PHOTOS: Amazon truck catches fire in Arlington
ARLINGTON, Va. (DC News Now) — An Amazon truck caught on fire in Arlington on Sunday, officials said.
The Arlington County Fire Department responded to the 2200 block of S Clark St. for a fully involved vehicle fire that was spreading to nearby bushes.
Crews battle Derwood house fire in humid weather
Crews quickly put out the fire, and no one was hurt.
The cause of the fire remains under investigation by the fire marshal's office.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How Rational Is EV Fast Charging When Most Cars Are Parked All Day?
All the press is about fast charging stations, some of which are literally sited with gas stations ... More and run by oil companies There are many different views on how EV charging infrastructure should be built, and financed. Today, almost all discussion revolves around 'fast charging' at 50kW or more, which will usually refill a car in under an hour. This is due to the legacy of 'gasoline thinking.' For a century, we drove cars with gasoline around until the tank said 'E' and then looked for a place to fill-up, which took under 5 minutes. That's a good experience, and it's understandable why there's so much effort to duplicate it. The more important question is should we? Almost all news and investment activity in EV charging is around this gasoline fill-up problem. Faster chargers and more of them. 800v cars and chargers that can peak over 350kW. New battery designs that can get a usable charge in under 10 minutes. BYD's demo of a partial charge in just 5 minutes in China. Charging stations which look very much like gas stations in their placement and style. Everybody would like fast charging, all other things being equal. But they very much aren't equal. Fast charging is very expensive, and the faster it is the more expensive it is. Wiring in hundreds of kilowatts isn't likely to ever get cheap. 10 minute charges require a megawatt, and that's definitely not easy or cheap. Imagine having 10 chargers at a station. If you consider the inherent energy in gasoline, a gas pump delivers 20 megawatts. Per pump. (In reality, because gasoline cars are around 30% efficient, that's more like 6 megawatts worth, but it's still huge.) You're unlikely to ever duplicate that, or to want to pay the price to do it. Fast charging stations today use a lot of expensive electrical gear. Tesla is smart, and it costs them about $30,000/stall to put in their stations, while non-Tesla stalls only get put in thanks to very fat government subsidies, and routinely cost over $200,000 each. That means getting a charge at these fast stations is pricey. The cost is typically around 40 to 60 cents/kWh, while the average cost at home in the USA (which recently increased a lot) is 16.26 cents, though often under 10 cents at night, and even less for people who put in solar power. It's such a huge difference that while those who charge at home save large sums over what they used to spend on gasoline, fast charging stations can make your energy cost per mile be more than gasoline in a hybrid car. In addition, being expensive, it's precious. It has to go in far fewer locations, and generally one must leave the stall as soon as charging is done to make space for somebody else. So all other things are not equal. That's without counting the time spent waiting at these stations or detouring to them, compared to the home or office or hotel where you sleep or work while your car sits where it was already going to sit anyway. Office parking lots with solar panels nearby and slow charging for the cars that park there all day ... More are the biggest win The typical car is parked over 22 hours per day. And the average driver who drives 10,000 miles/year only needs to charge for under 2 hours/day, not at a fast charger, but at a slow 'level 2' one. In fact, it only needs to charge for 7 hours/day, on average, at on ordinary dedicated 120v household plug, called 'level 1.' Slow chargers are cheap. In fact, there's almost nothing in them, just a $5 computer, a switch, thick wires and a plug. The most expensive part is the wiring (if you want the Level 2.) Enough electricity is already present in almost every building in the world. Other than land cost, one can probably put in 50 to 100 slow chargers for the cost of a single CCS fast charging stall. In the ideal future of the EV transition, there's low cost, not particularly fast charging at just a subset of those parking locations cars spend just 2 to 8 of their 22 parked hours. Today, most EV drivers have that--over 80% of EV drivers can charge at home or work and never use fast charging in their home town, with very rare exceptions. If we can 'charge where we park, rather than park where there's charging' the EV experience becomes much better than the gasoline one in every way. When people ask me how long it takes to charge my EV, I tell them it takes less time than I spent getting gasoline in my last car. That's true at home, and it's almost true on road trips. It's hard to see wanting any other world. Yet many companies are building large EV gas stations hoping they can get in on being the 'gas station of the 21st century.' And today, they have customers, because there is a small cohort of EV drivers who can't charge at home or work, because they don't have a driveway, or don't own their home. But this is what we need to fix. All the subsidies and EV promotion laws should be aimed at trying to fix that, not at building EV versions of the gas station. Let's make it easy for apartments and condos to put in charging, and for tenants to demand it. Let's get curbside charging for streets where people don't have driveways and park on the street at night. Let's leave the gas-style EV stations for the few who can't get that. There's more good news. Under 20th century rules, many buildings could not add EV charging because they didn't have sufficient electrical service. New, smarter technologies (Disclaimer: I have investment in a company that provides this) allow any building to handle all its EVs without upgrading the electrical service. The Exceptions There are some cars that aren't parked 95% of the time. Professional drivers/cabs, and people on long intercity road trips. There are many types of road trips. In most, cars are still parked 10 hours at a hotel or other sleeping stop, and 1-2 hours for meals and breaks. For more leisurely road trips, they are parked many more hours at 'attractions' along the way. These cars also need much more charging during their day of long driving. Fast charging is needed, but it also should be located at the places people already stop, such as restaurants, some shops, and attractions. At restaurants, 100kW is more than enough for most--in fact, if it's too fast, you have to interrupt your meal to go move your car, because fast stations also don't let you sit idle after you are done. They're too expensive. The only cars that need really fast charging are those in a terrible hurry, who want to stop for a bathroom break every 2-3 hours and want to pick up 30-40kWh in the fastest time. (Most cars only charge fast when going from 0% to 50%.) If we build the world where there's EV charging in the places we already stop or park, the other needs are few. How many will pay large surcharges for 10 minute charges? Will they be enough market to justify building these cars and stations? Perhaps only if it gets cheaper. Most Uber drivers actually do under 300 miles/day, often under 200. If so, they'll need only a small amount of fast charging if they can get a cheap, slow 'sleep charge.' A short break, for lunch or otherwise, will keep them in place, as long as there is charging where they stop. Some Fleet vehicles (particularly heavier ones with shorter range) may want to run multiple shifts, or may need a larger recharge mid-shift. These do want their charging to be fast. If a fleet sees full utilization, and charging time is downtime, this is an instance where you want it to be as fast as possible. If utilization is not full, though, you just rotate vehicles so some are charging and others are working, and you don't need the charging to be as fast. The Future Tesla keeps promising their cars will fully drive themselves 'this year,' and has predicted that each year for almost a decade. But one thing that's actually coming is cars that can make short drives at off-peak times on quiet roads and in office complexes at low speeds. That's a car that can take itself to charging. as long as an attendant or robot (or the car itself, which is a robot) can plug it in. When that arrives, you no longer need charging where you park, you just need charging lots within a moderate distance of where you park. Cars needing a charge can slip off when their owner is asleep or working or staying for a while. Remember that the average car needs less than 2 hours of slow charging per day. Forget 'gasoline' thinking--this is a car that just is always charged as if by magic, with no electrical wiring, and very limited use of fast charging. Robotaxis, on the other hand, though able to drive to where they charge, actually do want faster charging to get back to work. Though in this case 25kW does the job--that is what Tesla has chosen for the CyberCab.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
I-20 at US-377 in Benbrook shut down due to crash
Westbound lanes of I-20 at US-377 in Benbrook are shut down due to a crash. The crash happened around 2:25 a.m. on Monday, according to the Texas Department of Transportation. Traffic cameras showed cars being diverted off I-20 at Winscott Road. It is unclear how long the road will be closed. This story is developing. Check back for updates.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
This Ex-Ralph Lauren Ferrari F50 Could Hit $7.5 Million At Auction
Just two U.S-specification Ferrari F50s left the factory painted yellow It's not every day that a Ferrari F50 comes up for auction. Those days are even scarcer when it's a yellow F50 we're talking about – and when the car previously belonged to Ralph Lauren? It's a truly unique moment. Lauren's classic car collection is world-famous, but opportunities to buy one of his cars come by very rarely indeed. The F50 coming up for auction this summer was first bought by the fashion mogul in 1995, then sold in 2003 and seldom seen since. Ferrari produced just 349 examples of the F50, a two-seat supercar with a Formula One-derived V12 engine and a removable hard-top roof, to celebrate its 50th anniversary. The vast majority of those 349 were painted red, with just 31 painted 'Giallo Modena' yellow – and of those, just two were built to U.S. market specification. This is one of those two cars. It is being offered for auction by RM Sotheby's and will go under the hammer in mid-August, during Monterey Car Week in California. It has had the same owner for the last 22 years and, the auction house says, has not been shown or displayed in public since 2009. It is described as being in immaculate condition and is showing fewer than 5,400 miles from new. The car was purchased new by Ralph Lauren in 1995, then sold to the current owner in 2003. The car carries a guide price of $6,500,000 to $7,500,000. This puts it firmly at the top end of the Ferrari F50 market, and demonstrates not only the draw of the rare color and Lauren ownership, but also the increasing appreciation of the F50 more generally. Initially seen as a car failing to out-do its F40 predecessor, the F50 value has surged from below the $1 million mark in the previous decade, to more than double that today. RM Sotheby's sold a red example with just 1,000 miles on the clock in February 2025 for $5,532,500, and another sold in the summer of 2024 for $5,505,500. Expanding on the significance of an ex-Lauren car coming up for sale, Sotheby's states, 'It is very rare that Mr. Lauren has parted with a car once acquired, making the opportunity to purchase a vehicle with his provenance quite a rarity. Nonetheless, Mr. Lauren retained the F50 until May of 2003, at which point it was made available for sale through Paul Russell & Company with 3,300 miles; it appears to have been sold into the hands of a dealer in Florida.' The yellow paintwork is contrasted by an all-back leather interior. The car is described as being 'the centerpiece' of its owners' collection, a married couple who are known as being avid Ferrari fans, and who have both competed in the company's Challenge race cars. Further explaining how rarely the car has been seen in public, the auction house said, 'Early in their ownership it was taken to a couple of events, including being driven for demonstration laps at Watkins Glen, and used as the poster car for the Burn Prevention Foundation Concours in 2005, as well as display at the Cavallino Classic in 2009. It is believed to have not been shown publicly since that year at the Celebration Exotic Car Festival in Central Florida.' As you would expect from a Ferrari of such significance, the F50 has received Ferrari Classiche Certification, which was reviewed and renewed in 2024 with a new 'Red Book' documentation folder due to arrive with the seller ahead of the auction. This process acts as confirmation from the Ferrari factory in Maranello, Italy that all components remain original and are exactly as they should be.
