Man killed after exchanging gunfire with Border Patrol agents in McAllen, Texas
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' spokesperson says he was met with a standing ovation at jail after verdict
Sean 'Diddy' Combs received a standing ovation when he returned to the Metropolitan Detention Center after the verdict in his federal criminal trial last week, according to his spokesperson. Combs was acquitted of the more serious charges of which he was accused – racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. He was found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. A virtual hearing is scheduled for Tuesday at 2 p.m. ET for attorneys and the judge in the case to discuss a request to expedite his sentencing. He faces 10 years in prison on each count, though legal analysts predict he will get much less. The music mogul has been in custody at a federal detention center in Brooklyn since his arrest in September. During a bail hearing that followed the verdict last Wednesday, Combs' lawyers requested he be released on bail, arguing that he was not convicted of any violent offenses. The judge denied the request to release Combs on bail, telling defense attorney Marc Agnifilo that in his closing arguments he 'full-throatedly … told the jury that there was violence here. And domestic violence is violence. And you said this is a case that did involve violence.' At the time, Judge Arun Subramanian proposed an initial sentencing date for October 3. Prosecutors accused Combs of leading a criminal enterprise in which he allegedly used threats, violence, forced labor, bribery and other crimes to coerce his former girlfriends Cassie Ventura and a woman who testified under a pseudonym Jane to engage in drug-fueled sex performances with male escorts called 'Freak Offs' or 'hotel nights.' Combs pleaded not guilty to the charges. His lawyers argued the so-called 'Freak Offs' were consensual given his long-term relationships with both Ventura and Jane. Combs also faces dozens of civil lawsuits, for which he has denied all wrongdoing.
CBS News
32 minutes ago
- CBS News
"Unknown actor" using AI to impersonate Rubio, State Department cable shows
An "unknown actor" created a Signal account and used artificial intelligence to contact government and foreign officials impersonating Secretary of State Marco Rubio, according to a State Department cable obtained by CBS News. The cable was sent to "All Diplomatic and Consular Posts," and alerted them that the account was created in mid-June 2025 with the display name "The individual contacted at least five non-Department individuals, including three foreign ministers, a U.S. governor, and a U.S. member of Congress," the cable said. "The actor left voicemails on Signal for at least two targeted individuals, and in one instance, sent a text message inviting the individual to communicate on Signal." In a statement, the State Department said it is "aware of this incident and is currently investigating this matter." The Department said it "continuously takes steps to improve the department's cybersecurity posture to prevent future incidents." The story was first reported by The Washington Post. This is a breaking story. It will be updated.
Associated Press
32 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Federal judge dismisses lawsuit seeking to stop DOJ grant cancellations
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has allowed the Trump administration to rescind nearly $800 million dollars in grants for programs supporting violence reduction and crime victims. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington on Monday denied a preliminary injunction sought by five organizations on behalf of all recipients of the more than 360 grant awards, and granted a motion by the federal government to dismiss the case. Mehta called the Department of Justice's actions 'shameful,' but said the court lacked jurisdiction and the organizations had failed to state a constitutional violation or protection. 'Defendants' rescinding of these awards is shameful. It is likely to harm communities and individuals vulnerable to crime and violence,' Mehta wrote in his ruling. 'But displeasure and sympathy are not enough in a court of law.' The Justice Department's Office of Justice Programs cancelled the grants worth more than $800 million in April, saying it had changed its priorities to, among other things, more directly support certain law enforcement operations, combat violent crime and support American victims of trafficking and sexual assault. A message left seeking comment from Democracy Forward officials was not immediately returned. A Department of Justice spokesperson declined to comment on the ruling. The lawsuit filed by the Democracy Forward Foundation and the Perry Law firm argued that the grant terminations did not allow due process to the organizations and lacked sufficient clarity. The lawyers also said the move violated the constitutional separation of powers clause that gives Congress appropriation powers. Many of the organizations that lost the federal money said the unexpected cancellations mid-stream had meant layoffs, program closures and loss of community partnerships. The five organizations named as plaintiffs sought class status to represent all affected grant recipients. Attorneys General from at least 18 states and the District of Columbia had filed amicus briefs in support of the action, as well as local governments and prosecuting attorneys- several of whom had lost grants for victims programs, alternatives to prosecution programs or others. The Justice Department asked Mehta to dismiss the suit, arguing in a court filing that there was 'no legal basis for the Court to order DOJ to restore lawfully terminated grants and keep paying for programs that the Executive Branch views as inconsistent with the interests of the United States.' Noting that it intended to redirect the grant funds, it called the suit a 'run-of-the mill contract dispute' and said it belonged in a different court.
