Telangana argues for restriction of diversion for KC Canal system by A.P.
Telangana has argued before the Brijesh Kumar Tribunal, Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-II, that Andhra Pradesh had increased the utilisation of water for the Kurnool-Cuddapah (KC) Canal system, disregarding the June 1944 agreement between the erstwhile Hyderabad and Madras States and later obtained the same as allocation.
Andhra (Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema, including ceded districts that comprised Ballari too) was a part of the Madras State then.
Resuming the final arguments before the Tribunal in New Delhi on Wednesday in the matter of Section 3 (ISRWD Act, 1956) reference made for redistribution of Krishna water between the residuary States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh from out of the allocation of 811 tmc ft (assured water) made to erstwhile (combined) AP, Senior Counsel appearing for Telangana C.S. Vaidyanathan said the KC Canal was developed with the consent of erstwhile Hyderabad State (now Telangana).
The condition for Hyderabad's consent was that no objections should be raised in future if Hyderabad chose to divert water, the counsel explained and added that the 1944 agreement reached between Hyderabad and Madras States was for diversion of 10 tmc ft water for KC Canal and 17.1 tmc ft for Rajolibanda Diversion Scheme (RDS) — 15.9 tmc ft for Telangana (Hyderabad) and 1.2 tmc ft for Karnataka (Raichur, then a part of Hyderabad).
Further, the counsel for Telangana stated that the same was presented by the Central water and Power commission in the Inter-State Conference, 1951.
However, disregarding the 1944 Agreement, A.P. went on to increase the utilisation of KC Canal to 39.9 tmc ft, he submitted to the Tribunal adding that the actual utilisation on an average was 54 tmc ft.
Besides, A.P. did not furnish the details of contribution by streams/rivulets such as Nippulavagu, Galeru and Kundu, all tributaries of Penna river, to an extent of 5.2 tmc ft to the command area of KC Canal before the KWDT-I, the counsel for Telangana submitted to the Tribunal (KWDT-II), according to officials of the Telangana Irrigation department who were present at the hearing.
The Telangana counsel also explained with the help of maps how three additional sources — Muchumarri-KC Canal lift irrigation scheme, Malyala LIS and Escape Channel through Nippulavagu at Banakacherla — were being used to release water to the KC Canal from Srisailam reservoir in addition from the Sunkesula Barrage, the main source of KC Canal system. These diversions contravene the KWDT-I Award.
When the Tribunal enquired about how much quantum of water was being diverted from the Escape Channel, the Telangana counsel explained that A.P. government was objecting to the installation of telemetry equipment at the Banakacherla Cross Regulator complex where the Escape Channel regulator takes off. Unless telemetry was installed at all the regulators at Banakacherla complex, the accounting of releases to KC Canal, SRBC, TGP and others was not possible.
The counsel for Telangana further submitted that the availability of water to KC Canal was 45.1 TMC (39.9+ 5.2) and crop water requirement for the area under KC Canal as per the scientific assessment was only 18.51 tmc ft. Thus, there would be a saving of 26.59 tmc ft (45.1-18.51) and it should be allocated to the in-basin projects in Telangana. The Tribunal was pleaded for placing an administrative mechanism to restrict the utilisation of KC Canal to the allocated quantity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
K-pop, weather news, and scraping metal: Behind the sounds unleashed at the Korean border
The South Korean government on Monday (August 4) started removing loudspeakers which were placed at its border with North Korea for transmitting propaganda and information about the country. Over the years, these speakers blared everything from Michael Jackson songs and K-pop (Korean pop music) to weather reports. The Defence Ministry described it as a 'practical measure that can help ease inter-Korean tensions without affecting the military's readiness posture'. It follows another decision two months ago by the new President Lee Jae Myung, who ordered the suspension of loudspeaker broadcasts in frontline areas, according to the Korean Yonhap News Agency. It is being seen as part of a softer approach from the new administration, led by President Lee of the liberal Democratic Party. Although just a week ago, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's sister Kim Yo Jong said the government's 'blind trust' in its alliance with the US, and hostility toward North Korea, made it no different from its conservative predecessor. Why were these rather unconventional tactics employed in the decades-old discord between the two nations, who are still technically at war? The history North and South Korea were formed after the end of World War 2 (1939-45) as the peninsula was liberated from Japanese rule. Soon, the communist Soviet Union and the liberal capitalist United States competed to extend their influence, with the onset of the Cold War. The USSR and the US took control of the northern region and the south, respectively, for what was to be a temporary arrangement. The 38th parallel (or latitude) would be the dividing line, and according to former US Secretary of State Dean Rusk (then a military officer), he and Colonel Charles 'Tic' Bonesteel did it without much thought. Rusk later wrote in his memoir, As I Saw It, 'Neither Tic nor I was a Korea expert, but it seemed to us that Seoul, the capital, should be in the American sector… Using a National Geographic map, we looked just north of Seoul for a convenient dividing line but could not find a natural geographical line. We saw instead the thirty-eighth parallel and decided to recommend that…' The subsequent war and the influence of the occupying powers made the division permanent. An armistice agreement was signed on July 27, 1953, rather than a peace treaty, leaving North and South Korea technically still at war. Today, a buffer zone called the demilitarised zone (DMZ) runs along the 38th parallel to prevent border skirmishes, with both armies guarding it. The DMZ runs for almost 250 km and is around 4 km wide. Over the decades, a range of sounds has been blasted through rows of loudspeakers on either side. South Korean officials have claimed their broadcasts can be heard upto 10 km during the day, while North Korean broadcasts have not been heard as easily. Music, patriotism and more In the book Music and Conflict, musicologist Keith Howard wrote about the sounds in the early 2000s: 'From the North, verbal abuse juxtaposed with music, revolutionary songs, and songs telling of a land of plenty. The South aired a mixture dominated by American pop of the Michael Jackson kind, reflecting that American troops supplement South Korean forces'. What was the idea behind it? In an essay, South Korean researcher Yechan Moon of Seoul's Yonsei University wrote about the 'unique intersection of media technology, sensory experience, and geopolitical strategy' ('Sound and Access to Information: The Political Implications of the Loudspeaker Broadcasts to North Korea'). 'In the case of loudspeakers, the sensory immediacy and omnipresence of sound play a critical role. Unlike print or digital media, sound cannot be easily escaped or ignored when it envelops an environment,' Moon wrote. It assumes particular significance for North Korea, often called the 'hermit kingdom' for its strict control of information and isolationist policies. 'Unlike radio receivers or foreign DVDs (which North Korean authorities can criminalize and confiscate in clandestine raids), loudspeaker broadcasts require no active agency by North Korean listeners,' Moon added. This can make them aware of the world beyond through a common language. Many defectors from the North have said that they knew about South Korean popular culture, such as films, TV shows and music, but accessing smuggled media was difficult and dangerous. Moon wrote that the medium of sound itself is potent in provoking emotional and physiological responses. Furthermore, 'North Korea's own media strategy reflects its acknowledgment of sound's power. Domestically, the regime itself employs ubiquitous loudspeaker systems — every North Korean town has public address speakers that broadcast approved news and martial music every morning — essentially a one-way internal loudspeaker propaganda network.' Shifting policy The sound has been turned on and off periodically, depending on the state of the ties and specific incidents. Last year, under the former conservative Yoon Suk Yeol administration, South Korea turned on the loudspeakers for the first time in six years, as Pyongyang launched thousands of trash-carrying balloons across the border. Seoul had previously conducted the campaign after North Korea's fourth nuclear test in 2016, Yonhap News Agency said. This time around, it reportedly included K-pop group BTS's English language mega-hits 'Butter' and 'Dynamite,' weather forecasts and news, and criticism of the North's missile program and its crackdown. The North launched its own propaganda in return. After a few weeks, the Incheon Metropolitan Government said it would request the central government to devise a framework for 'compensating residents near the inter-Korean border who have been affected by disruptive noises,' The Korea Times reported. Residents said they heard high-pitched noises resembling scraping metal, sirens and drums. (With Associated Press inputs) Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India. ... Read More
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
Pakistan Foreign Minister To Visit Bangladesh This Month
Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar will undertake a two-day visit to Bangladesh starting August 23, the local media reported on Monday. This would mark the first bilateral visit by a Pakistani foreign minister in a long time amid growing closeness between Dhaka and Islamabad since the exit of the Awami League government led by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, last year. Citing diplomatic sources, Bangladesh's leading Bengali daily Prothom Alo reported that during his visit Dar will hold discussions with the Foreign Affairs Advisor Towhid Hossain and also call on Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Advisor to the interim government in the country. The report indicated that Dar will engage with Bangladeshi political leaders during his visit to Dhaka. "The agenda has not been decided yet. Hopefully, it will be finalised in early August," Prothom Alo quoted Hossain as saying in response to a question on the priorities of the upcoming Dhaka-Islamabad foreign ministerial meeting. In April, Pakistan Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch visited Dhaka for the Foreign Office Consultations (FOC) which were held after a gap of 15 years. During Baloch's visit, Bangladesh had raised the issue of financial claim to the tune of USD 4.32 billion from Pakistan as a fair share from the assets of undivided Pakistan before 1971 besides also seeking a formal apology for the genocide committed by the Pakistani armed forces during the Liberation War. Dar was scheduled to be in Dhaka immediately after Baloch's trip but had to cancel the visit following the Pakistan-sponsored heinous April 22 Pahalgam terror attack which witnessed the massacre of 26 innocent tourists in Jammu and Kashmir. Relations between Dhaka and Islamabad remained strained during the 15-year rule of the former Awami League government due to issues such as the war crimes trials in Bangladesh and broader regional politics. Key issues in Bangladesh-Pakistan relations have always included Pakistan's role in the 1971 genocide during the Liberation War, the return of stranded assets, and compensation. However, things have changed drastically since the formation of the interim government led by Yunus in August 2024. Last year, Yunus met Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, where both leaders agreed to strengthen bilateral ties. In January, four high-ranking officials of Pakistan's notorious Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), including the Director General of Analysis Major General Shahid Amin Afsar, visited Dhaka, marking a significant shift in Bangladesh-Pakistan relations. A Bangladeshi military delegation led by Lt. Gen. SM Kamrul Hasan, the Principal Staff Officer of the Armed Forces Division, also visited Rawalpindi the nerve centre of Pakistan's military establishment from January 13 to 18. The delegation met the chiefs of the Pakistani army, navy, and air force, highlighting a deepening military dialogue. The two nations historically estranged since the brutal 1971 Liberation War wherein Pakistani forces massacred millions of people and reportedly raped hundreds of thousands of Bangladeshi women are now demonstrating signs of rapprochement.
India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
Pak rebuilds 15 terror camps in 90 days after Op Sindoor, Intel warning issued
While Indian forces continue to mount aggressive counter-terror operations in Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan's support for cross-border terrorism shows no signs of abating. Fresh intelligence inputs have revealed that Pakistan is actively aiding major terror outfits in rebuilding infrastructure destroyed during India's recent Operation the last 90 days alone, more than 15 terror camps and launchpads have reportedly come up across Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Intelligence sources say these camps are being rebuilt with the help of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and other government agencies, which are not only sympathetic to the terrorists killed in Indian strikes but are now fully backing efforts to revive their hard by Indian forces, these terrorists are now utilising new methods and advanced technologies to evade surveillance and bolster militant capabilities. The camps are being reconstructed in key locations, including Kel, Shardi, Dudhniyal, Athmuqam, Jura, Lipa Valley, Tandapani, Nayyali, Jankot, and Chakothi. Additionally, four launchpads along the International Border in the Jammu region along Masroor, Chaprar, and a drone center at Shakargarh are also being reactivated, according to reports. This time, Pakistan-based terrorists are spreading in a wider area and avoiding concentration to evade detection by Indian forces. As India has been maintaining that Operation Sindoor is on, these terrorists fear more strikes from the forces. In order to avoid mass casualties, the terrorists are now building smaller camps accommodating approximately two dozen terrorists in a camp. The number earlier used to be five times higher in a single camp. The movement pattern of these terrorists is also changed according to sources. They are now including more women and children in their camps to use them as shields. The training is more technologically advanced with use of drones and surveillance equipment. These camps are located in densely forested areas and are reportedly equipped with radar camouflage, satellite masking, and other advanced tools. According to intelligence assessments, the ISI has allocated over PKR 100 crore to support this rebuild. Post-Operation Sindoor, top commanders from Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), The Resistance Front (TRF), and senior ISI officials have held multiple strategy meetings to chart out new terrorists are restructuring their operational leadership, procuring new weapons, and trying to resume recruitment efforts both in Pakistan and Jammu and Kashmir. There has been a significant drop in new terrorist recruitment in Jammu and Kashmir amid intense counter terror operations by the forces. - Ends
