How no taxes on tips could impact you
Another aspect that could put more money in your pocket will depend on where you work — and how you're paid.
If you receive tipped wages, up to $25,000 will be tax deductible starting this year and running through 2028. The maximum deduction is available to those who have an income of $150,000 or less, or up to $300,000 for those filing jointly.
This also only applies to federal income taxes, which means those who don't make enough to pay federal income taxes won't benefit from the deduction, according to The Wall Street Journal. Additionally, it will only apply to certain professions. The Treasury has to provide a list of those qualifying jobs within three months, WSJ reports.
Tips are currently considered taxable.
The cap on the amount of tipped wages that are tax deductible was added to the bill by the Senate, and received pushback from some, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). She called the cap a 'scam,' pointing to other cuts in the megabill that could raise taxes for some and strip their SNAP, Medicaid, or insurance.
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) shared similar sentiments about the bill passed by the GOP-led Senate, saying, 'These little flourishes that were added, like no tax on tips, are issues that are designed to cover the horrible job that they're doing.'
Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris campaigned on tax-free tips last year, and the Senate passed the 'No Tax on Tips Act' earlier this year, which received bipartisan support.
The Finance Committee specified that 'cash tips' qualify but said the term applied to tips paid in cash, charged to credit cards or received from other employees under a tip-sharing arrangement.
The National Restaurant Association, a trade organization that represents nearly 500,000 U.S. restaurants and bars, applauded the House's passage of Trump's spending bill — which did not cap the amount of tax deductible tipped wages — and said it wants to see tax-free tips. The association estimates the measure would benefit more than 2 million servers and bartenders.
But the U.S. restaurant industry has more than 12 million workers, including dishwashers and chefs, according to government data. The Independent Restaurant Coalition said last month the 'no tax on tips' proposal leaves out too many of those workers.
Others have instead called for Congress to take up a separate bill introduced by Nevada Democrat Steven Horsford that would eliminate taxes on tips but also require restaurants to pay workers at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. In 43 states, restaurants are currently allowed to pay tipped workers much less, in some cases as little as $2.13 per hour.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
El Salvador President has a one-word response to Democrats
El Salvador President has a one-word response to Democrats originally appeared on TheStreet. El Salvador President Nayib Bukele made light of new U.S. Senate legislation that would impose sanctions over his country's policies towards Bitcoin, saying Democrats are "just salty" in an X post. President Bukele was referring to the development following the introduction of the El Salvador Accountability Act of 2025, which directly targeted Bukele's regime and El Salvador's cryptocurrency actions. The resolution, introduced in June by Democratic Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), and Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), would apply property and visa sanctions against Salvadoran representatives deemed to have committed acts of human rights abuses or acts that infringe upon the constitutional rights of U.S. inhabitants. The bill also calls for opposition to any financial aid or loans to the Salvadoran government. The bill takes a deeper dive into El Salvador's Bitcoin play, describing it as a possible tool for large-scale corruption, bribery, graft, and sanctions evasion. It requires an evaluation of the nation's use of crypto, including Bitcoin purchases, the use of exchanges, wallet addresses, and its potential use of crypto to evade international sanctions. In response, Bukele posted a screenshot of the bill with the caption: 'HAHAHAHAHAHAHA the Dems are just salty…" El Salvador has centered much of its financial policy on Bitcoin since 2021, when it adopted the currency as legal tender. The government still buys one Bitcoin every day and owns more than 6,200 BTC, which is worth about $678 million at the time of writing. President Bukele says that El Salvador will keep buying one Bitcoin every day until it "becomes too expensive" with fiat currencies. El Salvador President has a one-word response to Democrats first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 9, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 9, 2025, where it first appeared.
Washington Post
22 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Nvidia is again Wall Street's most valuable company. How it got there, by the numbers
Nvidia reached another milestone in its rise to becoming one of the world's most important companies: the first publicly traded company to reach a market value of $4 trillion. Nvidia and other companies benefiting from the boom in artificial intelligence have been a major reason the S&P 500 has recently climbed to a record. Their explosion of profits has helped to propel the market despite worries about possible pain coming for the U.S. economy from tariffs and other policies of President Donald Trump.
Associated Press
24 minutes ago
- Associated Press
A surprise IRS move on political endorsements leaves faith leaders and experts divided
WASHINGTON (AP) — A surprise move by the IRS that would allow pastors to back political candidates from the pulpit without losing their organization's tax-exempt status is drawing praise from conservatives and even some progressive religious groups but concern from other leaders of faith, along with tax and legal experts. A 1954 provision in the tax code called the Johnson Amendment says churches and other nonprofits could lose their tax-exempt status if they participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. The rule was rarely enforced. While the IRS did not go as far as calling for the repeal of the Johnson Amendment, it said in court documents Monday that communications in good faith by a church to its flock does not amount to 'intervening' or affecting the outcome of a political campaign. 'Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,' the IRS said. The new IRS interpretation came after decades of debate and, most recently, lawsuits from the National Religious Broadcasters association and other conservative churches complaining that the amendment violates their First Amendment rights, among other legal protections. Speaking to reporters Wednesday, President Donald Trump called the IRS' assessment 'terrific.' 'I love the fact that churches can endorse a political candidate,' he said. 'We have a lot of respect for the people that lead the church.' While some congregations see a new freedom to speak openly about preferred candidates, others see openings for campaign finance corruption, new pressures on religious leaders and an overall entanglement between church and state. Praises to the IRS Robert Jeffress, pastor of a Baptist megachurch in Dallas and a Trump ally, called it 'the right decision.' He said his church's tax-exempt status was threatened because of an IRS investigation into their political endorsements, costing the megachurch hundreds of thousands in legal fees. 'The IRS has no business dictating what can be said from the pulpit,' he said. 'They need to stay the heck out of our churches.' Calvary Church Chino Hills, a Southern California megachurch led by Jack Hibbs, has been endorsing candidates for years, particularly in local elections. Gina Gleason, director of the church's political engagement team, said she hopes the move will encourage smaller churches previously hesitant for fear of triggering an IRS response. 'I'd have thought if the IRS had targeted any church it would've been us,' she said. 'But we got sound legal advice from lawyers and religious liberty organizations that explained we were within our constitutional rights.' For Democrats trying to connect with people of faith, this decision is timely, said Doug Pagitt, pastor and executive director of Vote Common Good, a progressive and evangelical Christian organization. 'Conservative pastors who have been blatantly endorsing candidates regardless of the Johnson Amendment over the years created a disadvantage causing Democrats to step away from faith voters,' he said. 'There was a true imbalance between how many more opportunities there were for Republican voters.' The IRS statement, Pagitt says, also puts an end to the delicate dance pastors and congregations were forced to do. 'You could talk about politics in the church gymnasium, but not in the sanctuary or from the pulpit,' he said. 'Pastors could express political opinions on their personal Facebook page, but not on the church's website. It's just silly.' Church politicking concerns Tax and constitutional law experts, meanwhile, are wary of what entanglements could arise from the IRS' new position. Philip Hackney, a University of Pittsburgh School of Law professor who studies the relationship between churches and tax authority, said the decree could allow churches to push new boundaries. 'It's essentially creating a political intervention tax shelter for churches,' Hackney said. 'It has the potential to corrupt their mission, more towards politics and away from their true beliefs.' Other religious groups, particularly in faith communities of color, are viewing it with skepticism. The Rev. Mark Whitlock, senior pastor at Reid Temple African Methodist Episcopal Church in Glenn Dale, Maryland, said it raises more questions than answers. 'From those of us in the Black church, this decision is being viewed with caution, apprehension and skepticism,' he said. 'The question we're asking is: 'Why now?'' Whitlock said he will continue to do what the Black church has always done — educating and civically engaging parishioners. His congregants' political views vary, too. 'If I do say something in church, it needs to be God-centered, God-focused and a revelation that God gave you,' Whitlock said. 'You can't go to the pulpit as a campaign manager.' Raymond Chang, president of the Asian American Christian Collaborative, warned that a repeal of the Johnson Amendment could help tether some congregations to certain parties or candidates. 'This can lead to a partisan identity becoming the primary marker of a church or congregation, over a commitment to the Gospel, which cuts against both existing major parties,' he said. 'Church leaders may also face pressure to make political endorsements.' What comes next Nearly 80% of U.S. adults believe churches and other houses of worship should not come out in favor of one political candidate over another during elections, a Pew Research Center survey conducted in 2022 found. White evangelicals and Black Protestants were a little more divided on the matter, with about one-third in each group favoring political endorsements. But in every other religious group surveyed, there was a strong consensus against political involvement by houses of worship. Others are more optimistic that the IRS statement puts to bed unfounded criticisms against the agency for a rarely enforced rule. Terry Lemons, a former IRS official who began at the agency under Democratic President Bill Clinton, called it a 'common sense approach through a narrowly written filing.' Roger Colinvaux, a Catholic University of America law professor, said he would caution churches against 'overinterpreting' the IRS statement. He points out that the word 'endorse' does not appear anywhere in it and said his biggest concern is religion being used as a partisan tool in campaigns. Pagitt at Common Good said not all pastors will seize the opportunity because they might be ministering to a divided congregation or might not be comfortable mixing politics and religion. Chieko Noguchi, spokesperson for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said Tuesday that the IRS statement doesn't 'change how the Catholic Church engages in public debate.' 'The Church seeks to help Catholics form their conscience in the Gospel so they might discern which candidates and policies would advance the common good,' Noguchi said. 'The Catholic Church maintains its stance of not endorsing or opposing political candidates.' ___ Bharath reported from Los Angeles. ___ AP's religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
