
Japan's monetary normalisation is not a source of global financial risk
In this context, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) has initiated a long-awaited monetary policy normalization process. Negative policy rates have been abandoned, yield curve control (YCC) has been phased out, and the central bank is gradually stepping away from its role as the dominant buyer of Japanese government bonds (JGB). The policy stance has evolved in response to improving domestic fundamentals, including a tighter labour market and persistent inflation above 2%.
However, Japan's normalization has raised concerns in global financial circles. Market participants fear that this policy shift could catalyze a rapid reversal of capital flows and destabilize global financial markets. These concerns are rooted in Japan's historical role as a key source of global liquidity. Years of ultra-loose monetary policy – negative rates, YCC, and massive asset purchases –positioned the BoJ as an anchor for global interest rates. Japanese investors, in search of higher yields abroad, became significant players in global capital markets, engaging in large-scale cross-border investments and yield-seeking 'carry trades.' In fact, Japanese residents hold the world's largest net international investment position, comfortably above that of China or the Euro area.
Given this backdrop, the fear is that monetary policy normalization and rising JGB yields could trigger a capital reallocation back to Japan, tightening global liquidity and generating market stress. In our view, however, these concerns are overstated. Two main reasons explain why Japan's monetary tightening is unlikely to generate material financial instability, either domestically or globally.
First, even after the recent adjustments, interest rate differentials against major advanced economies remain wide – both in nominal and real terms. Currently, the BoJ's short-term policy rate stands at 0.5%, while the US Federal Reserve maintains its federal funds rate at 4.5% and the European Central Bank's deposit facility rate is at 2%. And this comes in a context where inflation in Japan runs at 3.5%, significantly above what is seen across peers. Hence, real interest rates are still deeply negative in Japan, contrasting with positive real rates in the US and Euro area. These enduring differentials continue to incentivize Japanese investors to seek higher returns abroad, sustaining outbound capital flows and carry trade activities.
Second, the monetary tightening is expected to be orderly and well executed, preventing significant bouts of financial or economic stress. In fact, the BoJ's normalization strategy is cautious, deliberate, and well-communicated. The pace of tightening has been slow, allowing markets to adjust smoothly.
The BoJ retains flexibility and has signalled a willingness to adjust course if needed. Importantly, monetary policy in Japan remains deeply accommodative, i.e., policy rates and even the 10-year JGB yields are far below the nominal neutral rate of 2.5%. Should the gradual monetary policy tightening continue as expected, with two 25 basis points rate hikes per year, the transition to a more neutral or restrictive stance should be smoothed, reducing the likelihood of sudden capital flow reversals.
All in all, while Japan's transition to a more conventional macroeconomic and monetary regime represents an important global shift, it is not a source of financial instability. Interest rate differentials still support global capital flows and the BoJ's normalization is prudent and transparent. Rather than a shock to global liquidity, Japan's monetary shift should be viewed as a positive signal of macroeconomic normalization after decades of stagnation.
— By QNB Economics

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
11 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Young United States college graduates face employment crisis
Agencies Over two years, Rebecca Atkins filed more than 250 job applications, and felt like everyone was going into a gaping chasm—one opened by the highest unemployment rate for recent college graduates in the United States in more than a decade. 'It was extremely dispiriting,' said the 25-year-old, who graduated in 2022 with a degree in law and justice from a university in the US capital Washington. 'I was convinced that I was a terrible person, and terrible at working.' At 5.8 percent, unemployment for young, recent graduates from US universities is higher than it has been since November 2013, excluding 15 months in the COVID pandemic, according to official data. Moreover, it has also remained stubbornly higher than overall unemployment—an extremely unusual situation, analysts say. And while overall US unemployment has stabilized between around 3.5 and 4 percent post-pandemic, unemployment for recent college graduates is only trending higher. The labor market for new grads has weakened consistently since 2022, with new hiring down 16 percent in 2025, year-over-year, according to payroll firm Gusto. Analysts say the trend is likely a result of cyclical post-pandemic hiring slowdowns—particularly in new-grad-heavy sectors like technology, finance, and business information—and overall economic uncertainty in the tumultuous early days of the Trump administration. That is scant consolation to the droves of young people—often saddled with huge amounts of student debt—on the hunt for their first full-time job. 'All of the jobs that I wanted, I didn't have the requirements for—often entry-level jobs would require you to have four or five years of experience,' said Atkins, who bounced between part-time roles and working in restaurants for years. 'It is definitely an outlier,' said Matthew Martin, senior US economist at Oxford Economics. 'You'd expect that the white collar positions would not be as exposed to cyclical downturns (as other jobs).' Job openings for professional and business services have declined by more than 40 percent since 2021, according to research authored by Martin, with tech sector jobs disproportionately impacted. 'Part of that is a slower pace of hiring as they right-size after they hired at very high rates in 2022.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
In US capital, Trump tariffs bite into restaurant profits
Agencies Brazilian coffee beans, French champagne and Chinese teas -- drinks are a profit driver for U.S. restaurants, but higher import costs have eaten into margins and fed into consumer prices in the three months since President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping global tariffs. A stone's throw from the White House, a restaurant group that takes pride in dishing up fresh local meat and produce has found itself having to raise prices on its menus. 'The reality is, we have to pass along some of those to our guests,' said John Filkins, corporate beverage director at Clyde's Restaurant Group. 'Could be anywhere from 50 cents to $1 on certain wines by the glass, or spirits, or some of our food menu items.' 'We've seen huge increases in coffee and in teas, and we're beginning to see some of those increases in food, as well as paper products coming on through as well,' he added. Clyde's, which opened in the 1960s in Washington, has more than a dozen restaurants in and around the U.S. capital. One of them is The Hamilton in downtown Washington, where drinks prices have ticked up. While management has tried to limit increases, Filkins said this has been tough. Businesses have encountered snarled supply chains and higher costs since Trump imposed fresh tariffs after returning to the presidency in January. In April, the president unleashed his widest-ranging salvo, a 10 percent duty on imports from most trading partners. This is expected to surge to higher levels for dozens of economies. Leaders like Filkins are eyeing a deadline next Wednesday when the steeper tariffs are due to kick in. These are customized to each partner, with the level for European Union products rising to 20 percent and that for Japanese goods jumping to 24 percent unless they strike deals to avert or lower the rates. Filkins warned that the longer tariffs remain in place, the fewer small, independent distributors, importers and restaurants there might be. 'The hope is we don't see tariffs to the extent where we're seeing them any longer,' he added. 'Restaurants are, at the end of the day, typically low cash, low margin.' A typical outfit probably runs 'in the single digits in terms of profit margin,' he noted. This means that cutting out 10 percent to 15 percent of their profit for wine by the glass, for example, could prove a significant blow. Clyde's sources coffee beans from places like Brazil and Indonesia for its blends, while getting teas from India and China. 'Over the course of the last probably six months, we've seen about a 20 to 30 percent increase of that cost,' Filkins said. This is partly because suppliers and distributors are not only paying the 10 percent tariff but forking out more due to exchange rates. Imports from China face a 30 percent tariff currently even though Washington and Beijing have temporarily lowered tit-for-tat levies on each other's goods. Without a deal, products from Indonesia face a 32 percent duty come Wednesday, and the rate for India spikes to 26 percent. 'For liquor, beer and wine, most of the wine we import comes from the EU,' Filkins said, noting the impact is biggest on products from France, Italy, Spain and Portugal so far. Yet, his company is trying to hold off passing on additional costs entirely. 'Consumers are not comfortable spending more in the current climate,' said Filkins. The world's biggest economy has fared well after the COVID-19 pandemic, helped by a solid labor market that allowed consumers to keep spending. But economic growth has slowed alongside hiring. Economists are monitoring to see if tariffs feed more broadly into inflation this summer, and households become more selective with purchases. With Trump's approach of announcing, adjusting and halting tariffs roiling financial markets and fueling uncertainty -- forcing businesses to put investments on hold -- Filkins hopes for an easing of levies. 'It's hard for all of us to forecast what's going to happen in the next eight days,' said Filkins. 'We can't base all of our decisions on speculation.'


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Japan's monetary normalisation is not a source of global financial risk
After decades of battling deflationary stagnation, which started after the bust of the domestic asset price bubble in the late 1980s, Japan's macroeconomic environment has begun to change. During the deflationary period (1990-2020), the country operated in an anomalous setting of ultra-low growth, subdued inflation, and extraordinary monetary accommodation. But the confluence of the Covid-19 pandemic, global supply shocks, and aggressive fiscal and monetary stimulus appears to have finally 'reflated' the Japanese economy. Post-pandemic, Japan has experienced more consistent growth alongside inflation levels that are no longer materially below those of other advanced economies. This marks a structural shift, moving Japan into a more 'normal' macro regime after years of being a global outlier. In this context, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) has initiated a long-awaited monetary policy normalization process. Negative policy rates have been abandoned, yield curve control (YCC) has been phased out, and the central bank is gradually stepping away from its role as the dominant buyer of Japanese government bonds (JGB). The policy stance has evolved in response to improving domestic fundamentals, including a tighter labour market and persistent inflation above 2%. However, Japan's normalization has raised concerns in global financial circles. Market participants fear that this policy shift could catalyze a rapid reversal of capital flows and destabilize global financial markets. These concerns are rooted in Japan's historical role as a key source of global liquidity. Years of ultra-loose monetary policy – negative rates, YCC, and massive asset purchases –positioned the BoJ as an anchor for global interest rates. Japanese investors, in search of higher yields abroad, became significant players in global capital markets, engaging in large-scale cross-border investments and yield-seeking 'carry trades.' In fact, Japanese residents hold the world's largest net international investment position, comfortably above that of China or the Euro area. Given this backdrop, the fear is that monetary policy normalization and rising JGB yields could trigger a capital reallocation back to Japan, tightening global liquidity and generating market stress. In our view, however, these concerns are overstated. Two main reasons explain why Japan's monetary tightening is unlikely to generate material financial instability, either domestically or globally. First, even after the recent adjustments, interest rate differentials against major advanced economies remain wide – both in nominal and real terms. Currently, the BoJ's short-term policy rate stands at 0.5%, while the US Federal Reserve maintains its federal funds rate at 4.5% and the European Central Bank's deposit facility rate is at 2%. And this comes in a context where inflation in Japan runs at 3.5%, significantly above what is seen across peers. Hence, real interest rates are still deeply negative in Japan, contrasting with positive real rates in the US and Euro area. These enduring differentials continue to incentivize Japanese investors to seek higher returns abroad, sustaining outbound capital flows and carry trade activities. Second, the monetary tightening is expected to be orderly and well executed, preventing significant bouts of financial or economic stress. In fact, the BoJ's normalization strategy is cautious, deliberate, and well-communicated. The pace of tightening has been slow, allowing markets to adjust smoothly. The BoJ retains flexibility and has signalled a willingness to adjust course if needed. Importantly, monetary policy in Japan remains deeply accommodative, i.e., policy rates and even the 10-year JGB yields are far below the nominal neutral rate of 2.5%. Should the gradual monetary policy tightening continue as expected, with two 25 basis points rate hikes per year, the transition to a more neutral or restrictive stance should be smoothed, reducing the likelihood of sudden capital flow reversals. All in all, while Japan's transition to a more conventional macroeconomic and monetary regime represents an important global shift, it is not a source of financial instability. Interest rate differentials still support global capital flows and the BoJ's normalization is prudent and transparent. Rather than a shock to global liquidity, Japan's monetary shift should be viewed as a positive signal of macroeconomic normalization after decades of stagnation. — By QNB Economics