logo
'Royal family doesn't cost taxpayer too much - tourists want monarchist power'

'Royal family doesn't cost taxpayer too much - tourists want monarchist power'

Daily Mirror14 hours ago
The annual royal accounts have revealed the Firm cost the taxpayer £86.3 million last year, as King Charles derails the Royal Train in a bid to save cash - and we asked Mirror readers to share their thoughts
The royal family spent a staggering £2.7 million on travel last year, including journeys by private jet, helicopter, and train, the newly released royal accounts have revealed - and we asked Mirror readers if the Firm is costing the taxpayer too much.
Last year's accounts show that the royals cost the taxpayer £86.3 million for the fourth consecutive year, while the King and Queen's trip to Australia and Samoa in October came with a hefty £400,000 price tag. Following the publication of the annual accounts, it was announced that King Charles plans to derail the Royal Train after nearly 125 years of service in a bid to save cash.

The nine-carriage locomotive, which was once Queen Elizabeth II's preferred mode of travel, was only in action twice in the last year but cost £78,000. It comes as the King attempts to "modernise" the Royal Family, as Keeper of the Privy Purse James Chalmers said: "The time has come to bid the fondest of farewells as we seek to be disciplined and forward-looking in our allocation of funding."

The Sovereign Grant, which pays for the royal family's official duties and the upkeep of royal palaces, is met from public funds in exchange for the King's surrender of the revenue from the Crown Estate. The royals then in return get 12 per cent of this revenue back to run their affairs including travel, engagements at home and abroad and welcoming tens of thousands of people to the royal palaces.
Record offshore wind farm profits have seen the Crown Estate net profits for the last financial year and hit £1.1 billion - meaning a record breaking Sovereign Grant of £132million will be handed out next year and the year after. Palace aides say the extra cash will go towards paying for the £369million refit of Buckingham Palace and the upkeep of other royal residences.
However, former Minister of State for Home Affairs Norman Baker slammed Buckingham Palace 'pretending to be prudent' as 'utter hogwash'. He wrote in the Mirror: "Reality check: the Crown Estate has in effect been a public body since 1760, and until 2011, 100% of its profits went to the Treasury to pay for schools, hospitals, defence and, yes, disability benefits. This 12% is a new royal tax on the public purse."
We asked Mirror readers if they think the royal family is costing the taxpayer too much, and 62 percent said 'No'. Around 3,169 people took part in our poll, and 1,955 selected the option 'No - I don't think so'.
Voicing their thoughts in the comments section, one user said: 'The RF are the head of the UK and I love what we have, I am a royalist and I'm very proud to say so. I think the RF bring a lot of tourists to our country. King Charles has scaled down the working royals and has been scaling down on some ceremonies and Prince William has plans to scale back even more and wants to modernise the RF and make it less austere, it seems William and Catherine are doing that already.'

Another echoed: 'Westminster Abbey, one of the most popular attractions for oversees tourists, a symbol of British history & the final resting place of revered monarchs, including Queen Elizabeth I & her half sister Queen Mary & famed British icons (Charles Dickens). An unprecedented symbol of hierarchical succession & constitutional monarchy with every coronation conducted there & all monarchs anointed. Tourists want to see symbols of monarchist power, influence & status.'
'Many presidents of other countries are costing a lot more. If you don't take my word, do your research. On top of that tourists don't go visiting countries wanting to see any president, but they may do to see a king. Also The cost isn't only about the king head of state, but other working royals doing complimentary work for the king,' wrote a third.
Another added: 'If the Royals bring in more from tourism than is spent on them, that has got to be a win." However, 38 percent said the Firm is costing the taxpayer too much, as one reader fumed: 'All of the information out there and people still believe we aren't giving these over privileged people too much money, throwing millions at them each year doesn't make them any better.'

Get Royal Family updates straight to your WhatsApp!
As the royals get back to their normal duties after a difficult year, the Mirror has launched its very own Royal WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news on the UK's most famous family.
We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in.
All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group.
We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
A second wrote: 'It is absolutely ridiculous to believe anyone is coming to the UK to catch a glimpse of the King! or the Royal Family! They aren't in a zoo and they aren't magical beings from Fairyland. How absurd. No matter how you feel about elected Heads of State, at least they aren't automatically put in office just for coming out of the womb, and getting oiled up while pals hold up the sheets. Nobody's spending money and wasting time coming to Britain for that.'
Another voiced: 'The monarchy supporters distort the figures. Vastly over estimate any money they bring in (if any), under estimate what they cost. If they were abolished the country would benefit from the companies they own and the taxes they don't pay.'
Do you think the royal family is costing the taxpayer too much? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below and you can still vote in our poll HERE to have your say.
Please note that the poll is still live, so these results may change after the article has been published.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Little-known UK beach perfect for a sunny day that is only accessible by tunnel
Little-known UK beach perfect for a sunny day that is only accessible by tunnel

Wales Online

time12 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Little-known UK beach perfect for a sunny day that is only accessible by tunnel

Little-known UK beach perfect for a sunny day that is only accessible by tunnel The spot is less than a two-hour drive from Exeter and is also near various other idyllic coastal locations The hidden spot is perfect for a summer's day out (Image: Andy Sage via Getty Images ) Locating a picturesque beach spot in the UK might seem challenging. But travel influencer Chloe Lawford appears to have unearthed an ideal suggestion for a sunny summer's day. Remarkably, this secluded treasure, complete with crystal-clear waters, lies beyond a historic network of tunnels. In 2023, the creator ventured there for a picnic and a quick swim in the sea – and it was nothing short of stunning. ‌ "After paying a small fee to enter, you access the beach through these long tunnels," she said in a previous TikTok video, according to the Mirror. "The first set of tunnels leads you out to the Gentleman's Beach, which is on the left and there is a wedding venue here. ‌ "But you can continue going through more tunnels to get to the Ladies Beach on the right. This was the more popular beach and it's where the swimming pool normally is when the tide is out. Content cannot be displayed without consent "But we opted to head back up to the Gentleman's Beach as it was much quieter and it was like our own private little beach." Chloe's recommendation is none other than the Tunnels Beaches, nestled along the coast of Ilfracombe, Devon. Article continues below It's less than a two-hour drive from Exeter and is also near various other idyllic beaches such as Woolacombe and Wildersmouth Beach. According to Niche Museums, its tunnels date back to the 1820s, when hundreds of Welsh miners took two years to carve out six tunnels into the Ilfracombe hillside. This was part of North Devon's efforts to establish itself as an ideal holiday destination, offering tourists a route to the coast on foot or by coach. Currently, adults (16 and over) are charged £4.00 for entry to Tunnels Beaches. A ticket for children aged three to 15 is priced at £3.25, and those under three can enter for free. Discounts for students and senior citizens are available, as are family package deals. However, it's crucial to remember that cash transactions are not accepted for entry. ‌ The Tunnels Beaches are located on the coast of Ilfracombe, Devon (Image: Corbis via Getty Images ) Instead, you'll need to pay with a card, Apple Pay or Android Pay. "It was such a lovely day and the water was super clear. We were desperate for a swim," Chloe continued. "We had a little picnic and then went for a swim, although there were lots of jellyfish in the water, so we didn't brave too long of a swim and we sort of had a quick dip. Article continues below "But it was still super refreshing. If you're down in Devon, you must visit this beach on a super sunny day." Chloe's experience quickly became a hit on TikTok, with other users chiming in to praise the beach's allure. One person wrote: "This is down the bottom of my road, I have a season ticket and spend every day I can there! Bliss." Another added: "Omg I've been there it was so cool but more rocky then sandy." What do you think? Let us know in the comment section below

Brits warned of airport crimewave where 'most don't realise they're victims'
Brits warned of airport crimewave where 'most don't realise they're victims'

Edinburgh Live

time13 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Live

Brits warned of airport crimewave where 'most don't realise they're victims'

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Brits are being alerted to a cunning airport scam that often goes unnoticed until it's too late, as thieves target travellers' prized possessions. As the summer travel season heats up, holidaymakers are being cautioned about an increasing trend of airport crime where valuable items such as jewellery, designer goods, and luxury watches are at risk from crafty criminals. Security specialists are reporting a spike in distraction thefts and "switch" scams – where your genuine item is stealthily exchanged for a counterfeit – particularly prevalent in areas like baggage reclaim, duty-free shops, and taxi queues outside airports. It's not just high-end valuables like Rolex watches or diamond rings that are under threat; even mid-range timepieces are attracting the attention of organised crime rings who prey on tourists when they're most vulnerable: jet-lagged, distracted, or simply unaware. Danny Toffel, Watches2U's managing director, has shared some straightforward tips to safeguard your belongings while on the move. "We're seeing more reports from customers who've had close calls or actual thefts at airports abroad. It often starts with a small distraction - someone asking for directions, offering to help with bags or creating a minor commotion," Danny explained. He warns that while you're diverted, thieves or their partners seize the chance to snatch an unattended bag or switch out an item, reports the Mirror. Baggage reclaim zones are hotspots for watch and jewellery thefts at airports, particularly if you leave your trolley or luggage unwatched for even a brief moment. Duty-free counters are notorious hotspots, especially when shoppers are preoccupied with trying on jewellery or peering at items behind glass. At taxi ranks and pick-up areas, thieves often operate in duos, seizing the chance to swipe a visible item or snatch an unsecured bag while someone is busy with their luggage. Danny cautions that flaunting luxury items or carelessly storing watches in easily reachable bag compartments marks you out as an easy mark. "Scammers tend to look for signs that someone is carrying something expensive - and whether they're too distracted to notice something being taken or switched," he explained. The security guru advises keeping your timepiece strapped to your wrist or tucked away in secure carry-on luggage rather than in coat pockets or checked baggage. Holidaymakers should also be sceptical of overly eager strangers at luggage carousels or cab lines who offer to help with bags or directions. "Wearing a cheaper travel watch is a smart move if you're flying into busy tourist hubs. Keep your expensive pieces for secure evenings or hotel safes - not airport terminals," Danny recommended. He further emphasised that most thefts happen because of opportunity, noting: "Being aware of your surroundings and keeping valuables close - and discreet - can make all the difference."

'Royal family doesn't cost taxpayer too much - tourists want monarchist power'
'Royal family doesn't cost taxpayer too much - tourists want monarchist power'

Daily Mirror

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Royal family doesn't cost taxpayer too much - tourists want monarchist power'

The annual royal accounts have revealed the Firm cost the taxpayer £86.3 million last year, as King Charles derails the Royal Train in a bid to save cash - and we asked Mirror readers to share their thoughts The royal family spent a staggering £2.7 million on travel last year, including journeys by private jet, helicopter, and train, the newly released royal accounts have revealed - and we asked Mirror readers if the Firm is costing the taxpayer too much. Last year's accounts show that the royals cost the taxpayer £86.3 million for the fourth consecutive year, while the King and Queen's trip to Australia and Samoa in October came with a hefty £400,000 price tag. Following the publication of the annual accounts, it was announced that King Charles plans to derail the Royal Train after nearly 125 years of service in a bid to save cash. ‌ The nine-carriage locomotive, which was once Queen Elizabeth II's preferred mode of travel, was only in action twice in the last year but cost £78,000. It comes as the King attempts to "modernise" the Royal Family, as Keeper of the Privy Purse James Chalmers said: "The time has come to bid the fondest of farewells as we seek to be disciplined and forward-looking in our allocation of funding." ‌ The Sovereign Grant, which pays for the royal family's official duties and the upkeep of royal palaces, is met from public funds in exchange for the King's surrender of the revenue from the Crown Estate. The royals then in return get 12 per cent of this revenue back to run their affairs including travel, engagements at home and abroad and welcoming tens of thousands of people to the royal palaces. Record offshore wind farm profits have seen the Crown Estate net profits for the last financial year and hit £1.1 billion - meaning a record breaking Sovereign Grant of £132million will be handed out next year and the year after. Palace aides say the extra cash will go towards paying for the £369million refit of Buckingham Palace and the upkeep of other royal residences. However, former Minister of State for Home Affairs Norman Baker slammed Buckingham Palace 'pretending to be prudent' as 'utter hogwash'. He wrote in the Mirror: "Reality check: the Crown Estate has in effect been a public body since 1760, and until 2011, 100% of its profits went to the Treasury to pay for schools, hospitals, defence and, yes, disability benefits. This 12% is a new royal tax on the public purse." We asked Mirror readers if they think the royal family is costing the taxpayer too much, and 62 percent said 'No'. Around 3,169 people took part in our poll, and 1,955 selected the option 'No - I don't think so'. Voicing their thoughts in the comments section, one user said: 'The RF are the head of the UK and I love what we have, I am a royalist and I'm very proud to say so. I think the RF bring a lot of tourists to our country. King Charles has scaled down the working royals and has been scaling down on some ceremonies and Prince William has plans to scale back even more and wants to modernise the RF and make it less austere, it seems William and Catherine are doing that already.' ‌ Another echoed: 'Westminster Abbey, one of the most popular attractions for oversees tourists, a symbol of British history & the final resting place of revered monarchs, including Queen Elizabeth I & her half sister Queen Mary & famed British icons (Charles Dickens). An unprecedented symbol of hierarchical succession & constitutional monarchy with every coronation conducted there & all monarchs anointed. Tourists want to see symbols of monarchist power, influence & status.' 'Many presidents of other countries are costing a lot more. If you don't take my word, do your research. On top of that tourists don't go visiting countries wanting to see any president, but they may do to see a king. Also The cost isn't only about the king head of state, but other working royals doing complimentary work for the king,' wrote a third. Another added: 'If the Royals bring in more from tourism than is spent on them, that has got to be a win." However, 38 percent said the Firm is costing the taxpayer too much, as one reader fumed: 'All of the information out there and people still believe we aren't giving these over privileged people too much money, throwing millions at them each year doesn't make them any better.' ‌ Get Royal Family updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the royals get back to their normal duties after a difficult year, the Mirror has launched its very own Royal WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news on the UK's most famous family. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. A second wrote: 'It is absolutely ridiculous to believe anyone is coming to the UK to catch a glimpse of the King! or the Royal Family! They aren't in a zoo and they aren't magical beings from Fairyland. How absurd. No matter how you feel about elected Heads of State, at least they aren't automatically put in office just for coming out of the womb, and getting oiled up while pals hold up the sheets. Nobody's spending money and wasting time coming to Britain for that.' Another voiced: 'The monarchy supporters distort the figures. Vastly over estimate any money they bring in (if any), under estimate what they cost. If they were abolished the country would benefit from the companies they own and the taxes they don't pay.' Do you think the royal family is costing the taxpayer too much? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below and you can still vote in our poll HERE to have your say. Please note that the poll is still live, so these results may change after the article has been published.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store