
SNP in disarray as Deputy First Minister becomes latest to flee sinking ship
Kate Forbes announced her decision not to seek re-election as her daughter turned three, saying she does not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'.
Allies of Ms Forbes claimed that her decision to quit may have been partly down to 'disgraceful' treatment during her leadership contest against Humza Yousaf, when senior figures including Mr Swinney and Nicola Sturgeon raised concerns about her stance on issues like same-sex marriage.
Her announcement is a further blow to Mr Swinney ahead of the election, as she is widely regarded as one of his most capable ministers and has helped try to repair the SNP's relationship with the business community.
Scottish Conservative MSP Meghan Gallacher said: 'Despite our political differences I completely understand and appreciate Kate Forbes reasons for standing down. I wish her and her family well for the future.
'However, the departure of his Deputy First Minister will come as a hammer blow to John Swinney ahead of next year's election.
'He made the choice to bring her back into the heart of the government last year and would have wanted her to play a key role in the campaign.
'Kate Forbes is the latest senior figure to desert the SNP's sinking ship and clearly has no wish to hear voters' anger after 18 years of the nationalists' failing Scots on so many issues.
'If Scotland is to move on from the SNP's never-ending obsession with independence, then we must remove them from office next year and get the focus back on Scotland's real priorities.'
Fergus Ewing, who backed Ms Forbes' previous leadership bid and is now an independent MSP, suggested that her treatment by senior figures in the previous contest, including Mr Swinney questioning whether her opposition to same-sex marriage made her an appropriate candidate to be First Minister, had played a part in her decision.
Mr Ewing said: 'With Alex Salmond's death the SNP lost the best leader it has ever had, with Kate Forbes' decision to stand down the SNP has lost the best leader it should have chosen.
'As a dear friend of Kate's, I absolutely understand her decisions to bring up her family but the way that Kate was treated during the leadership election between herself and Yousaf was disgraceful.
'Yet despite being attacked by John Swinney and Nicola Sturgeon during that campaign because essentially they argued her Christian beliefs somehow disqualified her from being SNP leader, Kate turned the other cheek and did so with astonishingly good grace.
'The SNP has now lost the outstanding talent of her generation and perhaps that loss resulted from the SNP ceasing to be a broad church, tolerant of different views, and latterly descended into a form of cult or sect where dissent was unacceptable and rational argument was almost absent from debate.'
Ms Forbes, who narrowly lost a fractious leadership contest to Humza Yousaf in 2023 but was brought back into government last year as Mr Swinney sought to heal divisions in the party, said she has 'consistently put the public's needs ahead of my family's' and now does not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'.
Including Fergus Ewing and John Mason, who were both elected as SNP candidates in 2021 and have since left the party, Ms Forbes becomes the 25th Nationalist to step down from the party at next year's elections.
Others include former First Ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn and a score of former failed MPs have been accepted as potential candidates for the 2026 election. Anne McLaughlin, Kirsten Oswald, Anum Qaisar and Tommy Sheppard have also been named on the approved list.
It comes after the SNP suffered a damaging defeat in the recent Hamilton by-election. Labour's Davy Russell won the SNP seat with 8,559 votes, a majority of 602 over the Nationalists.
The vote followed the death of SNP MSP Christina McKelvie, who had represented the constituency since 2011.
Ms Forbes came under attack from a range of SNP MSPs during the 2023 leadership contest for her position on same-sex marriage and other beliefs she holds as a member of the Free Church of Scotland.
In a radio interview in 2023, Mr Swinney, then the Deputy First Minister, urged party members 'to decide if someone who holds those views would be an appropriate individual to be SNP leader and first minister'.
She had been expected to put her name forward as a candidate to be Mr Yousaf's successor when he resigned but instead agreed to join Mr Swinney's team rather than standing against him, in what opponents billed as a 'stitch-up'.
Ms Forbes was a prominent critic of the proposed gender reforms when Ms Sturgeon was First Minister, signed a letter raising concerns about them and said she wouldn't have voted for them. She also recently confirmed that she 'unequivocally' backs the protection of single-sex spaces.
Other prominent internal opponents of the SNP's self-ID agenda included Joanna Cherry, who lost her seat in last year's general election and does not intend to stand for Holyrood next year, Ash Regan, who defected to the Alba Party, and Fergus Ewing, who will stand for election as an independent candidate for Inverness and Nairn.
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie thanked Ms Forbes for her service over a decade in parliament and wished her well in future endeavours and spending time with her family, but added: 'But it cannot have escaped the notice of voters that many of the SNP's former rising stars are abandoning the stage, often to be replaced by defeated names of yesteryears and anonymous party apparatchiks.
'Kate Forbes was the future once - but now, like many of her counterparts in the SNP, she can see the writing on the wall. The truth is this is a tired government with no vision and no ideas.'
In a statement which shocked Scottish politics yesterday morning, Ms Forbes said she had informed her local constituency association that she would not seek re-election next year.
She said she is 'wholly supportive' of Mr Swinney and will campaign for the SNP in next year's election.
But the Deputy First Minister, who is also Economy Secretary, said: 'I have grown up in the public eye, getting married, having a baby and raising a young family. I have consistently put the public's needs ahead of my family's during that time.
'I am grateful to them for accommodating the heavy demands of being a political figure. Looking ahead to the future, I do not want to miss any more of the precious early years of family life - which can never be rewound.'
In his letter responding to her resignation, Mr Swinney said he is sorry she has taken the decision 'but recognise and understand the reasons for doing so'.
He said: 'You have made a huge contribution to public life in Scotland and have been instrumental in making progress on economic issues for my Government.
'You have much to be proud of in all of the work you have undertaken but I am especially heartened by the effect of your leadership on advancing support for the Gaelic language.
'We all wrestle with the inevitable conflicts between family and public life and I sympathise with the dilemmas you have faced. I wish you, Ali and your family well and much happiness in the years ahead.'
At an event in June, Ms Forbes admitted she was 'unsuccessfully' trying to juggle bringing up her daughter and her Cabinet job and raised fears that childcare issues may have contributed to many female MSPs leaving politics.
She also urged the Scottish Parliament to follow the lead of the House of Commons and set up its own nursery.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Government asks body to consult on axing ‘discriminatory' minimum wage age bands
The Government has said it is pushing forward with plans to look at removing 'discriminatory' age bands for the national minimum wage as it extended the remit of the Low Pay Commission (LPC). It said the advisory body will consult with employers, trade unions and workers on narrowing the gap between the minimum wage rate for 18 to 20-year-olds, and the so-called national living wage – the UK minimum wage for workers 21 years and older. The LPC will also be required to put forward 'recommendations on achieving a single adult rate in the years ahead'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'To ensure the right balance is struck between the needs of workers, business affordability and the wider economy, the LPC is being asked to consult on several issues before recommending the new rates.' Last year, Labour committed to removing these age bands to create a 'genuine' national living wage, as part of efforts to bolster employment rights. Currently, the national living wage for workers aged 21 and older is £12.21. Meanwhile, the minimum wage for workers aged between 18 and 20 is £10. There is also a minimum wage for those aged under 18, and apprentices, of £7.55. The Government said the change to the LPC remit will also ensure it actively considers the cost of living in its recommendations for changes to the minimum wage which are next applied from April 2026. The LPC, which was founded in 1997, provides recommendations to the Government each October regarding how it believes the minimum wage should be changed. The Government ultimately sets minimum wage rates for the following April after this advice. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'Low pay drags down living standards for our workers and in turn hurts our high streets and local businesses. 'This Government's plan for change will put money back in people's pockets, with this new remit marking the next step in considering how we ensure a fair deal for our lowest-paid workers while maintaining a competitive economy that boosts businesses and their employees alike.' Baroness Philippa Stroud, chairwoman of the LPC, said: 'We are pleased to receive our remit from the Government. 'Already, since the beginning of the year, we have spent significant time speaking with workers and employers to understand the pressures in the economy and the effects of the most recent increases in the minimum wage. 'We have held a successful call for evidence and received detailed submissions from all sides.'


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Russia walks out of ballistic missile treaty with US as Medvedev warns nemesis Donald Trump & Europe ‘expect more'
DMITRY Medvedev slammed NATO's 'anti-Russian policy' for driving Russia to scrap the Cold War-era moratorium on nuclear missiles. In his latest online clash with Donald Trump, the ex-Russian president ominously warned the West to 'expect further steps'. 5 5 5 Medvedev's comments came shortly after Russia's Foreign Ministry said the country no longer regarded itself bound by the moratorium on the deployment of short- and medium-range nuclear missiles. The ex-president wrote on X on Monday: "The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy. "This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps." The deputy head of Russia's powerful Security Council did not elaborate on the nature of the "further steps". The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty was signed in December 1987 by US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. But the US withdrew from the treaty in 2019, accusing Russia of breaking the rules. Moscow has since said it will not deploy the missiles - with ranges of 311 to 3,418 miles - unless Washington does first. But Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned last December that Moscow would have to respond to what he called the US and NATO's "destabilising actions". The ministry said: "Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of U.S.-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared." It comes as Trump said on Friday that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned to "the appropriate regions". Russia and China begin war games in Sea of Japan after Trump nuclear threat Trump and Medvedev have been locked in a war of words after the ex-Russian president accused Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game' over the White House's push to end the war in Ukraine. Trump first gave Putin 50 days to end the war - but slashed the deadline to just 10 days from July 29 due to a lack of progress on Moscow's part. The US president also vowed to impose secondary tariffs on Russia if a ceasefire agreement is not reached by August 8. Medvedev ominously warned Trump that Russia "isn't Israel or even Iran". 5 5 "Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war," he wrote on a post on X. Trump blasted Medvedev's comments as 'foolish and inflammatory' before ordering nuclear submarines to be deployed near Russian waters. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions," Trump wrote on Truth Social. The US has the world's largest fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, led by the USS Virginia - a 377-foot vessel armed with cruise missiles. Trump v Medvedev: War of words July 2025: Donald Trump announced a 50-day deadline for Russia to move toward ending the war in Ukraine or face "severe" tariffs. Dmitry Medvedev, the Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council, dismissed this as a "theatrical ultimatum" that Russia "didn't care" about. Late July 2025: President Trump reduced his deadline for Russia to secure a peace deal to just "10 or 12 days," threatening sanctions and secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Russia. In response, Medvedev wrote on X that Trump was "playing the ultimatum game" and warned that each new ultimatum was a step toward war, not between Russia and Ukraine, but with the United States. July 30, 2025: In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump publicly targeted Medvedev, calling him a "failed former President of Russia" who was "entering very dangerous territory" with his remarks. This statement came as Trump also announced a 25% tariff on India, criticizing its "dead economy" and continued defense and energy ties with Moscow. July 31, 2025: Medvedev retaliated on social media by referencing the "Dead Hand," a Cold War-era Soviet nuclear retaliation system, in a veiled threat to the US. He also stated that Trump's "jittery reaction" proved Russia was "completely in the right" and would continue on its own path. August 1, 2025: In a further escalation, President Trump announced he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned near Russia in response to Medvedev's "foolish and inflammatory statements." This move highlights the dangerous rhetorical turn the conflict has taken, now including nuclear threats from both sides. August 4, 2025: Medvedev blamed NATO countries for Russia's abandonment of a moratorium on short- and medium-range nuclear missiles. He added the West should "expect further steps".


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Parents beat Labour's VAT on fees raid by paying £500m up front
Parents of children at Britain's leading private schools may have avoided Labour's tax raid by offering up fees in advance. Hundreds of millions of pounds in fees were paid upfront last year to avoid the 20 per cent VAT, which came into effect on January 1, analysis by the Daily Telegraph shows. Britain's top 50 independent schools received £515 million in advance fees last year, up from £121 million in 2023, according to research of the latest annual accounts at Companies House and the Charity Commission. • More than fifty UK private schools shut since Labour put VAT on fees By handing over school fees before Labour's deadline, wealthy parents may have avoided up to £103 million in VAT, with that sum expected to be even higher when taking into account all of the UK's 2,600 private schools. Parents at some schools tried paying up to five years' fees before the January deadline to dodge Labour's tax, the analysis shows. The large scale of advance payments could impact Labour's plan to raise revenue, tax experts have warned. However, the Treasury says that the Office for Budget Responsibility considered the use of prepayment schemes when making its forecasts for how much money would be raised by the VAT raid. Fees gathered from prepayment schemes, which are used to pay for one or more years of a pupil's education in advance, have risen across the UK's most expensive schools, including Brighton College, which recorded £50.1 million in total prepaid fees last year — an increase of £4.1 million from 2023. Only 86 of its pupils were covered by the school's prepayment scheme last year. That figure jumped to 819 last year as parents scrambled to beat the VAT deadline. Eton College collected £52.7 million in advance fee payments last year, up £16.6 million from 2023. At Winchester College, fees collected in advance rose from £4.4 million in 2023 to £19 million in 2024. Labour maintains that its tax raid is aimed at targeting Britain's wealthiest families and will raise more than £1.8 billion a year for state schools in ten years. However, with wealthy parents forking out large sums to Britain's most prestigious schools, it is the smaller private schools that are likely to be affected the most. The government predicts that 100 schools could shut over the next three years, with more than 50 independent schools already announcing their closures as a result of the policy, the Telegraph reports.