Plane crash victims' families file complaint against Jeju Air CEO
The 72 bereaved relatives are calling for a more thorough investigation into the crash, which killed 179 of the 181 people on board - making it the deadliest plane crash on South Korean soil.
The crash was "not a simple accident", they allege, but a "major civic disaster caused by negligent management of preventable risks".
Nearly five months on, authorities are still studying what may have caused the plane to crash-land at Muan International Airport and then burst into flames.
The police had already opened a criminal investigation before this latest complaint, and barred Jeju Air CEO Kim E-bae from leaving the country, but no one has been indicted over the incident.
One of the relatives, Kim Da-hye, denounced the "lack of progress" in investigations.
"We are filled with deep anger and despair. Having taken this extraordinary measure of filing a criminal complaint, we will not give up and will continue to pursue the truth," Mr Kim said in a statement to the media.
Among the 15 people named in the complaint were government officials, airline officials and airport staff responsible for construction, supervision, facility management and bird control.
The complaint filed on Tuesday raises questions around the circumstances of the crash, including whether air traffic control responded appropriately and whether the reinforcement of a mound at the end of the runway violated regulations.
The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, took off from the Thai capital of Bangkok on the morning of 29 December, and was flying to Muan in South Korea.
Five minutes after the pilots made contact with Muan International Airport, they reported striking a bird and declared a mayday signal.
The pilots then tried to land from the opposite direction, during which the aircraft belly-landed without its landing gear deployed. It later overran the runway, slammed into a concrete structure and exploded.
Earlier this year, investigators said they found bird feathers in both engines of the jet, but did not conclude the extent to which the bird strike was a contributing factor.
Since the incident, some bereaved families have also been targeted by a torrent of conspiracies and malicious jokes online.
These included suggestions that families were "thrilled" to receive compensation from authorities, or that they were "fake victims". As of March this year, eight people have been apprehended for making such derogatory and defamatory online posts. — BBC
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
10 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
US condemns house arrest of Brazil's ex-president Jair Bolsonaro
SAO PAULO – Brazil's Supreme Court has ordered that the former right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro be put under house arrest. He is standing trial over allegations he plotted a coup, which he denies. The judge in charge of investigating Bolsonaro, Alexandre de Moraes, said the decision was because Bolsonaro hadn't complied with restraining orders put on him last month. In response to the order, Bolsonaro's legal team denied breaching any restraining order and said they would appeal the ruling, according to Reuters news agency. In a statement on X, the US state department said it "condemns" the court order and "will hold accountable all those aiding and abetting sanctioned conduct". Donald Trump has used Bolsonaro's trial, which he calls a "witch-hunt", as a justification for imposing 50% tariffs on some Brazilian goods despite the US having a trade surplus with Brazil. Moraes, who the US has also sanctioned, said Bolsonaro had used the social networks of his allies including his sons to spread messages that encouraged attacks on the Supreme Court and foreign intervention in the Brazilian judiciary. On Sunday, pro-Bolsonaro rallies were held in various Brazilian cities. One of his sons, Flávio, who is a senator, briefly put his father on speakerphone to the crowd in Rio de Janeiro. Flávio also reportedly later published a video, which he deleted afterwards, of his father on the other side of the call sending a message to supporters. Moraes cited the incident in his ruling, saying Bolsonaro "deliberately flouted" previous restrictions, according to local media. "The flagrant disregard for the preventative measures was so obvious that – it bears repeating – the defendant's own son, senator Flávio Nantes Bolsonaro, decided to delete the post from his Instagram account in order to conceal the legal transgression," the ruling said. Moraes also banned Bolsonaro from receiving visits, except from lawyers or people authorised by the Supreme Court, and from using a mobile phone directly or through third parties. "Justice is blind, but it is not foolish," wrote Moraes, adding that the court "will not allow a defendant to make a fool of it, thinking that he will go unpunished because he has political and economic power". These restrictions were imposed because of allegations he was encouraging Donald Trump to interfere in the case. Trump and Bolsonaro enjoyed a friendly relationship when their presidencies overlapped, with the pair meeting at the White House in 2019. In a social media post last month, Trump voiced his support for the former president saying Bolsonaro "was not guilty of anything" and praised him as a "strong leader" who "truly loved his country". – BBC
Saudi Gazette
11 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
US attorney general orders grand jury hearings on Trump-Russia probe
WASHINGTON – US Attorney General Pam Bondi has ordered prosecutors to open legal proceedings into allegations of a so-called Russiagate conspiracy that Donald Trump has long claimed was concocted by political foes to smear him. Bondi has ordered a federal prosecutor to seek a potential indictment, according to the BBC's US partner CBS News. It is unclear, however, what the possible charges might be and who could be charged. Last month, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused former President Barack Obama and his national security team of a "years-long coup" against Trump as she released a declassified report that Democrats branded false. Gabbard alleged that intelligence about Russian meddling in the 2016 White House election had been politicised by the Obama White House to falsely tie Trump to Russia. Trump reacted by accusing Obama of "treason". An Obama spokesman called that claim "bizarre". Democrats said nothing in Gabbard's findings invalidated a US intelligence assessment in January 2017 concluding that Russia had sought to damage Clinton's campaign and boost Trump in the vote three months earlier. A 2020 bipartisan report by the Senate intelligence committee also found that Russia had tried to help Trump's 2016 campaign. But last month the director of national intelligence referred the matter to the justice department to consider possible charges. On Monday, Bondi acted on that referral by directing an unnamed federal prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury, according to CBS. A grand jury is a group of members of the public who determine whether there is enough evidence to file an indictment in a case. It was not clear which former officials might be the target of any grand jury activity. But Fox News reported last month that ex-CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey were under criminal investigation relating to the Trump–Russia probe. Both have long denied any wrongdoing and accuse Trump of subverting the justice system. Half of Trump's first presidency was overshadowed by an investigation from his own justice department into whether he had conspired with Russia to sway the 2016 outcome. The resulting Mueller report found no proof that Trump or his campaign had co-ordinated with the Kremlin, and no-one was charged with such crimes. The debate over Russiagate was reinvigorated last week when an appendix to another justice department investigation into the affair was declassified. The 29 pages from Special Counsel John Durham's inquiry cites a March 2016 memo from a US intelligence source stating that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic White House candidate that year, had approved a plan to smear Trump as a Russian asset. Durham cites "what appear or purport to be original" emails that hackers affiliated with Russian intelligence might have obtained from an employee with a non-profit run by liberal donor George Soros. One of the messages appeared to have been sent by Leonard Benardo, senior vice-president at Open Society Foundations, Soros' philanthropic arm. It apparently refers to a Clinton foreign policy adviser, Julianna Smith. The email, dated 26 July 2016, reads: "Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. Now it is good for a post-convention bounce. Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire." There is nothing illegal about a political smear, but Trump allies suggested the email, if genuine, showed that federal investigators could have been part of the scheme. Durham, however, found no proof of such an FBI conspiracy. According to the appendix, Benardo told Durham that "to the best of his recollection" he did not draft the email, although he noted that some of the verbiage further down sounded like something he would have said. The special counsel also interviewed Smith, who said she did not recall receiving such an email from Benardo. Durham made no determination in his appendix whether the emails were authentic, or if they had been doctored by Russian spies. His main 306-page report, published in 2023, found the original FBI probe into Trump's campaign had lacked "analytical rigor" and relied on "raw, unanalysed and uncorroborated intelligence". US officials found the Russian meddling in 2016 included bot farms on social media and hacking of Democratic emails, but they ultimately concluded the impact was probably limited and did not actually change the election result. – BBC
Saudi Gazette
2 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Palestine Red Crescent says Israeli strike on Gaza HQ kills worker, injures three
KHAN YOUNIS, Gaza Strip — The Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS) accused Israeli forces on Sunday of striking its headquarters in southern Gaza, killing one worker and wounding three others. In a statement, the humanitarian group said the early morning attack on its Khan Younis facility sparked a fire in the building, which is 'well known' to the Israeli military and 'clearly marked with the protective red emblem.' It called the strike 'deliberate' and renewed its appeal for accountability and protection of humanitarian and medical staff. The PRCS identified the slain worker as Omar Isleem and said two other staff members were injured, along with a civilian who was attempting to put out the fire. Images shared by the group showed heavy structural damage, debris-filled offices and large bloodstains. When asked about the incident, the Israel Defense Forces told the BBC it had 'no knowledge about neither artillery nor any air strikes' targeting the facility. The attack comes as Gaza's humanitarian crisis deepens. UN figures indicate that at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed since late May while trying to access food, most near Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution sites. Israel disputes the UN's figures and accuses Hamas of fomenting chaos at the aid centres, while denying that its forces intentionally target civilians. Egyptian state media reported Sunday that two fuel trucks were waiting to enter Gaza amid ongoing shortages that have crippled hospitals and aid operations. The Hamas-run health ministry says 175 people, including 93 children, have died from malnutrition. Israel launched its Gaza campaign after the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which killed about 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage. Since then, more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to Gaza's health ministry. — BBC
