logo
Civil rights leaders alarmed after bible and other artifacts are removed from Smithsonian African-American museum

Civil rights leaders alarmed after bible and other artifacts are removed from Smithsonian African-American museum

Independent28-04-2025
A Bible carried during civil rights demonstrations and other artifacts are being quietly removed from the National Museum of African American History and Culture in the nation's capital, according to reports.
Rev. Amos Brown, a pastor and civil rights activist for more than five decades, received an email from the museum informing him that a Bible he carried during civil rights protests with Dr. Martin Luther King as well as other pieces he donated would soon be returned to him, he told WUSA9.
The Smithsonian museum opened its permanent location on the National Mall in September 2016. The reverend's bible has been a part of its collection since. But now, the museum said it would be returning the items it first borrowed nine years ago.
'We are grateful for the loan of these important objects and the ability to share them with the public. In order to preserve them and not display them for too long, we are now returning them to you,' the email said.
The Independent has reached out to the museum for comment.
The move comes one month after President Donald Trump 's March 27 executive order aiming to 'restore truth and sanity to American history.' The order targets Smithsonian museums, which have 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology,' the order says.
To achieve this restoration, the order says, expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy' are prohibited.
Brown doubted that the items were being returned to his possession due to fear of harming their condition: 'The flimsy excuse was because they were under too much light.'
His copy of The History of the Negro Race in America from 1619 to 1880, a historical account of the treatment of Black Americans from the slave trade through the 19th century, was also being returned to him, he said. 'I had called them and told them how unfortunate and ideological it is,' he added.
In a statement to the outlet, the museum said it 'routinely returns loaned artifacts per applicable loan agreements and rotates objects on display in accordance with the Smithsonian's high standards of care and preservation and as part of our regular museum turnover.' The statement continued: 'Recent claims that objects have been removed for reasons other than adherence to standard loan agreements or museum practices are false.'
Brown told NBC4 he was never asked about renewing the loan. "It is downright dishonest and it is demeaning," he told the outlet. "I hope people of good will, of conscience and common sense will rise up and say 'we need to stop this."
Mississippi Congressman Bennie Thompson also denounced the museum's decision to remove artifacts. He wrote on X over the weekend: 'The Trump administration's attempt to remove exhibits from the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture is a blatant attack on Black history. Erasing our past won't change the truth. We will not be silenced.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Expert debunks peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state
Expert debunks peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state

The National

time25 minutes ago

  • The National

Expert debunks peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state

On Thursday, around 40 members of the unelected second chamber wrote to Attorney General Richard Hermer, suggesting that the criteria for recognising Palestine had not been met under the Montevideo Convention – a Pan-American treaty signed in 1933. The Convention, signed by 17 signatories in the Americas, set out four key criteria for statehood. The UK was not a signatory. Richard McNeil-Willson, who lectures in the Islamic and Middle Eastern studies department at Edinburgh University, said that the interpretation was 'not only ludicrous' by a 'cynical' interpretation of the treaty. READ MORE: Ipso defends chair for publicly opposing recognition of Palestine And, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said it was 'deplorable' that peers were trying to use legal technicalities while a genocide is underway. The criteria under the Montevideo Convention sets out that a state must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and capacity to enter into relations with other states. But, McNeil-Willson explained there are several issues with that argument, adding that it was a 'spoiler attempt' to stop Palestinians from having 'basic rights'. 'It's very bizarre that this has been focused on by the 43 peers and signatories who essentially put forward these arguments that Palestine doesn't meet any of the four criteria," he said. 'You can look at this from a technical point of view, the letter of the law, and you can say, well clearly Palestine has a permanent population. 'It also has borders, and it has borders that are internationally recognised, and they are recognised under the International Court of Justice.' (Image: Supplied) McNeil-Willson noted the claims that this applies as there isn't a functioning government in Palestine, there have been no elections for decades, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, falls short. 'The [Montevideo Convention] doesn't care what kind of government is in place, if it's a democratic organisation, they wouldn't care if it's non-democratic authoritarian – that doesn't stop it from being recognised as a state,' he added. 'Equally, the idea that it's a terrorist organisation – if you look at contemporary international relations, the recognition of the Taliban as a government in Afghanistan, despite it being previously seen by the US and lots of Europe as a terrorist organisation. 'Then there's the HTS [Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham] in Syria which is now being recognised as the legitimate government of Syria, that doesn't change Syria's righteousness as a state. None of these ideas make any sense.' McNeil-Willson added that under the interpretation put forward by the peers in the letter, the 147 states that have already recognised Palestine, including Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, who also signed the Montevideo Convention, are already in violation of international law. READ MORE: 'Keir' name goes extinct after Starmer comes to power 'The arguments they're putting forward – that the population isn't permanent, the borders aren't recognised – are a direct result of Israel's genocide, of its bombing and its invasion,' he added. 'It's not only ludicrous, it's a very cynical view of the conflict that in no way takes Israel's role into account.' He added: 'To Israel, the existence of Palestine is a threat. To Palestinians, it's simply a way of proclaiming basic human rights that should be granted to them.' Scottish Greens co-leader Harvie said that recognition of Palestine as a state is 'long overdue'. 'It must be just the first step of many toward achieving peace, security and justice for the Palestinian people,' he added. 'To seek legal technicalities to block progress is deplorable. We should completely reject the idea that Palestine should be denied statehood because of factors which are entirely the result of Israel's occupation and illegal settlements over many years. 'The current genocide must end, the occupation must end, and the international community must finally take action against the state of Israel for its dehumanisation of Palestinians and hold war criminals accountable.' We previously told how Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK Government would follow France's lead and officially recognise Palestinian statehood in September if Israel and Hamas do not agree to a ceasefire.

Peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state is 'deplorable'
Peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state is 'deplorable'

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state is 'deplorable'

On Thursday, around 40 members of the unelected second chamber wrote to Attorney General Richard Hermer, suggesting that the criteria for recognising Palestine had not been met under the Montevideo Convention – a Pan-American treaty signed in 1933. The Convention, signed by 17 signatories in the Americas, set out four key criteria for statehood. The UK was not a signatory. Richard McNeil-Willson, who lectures in the Islamic and Middle Eastern studies department at Edinburgh University, said that the interpretation was 'not only ludicrous' by a 'cynical' interpretation of the treaty. READ MORE: Ipso defends chair for publicly opposing recognition of Palestine And, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said it was 'deplorable' that peers were trying to use legal technicalities while a genocide is underway. The criteria under the Montevideo Convention sets out that a state must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and capacity to enter into relations with other states. But, McNeil-Willson explained there are several issues with that argument, adding that it was a 'spoiler attempt' to stop Palestinians from having 'basic rights'. 'It's very bizarre that this has been focused on by the 43 peers and signatories who essentially put forward these arguments that Palestine doesn't meet any of the four criteria," he said. 'You can look at this from a technical point of view, the letter of the law, and you can say, well clearly Palestine has a permanent population. 'It also has borders, and it has borders that are internationally recognised, and they are recognised under the International Court of Justice.' (Image: Supplied) McNeil-Willson noted the claims that this applies as there isn't a functioning government in Palestine, there have been no elections for decades, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, falls short. 'The [Montevideo Convention] doesn't care what kind of government is in place, if it's a democratic organisation, they wouldn't care if it's non democratic authoritarian – that doesn't stop it from being recognised as a state,' he added. 'Equally, the idea that it's a terrorist organisation – if you look at contemporary international relations, the recognition of the Taliban as a government in Afghanistan, despite it being previously seen by the US and lots of Europe as a terrorist organisation. 'Then there's the HTS [Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham] in Syria which is now being recognised as the legitimate government of Syria, that doesn't change Syria's righteousness as a state. None of these ideas make any sense.' McNeil-Willson added that under the interpretation put forward by the peers in the letter, the 147 states that have already recognised Palestine, including Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, who also signed the Montevideo Convention, are already in violation of international law. READ MORE: 'Keir' name goes extinct after Starmer comes to power 'The arguments they're putting forward – that the population isn't permanent, the borders aren't recognised – are a direct result of Israel's genocide, of its bombing and its invasion,' he added. 'It's not only ludicrous, it's a very cynical view of the conflict that in no way takes Israel's role into account.' He added: 'To Israel, the existence of Palestine is a threat. To Palestinians, it's simply a way of proclaiming basic human rights that should be granted to them.' Scottish Greens co-leader Harvie said that recognition of Palestine as a state is 'long overdue'. 'It must be just the first step of many toward achieving peace, security and justice for the Palestinian people,' he added. 'To seek legal technicalities to block progress is deplorable. We should completely reject the idea that Palestine should be denied statehood because of factors which are entirely the result of Israel's occupation and illegal settlements over many years. 'The current genocide must end, the occupation must end, and the international community must finally take action against the state of Israel for its dehumanisation of Palestinians and hold war criminals accountable.' We previously told how Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK Government would follow France's lead and officially recognise Palestinian statehood in September if Israel and Hamas do not agree to a ceasefire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store