CIMB names former SC top executive Syed Zaid Albar as new group chairman
He will succeed Tan Sri Mohd Nasir Ahmad, who will retire from the board on July 19 after serving CIMB for 10 years since 2015, including as group chairman since 2018.
In line with the transition, Datuk Syed Zaid will be appointed as an independent non-executive director effective from June 18.
Mohd Nasir Ahmad said Syed Zaid's leadership and extensive corporate experience across legal industry, financial and regulatory landscape will bring valuable perspective in guiding CIMB through its next chapter of growth and transformation.
"We are confident that his stewardship will provide strong guidance in driving the success of the Group's Forward30 strategic plan," he said in a statement.
Syed Zaid is a lawyer with four decades of experience across a broad range of practice areas, with a strong focus on financial services and corporate advisory.
As one of the founding partners of Albar & Partners, he has established himself in Malaysia's capital market and legal landscape, particularly in debt and equity finance, including Islamic finance.
His significant contributions have earned him multiple recognitions for his involvement in notable capital market transactions.
Syed Zaid stepped away from legal practice in 2018 to assume the role of executive chairman of the SC, a position he held until mid-2022.
During his tenure at the SC, Syed Zaid played a key role in strengthening the governance, regulatory oversight and the development of Malaysia's capital markets, both domestically and internationally.
He rejoined Albar & Partners in early 2023 as a senior partner, taking on an advisory role and professional development.
Syed Zaid previously served the boards of numerous public listed companies, including Yinson Holdings Bhd, Cycle & Carriage Bintang Bhd, Malaysian Pacific Industries Bhd and Malaysia Building Society Bhd.
CIMB group chief executive officer Datuk Novan Amirudin said it looks forward to Syed Zaid's guidance as it executes Forward30 strategic plan over the next six years, which is anchored on its purpose of advancing customers and society.
"Our goal is to be the top-of-mind Asean bank, reimagining banking by embedding ourselves into our customers lives and keeping our customers at the heart of everything we do.
"I would like to extend our deepest appreciation to Mohd Nasir for his exemplary leadership and invaluable contributions over the past decade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Aeon Credit issues 10th sukuk wakalah of RM150mil
KUALA LUMPUR: Aeon Credit Service (M) Bhd has made its 10th issuance of sukuk wakalah under the Islamic commercial papers (ICP) programme today, with a total nominal amount of RM150 million and a 179-day tenure starting from July 14, 2025. "The proceeds will be utilised for financing of disbursements to customers in the ordinary course of business of providing consumer financing based on Shariah principle, financing expenses relating to the ICP programme, and refinancing any existing and future Islamic financing facilities of the issuer,' it said in a Bursa Malaysia filing. - Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ringgit rises as US plans new tariffs on major partners
KUALA LUMPUR : The ringgit opened higher against the US dollar on Monday, lifted by concerns over Washington's plan to impose tariffs on three major trading partners from Aug 1, 2025. Over the weekend, US President Donald Trump announced plans to impose a 30% tariff on goods from the European Union and Mexico, and a 35% tariff on Canadian products. At 8am, the ringgit strengthened to 4.2405/4.2635 against the greenback, compared with Friday's close of 4.2475/4.2525. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Afzanizam Rashid said the US had weaponised tariffs to gain economic advantage. 'Clearly, the tariff policy instrument has been weaponised by the US to address economic imbalances. 'This means downside risks to global growth remain elevated, while the risk of higher inflation especially in the US, is becoming more apparent, complicating the Federal Reserve's decision-making on rate cuts,' he noted. Afzanizam added that the ringgit is expected to remain within a narrow range of RM4.24 to RM4.25 amid ongoing global uncertainties. At the open, the ringgit was higher against a basket of major currencies. It advanced against the Japanese yen to 2.8792/2.8950 from 2.8893/2.8929, strengthened against the British pound to 5.7234/5.7544 from 5.7524/5.7592, and gained versus the euro to 4.9546/4.9815 from 4.9679/4.9737 previously. The local note was also firmer against most Asean currencies, except the Thai baht. It rose vis-a-vis the Singapore dollar to 3.3119/3.3303 from 3.3186/3.3228, edged up against the Indonesian rupiah to 261.4/263.0 from 261.8/262.3, and appreciated versus the Philippine peso to 7.51/7.55 from 7.52/7.53. However, it slipped against the Thai baht to 13.0916/13.1711 from 13.0668/13.0886 at Friday's close.
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ambalat needs quiet diplomacy, not open debates
The recent pledge by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto to pursue peaceful, mutually beneficial economic cooperation deserves praise for its pragmatic foresight. The pledge in June includes several promising prospects. Among them is a plan to jointly explore and develop the contested oil- and gas-rich Ambalat block in the Celebes Sea, off the eastern coast of Sabah. If this initiative proceeds, it would mark a welcome step away from the longstanding impasse over unresolved maritime boundaries between the two countries. For Malaysia, this peaceful mechanism for managing maritime territorial disputes is neither new nor unprecedented. Among ASEAN members, Malaysia pioneered the approach by signing joint development agreements — first with Thailand in 1979, and later with Vietnam in 1992 — enabling shared exploration and development of hydrocarbon reserves across vast contested areas in the Gulf of Thailand. In the context of international law, this arrangement is consistent with provisions in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which allow collaborative measures to be implemented while disputing parties seek a final resolution over the contested area. In the case of Ambalat, the intention of both countries to manage the dispute peacefully aligns with the principles embodied in the ASEAN Charter. Certain parties, though, voiced objections to jointly developing Ambalat's oil and gas resources with Indonesia. However, the public uproar also highlights a deeper issue: the misguided notion that the details of delicate negotiations and high-level meetings between leaders or government officials must be made public. Not all diplomatic negotiations are created equal, nor should they be subject to real-time public scrutiny. Some issues, especially those involving maritime territorial and boundary disputes like the Ambalat seabed, are highly technical, legally complex and inherently sensitive. Openly debating these topics risks turning nuanced discussions into populist spectacles. The reality is that maritime boundary delimitation requires expertise in international law, hydrography and history — fields in which few laypersons or politicians are truly knowledgeable. Keeping the negotiation process private, at least to a certain degree, helps prevent misunderstandings or misinterpretations that could inflame tensions or derail delicate talks. Until finalised outcomes are reached, negotiators need private space to discuss sensitive issues, test ideas, make concessions and propose creative solutions without fear of immediate political backlash or public pressure. When talks unfold under the glare of public opinion, even a hint of flexibility is often seized upon as a sign of weakness, pushing parties to retreat into rigid, uncompromising stances. At certain stages, confidentiality in negotiations — even beyond the context of the Ambalat dispute — is essential to protect national interests and security. Prematurely revealing positions can weaken Malaysia's bargaining power and expose strategic vulnerabilities. Once negotiating lines become public, adversaries can exploit them, and domestic critics can pressure leaders or negotiators into rigid stances that leave no room for compromise or manoeuvring. Beyond joint development of economic resources in the disputed maritime areas, are there alternative options to manage or resolve the Ambalat dispute peacefully? Third-party dispute settlement mechanisms are one possibility worth considering. Malaysia has previously referred its maritime sovereignty disputes to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for adjudication, notably in cases involving the Sipadan and Ligitan islands with Indonesia, as well as Batu Puteh and two maritime features with Singapore. Nonetheless, pursuing this judicial route may not be the preferred option for Indonesia. When the ICJ awarded Sipadan and Ligitan to Malaysia in 2002, the judgment sparked protests in several Indonesian cities. Had every stage of the current Ambalat discussions been made public, nationalist fervour on either side could have derailed progress. Demanding full disclosure of every twist and turn of negotiations is unrealistic and counterproductive. In the case of Ambalat, success depends not only on what leaders decide, but also on society's willingness to trust the process. After decades of stalemate in the Ambalat dispute, we should give diplomacy the space it needs to succeed.
