users need to be at least 13-years-old to create a YouTube account, meaning eSafety's proposed ban would only impact teenagers. Sky News Digital Editor Jack Houghton, host of The Media Show, told his audience the survey was a "flawed" way to research the issue as it was based on the perceptions of young children who were being asked to self-identify 'harmful content'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store