
The cost of victory: Israel overpowered its foes but deepened its isolation
The new reality in Israel, said Yaakov Amidror, a retired Israeli general and former top aide to Netanyahu, is that places once under constant threat from Lebanon, Syria, or Gaza 'will be more secure than Manhattan.'
But at what cost?
Advertisement
Netanyahu's relentless and unapologetic military response to the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack that killed 1,200 people and took 250 people hostage has cemented the view of Israel as a pariah, its leadership accused of genocide and war crimes and disdained by some world leaders. In opinion polls globally, most people have a negative view of Israel.
In Gaza, the war against Hamas has taken a devastating toll, killing tens of thousands of people and leaving more than 1 million homeless and hungry. Much of the enclave has been reduced to rubble. Poverty and hopelessness are rampant.
Hundreds of Israeli soldiers have also been killed, and officials believe about 20 living hostages are still imprisoned in Hamas tunnels after more than 630 days.
Advertisement
Israel's actions have shattered a rock-solid, bipartisan consensus in the United States for defending Israel. Now support for the country has become a fiercely contentious issue in Congress, the subject of angry debates and protests on college campuses, and fuel for a surge in antisemitic incidents in the United States and around the world.
The political climate has become deeply polarized. Many supporters of Israel denounce any criticism as antisemitic hate, while those opposed to Israeli policies vow not to be silenced by a label they call unfair.
Inside Israel, the decision to prioritize military victories over the return of the hostages has deeply wounded many people. And the violence has strained the goodwill of the country's allies and neighbors.
Yet many Israelis welcome the prospect of a future in which they are no longer surrounded by well-armed enemies determined to do them harm, even if it means being viewed negatively by the rest of the world.
In 1981, Menachem Begin, the prime minister of Israel, urged Israelis to 'never pause to wonder what the world will think or say.' He told a group of American Jews that 'the world may not necessarily like the fighting Jew, but the world will have to take account of him.'
But 20 months of fighting in all directions has had consequences. Another generation of Palestinians living under occupation will see some radicalized to fight against Israel. Israel has created a new wave of global opinion critical of its goals and methods. And many Israelis now feel threatened while abroad, even as they are more secure at home.
Advertisement
Surging protests
One recent Saturday, thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters gathered in Russell Square in the heart of London. Their message: 'End the Genocide. Stop Arming Israel. Stop Starving Gaza.'
The rally was organized by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, which was founded in 1982. Ben Jamal, the director of the group, said Israel's actions have supercharged its efforts to isolate Israel from the world's democracies and force a change in its behavior with boycotts and calls for disinvestment.
Before the Oct. 7 attacks, the British group had 65,000 members; now it claims more than 300,000. Two years ago, there were 65 active branches in cities and towns around Britain. Today, there are more than 100.
'People see the scale of the slaughter,' said Jamal, who is Palestinian. 'And then they're hearing the genocidal rhetoric. They're hearing Israel's ministers saying, 'We're going to devastate everything. We're dealing with human animals. Nothing will be left.' And they're seeing the result of that.'
Israeli officials strongly deny the accusations of genocide and say they are fighting to eliminate the threat from Hamas and that the military takes precautions to mitigate civilian casualties.
The activist movement to isolate and censure Israel — known as BDS, for boycott, divestment, and sanctions — has been around for years. There has not been a widespread move by companies to cut ties with Israel, but the wars have given the movement new momentum.
The company that runs the British Co-op chain of groceries, one of the country's largest, announced last month that it would stop sourcing items from Israel, adding it to a list of rogue countries, including Afghanistan, Russia, Iran, and Libya.
In a Pew Research survey of 24 countries around the world published last month, negative opinions about Israel have surged. In 20 countries, more than half of the people said they had an unfavorable view of Israel. In eight countries — Australia, Greece, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey — more than 75 percent held that view.
Advertisement
Only two countries, Nigeria and Kenya, reported majorities with favorable views of Israel.
For Israel, the ripple effects have been felt in the Persian Gulf, where before Oct. 7, countries like Saudi Arabia appeared willing to establish diplomatic and economic ties with Israel.
Now most analysts believe that hopes for normal relations have been drastically set back as the war in Gaza has dragged on, in part because the Persian Gulf nations have tied the idea of diplomatic ties to a resolution of the Palestinian issue — a resolution that seems more distant than ever.
In the occupied West Bank, Netanyahu's government has emboldened Israeli settlers encroaching on land seen as integral to a future Palestinian state, and there has been a surge in violence by extremist settlers against Palestinian civilians. The Israeli military has launched the most intense crackdown on West Bank militancy in a generation, carrying out destructive raids, killing hundreds of people, and arresting thousands.
But Israel's diplomatic outlook in the region is not all grim. It is negotiating with Syria's new government about a potential truce. And once the Israel-Hamas war ends, normalization with Saudi Arabia could be back on the table.
Jamal said Netanyahu will have to live with the consequence of his military actions.
'On one level, he's been absolutely successful,' he said. 'But has he got the outcome he wanted? I'm not sure.'
Advertisement
'Paying the price'
Lior Soharin, 25, grew up fearing missiles in Nahariya, Israel, just south of the border with Lebanon. Hezbollah, once a powerful Iran-backed proxy group, routinely launched crude but dangerous rockets over the border. Israel frequently responded with devastating strikes of its own.
Soharin is now a student at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, studying law and economics. His 280-day service in the Israeli military reserves ended last month, and he said he is pleased that Hezbollah's military capabilities have been so diminished. But he does not feel safer yet.
'Hamas and Hezbollah and Iran — maybe they are not an existential threat right now,' he said. 'But after Oct. 7, our feeling of self-confidence, the feeling of security in Israel, was shaken very strongly, and it is very hard to build it back.'
Opinion surveys reveal the deep divisions that remain within the Israeli public even as the country's military strikes in Iran have boosted Netanyahu's popularity. In one poll, two-thirds of Israelis said they wanted to end the war in Gaza with a settlement that could bring the hostages home.
Within Israel, the war has exacerbated tensions between the government and members of Israel's Arab minority, some of whom have been arrested for social media posts about the war.
Nira Sharabi is the widow of Yossi Sharabi, who was kidnapped from their home in Kibbutz Be'eri on Oct. 7 and was killed after 100 days in captivity in Gaza in an Israeli airstrike. While she blames Hamas for her husband's death, she said she is frustrated by the failure to free the remaining hostages, calling it a cost of Netanyahu's actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran.
Advertisement
'As it looks now, they are paying the price,' she said of the hostages. 'Yes, the government is not dealing with them, but with other things. However we look at it, they are paying the price.'
Soharin said he, too, wants the Israel-Hamas war to end so the hostages can come home. He called the damage done to Hamas 'very, very good,' but he said the consequences for Israelis around the world have been serious.
'Israelis like to travel a lot to Europe and to other places, and I think to speak Hebrew in Europe now is pretty dangerous,' he said. 'You might get hurt.'
He is also angry about the accusations of brutality leveled by some against Israel and its citizens.
'We're not even close to doing the things we're being accused of. It's nonsense,' Soharin said. 'Of course, there is civilian death, and I think nobody should be happy. But that's war. It's a very, very bad situation. And we didn't start this war.'
Anger, activism, and violence
Just 46 percent of Americans in the latest Gallup survey expressed support for Israel, the lowest number since the company began asking the question a quarter-century ago. A third of the respondents in the United States said they sympathize with the plight of the Palestinians, up from just 13 percent in 2003.
Around the world, outrage at Israel's actions in Gaza has been expressed largely as peaceful protests demanding an end to the war, but also by praise for the Hamas attacks and even by some targeted attacks on Jews, killed in the name of opposition to Israel.
In Washington, D.C., two employees of the Israeli Embassy were fatally shot in May in an attack officials called a hate crime and terrorism. Authorities said the gunman told them, 'I did it for Palestine. I did it for Gaza.'
In Boulder, Colo., a man firebombed marchers who were calling for the release of Israeli hostages. One woman later died of her wounds.
There have also been Islamophobic attacks. Days after the Oct. 7 attack, a man in Chicago fatally stabbed a 6-year-old Palestinian American boy who lived at his property, an attack prosecutors said was motivated by hatred of Muslims.
Peaceful demonstrations have sometimes turned ugly, triggering clashes with police on some of America's most prestigious campuses. More than 100 people were arrested at Columbia University in 2024 after police were called into break up what organizers had called the 'Gaza Solidarity Encampment.'
At Britain's Glastonbury music festival last weekend, punk rap duo Bob Vylan chanted, 'Death to the IDF,' a reference to the Israeli military, prompting US officials to deny the band's visas for a tour set to begin in October.
On Oct. 7, 2024, a year after the attacks by Hamas inside Israel, the pro-Palestine group that had organized student encampments at Columbia University issued a statement calling for 'liberation by any means necessary, including armed resistance.'
The statements were meant to shock and provoke. They were at the extreme end of the spectrum and do not represent the views of most students, experts say.
But they underscore an undeniable shift in opinion about Israel. Many surveys have found that non-Jewish students sympathize with Palestinians, while Jews on many campuses say they feel ostracized and socially isolated.
The Trump administration has seized on the campus divisions to accuse universities of failing to respond to antisemitism. In May, the Department of Health and Human Services concluded that Columbia University had acted 'with deliberate indifference towards student-on-student harassment of Jewish students.'
Democratic lawmakers say Trump is exaggerating the situation for political gain. In April, five Jewish senators wrote in a letter to the president that his stated goal of fighting antisemitism was 'simply a means to an end to attack our nation's universities.'
Diplomatic scolding
Long before Oct. 7, Israel had been the target of official international condemnation. Over decades, the United Nations has passed dozens of resolutions criticizing Israel.
But the denunciation has intensified as international organizations and world leaders have repeatedly called on Israel to restrain its military and end the war in Gaza.
In 2024, Spain, Norway, and Ireland formally recognized a Palestinian state, a sharp but largely symbolic gesture designed to pressure Israel to cease the fighting. President Emmanuel Macron of France has made it clear he intends to do the same soon.
Macron's position and the actions of the other European leaders have enraged members of Netanyahu's government, who accused the French president of leading 'a crusade against the Jewish state.'
But many Israelis, like Amidror, the retired general, shrug off the criticism.
'The ability of Israel to defend itself and to get rid' of its enemies, he said, 'is much, much, much, much more important than the international community's view about Israel.'
This article originally appeared in
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
No proof Hamas routinely stole UN aid, Israeli military officials say
Now, with hunger at crisis levels in the territory, Israel is coming under increased international pressure over its conduct of the war in Gaza and the humanitarian suffering it has brought. Doctors in the territory say that an increasing number of their patients are suffering from -- and dying of -- starvation. More than 100 aid agencies and rights groups warned this past week of 'mass starvation' and implored Israel to lift restrictions on humanitarian assistance. The European Union and at least 28 governments, including Israeli allies like Britain, France, and Canada, issued a joint statement condemning Israel's 'drip-feeding of aid' to Gaza's 2 million Palestinian residents. Advertisement Israel has largely brushed off the criticism. David Mencer, a government spokesperson, said this past week that there was 'no famine caused by Israel.' Instead, he blamed Hamas and poor coordination by the United Nations for any food shortages. Advertisement Israel moved in May toward replacing the UN-led aid system that had been in place for most of the 21-month war in Gaza, opting instead to back a private, American-run operation guarded by armed US contractors in areas controlled by Israeli military forces. Some aid still comes into Gaza through the United Nations and other organizations. The new system has proved to be much deadlier for Palestinians trying to obtain food handouts. According to the Gaza Health Ministry, almost 1,100 people have been killed by gunfire on their way to get food handouts under the new system, in many cases by Israeli soldiers who opened fire on hungry crowds. Israeli officials have said they fired shots in the air in some instances because the crowds came too close or endangered their forces. The military officials who spoke to The New York Times said that the original UN aid operation was relatively reliable and less vulnerable to Hamas interference than the operations of many of the other groups bringing aid into Gaza. That's largely because the United Nations managed its own supply chain and handled distribution directly inside Gaza. Hamas did steal from some of the smaller organizations that donated aid, as those groups were not always on the ground to oversee distribution, according to the senior Israeli officials and others involved in the matter. But, they say, there was no evidence that Hamas regularly stole from the United Nations, which provided the largest chunk of the aid. A Hamas representative did not immediately respond to requests for comment. An internal US government analysis came to a similar conclusion, Reuters reported Friday. It found no evidence of systematic Hamas theft of US-funded humanitarian supplies, the report said. Advertisement 'For months, we and other organizations were dragged through the mud by accusations that Hamas steals from us,' said Georgios Petropoulos, a former UN official in Gaza who oversaw aid coordination with Israel for nearly 13 months of war. The senior military officials and others interviewed by the Times spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly on behalf of the military or government. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In a statement, the military said that it has been 'well documented' that Hamas has routinely 'exploited humanitarian aid to fund terrorist activities.' But the military did not dispute the assessment that there was no evidence that Hamas regularly stole aid from the United Nations. The Israeli government and military have often clashed over how to conduct the war in Gaza. Early last year, top commanders urged a cease-fire with Hamas to secure the release of hostages. Netanyahu's government instead expanded the ground operation in southern Gaza. Israel used the rationale that Hamas steals aid when it cut off all food and other supplies to Gaza between March and May. In March, after a cease-fire between Hamas and Israel collapsed, Netanyahu said: 'Hamas is currently taking control of all supplies and goods entering Gaza,' and he declared that Israel would prevent anything from entering the territory. That blockade, and problems with a new aid system that launched in May, brought hunger and starvation in Gaza to the current crisis levels. For most of the war, the UN was the largest single source of aid entering Gaza, according to data from the Israeli military unit that oversees policy in the territory. Advertisement Now, the new aid system is managed instead by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a private American company led by a former CIA agent. It was intended to eventually replace international aid organizations and the UN role. But it has only a few distribution hubs, compared with hundreds under the former UN-run operation. The new system's rollout at the end of May was quickly followed by near-daily episodes of deadly violence near distribution sites. Desperate and hungry Palestinians must go to the few aid distribution sites located in areas controlled by Israeli forces. The hours of operation are limited and supplies run out, so crowds arrive early, with some walking for miles to get there. Since May 19, when Israel allowed emergency supplies to resume entering Gaza after its two-month blockade, half of the aid has been distributed by the United Nations and international organizations, with the other half coming through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Israeli military says. Petropoulos welcomed the notion that some Israeli officials had recognized the UN-led aid system as effective during the war. But he said he wished that endorsement had come much sooner. 'If the UN had been taken at face value months ago, we wouldn't have wasted all this time and Gazans wouldn't be starving and being shot at trying to feed their families,' he said. This article originally appeared in


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
How France's recognition of the state of Palestine could shift Middle East dynamics
PARIS — France's bold decision to recognize the state of Palestine could help to shift conversations about the future of the Middle East, even if it's unlikely to have an immediate impact for people in Gaza or on Israel's war with Hamas. In a world where nations are again using military force to impose their will on others — notably Russia in Ukraine, and the U.S. and Israel with their recent strikes on Iran and its nuclear facilities — French President Emmanuel Macron is attempting to strike a blow for diplomacy and the idea that war rarely brings peace. With less than two years left of his second and last term as president, Macron also has his legacy to think about. Not acting decisively as a humanitarian disaster unfolds in Gaza could be a stain when history books are written. Macron has levers to influence world affairs as leader of a nuclear-armed, economically and diplomatically powerful country that also sits at the big table at the United Nations, as one of the five permanent members of its security council. Being the first member of the G7 group of industrialized nations to take this leap carries domestic risks. Presiding over a country with both Europe's largest Jewish population and largest Muslim population, Macron is on a public opinion tightrope. His words will please some voters but infuriate others — a fact reflected by deeply divided political reactions in France to his decision announced on X on Thursday evening. But after staunchly backing Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas and its Oct. 7, 2023, attack that triggered the war, Macron is signaling that France's support can only go so far. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denounced the shift by one of his country's closer allies in Europe. 'Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became,' he said in a statement. 'A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel — not to live in peace beside it.'' The idea that Palestinians and Israelis could live side by side in peace in their own states has perhaps never looked more unrealistic — with Gaza in ruins and the occupied West Bank facing increasing settlement by Israelis. Macron's words alone won't change that. Still, the French leader's message is that the hope of a 'two-state solution' achieved through diplomacy must not be allowed to die — however unattainable it may seem. 'This solution is the only path that can address the legitimate aspirations of both the Israelis and the Palestinians. It must now be brought about as quickly as possible,' Macron said in a letter to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas which confirmed his decision to recognize Palestine as a state. 'The prospect of a negotiated solution to the conflict in the Middle East seems increasingly distant. I cannot resign myself to that,' he said. The first impacts are likeliest not in Gaza but in world capitals where leaders may face pressure or feel emboldened to follow France's lead. Attention is focusing on other G7 nations, because of their economic and diplomatic sway. 'Macron's declaration could create a precedent because it would be the first Western country in the G7 to do so, which could have the effect of leading others,' said David Rigoulet-Roze, a researcher at the French Institute of Strategic Analysis. Although more than 140 countries recognize Palestine as a state, France will be the biggest, most populous and most powerful among those in Europe that have taken this step. 'It creates some small momentum,' said Yossi Mekelberg, a senior consulting fellow at the Chatham House think tank in London who also added, however, that 'this is not enough.' 'France should be congratulated, and Macron should be congratulated for doing that and showing the courage,' he said. Until now, China and Russia were the only permanent members of the U.N. Security Council that recognized Palestinian statehood. France will join them when Macron makes good on his promise in September at the U.N. General Assembly. The new trio will leave the U.S. and the U.K. in a security council minority as its only permanent members that don't recognize Palestine as a state. The so-called P5 nations are divided on many other issues — including Ukraine, trade and climate change — so France's shift isn't, in itself, likely to spur radical and rapid change for Palestinians. Still, if only mathematically, the U.S. — Israel's most important ally — and the U.K could find themselves more isolated among the big powers in any discussions on solutions for the Middle East. U.S. President Donald Trump dismissed Macron's decision on Friday, saying 'What he says doesn't matter. It's not going to change anything.' France may have better traction with the U.K. Putting Brexit behind them, the U.K. and France are now drawing closer, most notably in support for Ukraine. If British Prime Minister Keir Starmer follows Macron's example, Trump could become the odd man out on Palestinian statehood among the security council's big five powers. Starmer has signaled growing disquiet over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, saying in a statement Thursday that suffering and starvation there 'is unspeakable and indefensible.' But he doesn't seem ready to take a leap like Macron, suggesting that fighting must stop first. 'Statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people,' Starmer said. 'A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution.'

an hour ago
USAID analysis finds no evidence of widespread aid diversion by Hamas in Gaza
An analysis compiled by USAID officials examining more than 150 reported incidents involving the theft or loss of U.S.-funded humanitarian aid in the war-torn Gaza Strip says it failed to find any evidence that Hamas -- the militant rulers of the Palestinian enclave -- engaged in widespread diversion of assistance, according to a presentation reviewed by ABC News. The findings of the report appear to undercut the Trump administration's repeated claims that Hamas has regularly interfered with aid distribution in the past -- assertions it has used to justify its support for the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and for measures undertaken by Israel to limit the flow of assistance to neighboring Gaza through other pathways. The GHF -- with Israel's approval and despite rejection from the United Nations -- took over most of the aid distribution system in Gaza on May 27, after an 11-week Israeli blockade on all supplies from entering the strip. Israel has long accused Hamas of stealing aid provided by the U.N. -- formerly the main distributor -- and others to fund its militant activity -- claims which Hamas denies. Israel has allowed a limited amount of supplies into Gaza since lifting the blockade and, according to an Israeli security official, is "coordinating future airdrops of aid" by foreign countries "that are expected to take place in the coming days." This comes after a coalition of more than 100 organizations warned this week that "mass starvation" is spreading in Gaza with "supplies now totally depleted." USAID officials behind the presentation say they analyzed alleged incidents of fraud, abuse and waste reported between October 2023, when the ongoing Israel-Hamas war began, and last May. It was compiled before the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) -- once the world's largest single donor of humanitarian aid -- officially ceased independent operations on July 1. The Trump administration canceled more than 80% of the agency's programs, while the remainder were absorbed by the U.S. Department of State. USAID officials say their findings indicate that in the majority of cases involving the loss of aid, the perpetrator could not be definitively identified. The Israel Defense Forces denied the report in a statement to ABC News, saying "not only does the report ignore clear and explicit evidence that Hamas exploits humanitarian aid to sustain its fighting capabilities, it goes so far as to criticize the IDF for routing decisions made specifically to protect humanitarian staff and shipments." The IDF added that when it "directs aid deliveries along specific routes, it is based on the operational reality and intelligence assessments, aimed at safeguarding both the aid and the humanitarian actors — precisely the issue the report claims is not being addressed." The State Department is also pushing back forcefully on the analysis, which was first reported by Reuters, as well as media coverage related to the matter. A State Department spokesperson called it "astonishing" that "the media is busy debating whether the masterminds of Oct. 7 are somehow too principled to loot." "There is endless video evidence of Hamas looting, not to mention members of the aid-industrial complex who have admitted that looting exists by reporting it as 'self-distribution,' in a poor attempt at an aid corruption coverup," the spokesperson said. "Available intelligence confirms what is reflected in open-source information: that a significant portion of non-GHF aid trucks have been diverted, looted, stolen, or 'self-distributed.'" Despite this, the Trump administration -- a staunch ally of Israel -- has provided no evidence of Hamas carrying out widespread aid diversion to date. The IDF said it is "making tremendous efforts to enable the safe distribution of humanitarian aid under complex operational conditions." The ongoing Gaza war erupted after Hamas led a surprise terror attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people there and taking 251 others hostage, according to figures from the Israeli government. Since then, Israeli forces have killed more than 59,000 people in Gaza, according to data released by the strip's Hamas-run Ministry of Health.