Trading Day: Sweeping US fiscal bill advances, rate path stays murky
NEW YORK () - -TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Lewis Krauskopf, Markets Reporter
Jamie is enjoying some well-deserved time off, but the Reuters markets team will still keep you up to date on what moved markets today. We're watching President Donald Trump's tax cut-and-spending bill, which made it through the U.S. Senate on Tuesday and now goes back to the other U.S. legislative body, the House of Representatives. I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at .
Today's Key Market Moves
* Wall Street indexes were mixed, with the Nasdaq slumpingwhile the Dow rose and moved closer to a record high * The beaten-up U.S. dollar edged lower against a basketof major currencies * U.S. Treasury yields rose, after data showed the labormarket remained resilient * Gold prices jumped over 1%, continuing a massive run forthe metal this year * Oil prices edged higher, as investors weighed positivedemand indicators in China and elsewhere
Today's Key Reads
1. Six questions facing US stock investors as 2025's secondhalf kicks off 2. Trump's push for regulatory reform highlights 'Treasuryput': Jen 3. Corporate spending binge could spur long-term US growth:Guild 4. How Novo Nordisk misread the US market for its weightloss sensation 5. DOGE now targeting SEC policy, eyes SPAC rules, sourcessay
Sweeping US fiscal bill moves ahead, rate path stays murky
President Donald Trump's U.S. fiscal bill took a key step forward on Tuesday, carrying with it possible risks and rewards for investors.
The legislation, narrowly passed by the U.S. Senate, would extend Trump's 2017 personal and business tax cuts, otherwise due to expire at the end of this year, and give new tax breaks in areas such as tipped income and overtime. Investors hope the tax easing might provide stimulus that supports consumer spending.
But, according to nonpartisan analysts, the bill would add an estimated $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt. Growing deficits are continuing to cloud financial markets, especially after Moody's cut America's pristine sovereign credit rating in May.
The bill still must pass the House of Representatives, where Trump's Republican party holds a slim majority, and it remains to be seen if it will become law by Trump's hoped-for deadline of the July 4 Independence Day holiday.
Focus was also on the Federal Reserve, and when the U.S. central bank may next cut interest rates. At a central bank gathering in Portugal, Fed Chair Jerome Powell reiterated the need to understand the impact of Trump's tariffs on inflation before lowering rates.
But Powell also declined to rule out a possible rate cut at the Fed's July 29-30 meeting. Markets also seemed to include such a possibility: Fed Fund futures were baking in a roughly 20% chance of a cut at the July meeting, with chances deemed much more likely at the Fed's September meeting.
The rate path could become more clear with economic data in coming days, including the monthly U.S. jobs report on Thursday.
The dollar, which has fallen steeply this year, edged lower against a basket of major currencies.
In a mixed day on Wall Street, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq pulled back from record high levels, while another major U.S. index, the Dow Jones industrial average, moved closer to a record peak.
A 5% drop in Tesla shares weighed on the Nasdaq and S&P 500. Trump threatened to cut off subsidies for companies run by Tesla chief Elon Musk, escalating tensions between the one-time allies who have since fallen out.
Musk, who spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election, had renewed his criticism of the fiscal bill, which would eliminate subsidies for electric vehicle purchases that have benefited Tesla.
Tesla shares could get another jolt on Wednesday when the EV carmaker releases its quarterly delivery figures.
What could move markets tomorrow?
* ADP national employment report (June) * Challenger job cuts data (June) * ECB forum on central banking * Euro zone unemployment rate (May) * Japan monetary base (June) * Tesla quarterly deliveries
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here.
(By Lewis Krauskopf)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House summons House GOP holdouts threatening Trump megabill
A cross-section of House Republicans — from hardline conservatives to moderates — are headed to the White House on Wednesday to meet with President Trump about the party's 'big, beautiful bill' of tax cut and spending priorities. The meetings come as GOP leaders lean on Republican holdouts who have voiced serious opposition to the bill, threatening leadership's hopes of getting it to the president's desk by July 4. Hardliners are vowing to vote against the procedural rule for the bill, which would bring the House floor to a standstill. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus who voted against the rule in committee early Wednesday, said he was headed to the White House to meet with Trump, along with other lawmakers in the group. A source familiar with the matter told The Hill that the White House invited Freedom Caucus members to the gathering. Most Republican lawmakers relented on their concerns with the bill when it came up in the House the first time after Trump and the White House deployed a strong pressure campaign, cajoling the members to get on board. This time around, however, some members are demanding changes to the Senate-passed version of the legislation to win their support. Deficit hawks in the House Freedom Caucus and beyond are furious that the Senate version of the bill does not adhere to the House framework hammered out months ago, which called for dollar-for-dollar spending reductions to offset tax cuts. House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.) said that without those changes, a group of members in his caucus and beyond will sink the procedural rule vote to tee up debate on the bill, dealing an embarrassing blow to GOP leaders. 'Hopefully it goes back to Rules [Committee], gets moved closer to the House position, and the Senate gets called back into town,' Harris said. 'Senate never should have left town. The President asked us to stay until this issue was resolved and the Senate left town.' GOP sources, though, say leaders are not interested in making any changes — arguing that the Senate made the bill more conservative in some areas and more moderate in other areas, but it is overwhelmingly similar to what the House passed last month. Asked about the White House wanting the House to pass this version of the bill, Harris said: 'Well, the White House doesn't have a voting card.' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) met with a group of deficit hawks, including many in the House Freedom Caucus, Wednesday morning. He told The Hill on the way into the gathering that he planned to tell lawmakers 'we gotta get this done.' He departed the meeting more than 40 minutes later, telling The Hill it was 'productive, we're moving forward,' but being non-committal on if the House would vote on the procedural rule Wednesday, as planned. 'We'll see,' he said. Harris said nothing had changed in his stance after that meeting. Norman, meanwhile, said the Freedom Caucus has 'a three-point plan' of demands to win their support for the bill. In some policy debates of the past, GOP leaders have been able to win the support of 11th-hour holdouts by promising future reforms favored by the critics. But Norman said that won't work this time. Instead, he said conservatives will demand changes to the current bill, which would require it to return to the Senate. 'I'm done with promises,' Norman said. 'The best thing is to send the bill back [to the Senate].' 'What we will add is a three-point plan that [indicates]: this is what it will take to get a yes. And it's what the president wants.' It is not just deficit hawks headed across Pennsylvania Avenue: A group of moderate House Republicans — Reps. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), David Valadao (R-Calif.) and Dan Newhouse (R-Calif.) — were spotted entering the West Wing Wednesday morning, according to CNN. Centrists have raised concerns about the Medicaid cuts in the bill and the aggressive rollback of green-energy tax credits, some of which benefit their districts. Valadao staked his opposition to the Senate's bill over the weekend, voicing concerns about Medicaid provisions in the legislation. 'I support the reasonable provisions in H.R. 1 that protect Medicaid's long-term viability and ensure the program continues to serve our most vulnerable, but I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on, including provider taxes and state directed payments, or any provisions that punish expansion states,' Valadao said in a statement on Saturday. 'President Trump was clear when he said to root out our waste, fraud, and abuse without cutting Medicaid and I wholeheartedly agree,' he continued. 'I urge my Senate colleagues to stick to the Medicaid provisions in H.R. 1 — otherwise I will vote no.' Valadao and Newhouse are the two remaining House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Mike Lillis contributed.
Engadget
27 minutes ago
- Engadget
Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' is a middle finger to US solar energy
The so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will, if passed, make sweeping changes to the US' clean energy market. While some of the worst provisions affecting the industry were stripped out during Senate proceedings earlier this week, it's still pretty bad. In fact, the current language of the bill might as well be a middle figure to the domestic solar manufacturing industry. As it stands, the bill guts many of the clean energy programs of Joe Biden's signature 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. That includes killing off incentives for domestic and utility-scale solar power as well as the Clean Electricity Production Credit . Even worse, the bill axes the Domestic Content bonus that incentivized the use of US-made gear. There were a number of provisions that did not survive its journey through the Senate, like the excise tax on renewable energy. As CBS News reported, the levy would have imposed an additional charge on projects that used materials from foreign countries. As CNN explained, this would have cut renewable energy projects in favor of extending the life of coal and gas turbine plants. Rob Gardner is Vice President of Congressional and Regulatory Affairs for SEMA, the Solar Energy Manufacturers for America coalition. He walked me through the bill, explaining the effects of the changes for the US solar industry. 'A positive is that it maintains production tax credits for manufacturers of clean energy components,' he said. One tweak from an earlier version of the bill was the speed at which the existing tax credits would be withdrawn. As it stands, projects that are already approved will qualify for the present regime, as will any project beginning construction before June 2026. 'Basically, a year after enactment [companies have] to begin construction on utility-scale solar projects to receive the full amount of the credit,' said Gardner. And, according to § 70512 (4)(a) those plants will need to be 'placed in service' no later than December 31, 2027. The bigger issue, however, is that the bill creates 'uncertainty for long-term demand for US products,' according to Gardner. Put simply, American-made solar panels are more expensive than their Chinese counterparts due to higher manufacturing costs. By removing the incentives, including the Domestic Content bonus, the US is opening the door for Chinese-made alternatives. Gardner added 'after the tax credits that incentivize domestic production and consumption expire, you will see a flood of Chinese product [in the market.]' The US's Environmental Information Administration projects that the US' total domestic energy consumption will grow by almost two percent in the next year. A slowdown in new energy additions is the last thing the US needs, especially as renewables made up almost 90 percent of all new power generation capacity in 2024. But it's likely that even with all of the changes in the bill, solar will remain the biggest technology used to implement new power generation capacity. Abigail Ross Hopper, CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association pulls no punches in her statement . She said the bill 'undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback.' Hopper added that 'families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs and our electric grid will grow weaker.' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association described the bill as a 'step backward' for American energy policy and an 'intentional effort' to undermine 'one of the fastest-growing sources of electric power.' Environmental groups also believe the bill's passing marks a dark day in the world's fight against climate change. Greenpeace USA Deputy Climate Program Director John Noël, said in a statement that 'this is a vote that will live in infamy' for its role in 'doling out fossil fuel industry handouts.' Environmental Defense Fund's Vice President for Political and Government Affairs Joanna Slaney agreed. She said that the bill is 'effectively cutting off supply of cheap energy right when the US needs it most.' In contrast, the bill offers a '10-year reprieve from paying a fee on wasteful methane pollution,' a gas significantly more harmful than carbon dioxide to the environment. Research by clean energy company Cleanview suggests the bill may jeopardize up to 600GW of new renewable energy capacity. This is because of the tight deadlines the bill imposes to qualify for the existing credits, which again, need to begin construction before June 2026. That 600GW figure includes solar farms and battery storage projects in California and Texas that would need to be rushed to get working.
Fast Company
29 minutes ago
- Fast Company
China's Huawei Technologies must face fraud and racketeering charges, says U.S. judge
A U.S. judge has ruled that China's Huawei Technologies, a leading telecoms equipment company, must face criminal charges in a wide reaching case alleging it stole technology and engaged in racketeering, wire and bank fraud and other crimes. U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly on Tuesday rejected Huawei's request to dismiss the allegations in a 16-count federal indictment against the company, saying in a 52-page ruling that its arguments were premature. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The U.S. accuses Huawei and some of its subsidiaries of plotting to steal U.S. trade secrets, installing surveillance equipment that enabled Iran to spy on protesters during 2009 anti-government demonstrations in Iran, and of doing business in North Korea despite U.S. sanctions there. During President Donald Trump's first term in office, his administration raised national security concerns and began lobbying Western allies against including Huawei in their wireless, high-speed networks. In its January 2019 indictment, the Justice Department accused Huawei of using a Hong Kong shell company called Skycom to sell equipment to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions and charged its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, with fraud by misleading the HSBC bank about the company's business dealings in Iran. Meng, the daughter of Huawei's founder, was arrested in Canada in late 2018 on a U.S. extradition request but released in September 2021 in a high-stakes prisoner swap that freed two Canadians held by China and allowed her to return home. Chinese officials have accused the U.S. government of 'economic bullying' and of improperly using national security as a pretext for 'oppressing Chinese companies.' In their motion to dismiss the broad criminal case, among other arguments Huawei's lawyers contended that the U.S. allegations were too vague and some were 'impermissibly extraterritorial,' and do not involve domestic wire and bank fraud. The biggest maker of network gear, Huawei struggled to hold onto its market share under sanctions that have blocked its access to most U.S. processor chips and other technology. The limits led it to ramp up its own development of computer chips and other advanced technologies. The company also shifted its focus to the Chinese market and to network technology for hospitals, factories and other industrial customers and other products that would not be affected by U.S. sanctions.
