Monarchy set to receive £132m for second year in a row in 2026-27
Members of the royal family on the balcony of Buckingham Palace to mark the 80th anniversary of VE Day (Ben Birchall/PA)
The monarchy is already receiving an increase in the current 2025-26 financial year, with around £132 million in Sovereign Grant funding – £45.7 million more than the £86.3 million in 2024-25, thanks to £1.1 billion Crown Estate profits in 2023-24.
This puts the total extra over the next two years (2025-26 and 2026-27) at £91.4 million.
But Crown Estate profits are set to drop back sharply in the future as the short-term boost from offshore wind farms fades.
The 'temporary uplift' to the Sovereign Grant will be used to help fund the remaining £100 million of the £369 million refurbishment of Buckingham Palace, but also for an enhanced programme of works at other occupied royal palaces after the Covid pandemic halted progress.
James Chalmers, the King's new Keeper of the Privy Purse, said: 'The temporary uplift in the grant will also help repay the shortfalls from the years during which the Sovereign Grant remained fixed at £86 million, and to finance, among other projects, an enhanced programme of works to protect and preserve heritage buildings across the Occupied Royal Palaces.
The East Wing of Buckingham Palace opened to visitors last year as part of the next phase of reservicing (Jonathan Brady/PA)
'Many of these works fell out of scope of the reservicing programme and had to be paused as a consequence of the Covid impact and budgetary constraints.
'In funding their completion, the Royal Household is able to invest in the protection and preservation of properties held in trust for the nation, while supporting skilled jobs in conservation and traditional crafts across the UK.'
The Sovereign funding was reduced from 25% to 12% of the Crown Estate's net profit in 2023, in a review of royal finances by Royal Trustees, to take account of huge profits from offshore wind farm deals.
The King asked for the extra profits to be used for the wider public good, but he will still receive more than £90 million extra.
Predictions in the 2023 review had set the expected Crown Estate profits in 2023-24 as £1.04 billion and 2024-25 as £1.05 billion.
The total Sovereign Grant for 2024/25, relating to Crown Estate profits in 2022/23, remained flat at £86.3 million because of a caveat which means it cannot fall below current levels.
The Crown Estate is a multibillion-pound property, land and rights portfolio which includes Regent Street in London's West End and Ascot Racecourse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
30 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Major furniture maker that supplies ‘leading brands' across UK abruptly ceases trading with ALL workers to lose jobs
The firm is about to go into liquidation DOORS CLOSING Major furniture maker that supplies 'leading brands' across UK abruptly ceases trading with ALL workers to lose jobs Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR manufacturer has suddenly shut down due to "very difficult" market conditions. Andrew Paul Furniture, which supplied "leading brands" across the UK, had to cease trading. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 A major furniture maker had to stop trading due to decline in sales Credit: Getty The major furniture maker, which manufactured chairs and sofas for well-known brands, has closed down after a decline in sales. Andrew Paul Furniture employs 178 highly skilled wood machinists, frame makers and upholsterers in Long Eaton who will now lose their livelihood. The firm stopped trading on June 26 after 15 years on the market and is about to go into liquidation. This means that all employees will be let off and the company's assets will be liquidated in an effort to pay off its debts. Post-Covid struggles According to the company's financial records for 2024, Andrew Paul Furniture has provided goods to "leading brands" and is a part of the "recognised centre of excellence for upholstered furniture" in Long Eaton. The furniture maker produced "modern designs to high specifications" by combining traditional craft and the latest technology. But the firm struggled with a challenging market climate following Covid-19. In the report, bosses said: "Like all manufacturers in the furniture trade, business has been very difficult and cutbacks in all areas of the business have had to be made. "The company has experienced a slight downturn in trade and in recent years has made losses." The firm owes £2million in debt The financial filings have also revealed that the firm owes creditors over £2million over the course of the next year. The lion's share of this money, around £1million, is owed to other businesses which had worked with the furniture maker. The company had implemented a restructuring programme in a bid to save itself from bankruptcy and even moved its production to Meadow Lane premises to reduce costs. However, in the same financial report the firm had admitted that its future was uncertain. Despite the efforts, Andrew Paul Furniture saw a decrease in turnover from £14,242,283 in 2023 to £12,944,655 in the previous year.
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
U.S. job growth expected to have slowed in June as economy sends mixed signals
The U.S. economy continues to send mixed signals. On Thursday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will report job figures for June that may help clear up the picture. Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal forecast that 110,000 new payrolls were added in June. That would be the fewest since February, and it would be the fourth monthly decline in the past six months. The unemployment rate, meanwhile, was expected to have climbed to 4.3%, the highest since October 2021. Consumers and businesses are still grappling with the uncertainty caused by President Donald Trump's policies, something further reflected in volatile data. On one hand, the inflation rate has so far proven stable, while average earnings continue to grow at a healthy clip. Stocks have returned to all-time highs, and in testimony last week, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell described overall economic conditions as 'solid.' 'Look at labor force participation, look at wages, look at job creation,' Powell said. 'They're all at healthy levels now. I would say you can see perhaps a very, very slow continued cooling but nothing that's troubling at this time.' On the other hand, Powell's assertions have not sat well with Trump, who has continued to harangue him to lower the federal interest rate. On Wednesday evening, the president said Powell should "resign immediately." Commentary from U.S. firms and various other data points paint a more worrisome portrait of the economy. The latest survey of manufacturers from the Institute for Supply Chain Management found some firms describing the business environment as 'hellacious' and 'too volatile' for long-term procurement decisions. On Wednesday, the private payrolls processor ADP reported a net decline in jobs added, which hasn't occurred since March 2023 — and before that, the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic. The May job growth figure was revised even lower, to just 29,000 jobs added, from 37,000. 'Though layoffs continue to be rare, a hesitancy to hire and a reluctance to replace departing workers led to job losses last month,' Nela Richardson, ADP's chief economist, said in a news release published Wednesday morning. Clarity about tariffs was supposed to have arrived by next week, with Trump having set July 9 as the deadline to negotiate new deals. While he said this week he does not plan to extend the deadline, the White House said last week that the key date was 'not critical.' Meanwhile, Trump's tax cut and spending bill continues to be debated in Congress even as it has cleared some key hurdles. 'Companies need business visibility in taxes and policy if they are going to take the risk of hiring a new employee,' Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer of Bleakley Financial Group, wrote in a note to clients. 'And tariffs, on again/off again, have just thrown mud into the gears of business activity.' The ADP report has a mixed track record of predicting the official BLS figure, which is usually published a day or two later. Earlier in the week, the BLS reported data showing a somewhat more sound picture of the job market, with job openings having unexpectedly increased in June. Yet, even then, the bulk of those openings were in the leisure and hospitality sector, while openings declined in manufacturing and professional and business services. 'The leisure/hospitality sector alone cannot support the labor market amidst a broader weakening,' analysts with Citi Research wrote in a note to clients. An additional hiring report released this week by the job consultancy Challenger, Gray and Christmas showed that through June, U.S. employers have announced 82,932 planned hires, a 19% increase over the 69,920 announced at this point in 2024. Yet that rate remains historically low, it said. 'Hiring announcements in 2025 suggest a cautious but stabilizing labor market,' firm Senior Vice President Andrew Challenger said in a release. 'While companies are clearly adding workers at a higher rate than in 2024, the restraint shown relative to previous years indicates continued uncertainty around costs, automation, and the broader economic outlook. Without a strong economic driver, hiring may remain measured through the rest of the year.'
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Royal family doesn't cost taxpayer too much - tourists want monarchist power'
The annual royal accounts have revealed the Firm cost the taxpayer £86.3 million last year, as King Charles derails the Royal Train in a bid to save cash - and we asked Mirror readers to share their thoughts The royal family spent a staggering £2.7 million on travel last year, including journeys by private jet, helicopter, and train, the newly released royal accounts have revealed - and we asked Mirror readers if the Firm is costing the taxpayer too much. Last year's accounts show that the royals cost the taxpayer £86.3 million for the fourth consecutive year, while the King and Queen's trip to Australia and Samoa in October came with a hefty £400,000 price tag. Following the publication of the annual accounts, it was announced that King Charles plans to derail the Royal Train after nearly 125 years of service in a bid to save cash. The nine-carriage locomotive, which was once Queen Elizabeth II's preferred mode of travel, was only in action twice in the last year but cost £78,000. It comes as the King attempts to "modernise" the Royal Family, as Keeper of the Privy Purse James Chalmers said: "The time has come to bid the fondest of farewells as we seek to be disciplined and forward-looking in our allocation of funding." The Sovereign Grant, which pays for the royal family's official duties and the upkeep of royal palaces, is met from public funds in exchange for the King's surrender of the revenue from the Crown Estate. The royals then in return get 12 per cent of this revenue back to run their affairs including travel, engagements at home and abroad and welcoming tens of thousands of people to the royal palaces. Record offshore wind farm profits have seen the Crown Estate net profits for the last financial year and hit £1.1 billion - meaning a record breaking Sovereign Grant of £132million will be handed out next year and the year after. Palace aides say the extra cash will go towards paying for the £369million refit of Buckingham Palace and the upkeep of other royal residences. However, former Minister of State for Home Affairs Norman Baker slammed Buckingham Palace 'pretending to be prudent' as 'utter hogwash'. He wrote in the Mirror: "Reality check: the Crown Estate has in effect been a public body since 1760, and until 2011, 100% of its profits went to the Treasury to pay for schools, hospitals, defence and, yes, disability benefits. This 12% is a new royal tax on the public purse." We asked Mirror readers if they think the royal family is costing the taxpayer too much, and 62 percent said 'No'. Around 3,169 people took part in our poll, and 1,955 selected the option 'No - I don't think so'. Voicing their thoughts in the comments section, one user said: 'The RF are the head of the UK and I love what we have, I am a royalist and I'm very proud to say so. I think the RF bring a lot of tourists to our country. King Charles has scaled down the working royals and has been scaling down on some ceremonies and Prince William has plans to scale back even more and wants to modernise the RF and make it less austere, it seems William and Catherine are doing that already.' Another echoed: 'Westminster Abbey, one of the most popular attractions for oversees tourists, a symbol of British history & the final resting place of revered monarchs, including Queen Elizabeth I & her half sister Queen Mary & famed British icons (Charles Dickens). An unprecedented symbol of hierarchical succession & constitutional monarchy with every coronation conducted there & all monarchs anointed. Tourists want to see symbols of monarchist power, influence & status.' 'Many presidents of other countries are costing a lot more. If you don't take my word, do your research. On top of that tourists don't go visiting countries wanting to see any president, but they may do to see a king. Also The cost isn't only about the king head of state, but other working royals doing complimentary work for the king,' wrote a third. Another added: 'If the Royals bring in more from tourism than is spent on them, that has got to be a win." However, 38 percent said the Firm is costing the taxpayer too much, as one reader fumed: 'All of the information out there and people still believe we aren't giving these over privileged people too much money, throwing millions at them each year doesn't make them any better.' Get Royal Family updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the royals get back to their normal duties after a difficult year, the Mirror has launched its very own Royal WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news on the UK's most famous family. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. A second wrote: 'It is absolutely ridiculous to believe anyone is coming to the UK to catch a glimpse of the King! or the Royal Family! They aren't in a zoo and they aren't magical beings from Fairyland. How absurd. No matter how you feel about elected Heads of State, at least they aren't automatically put in office just for coming out of the womb, and getting oiled up while pals hold up the sheets. Nobody's spending money and wasting time coming to Britain for that.' Another voiced: 'The monarchy supporters distort the figures. Vastly over estimate any money they bring in (if any), under estimate what they cost. If they were abolished the country would benefit from the companies they own and the taxes they don't pay.' Do you think the royal family is costing the taxpayer too much? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below and you can still vote in our poll HERE to have your say. Please note that the poll is still live, so these results may change after the article has been published.
