East Riding Council to cut 400 jobs and raise tax by 4.99%
Council tax bills in East Yorkshire will rise by nearly 5% this year.The rise consists of 2.99% for general services and 2% for adult social services and is the highest increase allowed before needing a public vote.Plans also include reducing the council's workforce by 400 posts over the next two years.The job cuts aim to save the authority up to £12m a year.
According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the Conservative and Independent coalition was backed by Yorkshire Party councillors in supporting the budget, which passed by 37 votes to five, with 16 councillors abstaining.The cabinet member for finance, Nigel Wilkinson, told the meeting the reduction in workers would be achieved by "natural attrition, a reduction of management layers, redeployment and voluntary redundancies" with £6.6m put aside to pay for the job cuts.Other spending items include £21m for the Jocks Lodge road improvement scheme, £18m for the Howden Link Road and more than £12m for vehicle purchases. Liberal Democrat councillor Denis Healy described the budget as being "untenable, flimsy, and most likely unachievable".Labour and Reform UK groups in the council either rejected the budget or abstained from the vote.Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Our neighbour built TWO homes without planning permission... we're going to sit there with popcorn when they got bulldozed
Fuming neighbours are ready to 'buy popcorn' and watch from their windows if bulldozers move in to tear down two huge homes – after it emerged they were built without planning permission. The controversial semi-detached homes sprung up on the site of a former pub car park in Bradford, West Yorks, despite original planning permission having long since lapsed. Now locals are demanding action over the 'cowboy' development, which they claim towers over surrounding heritage cottages and damages the area's character. Residents have also called on council officials to make an example of rogue developers who flout planning laws and later seek retrospective approval. It comes as MailOnline this weekend revealed further cases in Bradford where developments were constructed without proper permissions. Helen Naylor, 50, said: 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations. 'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care. 'Cowboys come along, whack something up and just expect that the council will eventually sign it off. 'I think everyone around here has just had enough of it.' The homes appeared in just under a year on the site of the long-disused pub car park in the Heaton area of the city, with one listed for sale online as a five-bedroom, three-storey property. Although permission was granted in 2015 for a modest development, residents say that lapsed long before building began. Now, both homes face potential demolition if Bradford Council refuses to approve the scheme in hindsight. Neighbour Jane Loe, 68, said: 'It's quite funny in a way, but also horrible for those who live here. 'My neighbour and I said we're buying popcorn if and when they make them pull it down. 'We're going to sit out here and laugh.' Ms Loe, who lives opposite the new houses with husband Nick Swift, 76, described the builder's behaviour as 'outrageous'. She explained: 'The original design was unattractive but what they've actually built is even worse. 'We've watched them deviate from the plans in every way for the last year and a half. 'The build quality is terrible – we've seen people working with no helmets, no high-vis, no gloves. 'They even plugged power tools into a neighbour's living room and just ran a cable across the road. 'It's been a bunch of cowboys, basically. It's a monstrosity.' The developer, named in council documents as Amjad Yaqoob, reportedly believed the 2015 approval still applied when he purchased the land. He has claimed to have been unaware that the consent had lapsed. Bradford Council has confirmed that no valid permission was in place when the two homes were built. A decision on the retrospective application is expected in the coming weeks. Neighbours close to the new-build homes say they hope the council will take firm action. Eighty-year-old Janet Megson, who lives nearby with her husband Les, 76, said: 'The whole thing is an absolute disaster. 'I believe they didn't have planning permission but that doesn't seem to mean a thing these days. 'I want to see the council enforce the rules and bring it back to how it was. They should be forced to take the whole thing down. 'I don't know what sort of mentality the council planning department had in the first place to allow anyone to build on this site. 'There are little cottages round the back, it's narrow. There's nowhere to park. It's just out of character. It's out of place, altogether. 'I think anywhere else in the country, with something without permission like this, they'd immediately have to take the whole thing down. 'But I'm afraid round here, it's this sort of 'we'll go back to the planning department, and we'll see if there are amendments or compromises'. 'It's ridiculous.' Mr Yaqoob, who runs a building company in Bradford, declined to comment when approached by MailOnline. However, architects working on his behalf told Bradford Council that there was 'never any malicious intent to build something without approval', and claimed the development was 'very similar' to the previously approved plans. The firm added: 'The materials used are sympathetic to the area, and there are no additional issues of overlooking or overbearing. 'We therefore feel the retrospective application should be approved.' That assessment, however, brought short shrift when MailOnline visited the village. Angry NHS worker Jane Megson, 52, said the idea of letting the build remain was 'disgusting'. She said: 'It doesn't fit in, and the thought of retrospective planning, it's disgusting. 'Why do we bother having rules and regulations if they're just going to do what they like and then get retrospective planning? 'The council needs to make a show of these people and force them to take it down, to be honest. 'It's shocking the way they behave in Bradford, quite frankly. 'The thing that annoys me is that they, on the planning application, said it fits in with the surroundings. 'It does not fit in with the surroundings at all.' 'I really do hope they make an example because it's happening far too often in Bradford. 'People just do what they want and then put in the retrospective planning. Because the council can't be bothered, they just roll over and let them have their way.' Helen Naylor, who lives yards from the unapproved homes, added: 'I think it's absolutely disgraceful, but it doesn't surprise me in the least. 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations. 'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.' Fran Jones, 60, joked that the houses looked ready to collapse. She said: 'I think they might blow down when the wolf blows on them. I don't think they've got foundations – I think they're built on a concrete slab. 'They stand out a mile and the finish is cheap. I feel sorry for the people in the heritage cottages behind it. It's so awful. 'We saw them building it and we were all shaking our heads going: 'I'll huff, and I'll puff and I'll blow your house down'. 'The fact that it's now come up with no planning permission is no surprise to any of us.' The developer's agents, P.N. Bakes Architectural Consultancy, argue that the homes are 'very similar' to the 2015 plans and say their client believed a 'material start' had already been made. Bradford Council say enforcement action will be 'reviewed' once a decision is made. A spokesman said: 'Our Planning Enforcement Team have investigated reports of these works being carried out without planning permission. 'As a planning application has now been submitted, the matter of enforcement will be reviewed once a decision on planning permission has been made, as is standard practice nationally.'
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Allowance of £72k agreed for Hull's new mayor
The Mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire, Luke Campbell, will be paid £72k a year for his annual allowance was agreed by members of the combined authority's executive board at a meeting on panel who recommended the allowance said that the calculation was reached by comparing the role against similar positions across the Campbell, was elected as the region's first mayor on 1 May. Combined authorities are led by an elected mayor. As head of the combined authority, Campbell is responsible for housing, public transport, infrastructure, economic development, business, skills and is no set salary for mayors across England. The Institute for Government states that in 2022/23 the average salary was £92,063. In 2022/23, the mayor of Greater London had the highest salary at £154,963 a year, and the Tees Valley and North of Tyne mayors had the lowest salaries at £65,000 a to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the report stated that the Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) was the "best comparable area to use as a benchmark." The document said the TVCA's area had a similar population to Hull and East Yorkshire and the two areas received similar devolution document also stated that the panel thought it was important to set the allowance "above the local authority leader allowances and below member of parliament allowances". MP's are paid £93,904 a report said the panel used the police and crime commissioner's (PCC) allowance as a benchmark. According to the government's website, the Humberside Police and Crime Commissioner, Jonathan Evison, is paid £78,400 a panel said it took into account the PCC covered a larger area and their remit was significantly different from the remit of the combined authority. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Wales Online
10 hours ago
- Wales Online
Eluned Morgan responds to UK Labour comments that Wales should be 'grateful' for what it gets from Westminster
Eluned Morgan responds to UK Labour comments that Wales should be 'grateful' for what it gets from Westminster It was during a row over rail funding Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan has said comments by a senior UK Government minister saying Wales should be "grateful" for what it is has had in terms of rail funding were "unfortunate". Mrs Morgan was speaking in an interview with BBC Radio Wales' Sunday Supplement programme. The row started after the spring statement, when the UK Government announced a £445m funding package for rail in Wales. A number of questions were outstanding after that announcement including exactly what it would be spent on, and how much of it will go to the five new, promised stations in Cardiff, Newport and Monmouthshire. While the announcement was much lauded by Welsh Labour figures, it is far short of the total amount Wales needs, and does not address historic underfunding of rail in Wales, something now formally acknowledged by both UK and Welsh Governments. There were big questions remaining after the announcement, many of which we have been unable to get any clarity over since. You can read those here. Ten days ago, Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, was asked in the Commons by Wales' sole Liberal Democrat MP David Chadwick about the funding. "I hope the minister appreciates just how insulting it is for Welsh ears to been told that we're getting a fair deal when it comes to railway funding, when we've been cheated out of billions of pounds due to the classification of several projects as England [and] Wales projects. Article continues below He said five new stations in south Wales was "hardly national renewal". Mr Jones responded: "There's a huge difference. Under the last government you didn't get a penny." He said the UK Government was providing the "largest real terms increase in spending in Wales since devolution began". He added: "You might want to be a little more grateful in future." Mr Chadwick said in a statement: "This was a gobsmackingly arrogant response from the minister that just shows how out of touch Labour are with Wales." While at the time, Plaid Cymru's Liz Saville Roberts said it was "arrogant and insulting". Mrs Morgan was asked by radio host Vaughan Roderick if that was how Westminster sees Wales. "That ws an unfortunate turn of phase," she said. Article continues below Asked if it made her wince, she replied: "I've said it was an unfortunate turn of phrase". She continued: "If you compare what we were given before with relation to rail compared to what we were getting before that's a substantial increase. Is it enough? No. "Has there been a commitment to give further? Yes. This is just the beginning".
