IND vs ENG: 'Luckiest England cricketer ever', 'past his sell-by date' - Ex-England captains tear apart two Bazballers
have made a scathing attack on
and
after Ben Stokes and co. suffered a humiliating 337-run loss at Edgbaston in the second Test of the ongoing Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Boycott said opener Zak Crawley has not learnt a thing and has resorted to his old bad ways.
Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!
"At Headingley, he played straight with the full face of the bat, left wide balls, and let the ball come to him so he could keep his bat close to his pad," Boycott wrote in his column for The Telegraph.
"The two shots he got out to at Edgbaston were awful. In the first innings, his feet got stuck in cement, neither forward nor back, and then he wafted at the ball to be caught at slip.
"In the second innings, he batted on off stump and drove at a well-pitched-up ball two feet wide. He did not need to play it. He was on nought, had been fielding for five sessions, and his legs were tired, so he should have been thinking about surviving that evening.
"I don't think he can change or get better."
Shubman Gill, Gautam Gambhir shut critics with thumping win over England
The 27-year-old opener has played 56 Tests and still averages 31 in Test cricket, which Michael Vaughan said is just not good enough.
"There have been many players who have frustrated fans – including me – over the years, but he is right up there as the most frustrating I can remember. And in my time watching, playing for, and covering England, he is the player luckiest to have won as many caps as he has," Vaughan wrote in his column for The Telegraph.
"He has to count himself fortunate to have played 56 games, while scoring just five hundreds and averaging 31.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Among all the openers in history with more than 2,500 runs, he has the lowest average: 30.3. He's batted 102 times in Test cricket and been out in single digits 42 times."
Boycott used even sterner words for Chris Woakes, who he thinks is past his sell-by date.
"His pace is dropping, as you would expect as a seamer gets older. He has never been a wicket-taker abroad, where his record is poor. He is good – or has been good – on English pitches, and his batting has been handy at times as a safety valve when others have failed. His job should not be to shore up bad batting. Batsmen are there to score runs, and bowlers need to take wickets," said Boycott.
"Woakes has been a good cricketer, but not a master craftsman like James Anderson, who took buckets full of wickets home and away consistently."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
'He has only himself to blame': Rishabh Pant's reckless shot sparks debate
Rishabh Pant (Getty Images) NEW DELHI: India's Rishabh Pant suffered a foot fracture during the ongoing Manchester Test against England after attempting a reverse sweep on Day 1. The injury occurred when he was on 37, as Chris Woakes delivered a yorker that struck Pant's right toe, reportedly causing the fracture. Despite the setback, Pant resumed his innings on Day 2 and battled through the pain to notch up a gritty half-century before falling to Jofra Archer . His injury has now cast doubt over his availability for India's second innings and reignited conversations around the use of injury substitutes in Test cricket. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Former England captain Geoffrey Boycott, speaking on The Telegraph Podcast, criticised Pant's shot selection and said the injury was avoidable. 'It is always sad when a player gets hurt and affects his ability to play a part in the game—especially someone as talented as him. But he has only himself to blame,' Boycott said. Poll Do you think Rishabh Pant's injury could impact India's performance in the match? Yes, significantly Yes, but not too much No, it won't affect the team Not sure 'They were nicely in control, batting orthodox—there was no need to try something outrageous. Rishabh tries amazing strokes. When they come off, people are astonished and cheer him, and that is the essence of his batting. But when they don't, it can look silly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Smart Are You Really? This Test Will Surprise You Try Now Undo India were building a strong position. Some might say that's just his nature, but if he can't bat in both innings, it might cost India the match. He's that important,' he added. Shardul Thakur opens up on being under bowled, gives inside details on Rishabh Pant The incident has sparked fresh debate over allowing like-for-like substitutions in Tests. Speaking to TalkSport Cricket, former England batter David Lloyd offered his take: 'I'm probably against runners, but I'm in favour of substitutes for external injuries. It does open a can of worms, but if it's a break and medically he's out for six weeks, then maybe a like-for-like replacement is worth considering. Not something like replacing a batter with a spinner, though.' For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Rishabh Pant Has Only Himself To Blame": England Great Tears Into Injured India Star
Rishabh Pant 's foot injury has left a huge void in Team India's batting lineup in the ongoing Manchester Test against England. Pant, who was retired hurt after fracturing his foot on Day 1, walked out to bat on Day 2 despite being in visible pain. He batted for a while and completed his half-century before Jofra Archer uprooted his stumps with a peach of a delivery. It is not clear whether Pant will bat in the second innings. England great Geoffrey Boycott shared his views on Pant's injury, saying that while it was an unfortunate incident, the player has no one but himself to blame. "It is always sad when a player gets hurt and affects his ability to play a part in the game. Especially someone as talented as him. But he has only himself to blame," Boycott said on The Telegraph Podcast. Boycott pointed out that there was no need for Pant to play that short considering how India were in control at that moment. "They were nicely in control, batting orthodox, there was no need to try something outrageous. Rishabh tries amazing strokes. When they come off, people are astonished and he is cheered, and that is the essence of his batting. But occasionally when it does not, it can look silly. India, yesterday, was getting themselves to an excellent batting position. On one hand, many would say that is his nature, but on the other hand, him not batting in both innings might cost India the match. It will affect the runs they could add to that innings. He is that good," he added. Pant was batting at 37 on Day 1 when he was injured while attempting to reverse sweep a Chris Woakes yorker, which ended up hitting him on the toe and resulted in a reported fracture on his right foot. Pant's injury once again sparked the debate of whether substitutes should be allowed for injuries in Test cricket. Former England batter David Lloyd was in favour of the idea in case of an external injury like Pant. "I probably am against runners, but I am pro substitutes for an external injury. It opens up a can of worms, it really does. But if it is an external injury, a break, and medically he isn't going to be fit for six weeks, you could have a like-for-like substitute. So that's something else that you've got to consider. Not like replacing a batter with a spinner, though," said Lloyd while speaking to TalkSport Cricket.
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
Sunil Gavaskar Backs India Legend, Who Retired In 1975, To Fetch Rs 27 Crore In IPL Auction
India's wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant scripted history in the Indian Premier League last year after being bought for a massive sum of Rs 27 crore by Lucknow Super Giants in the auction held in November. He became the costliest player ever in the history of the tournament. While heaping praises on Farokh Engineer, Sunil Gavaskar claimed that the former India wicketkeeper-batter too would have got a similar amount had he been playing IPL. Gavaskar said it while doing commentatory during the India vs England 4th Test at Old Trafford, Manchester. "How much did Rishabh Pant go for (in IPL auction)? I think he'd go for something similar," said Gavaskar on Sony Sports as quoted by Sportskeeda. Farokh Engineer and legendary West Indies captain Clive Lloyd were on Wednesday honoured by the Lancashire County Cricket Club with stands named after them at the Old Trafford Stadium, on the opening day of the fourth Test between India and England. Engineer, who represented Lancashire from 1968 to 1976, played 175 matches, amassing 5,942 runs, 429 catches, and 35 stumpings. His arrival marked a turning point for the club, helping them win the Gillette Cup four times between 1970 and 1975 after a 15-year title drought. Despite his deep ties to Indian cricket, including the memorable outings he had at Mumbai's Brabourne Stadium, Engineer surprisingly does not have a stand named after him there. Lloyd, a two-time World Cup-winning captain, joined Lancashire in the early 1970s as an overseas player. Lloyd's two-decade-long association with the club was transformational as he played a crucial role in reshaping Lancashire's cricketing fortunes. The gesture immortalises the contributions made by both Engineer and Lloyd to the county, celebrating their legacies in English domestic cricket. Engineer, now 87, has made Manchester his home post-retirement and continues to reside there. Talking about Pant, the wicketkeeper-batter is one of the most important players in the Indian cricket Test team. He has also shone with his performance in IPL.
