Immobile home: WVDOT gives owner time to move structure from side of road
However this isn't the first time this house has been a roadside unattractive. Before it wound up in its current location, it had been left for weeks along the Kingwood Pike near the Interstate 68 overpass.
The West Virginia Department of Transportation has been in contact with the owner of the home and has given the owner time to get the home moved from next to the roadway, according to spokesman Brent Walker.
"We are in contact with the owner, and we're working with them trying to give them a little bit more time to make arrangements to move the mobile home, " Walker said. "We are just trying to give him a little bit more time before it'll have to be moved by us."
Walker added several groups have been in contact with the owner of the home to try and get it moved from its current position.
"It takes a special permit " to move it, he said. "We're not able to just get in there and lift it. It's the owner's responsibility, so we're just working with him and letting him know that he has a little bit more time."
Walker added he would like to have the home moved sooner rather than later, but no specific timeframe has been given yet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The States Where It Costs the Most To Charge a Tesla
West Virginia, Alabama and Arkansas may pride themselves on having a lower cost of living than most of the nation, but they're among the 17 most expensive states for charging a Tesla. Be Aware: Explore More: GOBankingRates referred to AAA's EV charging prices and factored how much it would cost a person to charge a 75kWh battery to full. The total cost for fully charging a battery in these 17 states is $30 or more. Find out where it costs the most money to charge a Tesla. 1. West Virginia Cost/kWh: $0.518 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $38.85 View More: Discover Next: 2. Alaska Cost/kWh: $0.510 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $38.25 Read More: 3. Tennessee Cost/kWh: $0.470 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $35.25 4. Hawaii Cost/kWh: $0.467 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $35.03 5. Montana Cost/kWh: $0.454 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $34.05 For You: 6. South Carolina Cost/kWh: $0.445 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $33.38 7. New Hampshire Cost/kWh: $0.433 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $32.48 8. Wisconsin Cost/kWh: $0.428 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $32.10 Find Out: 9. Alabama Cost/kWh: $0.426 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $31.95 10. Arkansas Cost/kWh: $0.425 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $31.88 11. Kentucky Cost/kWh: $0.425 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $31.88 Trending Now: 12. North Dakota Cost/kWh: $0.425 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $31.88 13. Louisiana Cost/kWh: $0.424 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $31.80 14. Arizona Cost/kWh: $0.418 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $31.35 Check Out: 15. Nevada Cost/kWh: $0.404 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $30.30 16. Ohio Cost/kWh: $0.402 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $30.15 17. Oklahoma Cost/kWh: $0.402 Cost to charge a battery to 75kWh: $30.15 Methodology: For this piece GOBankingRates used AAA EV charging prices and factored that out for how much it would cost one to charge a 75kWh battery to full. All data was collected and up to date as of July 14, 2025. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy This article originally appeared on The States Where It Costs the Most To Charge a Tesla
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
GreenPower Provides Business Update and Reports Year-End Fiscal 2025 Results
Webinar Scheduled for August 4, 2025 at 4:15 p.m. EST/1:15 p.m. PST VANCOUVER, BC, July 30, 2025 /CNW/ -- GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (Nasdaq: GP) (TSXV: GPV) ("GreenPower" and the "Company"), a leading manufacturer and distributor of all-electric, purpose-built, zero-emission medium and heavy-duty vehicles serving the cargo and delivery market, shuttle and transit space and school bus sector, today reported its year-end fiscal year 2025 results. "Fiscal year 2025 was a transformative year for GreenPower as the political winds shifted and federal EV incentives and policies began to change," said GreenPower CEO Fraser Atkinson. "While GreenPower continued to manufacturer and deliver class leading all-electric, purpose-built, zero-emission school buses and commercial vehicles, the Company was focused on adapting to these changes by streamlining production and retooling operations to be successful in the space." During the year GreenPower consolidated its California operations from multiple locations in the state to one facility in Riverside. "Consolidating our operations from five different facilities spread throughout California to one larger facility has reduced our costs and increased efficiency," said GreenPower President Brendan Riley. "Having our U.S. corporate headquarters, engineers, project managers, upfitting operations and west coast manufacturing in one location better positions the company for managed growth and success." Manufacturing in the West Virginia facility continued during the fiscal year with the first BEAST Type D school buses rolling off the manufacturing line for in-state orders and a Round 2 EPA Clean School Bus Program (CSBP) grant that was awarded to multiple school districts in the state during fiscal 2025. In the western half of the country, school bus manufacturing and deliveries also continued during the fiscal year under a variety of programs including the CSBP. Type D BEASTs and Type A Nano BEASTs from GreenPower's California facilities were delivered through its dealers to schools in Arizona, California and Oregon. "As the only all-electric, purpose-built school bus OEM manufacturing both a Type A and a Type D school bus in facilities on both sides of the country, GreenPower is perfectly positioned to meet the market demand nationwide," Atkinson continued. "GreenPower innovation remained at the forefront of activities in fiscal year 2025, as two new Class 4 all-electric, purpose-built, zero-emission commercial vehicles were introduced into the marketplace," Riley stated. The first new vehicle was the EV Star Utility Truck which is built for day-to-day demands and workloads and is equipped with optional power sources, providing accessible power through built-in plugs to accommodate tool charging conveniently on a job site. The front box of the vehicle has optional full pass-through capacity, allowing for oversize tools and supplies. The EV Star Utility Truck offers tailored contractor body configurations, coming in a standard bed size of 16 feet, with the option to customize the length to meet the customer's needs, allowing for more room and applications. The second new vehicle unveiled during the fiscal year was the EV Star REEFERX, a new modern offering, all-electric refrigerated medium-duty delivery truck. Built on GreenPower's EV Star Cab & Chassis platform, the EV Star REEFERX is purpose-built and fully customizable with a lighter body to allow for increased payload. Designed to serve mid to last-mile refrigerated delivery and catering applications, the EV Star REEFERX moves goods that need to be temperature controlled, such as fresh and frozen foods, flowers and pharmaceuticals, among other applications. The vehicle body features a one interior wall structure to allow for seamless sanitation, consistent insulation throughout and a longer life. 2025 Year-End Highlights: Generated revenues of $19.8 million for the year ended March 31, 2025. GreenPower delivered a total of 84 vehicles, which were comprised of 34 BEAST Type D school buses, two Nano BEAST Type A school buses, 23 EV Star Cargo and EV Star Cargo Plus commercial vehicles and 25 EV Star Passenger Vans. GreenPower had working capital of $8.1 million at year-end. At the end of the year GreenPower had inventory of $25.6 million, consisting of $10.1 million of finished goods, $11.3 million of work-in-process and $4.2 million of parts and components. The Company had Deferred revenue of $10.1 million at year-end. Completed an underwritten offering of 3,000,000 common shares raising gross proceeds of $3 million in October 2024 and a unit offering in which it issued 1,500,000 common shares and warrants to purchase 1,575,000 common shares for gross proceeds of $2,325,750. For additional information on the results of operations for the year ended March 31, 2025 review the audited financial statements and related reports posted on GreenPower's website as well as on or filed on EDGAR. Webinar on August 4, 2025 Red Chip will be hosting a webinar for GreenPower on Monday August 4, 2025 at 1:15 p.m. PST/4:15 p.m. EST Register in advance for this webinar: For further information contact: Fraser Atkinson, CEO(604) 220-8048 Brendan Riley, President(510) 910-3377 Michael Sieffert, CFO(604) 563-4144 About GreenPower Motor Company designs, builds and distributes a full suite of high-floor and low-floor all-electric medium and heavy-duty vehicles, including transit buses, school buses, shuttles, cargo van and a cab and chassis. GreenPower employs a clean-sheet design to manufacture all-electric vehicles that are purpose built to be battery powered with zero emissions while integrating global suppliers for key components. This OEM platform allows GreenPower to meet the specifications of various operators while providing standard parts for ease of maintenance and accessibility for warranty requirements. GreenPower was founded in Vancouver, Canada with primary operational facilities in southern California. Listed on the Toronto exchange since November 2015, GreenPower completed its U.S. IPO and NASDAQ listing in August 2020. For further information go to Forward-Looking StatementsThis document contains forward-looking statements relating to, among other things, GreenPower's business and operations and the environment in which it operates, which are based on GreenPower's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather on current expectations and projections about future events, and are therefore subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from the future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "upon", "may", "should", "will", "could", "intend", "estimate", "plan", "anticipate", "expect", "believe" or "continue", or the negative thereof or similar variations. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. A number of important factors including those set forth in other public filings (filed under the Company's profile on could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place any undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. In addition, these forward-looking statements relate to the date on which they are made. GreenPower disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. All amounts in U.S. dollars. ©2025 GreenPower Motor Company Inc. All rights reserved. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE GreenPower Motor Company View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19-07-2025
- Yahoo
Proposed Ghent truck stop a no-go as courts back county commission decision
GHENT, WV (WVNS) – Local courts chose to concur with the decision of county leadership regarding a proposed truck stop location at the Ghent exit on I-77. Several public meetings were held to discuss the proposed project earlier in the year. Commission members said the community was largely opposed to the addition. Raleigh County Commission President, Greg Duckworth told 59News public outcry played a large role in the decision. DUI checkpoint to be held in Raleigh County 'Public input should weigh very heavy on rezoning, responsible development, and those kinds of things,' said Commissioner Duckworth. 'In this case the outcry, it wasn't even close. It was so lopsided the community just didn't want the truck stop there.' Raleigh County Attorney, Bill Roop said Go-Mart would still have the option to use the property commercially. Raleigh County Circuit Courts backed the commission's decision that the truck stop project is not viable under commercial use.'They did say that the property could be used as a commercial use such as a gas station or a convenient store,' said Roop. 'The problem was just the overnight parking of the tractor trailers.' Circuit courts have indicated the commission acted within its legal authority to block the project, though Roop told 59News that Go-Mart still has the opportunity to appeal the decision through the West Virginia Supreme Court should they choose to do so. Commission members have stated they will continue to support the planning and zoning process as a fair and structured method for consideration of land use and development. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
