logo
Israelis begin to question the morality of their war in Gaza

Israelis begin to question the morality of their war in Gaza

Straits Times4 days ago
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Now the issue of hunger in Gaza dominates news coverage in Israel.
JERUSALEM – The news on Israel's main TV channel had just finished a segment on how
hunger in Gaza is portrayed around the world when the anchor looked up and said: 'Maybe it's finally time to acknowledge that this isn't a public relations failure, but a moral one.'
Whether or not it was a Walter Cronkite moment, when the US broadcaster declared on live TV in 1968 that the Vietnam War was unwinnable – a turning point in public opinion – it seemed significant in a country that's been steadfast in its defence of the war against Hamas in Gaza for 22 months.
There are other indications – from WhatsApp group chats to new reports by Israeli human rights organisations – that the mood is shifting away from a robust embrace of the conflict.
Some commentators are announcing a change of heart about the war, triggered when
Hamas militants attacked Israel on Oct 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and abducting 250.
The subsequent Israeli offensive has killed nearly 60,000 people, according to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, and left much of the Palestinian territory in ruins.
The United Nations World Food Programme has warned for weeks that Gaza's population of more than 2 million people faces crisis levels of food insecurity, with scores of aid groups reporting widespread starvation.
'After the massacre, it was imperative to strike at Hamas with all our might, even at the cost of civilian casualties,' wrote Mr Nahum Barnea, a columnist for centrist newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Grace Fu apologises for Tanjong Katong sinkhole, says road may stay closed for a few more days
Singapore Terrorism threat in Singapore remains high, driven by events like Israeli-Palestinian conflict: ISD
Singapore S'pore can and must meaningfully apply tech like AI in a way that creates jobs for locals: PM Wong
Singapore 7, including child and firefighter, taken to hospital after fire breaks out in Toa Payoh flat
Singapore ICA inspector obtained bribes in the form of sex acts from 6 foreign men in exchange for his help
Singapore Doctor who forged certificates for aesthetic procedures gets 4 months' jail
Singapore 12 motorists nabbed for providing illegal private-hire services: LTA
Life Alone but not lonely: Tips from seniors who live solo and like it
But 'the damage – in military casualties, Israel's international standing and civilian casualties – is growing worse. Hamas is to blame, but Israel is responsible'.
Mr Sherwin Pomerantz, who runs an economic consulting group, wrote in the conservative Jerusalem Post: 'What was a just war two years ago is now an unjust war and must be ended.'
The shift in Israeli sentiment is reflected in a pile-up of bad news: Hamas still holds hostages in Gaza and remains a military force, soldiers continue to die, Israelis abroad are shunned, even attacked, and now scenes of starving children are shown across global media.
US President Donald Trump, a fervent defender of Israel, even weighed in, saying this week he didn't agree with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's assertion there is no starvation in Gaza.
'That's real starvation stuff, I see it, and you can't fake that,' Mr Trump said in Scotland on July 28.
There haven't been any recent polls published in Israel related to the war.
One in May showed 65 per cent of Israelis unconcerned about humanitarian conditions in Gaza.
But until this past week, little of the destruction and death there appeared in Israeli media. Now the issue of hunger dominates news coverage.
Other shifts in public discourse are noticeable.
Human rights lawyers abroad have been accusing Israel of war crimes and genocidal intent in Gaza since just after the war started – charges the vast majority of Israelis have rejected.
For the first time, two Israeli human rights groups are now using the term genocide for what's happening – B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel.
Also on July 28, the presidents of five Israeli universities wrote an open letter to Mr Netanyahu urging him to 'intensify efforts to address the severe hunger crisis currently afflicting the Gaza Strip.'
'Like many Israelis, we are horrified by the scenes from Gaza, including infants dying every day from hunger and disease,' they wrote.
'As a people who endured the horrors of the Holocaust, we also bear a responsibility to use every means at our disposal to prevent cruel and indiscriminate harm to innocent men, women and children.'
Mr Yair Lapid, head of Israel's main opposition party, gave a fiery speech this week describing the war as a disaster and a failure and calling on Mr Netanyahu to end it and eliminate Hamas through cooperation with regional powers.
After ceasefire talks stalled again last week, a new effort is under way to revive negotiations with Hamas, designated a terrorist organisation by the US and others.
There's growing commentary in mainstream media declaring Hamas defeated, making an end to the war easier to accept.
There's also pushback to the starvation narrative.
The Israeli military authorities said, without additional evidence, that one photo of a skeletal boy published on front pages around the world was a child with a genetic disease that makes his bones protrude, and that he'd been evacuated from Gaza more than a month ago.
In addition, the military has distributed photos purported to be of Hamas operatives surrounded by food and looking healthy.
And, so far, Mr Netanyahu has shown no sign of shifting policy.
'We are fighting a just war, a moral war, a war for our survival,' he said in a statement on July 28.
'No country in the world would allow the continued rule in a neighbouring territory of a terror group bent on its destruction that already stormed across its borders in a genocidal attack.'
'We'll continue to act responsibly, as we always have, and we'll continue to seek the return of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas,' he said. 'That is the only way to secure peace for Israelis and Palestinians alike.' BLOOMBERG
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mali ex-prime minister to stand trial over social media post, lawyer says
Mali ex-prime minister to stand trial over social media post, lawyer says

Straits Times

time6 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Mali ex-prime minister to stand trial over social media post, lawyer says

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox BAMAKO - A Malian court has detained and charged former Prime Minister Moussa Mara over a social media post criticising shrinking democratic space under military rule in the West African nation, his lawyer said late Friday. Mara is one of few public figures in the country who has been willing to openly question moves taken this year to dissolve political parties and grant the military government, led by Assimi Goita, a five-year mandate without elections. Last month, authorities formally approved Goita's five-year term and said it could be renewed as many times as necessary as Mali struggles to respond to a long-running jihadist insurgency. Goita assumed power after military coups in 2020 and 2021. Mara had been summoned several times for questioning this month over a social media post dated July 4 expressing solidarity with government critics who have been jailed. On July 21, his lawyer, Mountaga Tall, posted on social media site X that Mara had been barred from boarding a flight to Senegal to participate in a regional conference on peace and security. On Friday, Mara was summoned by a judicial cybercrimes unit, and a prosecutor charged him with offences including undermining the credibility of the state and spreading false information, Tall said in a statement. Mara's trial has been scheduled for September 29, Tall said. A government spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The case against Mara comes amid worsening insecurity in Mali. The past few months have seen a surge of deadly attacks by Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), an al-Qaeda-linked group that also operates in Burkina Faso and Niger. Analysts say the group's battlefield tactics have grown increasingly sophisticated and that it has amassed substantial resources through raids on military posts, cattle rustling, hijacking of goods, kidnappings and taxes on local communities. On Friday, the group said it had ambushed a convoy of Malian soldiers and Russian mercenaries in the Tenenkou locality in central Mali. Mali's army confirmed the ambush in a statement on X. Neither statement gave a death toll. REUTERS

US court maintains restrictions on Los Angeles immigration arrests
US court maintains restrictions on Los Angeles immigration arrests

Straits Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

US court maintains restrictions on Los Angeles immigration arrests

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A federal appeals court late on Aug 1 affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the Lower Court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In the unsigned decision on Aug 1, the judges of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on 'apparent race or ethnicity', speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a 'bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day labourer pick up site, agricultural site, etc'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Opening of Woodlands Health has eased load on KTPH, sets standard for future hospitals: Ong Ye Kung Singapore New vehicular bridge connecting Punggol Central and Seletar Link to open on Aug 3 Business Property 'decoupling' illegal if done solely to avoid taxes: High Court Singapore HSA investigating teen who was observed to be allegedly vaping in MRT train Asia KTM plans new passenger rail service in Johor Bahru to manage higher footfall expected from RTS Singapore Tengah facility with over 40 animal shelters, businesses hit by ticks Asia 'Every day, we think about how to upgrade': China's factories see rise in robot adoption Singapore 60 years of building Singapore The Department of Homeland Security and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. 'The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now,' she said in a statement. Mr Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: 'This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region.' REUTERS

US appeals court keeps bar on Los Angeles federal immigration arrests
US appeals court keeps bar on Los Angeles federal immigration arrests

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

US appeals court keeps bar on Los Angeles federal immigration arrests

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A federal appeals court late on Friday affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring U.S. government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity," speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc." The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region." REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store