logo
IEAT focuses on South Korean investors

IEAT focuses on South Korean investors

Bangkok Post3 days ago
The Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (IEAT) is encouraging investors from South Korea to expand their businesses into Thailand, as a proposal to build a new complex to serve only South Korean entrepreneurs is being considered.
The new investment is being discussed among IEAT officials, South Korean authorities and representatives from the Thai Industrial Estate and Strategic Partner Association.
"The government supports all foreign investors who want to invest here, with entrepreneurs from South Korea a target market," said Sumet Thangprasert, governor of the IEAT.
South Korean executives want the government and private industrial estate developers to build a new industrial estate in the Eastern Economic Corridor.
Often known as the EEC, spanning parts of Chon Buri, Rayong and Chachoengsao provinces, it is envisioned as a high-tech industrial hub, housing 12 targeted S-curve industries, including next-generation cars and smart electronics.
The IEAT operates 68 industrial estates in 16 provinces across the country, including the Map Ta Phut industrial estate in Rayong.
Last year, Thai officials organised an investment roadshow in South Korea to invite business people to invest in Thailand. They met representatives from companies in various industries, including electric vehicle, electronics, digital technology, renewable energy, bioscience and pharmacy.
From January to March this year, South Korean firms submitted seven investment projects worth 1.2 billion baht to the Board of Investment (BoI) to apply for investment incentives.
Businesses included electrical appliances, machinery and parts as well as cars, according to the BoI.
South Korea is the 13th-largest trading partner of Thailand, with total trade value between the two countries tallying US$15 billion in 2024.
Between 2020 and 2024, Korean firms seeking BoI investment incentive packages submitted 141 investment projects worth 63 billion baht.
Among large South Korean companies in Thailand are Samsung, with 31 billion baht in investment value. Its subsidiary Samsung Electronics is known for its production of smartphones and home appliances.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Transformation is not a project. It's a power shift
Transformation is not a project. It's a power shift

Bangkok Post

time8 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

Transformation is not a project. It's a power shift

In boardrooms across Asia, 'transformation' is the buzzword of the decade. Every company is launching a new initiative. Digital. Cultural. AI-powered. But here's the uncomfortable truth: Most transformations fail not because of bad strategy, but because people never truly changed. They introduced new technology. Hired consultants. Rewrote organisational charts. But they never rewired how people think, decide or lead. So what actually works in 2025? Let me share two stories. Both are real. Both are recent. The first is a well-known Thai conglomerate with more than 30 business units and decades of success. The board had a bold vision. They wanted more speed, synergy and innovation across companies. But when we spoke to division heads, we heard the same thing: 'We protect our turf because no one else plays fair.' The culture was high-control and high-performance, but low-trust. Senior leaders did not challenge one another. Decisions were delayed. Even great ideas died quietly in layers of approval. Now contrast this with a fast-growing wellness company in Vietnam, founded by a Thai and German entrepreneur. The business started small with one boutique health café, then grew into a multi-brand lifestyle group in three countries. They did not have complex systems or layers of hierarchy. What they had was psychological safety. People spoke up. They experimented. Their leadership team held weekly failure forums, where they openly shared what did not work. In 18 months, they pivoted their product line three times and tripled their revenue. What made the difference? Not size. Not resources. Not even strategy. It was Mindset. The Three Real Levers of Transformation 1. From Control to Courage: Too many senior leaders, especially those over 60, still lead with authority rather than vulnerability. But transformation requires admitting, 'I don't know,' and co-creating answers. Courage today is not about being right. It is about letting go of being the only one who is right. Try this: In your next team meeting, ask, 'What's one thing we need to stop pretending is working?' Then listen without defending. Let truth breathe. 2. From Process to Purpose: One regional bank launched an AI-led transformation to cut costs. It worked at first. But soon, mid-level staff disengaged. Morale dropped. Why? Because no one connected the change to something meaningful. In 2025, people — especially Gen Z — want more than efficiency. They want purpose. Try this: Ask your transformation team, 'Who will this change benefit most, and why should they care?' Make purpose visible, not just profit. 3. From Silos to Synergy: Middle managers are the squeezed generation. They absorb pressure from the top and frustration from the bottom. But they are also the most powerful agents of cultural change — if you unlock them. Try this: One logistics firm in Thailand created 90-day cross-silo labs. They paired operations, sales and technology teams to solve one real customer pain point. No titles. No blame. Just focus. One lab saved the company 18 million baht in a single quarter and sparked collaboration habits that continued to grow. The bottom line is this: Transformation is not a campaign. It is a power shift. From ego to empathy. From knowing to learning. From hierarchy to co-creation. The most future-ready leaders are not the loudest or longest-serving. They are the ones willing to evolve. So the real question is not, 'Are you transforming?' It is this: 'Are you letting yourself be transformed?' or visit her LinkedIn profile.

US tariff opens 'opportunity' to reorient economy
US tariff opens 'opportunity' to reorient economy

Bangkok Post

time19 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

US tariff opens 'opportunity' to reorient economy

An economist is urging the government to adopt a three-phase strategy to cushion the impact of the newly-imposed 19% US tariff, warning that while the immediate effect may not be catastrophic, the move exposes deeper structural vulnerabilities. Asst Prof Kiatanantha Lounkaew, of Thammasat University's Faculty of Economics, said on Saturday the tariff, which came into effect on Friday, should not only be seen as a threat but as an opportunity to reorient the economy for long-term resilience. He proposed a phased response to mitigate shocks and drive structural reform. In the short term (0–6 months), he recommended a relief fund be set up by the Finance Ministry and Board of Investment to offer low-interest loans and liquidity support to affected exporters, particularly SMEs. Temporary tax relief and tariff cuts on essential raw materials should also be considered, along with aggressive market diversification into regions such as India, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America, he said. The medium-term plan (6–18 months) should focus on restructuring supply chains, reducing foreign dependency and promoting industries aligned with sustainability goals, he said. New investment incentives must align with global standards like ESG criteria and carbon border taxes, he added. He also stressed the need for workforce upskilling and the integration of digital tools like AI and big data. In the long run (1.5–5 years), Thailand must shift from being a low-cost manufacturing base to a regional hub for high-value services and innovation, he said. This requires robust investment in R&D, patent development and upstream technologies, he added. Asst Prof Kiatanantha also proposed the formation of a Thai-US economic dialogue platform and active engagement in multilateral forums to avoid future trade frictions.

Trump sacks data chief over poor job numbers
Trump sacks data chief over poor job numbers

Bangkok Post

timea day ago

  • Bangkok Post

Trump sacks data chief over poor job numbers

WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump has fired a top Labor Department official after the release of unexpectedly weak employment figures, accusing her without evidence of manipulating the figures to make his administration look bad. A White House official defended the move, saying there had been concerns for some time about the quality of economic data published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). In a second surprise economic policy development, the door for Trump to make an imprint on a Federal Reserve — with which he clashes almost daily for not lowering interest rates — opened earlier than anticipated when Fed Governor Adriana Kugler unexpectedly announced her resignation on Friday. The two developments further rattled a stock market already reeling from Trump's latest barrage of tariff announcements and the weak jobs data. The benchmark S&P 500 Index sank 1.6% in its largest daily drop in more than two months. Trump accused Erika McEntarfer, appointed by former president Joe Biden, of faking the jobs numbers. There is no evidence to back Trump's claims of data manipulation by the BLS, which compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data. A representative for the BLS did not respond to a request for comment. Friday began with BLS reporting the US economy created only 73,000 jobs in July, but more stunning were net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social network. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he said. He later added that the figures 'were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad'. US data agencies enjoy a global reputation for 'gold standard' statistics — one Trump may now be putting in danger — and economists of all stripes dismissed the idea of politically motivated manipulation. But a Trump administration official who requested anonymity said the White House has been dissatisfied with how large the revisions have been in the recent BLS data, and with lower survey responses. The problem started during the Covid pandemic and has not been addressed in the years since. 'There are these underlying problems that have been festering here for years now that have not been rectified,' the person said. 'The markets and companies and the government need accurate data, and we just weren't getting that.' The BLS has already reduced the sample collection for consumer price data as well as the producer price report, citing resource constraints. The government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies, representing approximately 631,000 individual worksites for the employment report. The response rate has declined from 80.3% in October 2020 to about 67.1% in July, BLS data shows. A Reuters poll last month found 89 of 100 top policy experts had at least some worries about the quality of US economic data, with most also concerned that authorities are not addressing the issue urgently enough. In addition to the concerns over job market data, headcount reductions at BLS have resulted in it scaling back the scope of data collection for the Consumer Price Index, one of the most important gauges of US inflation, watched by investors and policymakers worldwide. Trump's move fed into concerns that politics may influence data collection and publication. 'Politicising economic statistics is a self-defeating act,' said Michael Madowitz, principal economist at the Roosevelt Institute. 'Credibility is far easier to lose than rebuild, and the credibility of America's economic data is the foundation on which we've built the strongest economy in the world. Blinding the public about the state of the economy has a long track record, and it never ends well.' Meanwhile, Kugler's surprise decision to leave the Fed at the end of next week presents Trump an earlier-than-expected opportunity to install a potential successor to Fed chair Jerome Powell on the central bank's board of governors. Trump has threatened to fire Powell repeatedly because the Fed chief has overseen a policymaking body that has not cut interest rates as Trump has demanded. Powell's term expires next May, although he could remain on the Fed board until Jan 31, 2028, if he chooses. Trump will now get to select a Fed governor to replace Kugler and finish out her term, which expires on Jan 31, 2026. A governor filling an unexpired term may then be reappointed to a full 14-year term. Some speculation has centred on the idea Trump might pick a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place. Leading candidates for the next Fed chair include Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and Fed Governor Chris Waller, a Trump appointee who this week dissented with the central bank's decision to keep interest rates on hold, saying he preferred to start lowering them now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store