Here we go again! Controversial paper questions whether interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS is 'possibly hostile' alien tech in disguise
The newly discovered interstellar object 3I/ATLAS could be a piece of "possibly hostile" extraterrestrial technology in disguise, according to controversial research from a small group of scientists, including a renowned alien-hunting astronomer.
Their paper, which has not been peer-reviewed, echoes similar claims previously made about 'Oumuamua, the first-ever cosmic interloper that was discovered in 2017.
But experts have told Live Science that the new claims are "nonsense" and "insulting," and insist that the available evidence points toward the object being completely natural.
3I/ATLAS was discovered on July 1 barreling toward the sun at more than 130,000 mph (210,000 km/h), and was confirmed to be an interstellar object less than 24 hours later. Initial observations strongly suggest it is a large comet surrounded by a cloud of ice, gas and dust called a coma, stretching up to 15 miles (24 kilometers) across. A computer model simulating where it originated from hinted that it could be up to 3 billion years older than our solar system, potentially making it the oldest comet ever seen.
But in a new paper, uploaded July 16 to the preprint server arXiv, a trio of researchers have questioned whether the comet is actually some form of covert alien tech sent here by an advanced, potentially aggressive extraterrestrial civilization.
The researchers described the new paper as a "pedagogical exercise," or thought experiment, and offer no clear evidence of alien involvement. Instead, they point at the comet's "anomalous characteristics" and provide alternative theories to explain them.
The study's most notable author is Avi Loeb, an astronomer at Harvard University who is renowned for linking extraterrestrial objects to intelligent aliens. He is the head of the Galileo Project, which is attempting to detect evidence of technosignatures and UFOs. In 2023, he led a controversial expedition that claimed to have collected pieces of possible alien tech left behind by an unconfirmed interstellar meteorite in the Pacific Ocean. (These claims have since been largely debunked by outside researchers).
Loeb was also the primary researcher who claimed that the unusual shape and non-gravitational acceleration of the interstellar object 'Oumuamua were signs that it was an alien probe.
Today, the general consensus is that 'Oumuamua was an asteroid that was leaking gas into space, similar to a comet. However, Loeb and his colleagues have continued to advocate its potential alien origin and have proposed missions to track down the wandering space rock.
Loeb's co-authors for the new study are both associated with the Initiative for Interstellar Studies (i4is), a U.K. institute dedicated to planning future missions to alien star systems.
In a blog post explaining the new paper, Loeb wrote that if 3I/ATLAS is a "technological artifact" it could be evidence of the dark forest hypothesis, which argues that the reason we have not found evidence of extraterrestrial life is that they are staying silent to remain invisible to potential predators or prey.
"The consequences, should the hypothesis turn out to be correct, could potentially be dire for humanity, and would possibly require defensive measures to be undertaken," he wrote.
Alien 'evidence'
Most of the points laid out in the new paper relate to the unusual trajectory of 3I/ATLAS. The object is moving significantly faster than the only other known interstellar objects — 'Oumuamua and Comet Borisov, which was spotted in 2019 — and has entered the solar system at a different angle from its predecessors, approaching the sun side-on relative to our star's orbit through the Milky Way.
Loeb wrote that the object's trajectory "offers various benefits to an extraterrestrial intelligence" that may be using it to subtly spy on Earth. One such benefit is that 3I/ATLAS will make relatively close approaches to three planets: Jupiter, Mars and Venus. And the minimum distances between the object and these worlds could enable aliens to discretely deploy "gadgets" there, Loeb wrote.
3I/ATLAS will also be hidden on the opposite side of the sun to Earth when it reaches its closest point to our home star in late October. "This could be intentional to avoid detailed observations from Earth-based telescopes when the object is brightest or when gadgets are sent to Earth from that hidden vantage point," Loeb wrote.
The unusually high speed of 3I/ATLAS also makes it very hard to launch a spacecraft to intercept it before it exits the solar system, which could be another potential sign of clandestine alien activity, the researchers argued.
Based on its current speed, Loeb also noted that 3I/ATLAS would have entered the outer boundaries of the solar system around 8,000 years ago, which is "roughly when human-made technologies became advanced enough to start documenting history on Earth." Although, it is unclear what he is trying to imply by saying this.
The researchers also argued that there is insufficient evidence to show conclusively that 3I/ATLAS is a comet, especially as researchers are yet to identify any "volatiles," or specific chemicals associated with comets, within its coma.
Controversial claims
Since 3I/ATLAS was discovered, researchers have been trying to identify it, and so far, the overwhelming consensus is that it is a comet.
"There have been numerous telescopic observations of 3I/ATLAS demonstrating that it's displaying classical signatures of cometary activity," Darryl Seligman, an astronomer at Michigan State University who led the first study quantifying 3I/ATLAS, told Live Science in an email.
"All evidence points to this being an ordinary comet that was ejected from another solar system, just as countless billions of comets have been ejected from our own solar system," added Samantha Lawler, an astronomer at the University of Regina in Canada who specializes in solar system dynamics.
Any assumptions about the object's lack of volatiles is also premature at this time. "The object is still pretty far away from the sun, so no, we wouldn't typically expect to find direct evidence of volatiles necessarily," Seligman said. Instead, these compounds will likely become apparent in the coming weeks and months, he added.
Loeb admits that the alien technology scenario is a long shot: "By far, the most likely outcome will be that 3I/ATLAS is a completely natural interstellar object, probably a comet," he wrote in the blog post.
Given the available evidence, many of the researchers who spoke to Live Science are disappointed with the new paper and pointed out that it distracts from the work of other scientists.
"Astronomers all around the world have been thrilled at the arrival of 3I/ATLAS, collaborating to use advanced telescopes to learn about this visitor," Chris Lintott, an astronomer at the University of Oxford who was part of the team that simulated 3I/ATLAS's galactic origins, told Live Science in an email. "Any suggestion that it's artificial is nonsense on stilts, and is an insult to the exciting work going on to understand this object."
RELATED STORIES
— Interstellar invader Comet 3I/ATLAS is packed with water ice that could be older than Earth
— New interstellar object 3I/ATLAS: Everything we know about the rare cosmic visitor
— Telescope spies rare interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS zooming through our solar system (photos)
Loeb is no stranger to this type of criticism and has defended his position, writing that "the hypothesis is an interesting exercise in its own right, and is fun to explore, irrespective of its likely validity."
However, while it is important to remain open-minded about any "testable prediction," the new paper pushes this sentiment to the limit, Lawler told Live Science in an email. "In my experience, the vast majority of scientists subscribe to the idea that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and the evidence presented is absolutely not extraordinary."
This story was provided by Live Science, a sister site of Space.com.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is life widespread throughout the cosmos? Complex organic molecules found in planet-birthing disk
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Astronomers have detected signs of complex organic molecules, the precursors to the building blocks of life as we know it, in a planet-forming disk around a distant star. The findings imply that the chemical seeds of life are constructed in space and are then spread to young or newly forming planets. Using the Atacama Large Millimeter/ submillimeter Array (ALMA), a system of radio telescopes in Chile, the team detected traces of 17 complex organic molecules in the protoplanetary disc of V883 Orionis, a young star located around 1,305 light-years away in the constellation of Orion. V883 Orionis is an infant star, or protostar, that is estimated to be just 500,000 years old, and it's in the active phase of gathering mass and forming planets. If 0.5 million years old seems ancient, consider that our middle-aged sun is about 4.6 billion years old. Complex organic molecules are molecules that have more than five atoms, at least one of which is carbon. They have been seen around sites of star and planet formation previously. However, the compounds discovered around V883 Orionis include the first tentative detections of ethylene glycol and glycolonitrile, compounds that are considered precursors to the building blocks of life. For instance, glycolonitrile is a precursor of the amino acids glycine and alanine, as well as the nucleobase adenine, one of the building blocks of DNA and RNA. The find could therefore provide a missing link in the story of the evolution of molecules around young stars, accounting for the period between the initial formation of stars and the growth of planets in their surrounding protoplanetary disks. "Our finding points to a straight line of chemical enrichment and increasing complexity between interstellar clouds and fully evolved planetary systems," team leader Abubakar Fadul, a scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA) in Germany, said in a statement. A cosmic chemical assembly line Stars start life when overdense clumps in vast clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse under their own gravity. This creates a protostar that continues to gather matter from its natal envelope until it has sufficient mass to trigger the fusion of hydrogen to helium in its core. That's the nuclear process that defines what a main-sequence star is. As this proceeds, material around the budding star flattens out into a swirling donut of gas and dust called a protoplanetary disk, from which planets will eventually emerge. The transition from protostar to a young main-sequence star is a violent one, replete with intense radiation, shocked gas, and gas being ejected from the protoplanetary disk. This is thought to be deleterious to the continued existence of complex chemicals built during earlier stages of the protostar's existence. This has led to the development of a so-called "reset scenario" that sees the chemicals needed for life forming at later stages in the existence of the protoplanetary disk, as planets, asteroids, and comets are formed. However, the new discovery suggests that this reset scenario is unnecessary. "Now it appears the opposite is true," said team member and MPIA scientist Kamber Schwarz. "Our results suggest that protoplanetary disks inherit complex molecules from earlier stages, and the formation of complex molecules can continue during the protoplanetary disk stage." The team theorizes that the period between the energetic protostellar phase and the establishment of a protoplanetary disk would be too brief for complex organic molecules to form in detectable amounts. The upshot of this is that the conditions that predefine biological processes may not be restricted to individual planetary systems, but may be more widespread. Because the chemical reactions that create complex organic molecules proceed better in colder conditions, they could occur in icy dust that later gathers to form large bodies. That means these molecules could remain hidden in dust, rock and ice in young planetary systems, only accessible when heating by the central star warms those materials. This is something seen in our own solar system when comets from the outer region of our planetary system pass close to the sun, creating cometary tails and halos called comas. Though V883 Orionis hasn't yet reached the mass needed to achieve nuclear fusion, there is a heating mechanism available in this young system for a similar thawing to occur: When material falls to the star, facilitating its growth, bursts of intense radiation are triggered. "These outbursts are strong enough to heat the surrounding disk as far as otherwise icy environments, releasing the chemicals we have detected," said Fadul. It's fitting that ALMA, an array of 66 radio telescopes located in the Atacama Desert region of northern Chile, has been integral to probing deeper into the disk around V883 Orionis. It was this array, after all, that first discovered the water snow line in the disk of V883 Orionis back in 2016. "While this result is exciting, we still haven't disentangled all the signatures we found in our spectra," Schwarz said. "Higher resolution data will confirm the detections of ethylene glycol and glycolonitril and maybe even reveal more complex chemicals we simply haven't identified yet." Related Stories: — The mystery of how strange cosmic objects called 'JuMBOs' went rogue — These mysterious objects born in violent clashes between young star systems aren't stars or planets — James Webb Space Telescope dives into the atmosphere of a mystery rogue planet or failed star Fadul suggested that astronomers need to look at light from stars like V883 Orionis and its protoplanetary disk in other wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum to find even more evolved molecules. "Who knows what else we might discover?" Fadul concluded. The team's research is available as a preprint on the paper repository arXiv. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Artificial stupidity' made AI trading bots spontaneously form cartels when left unsupervised, Wharton study reveals
A study from University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology found that when placed in simulated markets, AI trading bots did not compete with one another, but rather began colluding in price-fixing behaviors. According to the study authors, research on how AI behaves in market environments can help regulators understand gaps in existing rules and statutes. Artificial intelligence is just smart—and stupid—enough to pervasively form price-fixing cartels in financial market conditions if left to their own devices. A working paper posted this month on the National Bureau of Economic Research website from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology found when AI-powered trading agents were released into simulated markets, the bots colluded with one another, engaging in price fixing to make a collective profit. In the study, researchers let bots loose in market models, essentially a computer program designed to simulate real market conditions and train AI to interpret market-pricing data, with virtual market makers setting prices based on different variables in the model. These markets can have various levels of 'noise,' referring to the amount of conflicting information and price fluctuation in the various market contexts. While some bots were trained to behave like retail investors and others like hedge funds, in many cases, the machines engaged in 'pervasive' price-fixing behaviors by collectively refusing to trade aggressively—without being explicitly told to do so. In one algorithmic model looking at price-trigger strategy, AI agents traded conservatively on signals until a large enough market swing triggered them to trade very aggressively. The bots, trained through reinforcement learning, were sophisticated enough to implicitly understand that widespread aggressive trading could create more market volatility. In another model, AI bots had over-pruned biases and were trained to internalize that if any risky trade led to a negative outcome, they should not pursue that strategy again. The bots traded conservatively in a 'dogmatic' manner, even when more aggressive trades were seen as more profitable, collectively acting in a way the study called 'artificial stupidity.' 'In both mechanisms, they basically converge to this pattern where they are not acting aggressively, and in the long run, it's good for them,' study co-author and Wharton finance professor Itay Goldstein told Fortune. Financial regulators have long worked to address anti-competitive practices like collusion and price fixing in markets. But in retail, AI has taken the spotlight, particularly as legislators call on companies to address algorithmic pricing. For example, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) called Delta's practice of using AI to set individual airfare prices 'predatory pricing,' though the airline previously told Fortune its fares are 'publicly filed and based solely on trip-related factors.' 'For the [Securities and Exchange Commission] and those regulators in financial markets, their primary goal is to not only preserve this kind of stability, but also ensure competitiveness of the market and market efficiency,' Winston Wei Dou, Wharton professor of finance and one of the study's authors, told Fortune. With that in mind, Dou and two colleagues set out to identify how AI would behave in a financial market by putting trading agent bots into various simulated markets based on high or low levels of 'noise.' The bots ultimately earned 'supra-competitive profits' by collectively and spontaneously deciding to avoid aggressive trading behaviors. 'They just believed sub-optimal trading behavior as optimal,' Dou said. 'But it turns out, if all the machines in the environment are trading in a 'sub-optimal' way, actually everyone can make profits because they don't want to take advantage of each other.' Simply put, the bots didn't question their conservative trading behaviors because they were all making money and therefore stopped engaging in competitive behaviors with one another, forming de-facto cartels. Fears of AI in financial services With the ability to increase consumer inclusion in financial markets and save investors time and money on advisory services, AI tools for financial services, like trading agent bots, have become increasingly appealing. Nearly one third of U.S. investors said they felt comfortable accepting financial planning advice from a generative AI-powered tool, according to a 2023 survey from financial planning nonprofit CFP Board. A report last week from cryptocurrency exchange MEXC found that among 78,000 Gen Z users, 67% of those traders activated at least one AI-powered trading bot in the previous fiscal quarter. But for all their benefits, AI trading agents aren't without risks, according to Michael Clements, director of financial markets and community at the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Beyond cybersecurity concerns and potentially biased decision-making, these trading bots can have a real impact on markets. 'A lot of AI models are trained on the same data,' Clements told Fortune. 'If there is consolidation within AI so there's only a few major providers of these platforms, you could get herding behavior—that large numbers of individuals and entities are buying at the same time or selling at the same time, which can cause some price dislocations.' Jonathan Hall, an external official on the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee, warned last year of AI bots encouraging this 'herd-like behavior' that could weaken the resilience of markets. He advocated for a 'kill switch' for the technology, as well as increased human oversight. Exposing regulatory gaps Clements explained many financial regulators have so far been able to apply well-established rules and statutes to AI, saying for example, 'Whether a lending decision is made with AI or with a paper and pencil, rules still apply equally.' Some agencies, such as the SEC, are even opting to fight fire with fire, developing AI tools to detect anomalous trading behaviors. 'On the one hand, you might have an environment where AI is causing anomalous trading,' Clements said. 'On the other hand, you would have the regulators in a little better position to be able to detect it as well.' According to Dou and Goldstein, regulators have expressed interest in their research, which the authors said has helped expose gaps in current regulation around AI in financial services. When regulators have previously looked for instances of collusion, they've looked for evidence of communication between individuals, with the belief that humans can't really sustain price-fixing behaviors unless they're corresponding with one another. But in Dou and Goldstein's study, the bots had no explicit forms of communication. 'With the machines, when you have reinforcement learning algorithms, it really doesn't apply, because they're clearly not communicating or coordinating,' Goldstein said. 'We coded them and programmed them, and we know exactly what's going into the code, and there is nothing there that is talking explicitly about collusion. Yet they learn over time that this is the way to move forward.' The differences in how human and bot traders communicate behind the scenes is one of the 'most fundamental issues' where regulators can learn to adapt to rapidly developing AI technologies, Goldstein argued. 'If you use it to think about collusion as emerging as a result of communication and coordination,' he said, 'this is clearly not the way to think about it when you're dealing with algorithms.' This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Salt's "chilling" effect
Salt! It is sugar's savory cousin and is mostly thought of as an ingredient in food. It is much more than that, though. Salt is essential to your body's functions. It melts snow and ice in the winter, and you can use it to help cream freeze to make a delicacy sent from the cream! At least that's the way we are going to make ice cream today. You might be thinking to yourself, "salt melts liquids, so why would you need that for ice cream?" Adding salt to water technically does not melt it. It just lowers the freezing temperature of water, which does melt it until you hit that lower temperature. While it lowers the freezing temperature, it actually gets colder too! You heard that right. Adding salt to water makes the water colder, as you can see! That probably seems backwards. Dissolving salt in water requires energy, so that energy is absorbed from the water, causing the temperature to drop. The same goes for salt on ice! The salt dissolves on the ice, dropping the freezing temperature of the ice, but making it colder at the same time. Purdue University says this is an endothermic reaction, or a chemical reaction that occurs with the absorption of heat. We are going to use this knowledge to make our version of one of science's greatest cream! My ice cream maker is a little different. On one side of this ball, you put your ingredients in a compartment. The other side of the ball gets filled up with ice and rock salt, kosher salt, or ice cream salt. That is where our reaction will happen, causing the temperature to drop. To turn this into ice cream, we have to shake and roll, and play with this ball for 25 minutes! The action makes sure the salt is dissolving on the ice, lowering the temperature. It also churns the cream, making sure that large ice crystals don't form. This also allows air inside the freezing cream, helping it to be creamy, rather than rock-hard. It is a lot of work, but the science and ice cream are worth it. Using salt and ice's endothermic reaction was how they made ice cream in the olden days. This ball is just a new take on the classic way to make ice cream.
