Jeffrey Epstein's real estate empire: Who owns them now?
It's time to put a lid on the conspiracy theories.
It's been over five years since rumors have been circulating about the nature of Jeffrey Epstein's death. However, on Wednesday, the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Deputy Director Dan Bongino revealed that there is nothing in the Jeffrey Epstein file indicating he died by any other way than suicide.
Bongino updated Fox News on the investigation into the Epstein file, as conspiracies continue to float that he was murdered in prison, and said, "The evidence we have in our files clearly indicates that it was, in fact, a suicide. We do have video. It's not the greatest video in the world. I don't want to set expectations on fire." Bongino added, "However, the video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you'll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back.
You'll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him. There's no one in there. There's nothing there in the file at all that indicates anything other than in fact a suicide."
The infamous American financier died in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
But what happened to the heap of wealth he amassed?
Read on to find out.
Jeffrey Epstein had amassed a significant real estate portfolio over the decades.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Tecno Pova Curve 5G - India's Slimmest 5,500mAh Curve
TECNO Mobile
Buy Now
Undo
From private islands to the landmark townhouse on Manhattan – the list of his possessions and property is quite long.
Following his death, these properties became central to legal battles, settlements, and public scrutiny. While some properties have been sold and proceeds allocated to settlements, others remain in limbo, awaiting resolution.
Here's an overview of his key properties and their current ownership.
Take a look.
Little Saint James & Great Saint James, US Virgin Islands:
Epstein's most infamous holdings were his two private islands in the US Virgin Islands. Little Saint James, often referred to as 'Pedophile Island', was where many of the alleged abuses occurred. Great Saint James, purchased in 2016, remained largely undeveloped.
Current ownership:
In May 2023, private equity mogul Stephen Deckoff, through his firm SD Investments, acquired both islands for $60 million, significantly below the initial $125 million listing price.
Settlement details:
As part of a settlement with the US Virgin Islands, half of the proceeds from the sale of Little Saint James were allocated to the territory. Additionally, Epstein's estate agreed to pay $450,000 to address environmental damages on Great Saint James.
Manhattan townhouse, New York City:
Located on East 71st Street, Epstein's seven-story mansion became one of the most popular landmarks in the city and was valued at $77 million in 2019.
The property was raided by federal authorities in July 2019 as part of their investigation into Epstein's activities.
Current ownership:
In March 2021, former Goldman Sachs executive Michael Daffey purchased the townhouse for $51 million. The proceeds from the sale were directed to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
Palm Beach estate, Florida:
Epstein acquired his Palm Beach estate in 1990. The property was estimated to be worth over $12 million in 2019.
In December 2021, a venture capitalist purchased the vacant lot for $25.845 million, with plans to demolish the existing house.
Zorro ranch, New Mexico:
Situated near Stanley, New Mexico, Zorro Ranch spanned approximately 10,000 acres and included various structures, such as a main residence, guest houses, and an airstrip. The ranch gained notoriety due to its association with Epstein's activities.
Current ownership:
In August 2023, Zorro Ranch was sold to San Rafael Ranch LLC for an undisclosed sum.
The buyer's identity and future plans for the property remain unclear.
Other properties:
Epstein also owned an apartment in Paris on the famous Avenue Foch, though details about its current status are limited. Additionally, he held a private jet, which was auctioned off in 2020.
Estate management and legal proceedings:
Following Epstein's death, his estate faced numerous legal challenges and settlements. In January 2025, the estate received a substantial tax refund, increasing its value to $145 million. However, activists and some victims' advocates argued that funds should be directed towards compensating survivors rather than benefiting individuals associated with Epstein.
Epstein Accuser Virginia Giuffre Cremated QUIETLY After Tragic Demise; Private Burial Details Emerge
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Stock trading scam: Retired software employee duped of Rs 3 crore in Hyderabad; added to WhatsApp group run by fake brokerage firm CEO
HYDERABAD: A 67-year-old retired software employee was duped for Rs 3 crore by fraudsters posing as representatives of a well-known Delhi-based stock trading firm. In his complaint to the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau (TGCSB), the victim from Lalaguda alleged that in mid-April he was added to a WhatsApp group administered by a fraudster posing as Anu Prita Daga, who claimed to represent the CEO of a Delhi-based stock brokerage firm. The group, with 60 members, persuaded investors to open Over-The-Counter (OTC) trading accounts on their web platforms such as and assuring them that all transactions were reported to SEBI and RBI. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Trusting the claims, the victim transferred money from his bank accounts to various bank accounts of technology, textile, and construction companies provided by the fraudsters in 36 transactions between May 30 and June 19. Later, the fraudsters announced that they were underwriting the initial public offer of a health tech firm and, through their manipulated portal, allotted shares worth Rs 49 crore in the victim's name and started pressuring him to make payment. The victim became suspicious as the total value of the IPO was Rs 55 crore. "I asked, how can they allot Rs 49 crore value of shares to a single retail investor and around 300 crores to other group members when the total IPO value was itself Rs 55 crore," the complainant said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo When he questioned the allotment, the accused threatened penalties for a negative balance and froze his account. The victim then directly contacted the health tech firm which issued the IPO and also SEBI to verify the documents sent by the fraudsters and realised that he was duped. Based on his complaint, TGCSB Headquarters police in Hyderabad registered a case under section 66-D of the IT Act and Sections 318(4) (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 319(2) (cheating by personation), and 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) on Saturday. "The defrauded amount was transferred to multiple accounts and withdrawn. We are analysing the bank transactions to identify the accused," said a police official.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tariff tightrope: How Donald Trump's ceasefire claim puts Centre in a 'no-win' situation
Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House, in Washington, DC, USA. (PTI file photo) While visiting India in late April, US vice president JD Vance announced the two sides had "officially finalised the Terms of Reference' for the negotiations on trade deal. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said June 3 that, "You should expect a deal between the United States and India (in the) not-too-distant future because I think we have found a place that really works for both countries. ' India was one of the first countries to begin trade negotiations with the US, launching talks in February as US President Donald Trump began to unveil his ambitious agenda to upend global trade. But as the July 9 deadline approaches, when a 90-day suspension on additional US tariffs is set to expire, the two sides have yet to seal the deal. Moreover, Trump has also said he does not plan to extend the 90-day pause on additional global tariffs beyond July 9, even as India's trade delegation extended its stay in Washington in a final push to iron out differences before the deadline. Also read: 'Not planning to extend tariff pause after July 9', says Donald Trump; India's trade team extends US stay India is seeking full exemption from the additional 26 per cent reciprocal tariff announced by the US on April 2. While the tariff was suspended for 90 days, the 10 per cent baseline tariff imposed by Washington remains in place. A tough ask It has proven difficult to officially ink a deal because of all the things the Trump administration is asking India to do to lower its trade barriers, while only offering to give up some of its newly-imposed tariffs, in return. The United States is urging India to open up sectors such as agriculture, dairy, and energy, and to reduce tariffs on products like soy, wheat, corn, ethanol, and apples. Washington is also seeking market access for genetically modified (GM) crops in India. India, however, is resisting these demands, particularly in agriculture and dairy, citing the importance of safeguarding farmers and maintaining the Minimum Support Price (MSP) mechanism. Negotiations have at times been marked by tension, as TOI reported earlier. At the beginning of the negotiations, the Indian government aimed to secure zero-duty access for several key export items, including textiles, leather products, pharmaceuticals, certain engineering goods, and auto parts. As TOI reported earlier that while American negotiators have shown interest in concluding the deal, they have conveyed to their Indian counterparts that the Trump administration is not in a position to offer zero tariffs immediately. Separately, India has also sought protection from any future tariff measures once an agreement is reached. Moreover, agriculture and dairy sectors are difficult and challenging areas for India to give duty concessions to the US. India has not opened up dairy in any of its free trade pacts signed so far. Trump's rhetoric on ceasefire between India and Pakistan Trump's repeated public claims about mediating peace between India and Pakistan during Operation Sindoor by threatening to "cancel all deals" have added a new layer of complexity to the already delicate trade negotiations between Washington and New Delhi. While trade officials from both sides have been working toward a deal since February, Trump's comments have stirred political unease in the country, as any suggestion of third-party involvement in India-Pakistan relations is considered a non-starter. The government has consistently maintained that there is "complete political consensus' against external mediation on Pakistan-related matters. Prime Minister Narendra Modi reinforced this position directly to Trump in a recent phone call. "PM Modi told President Trump clearly that during this period, there was no talk at any stage on subjects like India-US trade deal or US mediation between India and Pakistan," foreign secretary Vikram Misri said in a statement following the call between the two leaders. "Prime Minister Modi emphasized that India has not accepted mediation in the past and never will," Misri added. Despite this, Trump has continued to take public credit for what he has framed as brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. He repeated the claim at the Nato summit in the Netherlands and during other public appearances. This dissonance has made it politically harder for the Modi government to move forward with a trade deal that was supposed to showcase progress in India-US ties. "Nothing riles Indians more than the idea that their government was bullied by a foreign leader,' Syed Akbaruddin, India's former ambassador to the United Nations was quoted as saying by the Politico. "A trade bargain that could have been a win-win deal now risks being portrayed by those who oppose it as a tribute, not a partnership.' "Trump's comments have injected mistrust and public skepticism of US support to India,' said Akbaruddin. "The more he repeats his claim, the more a prospective US-India trade agreement smells like coercion, not cooperation." In effect, the ongoing trade talks have placed the government in a delicate position. If a deal is not finalised by the July 8 deadline, India could face fresh tariff hikes from the US. But if an agreement is reached, the government risks facing criticism at home for appearing to bow to American pressure. "Whatever the current government does, it will be seen as they basically capitulated to President Trump's demand,' Mukesh Aghi, president and CEO of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum was quoted as saying by the Politico. "So they are in a no-win situation." Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Ajit Ranade: What Mamdani's rise in New York tells us about welfarism versus populism
Ajit Ranade There's a crucial difference between the two, though real-world politics and policy often fail to keep them apart. Mamdani's mayoral run has drawn gasps and shocked the US right, but his plan for the city might be just what it needs. Mamdani's focus on affordable food and housing, quality creches and cheap transport can be seen as welfarist and not populist. Gift this article The 33-year-old Uganda-born son of immigrants, Zohran Mamdani, defeated 67-year-old Andrew Cuomo, three-term governor of New York state, in the city's mayoral primary poll for a Democratic party candidate. Mamdani's thumping victory has sent shockwaves in the party and exposed a divide between moderates and progressives. The 33-year-old Uganda-born son of immigrants, Zohran Mamdani, defeated 67-year-old Andrew Cuomo, three-term governor of New York state, in the city's mayoral primary poll for a Democratic party candidate. Mamdani's thumping victory has sent shockwaves in the party and exposed a divide between moderates and progressives. Cuomo has name recognition. He represents a powerful political dynasty, is a well-funded establishment figure and was backed by national heavyweights and endorsed by labour unions. Mamdani is a relatively unknown democrat socialist with a left-wing vision for the city, focused on issues of affordability, fairness and redistribution. If elected, he would be New York City's first Indian-American mayor and also the first Muslim to hold that office. His win made news in the US as a major upset that has overturned expectations and perhaps signalled an ideological shift. Mamdani was careful to assert that if elected, he would duly represent all New Yorkers. Also Read: How Zohran Mamdani beat Andrew Cuomo Clearly, Mamdani's campaign promises and messaging have touched a chord with voters. The election had a record turnout. His main theme was affordability, directly addressing the issue of inflation. On average, New Yorkers spend about 12% of their household budget on food. These costs have gone up by 50% in the past decade in the city, outpacing general inflation. Mamdani has promised city-owned grocery stores in each borough to tackle food security and keep prices low. This may sound familiar to Indian readers accustomed to fair price ration shops and state-run Amma kitchens. Mamdani also promised fare-free buses across the city and a freeze on subway fares. This is to make mobility more affordable. He has promised a rent freeze on stabilized apartment units, plus strong tenant protection and the construction of 200,000 new affordable homes. Rent stabilization, as practised in New York, is a regulatory cap on annual rent hikes. It is not outright rent control, but an attempt to mediate between profit-maximizing landlords and tenant rights. It aims to preserve affordable housing and also protect tenants from displacement. Those who squat on prized apartments in heritage precincts are not necessarily from lower income brackets. So New York's rent stabilization policy needs periodic review and tweaks to address abuse and goal drift. An affordable housing shortage afflicts all major cities and New York is no exception. Mamdani has promised universal childcare for children aged six weeks to five years. Lack of affordable quality childcare is one of the major factors behind families moving out of the city. Recall the priorities of Shinzo Abe, Japan's longest serving prime minister. Between 2013 and 2020, Japan added nearly half a million licensed childcare slots, especially in Tokyo's suburbs. This involved funding and subsidizing privately-run or local government-run childcare centres. As a result, female participation in the labour force jumped to a rate of 70%, surpassing even the US. As observed, reliable creches being out of reach had been leading Japanese women to drop out of work after their first pregnancy, often never to return. Creche support was a big component of 'Abenomics.' It was neither anti-free market, nor purely socialist central planning. Mamdani's focus on affordable food and housing, quality creches and cheap transport can be seen as welfarist and not populist. There's a crucial difference between the two. For instance, a welfarist frame would have the state intervene to make rent stabilization deeper and public housing available, but a populist frame in the city's context would project real estate developers as villains and define affordable housing as a right. Welfarism recognizes the need for intervention to remedy an externality. It uses economic tools like taxes and subsidies or other regulatory controls to nudge market behaviour and reduce its adverse effects. Populism, on the other hand, is often clothed in the language of rhetoric and slogans, but uses public outrage and incites confrontation. It often pits one class against the other, or the public against elites, thus endangering social harmony. In contrast, the discourse of welfarism uses concepts of fairness, inclusiveness, rights and universality. It is based on economic logic and recognizes the costs and benefits of a middle path between the free market and state control. In political and policy practice, however, welfarist and populist elements tend to get mixed up and it is not always possible to disentangle them. Also Read: Indian welfare: Beneficiaries and benefactors must overlap more Mamdani's emphasis on public expenditure to fix perceived externalities will need to be funded. New York city's budget is about $150 billion, but will need additional tax revenues, which he expects to raise by taxing the super-rich. He also wants to raise the top corporate tax rate. These tax policy changes may need the approval of the state's governor and possibly the federal government under President Donald Trump. This looks like an uphill battle and can't be won without some dialogue and compromise. Although some right-wing folks seem shocked at the prospect of a Mamdani mayorship, many concede that issues of inequality and affordability need to be addressed. By focusing on the concerns of low and middle income households, the city can become a magnet for talent and investments. Economic dynamism in a densely populated urban agglomeration usually exhibits positive externalities and network effects. Mamdani's welfarism might just be the shot in the arm that New York City needs. The author is senior fellow with Pune International Centre. Topics You May Be Interested In
