Astronomers discovered a whole new class of black holes
Scientists have observed a new type of black hole that is too heavy to have been born from a star but still too slim to act as an anchor for an entire galaxy. These black holes are being being referred to as 'lite' intermediate-mass black holes (IMBH), and they're extremely hard to identify because of how low-frequency their signals tend to be.
The quest to find these IMBHs has come about due to the fact that we've discovered ultramassive black holes that can measure up to millions of times the mass of our sun, while others can sit at just 50 solar masses or below. Astronomers wanted to understand where any mid-sized black holes might fit in, so they began looking harder.
Today's Top Deals
XGIMI Prime Day deals feature the new MoGo 4 and up to 42% off smart projectors
Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales
Best Ring Video Doorbell deals
What they discovered is that lite intermediate-mass black holes do indeed exist. However, finding them is difficult. To make it easier, the researchers used Virgo and LIGO, two gravitational wave detectors. Using the detectors, astronomers were able to find multiple black holes ranging in size from 100 to 300 times the mass of the sun.
While still massive, these black holes are not anywhere near powerful enough to have been born from dying stars or to hold galaxies together. So, where do they fit into the universe? Well, researchers believe they could have been born from mergers that happen out in the cosmos. While completing a run from 2019 to 2020, the LIGO and Virgo network logged 11 mergers that could fit the bill for these cosmic objects.
A study on the findings is published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. In it, the researchers detail how they classified the new class of black holes, breaking down the exact way they discovered them and why they are so important. The hope is that some of these smaller black holes could offer us a glimpse into the time when the first stars lived and died.
As we detect more and more of these lite intermediate-mass black holes, researchers believe we find even more reason to be excited about them. Understanding them could not only unlock the secrets of the early universe, but it could also help us refine the models that we use to view the universe as a whole.
More Top Deals
Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98
See the
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Statistics don't support UW-Milwaukee shuttering materials engineering program
Everything is made from something. The materials we use are so important that entire eras of human history are named for them: Stone Age, Bronze Age, Iron Age. The knowledge of how to make, process, and use these materials is fundamental to any form of society. A society that fails to pass this knowledge on to new generations will not survive or prosper. That's why it was disappointing to hear outgoing UWM Chancellor Mark Mone double down on the proposed closure of UWM's award-winning Materials Engineering program. This program provides students with life-changing opportunities for high-paying careers in an in-demand field. It's also critical for our region's manufacturing industry and national defense. Mone pointed to the relatively small size of the Materials Engineering program. He would be hard-pressed to find a school of engineering anywhere in the country in which materials engineering is not the smallest department in terms of number of students. Materials engineering programs typically have dozens of students, not hundreds. To put this into perspective, however, the Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts an average of just 10 job openings per year for neurologists in Wisconsin. Hopefully, no one would suggest that UW-Madison should stop training neurology residents, since most of us recognize that medical specialists are essential to the kind of society we want to have. Materials engineers are no less essential, but since we work behind the scenes, many people are unaware of the critical role we play. In fact, our work goes into every single manufactured item you see around you, from nuts and bolts to airplanes, and everything in between. Letters: Lack of state support, Republicans are to blame for UWM's budget constraints Chancellor Mone suggested redirecting resources towards UWM's Computer Science program. However, unemployment among computer science graduates is currently 6.1% — nearly 1.5 times the overall national average. While computer science is undoubtedly an important field, increasing the present oversupply of computer science graduates will not benefit students or Wisconsin's economy. Materials engineering graduates, in contrast, have an unemployment rate of just 1.85%, and Wisconsin manufacturers are struggling to fill materials engineering positions as the current generation retires. This critical shortage is why the Department of Defense created the METAL (Metallurgical Engineering Trades Apprenticeship & Learning) program, an initiative focused on rebuilding the materials engineering workforce. Given Wisconsin's position as the number one state for metal casting employment, the Defense Department has identified Milwaukee as a target location for a new $1.5 million METAL hub. Opinion: We asked readers about wake boats on Wisconsin lakes. Here's what you said. Funding from this initiative could be a tremendous catalyst to strengthen and grow UWM's Materials Engineering program. This would be a rare win-win-win-win situation: for UWM, for students, for industry, and for national defense. In order to qualify for this funding, however, UWM needs to continue to have a Materials Engineering program. UWM's incoming chancellor, Thomas Gibson, successfully worked with industry in his previous role to ensure UW-Stevens Point's offerings were aligned with workforce needs. Let's hope he brings that perspective to his new role at UWM. Outgoing Chancellor Mone has handed him an awesome opportunity to show that he is a different kind of leader who will take UWM in a new direction. By saving the UWM Materials Engineering program, the new chancellor has a chance to create a tremendous success story that will benefit our region for generations to come. Dave Palmer is a metallurgical engineer at Twin Disc in Racine. He earned his masters degree in Materials Engineering from UWM in 2014, and is currently working on a PhD in Materials Engineering at UWM. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: UWM materials engineering program must be saved from closure | Opinion
CNET
39 minutes ago
- CNET
Do You Really Learn When You Use AI? What MIT Researchers Found
Your brain works differently when you're using generative AI for a task than when you use your brain alone. Namely, you're less likely to remember what you did. That's the somewhat obvious-sounding conclusion of an MIT study that looked at how people think when they write an essay -- one of the earliest scientific studies of how using gen AI affects us. The study, a preprint that has not yet been peer-reviewed, is pretty small (54 participants) and preliminary, but it points toward the need for more research into how using tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT is affecting how our brains function. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the research (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) The findings show a significant difference in what happens in your brain and with your memory when you complete a task using an AI tool rather than when you do it with just your brain. But don't read too much into those differences -- this is just a glimpse at brain activity in the moment, not long-term evidence of changes in how your brain operates all the time, researchers said. "We want to try to give some first steps in this direction and also encourage others to ask the question," Nataliya Kosmyna, a research scientist at MIT and the lead author of the study, told me. The growth of AI tools like chatbots is quickly changing how we work, search for information and write. All of this has happened so fast that it's easy to forget that ChatGPT first emerged as a popular tool just a few years ago, at the end of 2022. That means we're just now beginning to see research on how AI use is affecting us. Here's a look at what the MIT study found about what happened in the brains of ChatGPT users, and what future studies might tell us. Now Playing: Testing OpenAI's New ChatGPT Search Engine 06:01 This is your brain on ChatGPT The MIT researchers split their 54 research participants into three groups and asked them to write essays during separate sessions over several weeks. One group was given access to ChatGPT, another was allowed to use a standard search engine (Google), and the third had none of those tools, just their own brains. The researchers analyzed the texts they produced, interviewed the subjects immediately after they wrote the essays, and recorded the participants' brain activity using electroencephalography, or EEG. An analysis of the language used in the essays found that those in the "brain-only" group wrote in more distinct ways, while those who used large language models produced fairly similar essays. More interesting findings came from the interviews after the essays were written. Those who used their brains alone showed better recall and were better able to quote from their writing than those who used search engines or LLMs. It might be unsurprising that those who relied more heavily on LLMs, who may have copied and pasted from the chatbot's responses, would be less able to quote what they had "written." Kosmyna said these interviews were done immediately after the writing happened, and the lack of recall is notable. "You wrote it, didn't you?" she said. "Aren't you supposed to know what it was?" The EEG results also showed significant differences between the three groups. There was more neural connectivity -- interaction between the components of the brain -- among the brain-only participants than in the search engine group, and the LLM group had the least activity. Again, not an entirely surprising conclusion. Using tools means you use less of your brain to complete a task. But Kosmyna said the research helped show what the differences were: "The idea was to look closer to understand that it's different, but how is it different?" she said. Nataliya Kosmyna shares a picture of a research subject writing an essay while an EEG monitors the brain activity. The Washington Post/Contributor/Getty Images The LLM group showed "weaker memory traces, reduced self-monitoring and fragmented authorship," the study authors wrote. That can be a concern in a learning environment: "If users rely heavily on AI tools, they may achieve superficial fluency but fail to internalize the knowledge or feel a sense of ownership over it." After the first three essays, the researchers invited participants back for a fourth session in which they were assigned to a different group. The findings there, from a significantly smaller group of subjects (just 18), found that those who were in the brain-only group at first showed more activity even when using an LLM, while those in the LLM-only group showed less neural connectivity without the LLM than the initial brain-only group had. This isn't 'brainrot' When the MIT study was released, many headlines claimed it showed ChatGPT use was "rotting" brains or causing significant long-term problems. That's not exactly what the researchers found, Kosmyna said. The study focused on the brain activity that happened while the participants were working -- their brain's internal circuitry in the moment. It also examined their memory of their work in that moment. Understanding the long-term effects of AI use would require a longer-term study and different methods. Kosmyna said future research could look at other gen AI use cases, like coding, or use technology that examines different parts of the brain, like functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI. "The whole idea is to encourage more experiments, more scientific data collection," she said. While the use of LLMs is still being researched, it's also likely that the effect on our brains isn't as significant as you might think, said Genevieve Stein-O'Brien, assistant professor of neuroscience at Johns Hopkins University, who was not involved in the MIT study. She studies how genetics and biology help develop and build the brain -- which occurs early in life. Those critical periods tend to close during childhood or adolescence, she said. "All of this happens way before you ever interact with ChatGPT or anything like that," Stein-O'Brien told me. "There is a lot of infrastructure that is set up, and that is very robust." The situation might be different in children, who are increasingly coming into contact with AI technology, although the study of children raises ethical concerns for scientists wanting to research human behavior, Stein-O'Brien said. You can have a chatbot help you write an essay, but will you remember what you write? ThaiWhy care about essay writing anyway? The idea of studying the effect of AI use on essay writing might sound pointless to some. After all, wasn't the point of writing an essay in school to get a grade? Why not outsource that work to a machine that can do it, if not better, then more easily? The MIT study gets to the point of the task: Writing an essay is about developing your thinking, about understanding the world around you. "We start out with what we know when we begin writing, but in the act of writing, we end up framing the next questions and thinking about new ideas or new content to explore," said Robert Cummings, a professor of writing and rhetoric at the University of Mississippi. Cummings has done similar research on the way computer technologies affect how we write. One study involved sentence completion technology -- what you might know informally as autocomplete. He took 119 writers and tasked them with writing an essay. Roughly half had computers with Google Smart Compose enabled, while the rest didn't. Did it make writers faster, or did they spend more time and write less because they had to navigate the choices proposed? The result was that they wrote about the same amount in the same time period. "They weren't writing in different sentence lengths, with different levels of complexity of ideas," he told me. "It was straight-up equal." Read more: AI Essentials: 29 Ways to Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts ChatGPT and its ilk are a different beast. With a sentence completion technology, you still have control over the words, you still have to make writing choices. In the MIT study, some participants just copied and pasted what ChatGPT said. They might not have even read the work they turned in as their own. "My personal opinion is that when students are using generative AI to replace their writing, they're kind of surrendering, they're not actively engaged in their project any longer," Cummings said. The MIT researchers found something interesting in that fourth session, when they noticed that the group who had written three essays without tools had higher levels of engagement when finally given tools. "Taken together, these findings support an educational model that delays AI integration until learners have engaged in sufficient self-driven cognitive effort," they wrote. "Such an approach may promote both immediate tool efficacy and lasting cognitive autonomy." Cummings said he has started teaching his composition class with no devices. Students write by hand in class, generally on topics that are more personal and would be harder to feed into an LLM. He said he doesn't feel like he's grading papers written by AI, that his students are getting a chance to engage with their own ideas before seeking help from a tool. "I'm not going back," he said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Experts Sound the Alarm on New Invasion Threatening Christmas Tree Farms
Invasive insects that resemble tiny wasps are quietly spreading across the United States, threatening pine trees, and experts say Christmas tree farms could be next. The Cool Down reported that European pine sawflies (Neodiprion sertifer) have been actively feeding on pine needles in Washington's Pierce County, and their slow but steady spread could pose a real risk to ornamental and plantation pines this summer. Sawfly larvae, which hatch from eggs laid in pine needles in the spring, can feed together in groups of dozens, stripping older needles clean, even if younger foliage remains safe. While they don't typically kill large trees, repeated feeding can stunt growth and create unsightly bald patches, which is a significant concern for growers and homeowners alike. These insects were first spotted in Washington in 2008, but their spread has been gradual since adult sawflies are poor fliers. Instead, they hitch rides on infested nursery stock, mulch, or soil, making nurseries and Christmas tree farms particularly vulnerable. The aesthetic damage is more than just cosmetic. 'It's the most common sawfly found infesting landscapes and Christmas tree plantations,' according to the University of Wisconsin, which notes these sawflies thrive in pines like Scots, red, Jack, and Mugo—common species in holiday tree lots. If you spot pine needles stripped bare like a bottle brush, you may have a sawfly infestation. These larvae can consume huge patches of older needles before moving on. While trees usually survive, the lasting effects can take a toll on growth and appearance. Experts recommend regular monitoring from spring through early summer. For light infestations, simply knocking larvae off or pruning affected branches may do the trick. Horticultural oils and insecticidal soaps can help against young larvae, while more persistent outbreaks may require targeted insecticides like acephate or spinosad. Natural predators, including certain birds, wasps, and small mammals, also feed on sawflies and their cocoons, offering a built-in defense mechanism. For Christmas tree farmers and homeowners who value healthy pines, early detection and control are key. Combined with native plantings that support wildlife, these steps can help prevent sawfly damage and protect future holiday trees. So, before you hang that ornament or wreath, take a close look at your pine branches. A handful of hungry sawflies now could mean a thinner, weaker tree come Sound the Alarm on New Invasion Threatening Christmas Tree Farms first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 3, 2025
